Higher risk of malignant neoplasms in young adults with end-stage renal disease receiving haemodialysis: A nationwide population-based study

[Nephron sparing in the management of localized solid renal mass]

Managing a malignant renal tumor requires, first of all, a reflection on the necessity of its treatment. It must consider the renal function, altered at the time of diagnosis in 50% of cases. The treatment method chosen depends on many factors, in particular, the predicted residual renal function, the risk of chronic kidney disease, the need for temporary or long-term dialysis, and overall long-term survival. Other factors include the size, position, and number of tumors and a hereditary tumor background. When a renal-sparing management alternative is available, total nephrectomy should no longer be performed in patients with small malignant renal masses (cT1a). This may consist of surgery (partial nephrectomy or lumpectomy), percutaneous thermo-ablation (by radiofrequency, microwave, or cryotherapy). In patients with limited life expectancy, imaging-based surveillance may be proposed to suggest treatment in case of local progression. Good coordination between urologist, radiologist, nephrologist, and sometimes radiotherapist should allow optimal management of patients with a malignant renal tumor with or without underlying renal failure.

Comparison of the risks of renal cell carcinoma or urothelial cancer between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients

PURPOSE

This study is to compare risks of developing renal cell carcinoma or urothelial cancer between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.

METHODS

The age-, sex-, and index year-matched patients with newly diagnosed end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis [HD (N = 22,587) or PD (N = 11,547)] from 2000 to 2015 in Taiwan were identified. Patients were followed until the development of renal cell carcinoma or urothelial cancer, renal transplantation, death, or the end of follow-up (December 31, 2017). The hazard ratio (HR), and sub-hazards ratio (SHR), in which death was considered as a competing risk, of developing renal cell carcinoma or urothelial cancer were compared between the HD and PD patients.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of renal cell carcinoma was higher in the PD group than in age-, sex-, and index year-matched HD group (11.5 versus 5.52 per 10,000 person-years), with an adjusted HR of 2.15 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.59, 2.92), and an adjusted SHR of 1.97 (95% CI = 1.46, 2.67). The incidence rate of urothelial cancer was also higher in the PD group than in corresponding HD group (40.3 and 34.0 per 10,000 person-years), with an adjusted HR of 1.15 (95% CI = 1.00, 1.33) and an adjusted SHR of 1.08 (95% CI = 0.94, 1.25). These findings were further validated in propensity score-matched dialysis cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

ESKD patients undergoing PD are at a higher risk of developing renal cell carcinoma than those on HD, but risks of developing urothelial cancer are similar among the two groups.

Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Complex Therapeutic Challenge in the Elderly

An increase in age and the occurrence of renal cell carcinoma have been positively correlated. A strict therapeutic protocol for early diagnosis, screening, prevention, and population awareness needs to be well-established as a rationale to approach the morbidity at a treatment-eligible phase in the aged. Genetic predisposition appears to have a minor role in the disease pathology. Imaging modalities, providing high-resolution images of the tumor, have undoubtedly benefitted the diseased subset in aiding the diagnosis, however, a preliminary guideline protocol for its early implication in concordance with the initial symptoms needs to be adopted. Burdening of the geriatric age group by concomitant co-morbidities further deteriorates the devastating effects of the primary tumor, which, in total, appear to evolve as a final, complex stage of the illness in the majority, leading to an eventual high mortality rate. Despite being a challenging task for managing the tumor, age should not be considered the sole treatment barrier for approaching the disease.