Current practice in dialysis central venous catheter management: Multi-disciplinary renal team perspectives

Clinical Audit of Assisting Renal Biopsy Procedure Performed in Nephrology Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital with a View to Develop Standard Nursing Procedure Protocol

Background

Renal biopsy is one of the most commonly performed diagnostic procedures in the nephrology unit. Nurses play a very important role in pre-biopsy preparation, assisting during procedure and post-biopsy care. Nursing care provided during or after renal biopsy is of utmost importance in reducing complications. The study aims to perform a clinical audit of nursing practices to find the gaps in existing practices for the procedure of assisting renal biopsy and to develop standard protocol.

Materials and Methods

This descriptive observational study was conducted on 19 nurses who were working in the nephrology unit of the tertiary care center. They were enrolled through total enumerative sampling. Sociodemographic profile and clinical profile were collected. The observation checklist was formed based on standard nursing practices, which included three dimensions for the procedure of assisting renal biopsy. Based on the gaps identified, a standard protocol was developed. Nurses were observed during two shifts and each nurse was observed once. Scoring of items was done in each dimension and for acceptable practices, nurses have to score ≥80% in each dimension. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

The majority of nurses (73.7%) have not undergone any special training in nephrology. None (100%) showed an acceptable level of nursing practices for all the dimensions of assisting renal biopsy procedure. Standard protocol was developed by the researcher following a rigorous process.

Conclusion

The clinical audit found that there were gaps in the existing nursing practices for the procedure of assisting renal biopsy and these gaps have been addressed by the development of a standard protocol.

Multifaceted Quality Improvement Interventions to Prevent Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are widely used for hemodialysis but are prone to burdensome and costly bloodstream infections. We determined whether multifaceted quality improvement interventions in hemodialysis units can prevent hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infections (HDCRBSI).

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING & STUDY POPULATIONS

PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to April 23, 2022, to identify randomized trials, time-series analyses, and before-after studies that examined the effect of multifaceted quality improvement interventions on the incidence of HDCRBSI or access-related bloodstream infections (ARBSI) among people receiving hemodialysis outside of the intensive care unit (ICU).

DATA EXTRACTION

Two people independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias and quality of evidence using validated tools.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Intervention effects, validity, and characteristics of studies with the same design were compared. Differences between study designs were described.

RESULTS

We included 21 studies from 8,824 identified by our search. Among 15 studies that measured HDCRBSI, 2 methodologically heterogenous cluster randomized trials reported discordant intervention effects, 2 interrupted time-series analyses reported favorable interventions with discordant patterns of effect, and 11 before-after studies reported favorable interventions with a very high risk of bias. Among 6 studies that only measured ARBSI, 1 time-series analysis and 1 before-after study did not find a favorable intervention effect, and 4 before-after studies reported a favorable effect with a very high risk of bias. The overall quality of evidence was low for HDCRBSI and very low for ARBSI.

LIMITATIONS

Nine definitions of HDCRBSI were used. Ten studies included hospital-based and satellite facilities but did not report separate intervention effects for each type of facility.

CONCLUSIONS

Multifaceted quality improvement interventions may prevent HDCRBSI outside the ICU. However, evidence supporting them is of low quality, and further carefully conducted studies are warranted.

REGISTRATION

Registered at PROSPERO with registration number CRD42021252290.

PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY

People with kidney failure rely on central venous catheters to facilitate life-sustaining hemodialysis treatments. Unfortunately, hemodialysis catheters are a common source of problematic bloodstream infections. Quality improvement programs have effectively prevented catheter-related infections in intensive care units, but it is unclear whether they can be adapted to patients using hemodialysis catheters in the community. In a systematic review that included 21 studies, we found that most quality improvement programs were reported to be successful. However, the findings were mixed among higher-quality studies, and overall the quality of evidence was low. Ongoing quality improvement programs should be complemented by more high-quality research.

Good practices for dialysis education, treatment, and eHealth: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Recommendations regarding dialysis education and treatment are provided in various (inter)national guidelines, which should ensure that these are applied uniformly in nephrology and dialysis centers. However, there is much practice variation which could be explained by good practices: practices developed by local health care professionals, which are not evidence-based. Because an overview of good practices is lacking, we performed a scoping review to identify and summarize the available good practices for dialysis education, treatment, and eHealth.

METHODS

Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL databases and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles using all synonyms for the words 'kidney failure', 'dialysis', and 'good practice'. Relevant articles were structured according to the categories dialysis education, dialysis treatment or eHealth, and assessed for content and results.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles (12 for dialysis education, 3 for dialysis treatment, 4 for eHealth) are identified. The good practices for education endorse the importance of providing complete and objective predialysis education, assisting peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients in adequately performing PD, educating hemodialysis (HD) patients on self-management, and talking with dialysis patients about their prognosis. The good practices for dialysis treatment focus mainly on dialysis access devices and general quality improvement of dialysis care. Finally, eHealth is useful for HD and PD and affects both quality of care and health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Our scoping review identifies 19 articles describing good practices and their results for dialysis education, dialysis treatment, and eHealth. These good practices could be valuable in addition to guidelines for increasing shared-decision making in predialysis education, using patients' contribution in the implementation of their dialysis treatment, and advanced care planning.

Prone positioning in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, translating research and implementing practice change from bench to bedside in the era of coronavirus disease 2019

Background

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a relatively common condition of varied aetiology associated with high morbidity and mortality. A range of therapies have been proven to be useful for patients with ARDS, including ventilatory and nonventilatory strategies. Prone positioning is one of the nonventilatory strategies and has been proven to be safe and is associated with significant mortality benefit in patients with moderate to severe ARDS. It is now included in several international guidelines as the standard of care for these cases.

Objectives

The aim of the study was to develop, implement, and evaluate a prone positioning program in two nonmetropolitan, nontertiary intensive care units in South East Queensland.

Methods

A Plan–Do–Study–Act quality improvement model was used to implement changes in clinical practice in relation to prone positioning of patients.

Results

A description of the methods used to promote a complex change strategy is provided in this article.

Conclusions

In this article, we demonstrate the feasibility of introducing a nonventilatory intervention of prone positioning in the management of patients with moderate to severe ARDS in regional intensive care in South East Queensland. This implementation strategy could be replicated and adopted in other similar intensive care units that do not have the ability to provide tertiary services such as extracorporeal life support.

Undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of the current content and pedagogical approaches used in PIVC education. A qualitative, descriptive study

BACKGROUND

The peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) is the most frequently used invasive medical device. PIVCs fail for a variety of reasons and failure often results in serious adverse events leading to patient discomfort, delays in treatment, increased health care costs and even death. Undergraduate nurses assess and manage PIVCs as part of their clinical learning. To date, no study has explored undergraduate nurses' perceptions of the education they receive about PIVCs.

AIM

We sought to critically explore the current state of education regarding PIVCs from the perspectives of undergraduate nurses.

METHODS

This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with third-year undergraduate nurses. Data were collected across two sites in Queensland, Australia. Fourteen face-to-face interviews were conducted and a modified 5-step qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the data.

FINDINGS

We identified three key domains relating to participants' experiences of PIVC education: 1) Universities provide foundational knowledge about PIVC assessment, management and removal; 2) Clinical practice consolidates and drives undergraduate nurses' knowledge, skills and confidence about PIVCs; and 3) inconsistencies in clinical practice and between individual clinicians impedes learning and knowledge translation about PIVCs.

CONCLUSION

Nursing students benefit from theoretical content delivered in the university setting. Practical application of theory and skill development whilst on clinical placement is variable. The current undergraduate curriculum, related to management of patients with a PIVC, is disjointed and inconsistent and this inconsistency may negatively impact patient safety.

REDUcing the burden of dialysis Catheter ComplicaTIOns: a National approach (REDUCCTION) - design and baseline results

Background

Patients with hemodialysis central venous catheters (HD CVCs) are susceptible to health care-associated infections, particularly hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infection (HD-CRBSI), which is associated with high mortality and health care costs. There have been few systematic attempts to reduce this burden and clinical practice remains highly variable. This manuscript will summarize the challenges in preventing HD-CRBSI and describe the methodology of the REDUcing the burden of dialysis Catheter ComplicaTIOns: a National approach (REDUCCTION) trial.

Methods

The REDUCCTION trial is a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial of a suite of clinical interventions aimed at reducing HD-CRBSI across Australia. It clusters the intervention at the renal-service level with implementation randomly timed across three tranches. The primary outcome is the effect of this intervention upon the rate of HD-CRBSI. Patients who receive an HD CVC at a participating renal service are eligible for inclusion. A customized data collection tool allows near-to-real-time reporting of the number of active catheters, total exposure to catheters over time, and rates of HD-CRBSI in each service. The interventions are centered around the insertion, maintenance, and removal of HD CVC, informed by the most current evidence at the time of design (mid-2018).

Results

A total of 37 renal services are participating in the trial. Data collection is ongoing with results expected in the last quarter of 2020. The baseline phase of the study has collected provisional data on 5385 catheters in 3615 participants, representing 603,506 days of HD CVC exposure.

Conclusions

The REDUCCTION trial systematically measures the use of HD CVCs at a national level in Australia, accurately determines the rate of HD-CRBSI, and tests the effect of a multifaceted, evidence-based intervention upon the rate of HD-CRBSI. These results will have global relevance in nephrology and other specialties commonly using CVCs.