A novel urine cell-free DNA preservation solution and its application in kidney transplantation

The impact of preanalytical variables on the analysis of cell-free DNA from blood and urine samples

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA), a burgeoning class of molecular biomarkers, has been extensively studied across a variety of biomedical fields. As a key component of liquid biopsy, cfDNA testing is gaining prominence in disease detection and management due to the convenience of sample collection and the abundant wealth of genetic information it provides. However, the broader clinical application of cfDNA is currently impeded by a lack of standardization in the preanalytical procedures for cfDNA analysis. A number of fundamental challenges, including the selection of appropriate preanalytical procedures, prevention of short cfDNA fragment loss, and the validation of various cfDNA measurement methods, remain unaddressed. These existing hurdles lead to difficulties in comparing results and ensuring repeatability, thereby undermining the reliability of cfDNA analysis in clinical settings. This review discusses the crucial preanalytical factors that influence cfDNA analysis outcomes, including sample collection, transportation, temporary storage, processing, extraction, quality control, and long-term storage. The review provides clarification on achievable consensus and offers an analysis of the current issues with the goal of standardizing preanalytical procedures for cfDNA analysis.

The Challenge to Stabilize, Extract and Analyze Urinary Cell-Free DNA (ucfDNA) during Clinical Routine

BACKGROUND

The "Liquid Biopsy" has become a powerful tool for cancer research during the last decade. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) that originates from tumors has emerged as one of the most promising analytes. In contrast to plasma-derived cfDNA, only a few studies have investigated urinary cfDNA. One reason might be rapid degradation and hence inadequate concentrations for downstream analysis. In this study, we examined the stability of cfDNA in urine using different methods of preservation under various storage conditions.

METHODOLOGY

To mimic patient samples, a pool of healthy male and female urine donors was spiked with a synthetic cfDNA reference standard (fragment size 170 bp) containing the T790M mutation in the EGFR gene. Spiked samples were preserved with three different buffers and with no buffer over four different storage periods (0 h; 4 h; 12 h; 24 h) at room temperature vs. 4 °C. The preservatives used were Urinary Analyte Stabilizer (UAS, Novosanis, Wijnegem, Belgium), Urine Conditioning Buffer (UCB, Zymo, Freiburg, Germany) and a self-prepared buffer called "AlloU". CfDNA was extracted using the QIAamp MinElute ccfDNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). CfDNA concentration was measured using the Qubit™ 4 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used for detection and quantification of the T790M mutation.

RESULTS

Almost no spiked cfDNA was recoverable from samples with no preservation buffer and the T790M variant was not detectable in these samples. These findings indicate that cfDNA was degraded below the detection limit by urinary nucleases. Stabilizing buffers showed varying efficiency in preventing this degradation. The most effective stabilizing buffer under all storage conditions was the UAS, enabling adequate recovery of the T790M variant using ddPCR.

CONCLUSION

From a technical point of view, stabilizing buffers and adequate storage conditions are a prerequisite for translation of urinary cfDNA diagnostics into clinical routine.

Cell-free DNA extraction from urine of lung cancer patients and healthy individuals: Evaluation of a simple method using sample volume up-scaling

BACKGROUND

Urine holds promise as a source for cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis of cancer genetics due to its nature as a self-collectable biospecimen available in large quantities. However, pre-analytical variables such as preservation of cfDNA or efficiency of up-scaling specimen volume need to be better explored to increase analysis sensitivity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Initially effects of pH levels on cfDNA stability of urine preserved with EDTA were investigated in three healthy probands. Furthermore, the efficiency of urine volume up-scaling was examined using a simple DNA extraction method and cfDNA in urine of 32 individuals. Quantification was performed by PCR detection of three relevant targets used for EGFR and KRAS gene mutational analysis.

RESULTS

Only samples preserved with EDTA at alkaline pH levels showed cfDNA stability of up to 10 days at room temperature. Moreover, it was found that increasing the volume up to 100 mL was highly efficient. A similar amount of copies was detected in three different gene sites in all specimens indicating both a good availability and a non-random distribution pattern across genes. Since the median cfDNA copy number was 1642 copies/mL, abundance of cfDNA in this type of liquid biopsy is low.

CONCLUSION

Predictable sensitivities with different urine volumes on the ground of detectable cfDNA in our study population revealed that up-scaling (>5 mL) is mandatory if the mutation allele frequency is less than 1%.

UAS™-A Urine Preservative for Oncology Applications

Liquid biopsy is a revolutionary tool that is gaining momentum in the field of cancer research. As a body fluid, urine can be used in non-invasive diagnostics for various types of cancer. We investigated the performance of UAS™ as a preservative for urinary analytes. Firstly, the need for urine preservation was investigated using urine samples from healthy volunteers. Secondly, the performance of UAS™ was assessed for cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and host cell integrity during storage at room temperature (RT) and after freeze-thaw cycling. Finally, UAS™ was used in a clinical setting on samples from breast and prostate cancer patients. In the absence of a preservative, urinary cfDNA was degraded, and bacterial overgrowth occurred at RT. In urine samples stored in UAS™, no microbial growth was seen, and cfDNA and cellular integrity were maintained for up to 14 days at RT. After freeze-thaw cycling, the preservation of host cell integrity and cfDNA showed significant improvements when using UAS™ compared to unpreserved urine samples. Additionally, UAS™ was found to be compatible with several commercially available isolation methods.

Application of plasma donor-derived cell free DNA for lung allograft rejection diagnosis in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has been applied to monitor acute rejection (AR) in kidney and heart transplantation. This study was aimed to investigate the application of dd-cfDNA levels in the diagnosis of AR and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) among the lung transplantation recipients (LTRs).

METHODS

One hundred and seventy LTRs were enrolled at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between 1 June 2015 and 30 March 2021. Patients were divided into 4 groups: stable group, AR group, infection group and CLAD group. The level of dd-cfDNA was analyzed using target region sequencing and the performance characteristics of dd-cfDNA for diagnosis of AR and CLAD were determined, respectively.

RESULTS

Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there were some significant differences in the level of dd-cfDNA (%) among the 4 groups, with p < 0.001. Among them, the level of dd-cfDNA (%) was highest (median 2.17, IQR [1.40-3.82]) in AR group, and higher in CLAD group (median 1.07, IQR [0.98-1.31]), but lower in infection group (median 0.71, IQR [0.57-1.07]) and lowest in stable group (median 0.71, IQR [0.61-0.84]). AUC-ROC curve analysis showed that the threshold of dd-cfDNA for AR was 1.17%, with sensitivity being 89.19% and specificity being 86.47%, and the optimal threshold of 0.89% was determined of CLAD, with sensitivity being 95.00% and specificity of 76.99%.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma dd-cfDNA could be a useful tool for the assessment of lung allograft rejection, including AR and CLAD, and holds promise as a noninvasive biomarker for "allograft injury" in both acute and chronic rejection following lung transplantation.

Urinary donor-derived cell-free DNA as a non-invasive biomarker for BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is a common cause of allograft failure. However, differentiation between BKPyVAN and type I T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is challenging when simian virus 40 (SV40) staining is negative, because of the similarities in histopathology. This study investigated whether donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) can be used to differentiate BKPyVAN. Target region capture sequencing was applied to detect the ddcfDNAs of 12 recipients with stable graft function, 22 with type I TCMR, 21 with proven BKPyVAN, and 5 with possible PyVAN. We found that urinary ddcfDNA levels were upregulated in recipients with graft injury, whereas plasma ddcfDNA levels were comparable for all groups. The median urinary concentrations and fractions of ddcfDNA in proven BKPyVAN recipients were significantly higher than those in type I TCMR recipients (10.4 vs. 6.1 ng/mL, P<0.001 and 68.4% vs. 55.3%, P=0.013, respectively). Urinary ddcfDNA fractions (not concentrations) were higher in the BKPyVAN-pure subgroup than in the BKPyVAN-rejection-like subgroup (81.30% vs. 56.64%, P=0.025). With a cut-off value of 7.81 ng/mL, urinary ddcfDNA concentrations distinguished proven BKPyVAN from type I TCMR (area under the curve (AUC)=0.848, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.734 to 0.963). These findings suggest that urinary ddcfDNA is a non-invasive biomarker which can reliably differentiate BKPyVAN from type I TCMR.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA: An independent biomarker in kidney transplant patients with antibody-mediated rejection

INTRODUCTION

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a major cause of kidney transplant failure which requires donor-specific antibodies (DSA) for a definitive diagnosis. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) is an emerging biomarker used to assess kidney allograft injury. However, current data is limited to predict the accuracy of ddcfDNA in ABMR diagnosis. This study was conducted to compare the performance of DSA with plasma ddcfDNA for the diagnosis of ABMR.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center observational study, we enrolled 50 kidney transplant recipients who were diagnosed with the suspicion of rejection between June 2018 and May 2019 at the Jinling Hospital. Plasma ddcfDNA was measured by using a novel target region capture sequencing methodology. A total of 37 patients who were tested with DSA and biopsy were divided into four subgroups (ABMR+/DSA+, ABMR+/DSA-, ABMR-/DSA+, ABMR-/DSA-) for the distribution of ddcfDNA (%) by ABMR and DSA.

RESULTS

The median level of ddcfDNA in biopsy showed that the ABMR group (1.66%, IQR 1.34-3.76%) was significantly higher than the median level (0.63%, IQR 0.43-0.74%) in non-ABMR (p < 0.001). With a ddcfDNA cutoff of 0.96%, the AUC was 0.90 (95%CI, 0.86-0.95), which was associated with a sensitivity of 90.5% (95%CI, 69.6-98.8%) and specificity of 96.6% (95%CI, 82.2-100%), a PPV of 95% (95%CI, 73.4-99.2%) and NPV of 93.3% (95%CI, 78.9-98.1%) were also observed. Among the four subgroups, ddcfDNA had no significant difference in both DSA+ group and DSA-group (p > 0.05). In the diagnosis of ABMR, the specificity, sensitivity, PPV and NPV of DSA were 50%, 74.1%, 41.7%, 80%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ddcfDNA levels in the blood could highly distinguish (biopsy-supported) ABMR occurrence, irrespective of whether this method is accompanied by DSA or not.