1
|
Forbes E, Hassien A, Tan RJ, Wang D, Lega B. Modulation of hippocampal theta oscillations via deep brain stimulation of the parietal cortex depends on cognitive state. Cortex 2024; 175:28-40. [PMID: 38691923 PMCID: PMC11221570 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
The angular gyrus (AG) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) demonstrate extensive structural and functional connectivity with the hippocampus and other core recollection network regions. Consequently, recent studies have explored neuromodulation targeting these and other regions as a potential strategy for restoring function in memory disorders such as Alzheimer's Disease. However, determining the optimal approach for neuromodulatory devices requires understanding how parameters like selected stimulation site, cognitive state during modulation, and stimulation duration influence the effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on electrophysiological features relevant to episodic memory. We report experimental data examining the effects of high-frequency stimulation delivered to the AG or PCC on hippocampal theta oscillations during the memory encoding (study) or retrieval (test) phases of an episodic memory task. Results showed selective enhancement of anterior hippocampal slow theta oscillations with stimulation of the AG preferentially during memory retrieval. Conversely, stimulation of the PCC attenuated slow theta oscillations. We did not observe significant behavioral effects in this (open-loop) stimulation experiment, suggesting that neuromodulation strategies targeting episodic memory performance may require more temporally precise stimulation approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenio Forbes
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
| | - Alexa Hassien
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
| | - Ryan Joseph Tan
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
| | - David Wang
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
| | - Bradley Lega
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goldenkoff ER, Deluisi JA, Destiny DP, Lee TG, Michon KJ, Brissenden JA, Taylor SF, Polk TA, Vesia M. The behavioral and neural effects of parietal theta burst stimulation on the grasp network are stronger during a grasping task than at rest. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1198222. [PMID: 37954875 PMCID: PMC10637360 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1198222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used in neuroscience and clinical settings to modulate human cortical activity. The effects of TMS on neural activity depend on the excitability of specific neural populations at the time of stimulation. Accordingly, the brain state at the time of stimulation may influence the persistent effects of repetitive TMS on distal brain activity and associated behaviors. We applied intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) to a region in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) associated with grasp control to evaluate the interaction between stimulation and brain state. Across two experiments, we demonstrate the immediate responses of motor cortex activity and motor performance to state-dependent parietal stimulation. We randomly assigned 72 healthy adult participants to one of three TMS intervention groups, followed by electrophysiological measures with TMS and behavioral measures. Participants in the first group received iTBS to PPC while performing a grasping task concurrently. Participants in the second group received iTBS to PPC while in a task-free, resting state. A third group of participants received iTBS to a parietal region outside the cortical grasping network while performing a grasping task concurrently. We compared changes in motor cortical excitability and motor performance in the three stimulation groups within an hour of each intervention. We found that parietal stimulation during a behavioral manipulation that activates the cortical grasping network increased downstream motor cortical excitability and improved motor performance relative to stimulation during rest. We conclude that constraining the brain state with a behavioral task during brain stimulation has the potential to optimize plasticity induction in cortical circuit mechanisms that mediate movement processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph A. Deluisi
- School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Danielle P. Destiny
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Taraz G. Lee
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Katherine J. Michon
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - James A. Brissenden
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Stephan F. Taylor
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Thad A. Polk
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Michael Vesia
- School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Markin K, Trufanov A, Frunza D, Litvinenko I, Tarumov D, Krasichkov A, Polyakova V, Efimtsev A, Medvedev D. fMRI Findings in Cortical Brain Networks Interactions in Migraine Following Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Front Neurol 2022; 13:915346. [PMID: 35800086 PMCID: PMC9253380 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.915346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is one of the high-potential non-pharmacological methods for migraine treatment. The purpose of this study is to define the neuroimaging markers associated with rTMS therapy in patients with migraine based on data from functional MRI (fMRI). Materials and Methods A total of 19 patients with episodic migraine without aura underwent a 5-day course of rTMS of the fronto-temporo-parietal junction bilaterally, at 10 Hz frequency and 60% of motor threshold response of 900 pulses. Resting-state functional MRI (1.5 T) and a battery of tests were carried out for each patient to clarify their diagnosis, qualitative and quantitative characteristics of pain, and associated affective symptoms. Changes in functional connectivity (FC) in the brain's neural networks before and after the treatment were identified through independent components analysis. Results Over the course of therapy, we observed an increase in FC of the default mode network within it, with pain system components and with structures of the visual network. We also noted a decrease in FC of the salience network with sensorimotor and visual networks, as well as an increase in FC of the visual network. Besides, we identified 5 patients who did not have a positive response to one rTMS course after the first week of treatment according to the clinical scales results, presumably because of an increasing trend of depressive symptoms and neuroimaging criteria for depressive disorder. Conclusions Our results show that a 5-day course of rTMS significantly alters the connectivity of brain networks associated with pain and antinociceptive brain systems in about 70% of cases, which may shed light on the neural mechanisms underlying migraine treatment with rTMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirill Markin
- Psychiatry Department, Kirov Military Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg, Russia
- *Correspondence: Kirill Markin ; orcid.org/0000-0002-6242-1279
| | - Artem Trufanov
- Neurology Department, Kirov Military Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg, Russia
- Department of Software Engineering and Computer Applications, Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Daria Frunza
- Neurology Department, Kirov Military Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Igor Litvinenko
- Neurology Department, Kirov Military Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Dmitriy Tarumov
- Psychiatry Department, Kirov Military Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Alexander Krasichkov
- Radio Engineering Systems Department, Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Victoria Polyakova
- Department of Pathology, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Alexander Efimtsev
- Department of Software Engineering and Computer Applications, Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”, Saint Petersburg, Russia
- Department of Radiology, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Dmitriy Medvedev
- Federal State Unitary Enterprise, Federal Medical Biological Agency, Saint Petersburg, Russia
- Department of Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine, North-Western State Medical University Named After I.I. Mechnikov, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Freedberg MV, Reeves JA, Fioriti CM, Murillo J, Voss JL, Wassermann EM. A direct test of competitive versus cooperative episodic-procedural network dynamics in human memory. Cereb Cortex 2022; 32:4715-4732. [PMID: 35106536 PMCID: PMC9627141 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Classical lesion studies led to a consensus that episodic and procedural memory arises from segregated networks identified with the hippocampus and the caudate nucleus, respectively. Neuroimaging studies, however, show that competitive and cooperative interactions occur between networks during memory tasks. Furthermore, causal experiments to manipulate connectivity between these networks have not been performed in humans. Although nodes common to both networks, such as the precuneus and ventrolateral thalamus, may mediate their interaction, there is no experimental evidence for this. We tested how network-targeted noninvasive brain stimulation affects episodic-procedural network interactions and how these network manipulations affect episodic and procedural memory in healthy young adults. Compared to control (vertex) stimulation, hippocampal network-targeted stimulation increased within-network functional connectivity and hippocampal connectivity with the caudate. It also increased episodic, relative to procedural, memory, and this persisted one week later. The differential effect on episodic versus procedural memory was associated with increased functional connectivity between the caudate, precuneus, and ventrolateral thalamus. These findings provide direct evidence of episodic-procedural network competition, mediated by regions common to both networks. Enhanced hippocampal network connectivity may boost episodic, but decrease procedural, memory by co-opting resources shared between networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael V Freedberg
- Address correspondence to Michael V. Freedberg, 2109 San Jacinto Blvd, Rm. 542, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
| | - Jack A Reeves
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Cynthia M Fioriti
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Jorge Murillo
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Joel L Voss
- Department of Neurology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Eric M Wassermann
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Caulfield KA, Brown JC. The Problem and Potential of TMS' Infinite Parameter Space: A Targeted Review and Road Map Forward. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:867091. [PMID: 35619619 PMCID: PMC9127062 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.867091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive, effective, and FDA-approved brain stimulation method. However, rTMS parameter selection remains largely unexplored, with great potential for optimization. In this review, we highlight key studies underlying next generation rTMS therapies, particularly focusing on: (1) rTMS Parameters, (2) rTMS Target Engagement, (3) rTMS Interactions with Endogenous Brain Activity, and (4) Heritable Predisposition to Brain Stimulation Treatments. METHODS We performed a targeted review of pre-clinical and clinical rTMS studies. RESULTS Current evidence suggests that rTMS pattern, intensity, frequency, train duration, intertrain interval, intersession interval, pulse and session number, pulse width, and pulse shape can alter motor excitability, long term potentiation (LTP)-like facilitation, and clinical antidepressant response. Additionally, an emerging theme is how endogenous brain state impacts rTMS response. Researchers have used resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) analyses to identify personalized rTMS targets. Electroencephalography (EEG) may measure endogenous alpha rhythms that preferentially respond to personalized stimulation frequencies, or in closed-loop EEG, may be synchronized with endogenous oscillations and even phase to optimize response. Lastly, neuroimaging and genotyping have identified individual predispositions that may underlie rTMS efficacy. CONCLUSIONS We envision next generation rTMS will be delivered using optimized stimulation parameters to rsfMRI-determined targets at intensities determined by energy delivered to the cortex, and frequency personalized and synchronized to endogenous alpha-rhythms. Further research is needed to define the dose-response curve of each parameter on plasticity and clinical response at the group level, to determine how these parameters interact, and to ultimately personalize these parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin A Caulfield
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Joshua C Brown
- Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, Brown University Medical School, Providence, RI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Phipps CJ, Murman DL, Warren DE. Stimulating Memory: Reviewing Interventions Using Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Enhance or Restore Memory Abilities. Brain Sci 2021; 11:1283. [PMID: 34679348 PMCID: PMC8533697 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11101283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Human memory systems are imperfect recording devices that are affected by age and disease, but recent findings suggest that the functionality of these systems may be modifiable through interventions using non-invasive brain stimulation such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). The translational potential of these rTMS interventions is clear: memory problems are the most common cognitive complaint associated with healthy aging, while pathological conditions such as Alzheimer's disease are often associated with severe deficits in memory. Therapies to improve memory or treat memory loss could enhance independence while reducing costs for public health systems. Despite this promise, several important factors limit the generalizability and translational potential of rTMS interventions for memory. Heterogeneity of protocol design, rTMS parameters, and outcome measures present significant challenges to interpretation and reproducibility. However, recent advances in cognitive neuroscience, including rTMS approaches and recent insights regarding functional brain networks, may offer methodological tools necessary to design new interventional studies with enhanced experimental rigor, improved reproducibility, and greater likelihood of successful translation to clinical settings. In this review, we first discuss the current state of the literature on memory modulation with rTMS, then offer a commentary on developments in cognitive neuroscience that are relevant to rTMS interventions, and finally close by offering several recommendations for the design of future investigations using rTMS to modulate human memory performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David E. Warren
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA; (C.J.P.); (D.L.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Freedberg M, Cunningham CA, Fioriti CM, Murillo J, Reeves JA, Taylor PA, Sarlls JE, Wassermann EM. Multiple parietal pathways are associated with rTMS-induced hippocampal network enhancement and episodic memory changes. Neuroimage 2021; 237:118199. [PMID: 34033914 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the inferior parietal cortex (IPC) increases resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) of the hippocampus with the precuneus and other posterior cortical areas and causes proportional improvement of episodic memory. The anatomical pathway(s) responsible for the propagation of these effects from the IPC is unknown and may not be direct. In order to assess the relative contributions of candidate pathways from the IPC to the MTL via the parahippocampal cortex and precuneus, to the effects of rTMS on rsFC and memory improvement, we used diffusion tensor imaging to measure the extent to which individual differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) in these pathways accounted for individual differences in response. FA in the IPC-parahippocampal pathway and several MTL pathways predicted changes in rsFC. FA in both parahippocampal and hippocampal pathways was related to changes in episodic, but not procedural, memory. These results implicate pathways to the MTL in the enhancing effect of parietal rTMS on hippocampal rsFC and memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Freedberg
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, NINDS, 9000 Rockville Pike, 10 Center Drive, Rm. 7-5659, Bethesda 20892, MD, USA.
| | - Catherine A Cunningham
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, NINDS, 9000 Rockville Pike, 10 Center Drive, Rm. 7-5659, Bethesda 20892, MD, USA
| | - Cynthia M Fioriti
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, NINDS, 9000 Rockville Pike, 10 Center Drive, Rm. 7-5659, Bethesda 20892, MD, USA.
| | - Jorge Murillo
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, NINDS, 9000 Rockville Pike, 10 Center Drive, Rm. 7-5659, Bethesda 20892, MD, USA.
| | - Jack A Reeves
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, NINDS, 9000 Rockville Pike, 10 Center Drive, Rm. 7-5659, Bethesda 20892, MD, USA.
| | - Paul A Taylor
- Scientific and Statistical Computing Core, NIMH, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | | | - Eric M Wassermann
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, NINDS, 9000 Rockville Pike, 10 Center Drive, Rm. 7-5659, Bethesda 20892, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|