1
|
Deer TR, Russo MA, Sayed D, Pope JE, Grider JS, Hagedorn JM, Falowski SM, Al-Kaisy A, Slavin KV, Li S, Poree LR, Eldabe S, Meier K, Lamer TJ, Pilitsis JG, De Andrés J, Perruchoud C, Carayannopoulos AG, Moeschler SM, Hadanny A, Lee E, Varshney VP, Desai MJ, Pahapill P, Osborn J, Bojanic S, Antony A, Piedimonte F, Hayek SM, Levy RM. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC)®: Recommendations for the Mitigation of Complications of Neurostimulation. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:977-1007. [PMID: 38878054 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The International Neuromodulation Society convened a multispecialty group of physicians based on expertise and international representation to establish evidence-based guidance on the mitigation of neuromodulation complications. This Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC)® project intends to update evidence-based guidance and offer expert opinion that will improve efficacy and safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS Authors were chosen on the basis of their clinical expertise, familiarity with the peer-reviewed literature, research productivity, and contributions to the neuromodulation literature. Section leaders supervised literature searches of MEDLINE, BioMed Central, Current Contents Connect, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed from 2017 (when NACC last published guidelines) to October 2023. Identified studies were graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria for evidence and certainty of net benefit. Recommendations are based on the strength of evidence or consensus when evidence was scant. RESULTS The NACC examined the published literature and established evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to guide best practices. Additional guidance will occur as new evidence is developed in future iterations of this process. CONCLUSIONS The NACC recommends best practices regarding the mitigation of complications associated with neurostimulation to improve safety and efficacy. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations should be used as a guide to assist decision-making when clinically appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.
| | | | - Dawood Sayed
- The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Jay S Grider
- UKHealthCare Pain Services, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Adnan Al-Kaisy
- Guy's and St. Thomas National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, The Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, UK
| | - Konstantin V Slavin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Neurology Section, Jesse Brown Veterans Administration Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sean Li
- National Spine & Pain Centers, Shrewsbury, NJ, USA
| | - Lawrence R Poree
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sam Eldabe
- The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Kaare Meier
- Department of Anesthesiology (OPINord), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Arhus, Denmark; Department of Neurosurgery (Afd. NK), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Arhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Jose De Andrés
- Valencia School of Medicine, Anesthesia Critical Care and Pain Management Department, General University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Alexios G Carayannopoulos
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Comprehensive Spine Center, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA; Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School (Neurosurgery), Providence, RI, USA
| | - Susan M Moeschler
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amir Hadanny
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Eric Lee
- Mililani Pain Center, Mililani, HI, USA
| | - Vishal P Varshney
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mehul J Desai
- International Spine, Pain & Performance Center, Virginia Hospital Center, Monument Research Institute, George Washington University School of Medicine, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - Peter Pahapill
- Functional Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - J Osborn
- St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stana Bojanic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Ajay Antony
- The Orthopaedic Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Fabian Piedimonte
- School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Salim M Hayek
- Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Robert M Levy
- Neurosurgical Services, Clinical Research, Anesthesia Pain Care Consultants, Tamarac, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Malinowski MN, Gish BE, Moreira AM, Karcz M, Bracero LA, Deer TR. Electrical neuromodulation for the treatment of chronic pain: derivation of the intrinsic barriers, outcomes and considerations of the sustainability of implantable spinal cord stimulation therapies. Expert Rev Med Devices 2024:1-13. [PMID: 39044340 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2382234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For over 60 years, spinal cord stimulation has endured as a therapy through innovation and novel developments. Current practice of neuromodulation requires proper patient selection, risk mitigation and use of innovation. However, there are tangible and intangible challenges in physiology, clinical science and within society. AREAS COVERED We provide a narrative discussion regarding novel topics in the field especially over the last decade. We highlight the challenges in the patient care setting including selection, as well as economic and socioeconomic challenges. Physician training challenges in neuromodulation is explored as well as other factors related to the use of neuromodulation such as novel indications and economics. We also discuss the concepts of technology and healthcare data. EXPERT OPINION Patient safety and durable outcomes are the mainstay goal for neuromodulation. Substantial work is needed to assimilate data for larger and more relevant studies reflecting a population. Big data and global interconnectivity efforts provide substantial opportunity to reinvent our scientific approach, data analysis and its management to maximize outcomes and minimize risk. As improvements in data analysis become the standard of innovation and physician training meets demand, we expect to see an expansion of novel indications and its use in broader cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brandon E Gish
- Lexington Clinic Interventional Pain, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Alexandra M Moreira
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Marcin Karcz
- The Spine and Nerve Centers of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Lucas A Bracero
- The Spine and Nerve Centers of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Timothy R Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Centers of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pritzlaff SG, Goree JH, Hagedorn JM, Lee DW, Chapman KB, Christiansen S, Dudas A, Escobar A, Gilligan CJ, Guirguis M, Gulati A, Jameson J, Mallard CJ, Murphy MZ, Patel KV, Patel RG, Sheth SJ, Vanterpool S, Singh V, Smith G, Strand NH, Vu CM, Suvar T, Chakravarthy K, Kapural L, Leong MS, Lubenow TR, Abd-Elsayed A, Pope JE, Sayed D, Deer TR. Pain Education and Knowledge (PEAK) Consensus Guidelines for Neuromodulation: A Proposal for Standardization in Fellowship and Training Programs. J Pain Res 2023; 16:3101-3117. [PMID: 37727682 PMCID: PMC10505612 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s424589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The need to be competent in neuromodulation is and should be a prerequisite prior to completing a fellowship in interventional pain medicine. Unfortunately, many programs lack acceptable candidates for these advanced therapies, and fellows may not receive adequate exposure to neuromodulation procedures. The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) desires to create a consensus of experts to set a minimum standard of competence for neurostimulation procedures, including spinal cord stimulation (SCS), dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S), and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS). The executive board of ASPN accepted nominations for colleagues with excellence in the subject matter of neuromodulation and physician education. This diverse group used peer-reviewed literature and, based on grading of evidence and expert opinion, developed critical consensus guides for training that all accredited fellowship programs should adopt. For each consensus point, transparency and recusal were used to eliminate bias, and an author was nominated for evidence grading oversight and bias control. Pain Education and Knowledge (PEAK) Consensus Guidelines for Neuromodulation sets a standard for neuromodulation training in pain fellowship training programs. The consensus panel has determined several recommendations to improve care in the United States for patients undergoing neuromodulation. As neuromodulation training in the United States has evolved dramatically, these therapies have become ubiquitous in pain medicine. Unfortunately, fellowship programs and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) pain program requirements have not progressed training to match the demands of modern advancements. PEAK sets a new standard for fellowship training and presents thirteen practice areas vital for physician competence in neuromodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott G Pritzlaff
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Johnathan H Goree
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David W Lee
- Fullerton Orthopedic Surgery Medical Group, Fullerton, CA, USA
| | | | - Sandy Christiansen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Andrew Dudas
- Mays & Schnapp Neurospine and Pain, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - Christopher J Gilligan
- Division of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maged Guirguis
- Division of Pain Management, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Amitabh Gulati
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kiran V Patel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | | | - Samir J Sheth
- Interventional Pain Management, Sutter Health, Roseville, CA, USA
| | | | - Vinita Singh
- Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Gregory Smith
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Natalie H Strand
- Interventional Pain Management, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Chau M Vu
- Evolve Restorative Center, Santa Rosa, CA, USA
| | - Tolga Suvar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Michael S Leong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Timothy R Lubenow
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Timothy R Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aggarwal AK, Kohan L, Moeschler S, Rathmell J, Moon JS, Barad M. Pain Medicine Education in the United States: Success, Threats, and Opportunities. Anesthesiol Clin 2023; 41:329-339. [PMID: 37245945 DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2023.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
The year 2022 marked the 30th anniversary of the first Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation of pain medicine training programs. Before this, the education of pain medicine practitioners was through primarily an apprenticeship model. Since accreditation, pain medicine education has grown under the national leadership of pain medicine physicians and educational experts from the ACGME, exemplified by the release of Pain Milestones 2.0 in 2022. The rapid growth of knowledge in pain medicine, along with its multidisciplinary nature, poses challenges of fragmentation, standardization of curriculum, and adaptation to societal needs. However, these same challenges present opportunities for pain medicine educators to shape the future of the specialty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuj K Aggarwal
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - Lynn Kohan
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, 545 Ray C Hunt Drive, Suite 3168, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Susan Moeschler
- Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - James Rathmell
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Health Care, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 0215, USA
| | - Jane S Moon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Suite 3325, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7403, USA
| | - Meredith Barad
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kalia H, Abd-Elsayed A, Malinowski M, Burkey A, Abdallah RT, Sivanesan E, Malik T, Tolba R, Eshraghi Y, Ferguson K, Schnur M, Raslan A, Guirguis M, Russo M, Slavin KV. Educational Curriculum for Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Developed by the North American Neuromodulation Society. Neuromodulation 2022; 26:483-489. [PMID: 36526547 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an effective neuromodulation therapy for chronic neuropathic and nociceptive pain. Although the total number of PNS implantations has increased over the last decade, no curriculum exists to guide training and learning of this therapy. The goal of the North American Neuromodulation Society (NANS) education committee is to develop a series of competency-based curriculums for neuromodulation therapies. The PNS curriculum is the latest part of such series, following the curriculums for spinal cord stimulation and intrathecal drug delivery system. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multidisciplinary task force (anesthesiology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurosurgery, preventive medicine and public health, and neurology) was created by the educational committee of NANS to develop a PNS curriculum in accordance with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones. The curriculum was created based on the best available evidence and expert knowledge (from our task force members) of available PNS systems. The final PNS curriculum was approved by the NANS board. RESULTS A PNS curriculum was developed by the task force. Milestones included professionalism, practice-based learning, interpersonal communication, medical knowledge, systems-based practice, procedural skills, and patient care. Each milestone was defined into three categories: early learner, advanced learner, and practitioner. CONCLUSIONS This manuscript provides a PNS training curriculum developed by a multidisciplinary task force of the NANS educational committee in accordance with the milestones described by ACGME for basic learners, advanced learners, and practitioners. This curriculum will help provide a structured training and evaluation process for obtaining proficiency in PNS treatment(s).
Collapse
|
6
|
Harland TA, Giridharan N, Hayek S, Russo MA, Pilitsis JG. What the International and North American Neuromodulation Societies Are Doing for You: The Benefits of Becoming a Member. Neuromodulation 2022; 25:645-647. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.04.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
7
|
North American Neuromodulation Society Educational Curriculum for Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Implantation and Management. Neuromodulation 2022:S1094-7159(21)06945-2. [PMID: 35088723 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2021.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDSs) are used for the treatment of pain and spasticity. A wide range of educational criteria exist for these devices. The North American Neuromodulation Society (NANS) Education Committee developed a comprehensive IDDS curriculum to function as a standard for physician graduate education and assessment through training and into practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS A multidisciplinary and diverse task force gathered by the NANS Education Committee met in person and virtually over several sessions and developed an IDDS curriculum modeling their previous work on spinal cord stimulation and following the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones. There were iterative revisions and adaptations to the curriculum, and the final version was approved by the NANS Board of Directors. RESULTS The curriculum was developed with distinction between implanting physicians and managing physician and physicians who perform both tasks. There is a lateral temporal progression from early learner to practitioner, with advanced learner in the middle. In addition, there is a modular vertical organization that divides the curriculum into the six educational competencies outlined by the ACGME. CONCLUSION A comprehensive, modular, graduated, and segmented educational curriculum for IDDSs was developed by NANS. We propose the curriculum to be the standard for guidance and assessment of trainees and physicians pursuing training in implanting or managing IDDSs.
Collapse
|
8
|
Deer TR, Russo MA, Grider JS, Pope J, Rigoard P, Hagedorn JM, Naidu R, Patterson DG, Wilson D, Lubenow TR, Buvanendran A, Sheth SJ, Abdallah R, Knezevic NN, Schu S, Nijhuis H, Mehta P, Vallejo R, Shah JM, Harned ME, Jassal N, Gonzalez JM, Pittelkow TP, Patel S, Bojanic S, Chapman K, Strand N, Green AL, Pahapill P, Dario A, Piedimonte F, Levy RM. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC): Recommendations for Surgical Technique for Spinal Cord Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2022; 25:1-34. [PMID: 35041578 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2021.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The field of neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic pain is a rapidly developing area of medicine. Although neurostimulation therapies have advanced significantly as a result of technologic improvements, surgical planning, device placement, and postoperative care are of equal importance to optimize outcomes. This Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) project intends to provide evidence-based guidance for these often-overlooked areas of neurostimulation practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS Authors were chosen based on their clinical expertise, familiarity with the peer-reviewed literature, research productivity, and contributions to the neuromodulation literature. Section leaders supervised literature searches of MEDLINE, BioMed Central, Current Contents Connect, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed from the last NACC publication in 2017 to the present. Identified studies were graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria for evidence and certainty of net benefit. Recommendations are based on evidence strength and consensus when evidence was scant. RESULTS This NACC project provides guidance on preoperative assessment, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative management in the form of consensus points with supportive evidence. These results are based on grade of evidence, strength of consensus, and expert opinion. CONCLUSIONS The NACC has given guidance for a surgical plan that encompasses the patient journey from the planning stage through the surgical experience and postoperative care. The overall recommendations are designed to improve efficacy and the safety of patients undergoing these neuromodulation procedures and are intended to apply throughout the international community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Centers of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.
| | - Marc A Russo
- Hunter Pain Specialists, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jay S Grider
- UKHealthCare Pain Services, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Jason Pope
- Evolve Restorative Center, Santa Rosa, CA, USA
| | - Philippe Rigoard
- Department of Spine Surgery and Neuromodulation, PRISMATICS Lab, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ramana Naidu
- California Orthopedics & Spine, Larkspur, CA, USA
| | | | - Derron Wilson
- Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, Department of Neurological Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Timothy R Lubenow
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Samir J Sheth
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Rany Abdallah
- Center for Interventional Pain and Spine, Milford, DE, USA
| | - N Nick Knezevic
- Department of Anesthesiology and Surgery at University of Illinois, Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Stefan Schu
- Leitender Arzt Neuromodulation, Neurochirurgie, Sana Kliniken Duisburg GmbH, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Harold Nijhuis
- Department of Anesthesiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jay M Shah
- SamWell Institute for Pain Management, Colonia, NJ, USA
| | - Michael E Harned
- UKHealthCare Pain Services, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | - Jose Manuel Gonzalez
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Málaga, Spain
| | - Thomas P Pittelkow
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Stana Bojanic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Kenneth Chapman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, The Pain and Spine Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Natalie Strand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Alexander L Green
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Peter Pahapill
- Functional Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Alessandro Dario
- Department of Neurosurgery, ASST Settelaghi, Insubria University, Varese, Italy
| | | | - Robert M Levy
- International Neuromodulation Society, Neurosurgical Services, Clinical Research, Anesthesia Pain Care Consultants, Tamarac, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pittelkow TP, Hagedorn JM. Step-by-Step: Advancing Spinal Cord Stimulation Education and Training. Neuromodulation 2020; 23:718. [DOI: 10.1111/ner.13229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|