1
|
Deer TR, Russo M, Grider JS, Sayed D, Lamer TJ, Dickerson DM, Hagedorn JM, Petersen EA, Fishman MA, FitzGerald J, Baranidharan G, De Ridder D, Chakravarthy KV, Al-Kaisy A, Hunter CW, Buchser E, Chapman K, Gilligan C, Hayek SM, Thomson S, Strand N, Jameson J, Simopoulos TT, Yang A, De Coster O, Cremaschi F, Christo PJ, Varshney V, Bojanic S, Levy RM. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC)®: Recommendations for Spinal Cord Stimulation Long-Term Outcome Optimization and Salvage Therapy. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:951-976. [PMID: 38904643 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The International Neuromodulation Society (INS) has recognized a need to establish best practices for optimizing implantable devices and salvage when ideal outcomes are not realized. This group has established the Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC)® to offer guidance on matters needed for both our members and the broader community of those affected by neuromodulation devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS The executive committee of the INS nominated faculty for this NACC® publication on the basis of expertise, publications, and career work on the issue. In addition, the faculty was chosen in consideration of diversity and inclusion of different career paths and demographic categories. Once chosen, the faculty was asked to grade current evidence and along with expert opinion create consensus recommendations to address the lapses in information on this topic. RESULTS The NACC® group established informative and authoritative recommendations on the salvage and optimization of care for those with indwelling devices. The recommendations are based on evidence and expert opinion and will be expected to evolve as new data are generated for each topic. CONCLUSIONS NACC® guidance should be considered for any patient with less-than-optimal outcomes with a stimulation device implanted for treating chronic pain. Consideration should be given to these consensus points to salvage a potentially failed device before explant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.
| | - Marc Russo
- Hunter Pain Specialists, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Jay S Grider
- UKHealthCare Pain Services, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Dawood Sayed
- The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | | | - Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Erika A Petersen
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | | | | | - Ganesan Baranidharan
- Leeds Teaching Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Trust, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Dirk De Ridder
- Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | | | - Adnan Al-Kaisy
- Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, The Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, UK
| | - Corey W Hunter
- Ainsworth Institute, Ichan School of Medicine, Mt Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Chris Gilligan
- Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Salim M Hayek
- Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Simon Thomson
- Pain & Neuromodulation Consulting Ltd, Nuffield Health Brentwood and The London Clinic, Brentwood, UK; Pain & Neuromodulation Centre, Mid & South Essex University NHS Hospitals, Basildon, UK
| | - Natalie Strand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Thomas T Simopoulos
- Arnold Warfield Pain Management Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ajax Yang
- Spine and Pain Consultant, PLLC, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | | | - Fabián Cremaschi
- Department of Neurosciences, National University of Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina
| | - Paul J Christo
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vishal Varshney
- Providence Healthcare, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stana Bojanic
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert M Levy
- Neurosurgical Services, Clinical Research, Anesthesia Pain Care Consultants, Tamarac, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moisset X. Neuropathic pain: Evidence based recommendations. Presse Med 2024; 53:104232. [PMID: 38641202 DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2024.104232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Neuropathic pain continues to be a significant problem that lacks effective solutions for every single patient. In 2015, international guidelines (NeuPSIG) were published, while the French recommendations were updated in 2020. The purpose of this minireview is to provide an update on the process of developing evidence-based recommendations and explore potential changes to the current recommendations. Primary treatments for neuropathic pain include selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) such as duloxetine and venlafaxine, gabapentin, tricyclic antidepressants, as well as topical lidocaine and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, which are specifically suggested for focal peripheral neuropathic pain. Pregabalin is a first line treatment according to international guidelines but second-line in the more recent French guidelines, due to lower efficacy seen in more recent studies and misuse risk. Additionally, tramadol, combination therapies, and psychotherapy as adjuncts are proposed second line; high-concentration capsaicin patches, and botulinum toxin A are proposed specifically for focal peripheral neuropathic pain. In cases where primary and secondary treatments prove insufficient, third-line options come into play. These include high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the motor cortex, spinal cord stimulation, and the use of strong opioids when no alternative is available. To ensure optimal management of neuropathic pain in real-life situations, it is imperative to disseminate these recommendations widely and secure the acceptance of practitioners. By doing so, we can bridge the gap between theory and practice, and enhance the overall care and treatment of individuals suffering from neuropathic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Moisset
- Clermont Auvergne University, University Hospital Center of Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Neuro-Dol, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burke L, Desai MJ. Pocket pain following spinal cord stimulator generator implantation: A narrative review of this under-reported risk. Pain Pract 2024; 24:659-669. [PMID: 38102862 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established treatment option for chronic pain. Pain over the implantable pulse generator, or pocket pain, is an incompletely understood risk of SCS implantation which may limit the efficacy of treatment and patient quality of life. The goal of this narrative review is to analyze the literature to gain a more thorough understanding of the incidence and risk factors for the development of pocket pain to help guide treatment options and minimize its occurrence in the future. METHODS A literature review was conducted investigating the development of pocket pain in patients with SCS for the management of a variety of pain conditions. RESULTS In total, 305 articles were included in the original database search and 50 met the criteria for inclusion. The highest level of evidence for papers that specifically investigated pocket pain was level III. Four retrospective, observational analyses included pocket pain as a primary outcome. The remainder of the included studies listed pocket pain as an adverse event of SCS implantation. CONCLUSIONS There is a relative dearth of primary literature that examines the incidence, characteristics, and health economic implications of pocket pain in patients with SCS. This highlights the need for large-scale, high-quality prospective or randomized controlled trials examining pocket pain. This may ultimately help prevent and reduce pocket pain leading to improved efficacy of treatment and greater patient quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Burke
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Mehul J Desai
- International Spine, Pain & Performance Center, Washington, DC, USA
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
D'Souza RS, Her YF. Stimulation holiday rescues analgesia after habituation and loss of efficacy from 10-kilohertz dorsal column spinal cord stimulation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2022; 47:rapm-2022-103881. [PMID: 35985769 PMCID: PMC9613866 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Habituation and loss of efficacy from spinal cord stimulation are commonly reported. This retrospective analysis investigated rescue of analgesia from spinal cord stimulation failure after implementing a strategy called a stimulation holiday, during which spinal cord stimulation is interrupted for a defined period and subsequently restarted. METHODS A 6-year review (June 1, 2016-May 13, 2022) from a tertiary care center was conducted on patients who underwent 10 kHz frequency dorsal column spinal cord stimulation for ≥3 months, experienced loss of efficacy (≤30% pain relief or patient self-report of lack of meaningful pain relief), subsequently underwent a stimulation holiday, and then restarted spinal cord stimulation. The primary outcome was comparison of pain relief and responder rate (≥50% relief in pain intensity) before and after stimulation holiday. RESULTS Of 212 patients, 40 (18.9%) experienced loss of efficacy at a mean follow-up period of 452.7±326.4 days after stimulator implantation and underwent stimulation holiday. Pain relief was significantly higher 1 month after stimulation holiday (39.4%±28.6%) compared with before stimulation holiday (8.7%±13.0%; mean difference 30.6%, 95% CI 21.9% to 39.3%, paired t-test p<0.001). A significantly higher responder rate (≥50% relief in pain intensity) was identified after stimulation holiday (57.5%) compared with before stimulation holiday (0%; Fisher's exact test p<0.001). Associations of superior pain relief and responder rate remained significant at 3 and 6 months after stimulation holiday. DISCUSSION Patients who experience loss of efficacy from spinal cord stimulation habituation could attempt a stimulation holiday rather than abandon therapy. Rescue of analgesia may be achieved after implementing a stimulation holiday and restarting spinal cord stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S D'Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Yeng F Her
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chapman KB, Yang A, Mogilner AY, Mandelberg N, Patel KV, Lubenow T, Deer T, Kallewaard JW, van Helmond N. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Device Explantation: A Multicenter Pooled Data Analysis. Pain Pract 2022; 22:522-531. [DOI: 10.1111/papr.13113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth B. Chapman
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, NY NY USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY NY USA
- Northwell Health New York City NY USA
| | - Ajax Yang
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, NY NY USA
- Northwell Health New York City NY USA
| | - Alon Y. Mogilner
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY NY USA
| | | | - Kiran V. Patel
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, NY NY USA
- Northwell Health New York City NY USA
| | - Timothy Lubenow
- Department of Anesthesiology Rush University Medical Center Chicago IL
| | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias Charleston WV
| | | | - Noud van Helmond
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, NY NY USA
- Cooper Medical School of Rowan University Cooper University Hospital Camden NJ USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gupta M, Ray M, Ladesich N, Gupta A. Health-Care Utilization and Outcomes with 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Refractory Pain. J Pain Res 2021; 14:3675-3683. [PMID: 34880672 PMCID: PMC8648088 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s306126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic pain is a common condition associated with decreased quality of life and increased health-care costs. Opioid analgesics are routinely used to treat chronic pain despite limited evidence of long-term efficacy. Spinal cord stimulation at a frequency of 10 kilohertz (10kHz-SCS) has been shown to be effective for treating chronic pain. Objective This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of 10kHz-SCS on patients’ pain intensity, volume of pain interventions, and opioid intake in a real-world setting. Study Design This study was a retrospective review of patient data. Setting The study was conducted at a single, community-based clinic. Methods Outcomes including pain relief, quality of life, opioid intake, and rate of health-care usage were evaluated using data from patients who were implanted with a 10kHz-SCS device to treat chronic pain. These outcomes were then compared for the pre- and post-implant periods. Results A total of 47 patients with a mean follow-up duration of 15.6 ± 6.2 months were included in this analysis. Mean pain relief was 73 ± 22% and 89% were responders at the final follow-up visit. The rate of medical interventions fell from 3.48±3.05 per year before starting 10kHz-SCS to 0.49±1.16 per year afterward (P < 0.001). Of 30 patients with available opioid consumption data, 89% maintained or decreased their intake after implant. Conclusion Retrospective data from a single center, with minimal exclusion criteria shows clinically significant pain relief with 10kHz-SCS, accompanied by significant indirect benefits including stable or reduced opioid use and reduced interventional procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayank Gupta
- Neuroscience Research Center, LLC, Overland Park, KS, USA
| | - Mahoua Ray
- Neuroscience Research Center, LLC, Overland Park, KS, USA
| | | | - Akshat Gupta
- Neuroscience Research Center, LLC, Overland Park, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Surges G, Paulus J, Blaß T, Mendryscha K, Bettag M, Rotte A. Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Cervical and Thoracic Leads: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience. Pain Ther 2021; 10:1255-1268. [PMID: 34236671 PMCID: PMC8586300 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00287-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with lower thoracic leads has been studied extensively. However, the evidence base for cervical SCS is less well developed, and reports of multiarea SCS lead placement are uncommon. Therefore, this single-center retrospective study evaluated outcomes from 10-kHz SCS with cervical or combined cervical and thoracic lead placement. METHOD All patients that underwent a 10-kHz SCS trial with either cervical or combined cervical and thoracic lead placement between 2015 and 2020 were included in our study. We reviewed patient's charts for demographic information, lead placement, and pain scores up to 48 months after implantation. RESULTS Of the 105 patients that underwent a 10-kHz SCS trial during the review period, 92 (88%) had back/neck or extremity pain that responded to therapy (≥ 50% pain relief from baseline) and received a permanent system. Sixty-two of these patients (67%) were implanted with combined cervical and thoracic leads, while 30 (33%) received cervical-only leads. Pain relief in both regions exceeded 60% at most visits throughout the 48-month study period. Throughout follow-up, the responder rate in both pain areas was consistently ≥ 70%. No unexpected adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION The 10-kHz SCS provided effective and durable pain relief with either cervical or combined cervical and thoracic leads. The efficacy and safety profile of both applications appears to be comparable to lower thoracic SCS. Our results suggest that 10-kHz SCS is a useful paresthesia-free therapeutic option for chronic neuropathic pain originating in the cervical area, as well as more complex multiarea pain presentations.
Collapse
|
8
|
Chakravarthy K, Reddy R, Al-Kaisy A, Yearwood T, Grider J. A Call to Action Toward Optimizing the Electrical Dose Received by Neural Targets in Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy for Neuropathic Pain. J Pain Res 2021; 14:2767-2776. [PMID: 34522135 PMCID: PMC8434932 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s323372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation has seen unprecedented growth in new technology in the 50 years since the first subdural implant. As we continue to grow our understanding of spinal cord stimulation and relevant mechanisms of action, novel questions arise as to electrical dosing optimization. Programming adjustment — dose titration — is often a process of trial and error that can be time-consuming and frustrating for both patient and clinician. In this report, we review the current preclinical and clinical knowledge base in order to provide insights that may be helpful in developing more rational approaches to spinal cord stimulation dosing. We also provide key conclusions that may help in directing future research into electrical dosing, given the advent of newer waveforms outside traditional programming parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishnan Chakravarthy
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA.,VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, Ca, USA
| | - Rajiv Reddy
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Adnan Al-Kaisy
- Pain Management and Neuromodulation Centre at Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Thomas Yearwood
- Pain Management and Neuromodulation Centre at Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jay Grider
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moisset X, Bouhassira D, Attal N. French guidelines for neuropathic pain: An update and commentary. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2021; 177:834-837. [PMID: 34332778 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2021.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Neuropathic pain remains a significant unmet need. French recommendations were updated in 2020. The goal of this minireview is to provide an update on these published guidelines. Despite newer relevant studies, our proposed algorithm remains relevant. First-line treatments include serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (duloxetine and venlafaxine), gabapentin and tricyclic antidepressants, topical lidocaine and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation being specifically proposed for focal peripheral neuropathic pain. Second-line treatments include pregabalin (such position being confirmed by newer studies), tramadol, combinations and psychotherapy as add on, high-concentration capsaicin patches and botulinum toxin A being proposed specifically for focal peripheral neuropathic pain. Third-line treatments include high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex, spinal cord stimulation and strong opioids (in the lack of alternative). Disseminating these recommendations and ensuring that they are well accepted by French practitioners will be necessary to optimize neuropathic pain management in real life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Moisset
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Neuro-Dol, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| | - D Bouhassira
- Inserm U987, AP-HP, CHU Ambroise Paré hospital, UVSQ, Paris-Saclay University, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - N Attal
- Inserm U987, AP-HP, CHU Ambroise Paré hospital, UVSQ, Paris-Saclay University, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Baranidharan G, Edgar D, Bretherton B, Crowther T, Lalkhen AG, Fritz AK, Vajramani G. Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Real-World Retrospective Studies. Biomedicines 2021; 9:180. [PMID: 33670252 PMCID: PMC7918133 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9020180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is increasingly utilized globally to treat chronic pain syndromes. Real-world evidence complementing randomized controlled trials supporting its use, has accumulated over the last decade. This systematic review aims to summarize the retrospective literature with reference to the efficacy and safety of 10 kHz SCS. We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed between 1 January 2009 and 21 August 2020 for English-language retrospective studies of ≥3 human subjects implanted with a Senza® 10 kHz SCS system and followed-up for ≥3 months. Two independent reviewers screened titles/abstracts of 327 studies and 46 full-text manuscripts. In total, 16 articles were eligible for inclusion; 15 reported effectiveness outcomes and 11 presented safety outcomes. Follow-up duration ranged from 6-34 months. Mean pain relief was >50% in most studies, regardless of follow-up duration. Responder rates ranged from 67-100% at ≤12 months follow-up, and from 46-76% thereafter. 32-71% of patients decreased opioid or nonopioid analgesia intake. Complication incidence rates were consistent with other published SCS literature. Findings suggest 10 kHz SCS provides safe and durable pain relief in pragmatic populations of chronic pain patients. Furthermore, it may decrease opioid requirements, highlighting the key role 10 kHz SCS can play in the medium-term management of chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ganesan Baranidharan
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK; (B.B.); (T.C.)
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | | | - Beatrice Bretherton
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK; (B.B.); (T.C.)
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Tracey Crowther
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK; (B.B.); (T.C.)
| | | | - Ann-Katrin Fritz
- Pain Management Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK;
| | - Girish Vajramani
- Centre for Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire SO16 6YD, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kallewaard JW, Gültuna I, Hoffmann V, Elzinga L, Munnikes R, Verbrugge L, Minne V, Reiters P, Subbaroyan J, Santos A, Rotte A, Caraway D. 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome with Predominant Leg Pain: Results from a Prospective Study in Patients from the Dutch Healthcare System. Pain Pract 2020; 21:490-500. [PMID: 33274545 PMCID: PMC8247309 DOI: 10.1111/papr.12973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Persistent back/and or leg pain is a common outcome after spinal surgery (otherwise known as failed back surgery syndrome [FBSS]). Studies have shown that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) at 10 kHz provides effective analgesia in FBSS patients with both back and leg pain symptoms and in those with predominant back pain. This study is the first to evaluate the therapy in FBSS patients with predominant leg pain. METHODS The safety and efficacy of 10 kHz SCS was evaluated in an uncontrolled, open-label, prospective study of FBSS patients with predominant leg pain in the Netherlands. Follow-ups were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post implantation. RESULTS Sixty out of 68 patients (88%) experienced sufficient pain relief during a stimulation trial. Of these, 58 proceeded to permanent implantation of a 10 kHz SCS system. After 12 months of treatment, 80% of patients experienced ≥ 50% reduction in baseline leg pain, and a similar proportion (76%) experienced ≥ 50% reduction in baseline back pain. At least two-thirds of patients were also leg pain and back pain remitters (visual analog scale [VAS] ≤ 2.5 cm). The therapy was also associated with a general improvement in patients' quality of life, as measured by secondary outcomes including disability, perception of health improvement, mental well-being, and satisfaction. A positive impact on opioid consumption was also observed. CONCLUSIONS Consistent with previous findings, 10 kHz SCS for the treatment of FBSS patients with predominant radicular symptoms is safe and effective and is associated with improved quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ismail Gültuna
- Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Pijnbehandelcentrum, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent Hoffmann
- Amphia Ziekenhuis Breda, Pijnbehandelcentrum, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Lars Elzinga
- Bravis Ziekenhuis Roosendaal, Pijncentrum, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| | - Renate Munnikes
- Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam, Pijnkliniek, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisette Verbrugge
- Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam, Pijnkliniek, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Anand Rotte
- Nevro Corp., Redwood City, California, U.S.A
| | | |
Collapse
|