Advanced Imaging in Psychiatric Neurosurgery: Toward Personalized Treatment

Emerging Outlook on Personalized Neuromodulation for Depression: Insights from Tractography-Based Targeting

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has shown individual promise in treating treatment resistant depression (TRD), but larger-scale trials have been less successful. Here, we create the largest meta-analysis with individual patient data (IPD) to date to explore if the use of tractography enhances the efficacy of DBS for TRD.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed 1823 articles, selecting 32 that contributed data from 366 patients. We stratified the IPD based on stimulation target and use of tractography. Utilizing two-way type III Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Welch Two Sample t-tests, and mixed-effects linear regression models, we evaluated changes in depression severity 9-15 months post-surgery (1-Y) and at last follow-up (LFU) (4 weeks - 8 years) as assessed by depression scales.

RESULTS

Tractography was used for medial forebrain bundle (MFB, n=17/32), subcallosal cingulate (SCC, n=39/241), and ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS, n=3/41) targets; and not used for bed nucleus of stria terminalis (n=11), lateral habenula (n=10), and inferior thalamic peduncle (n=1). Across all patients, tractography significantly improved mean depression scores at 1-Y (p<0.001) and LFU (p=0.009). Within the target cohorts, tractography improved depression scores at 1-Y for both MFB and SCC, though significance was only met at the alpha = 0.1 level (SCC: β=15.8%, p=0.09; MFB: β=52.4%, p=0.10). Within the tractography cohort, MFB with tractography patients showed greater improvement than those with SCC with tractography (72.42±7.17% versus 54.78±4.08%) at 1-Y (p=0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the promise of tractography in DBS for TRD as a methodology for personalization of therapy, supporting its inclusion in future trials.

Personalized Definition of Surgical Targets in Major Depression and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Potential Role for Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound?

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) are common and potentially incapacitating conditions. Even when recognized and adequately treated, in over a third of patients with these conditions the response to first-line pharmacological and psychotherapeutic measures is not satisfactory. After more assertive measures including pharmacological augmentation (and in the case of depression, transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, or treatment with ketamine or esketamine), a significant number of individuals remain severely symptomatic. In these persons, different ablation and deep-brain stimulation (DBS) psychosurgical techniques have been employed. However, apart from the cost and potential morbidity associated with surgery, on average only about half of patients show adequate response, which limits the widespread application of these potentially life-saving interventions. Possible reasons are considered for the wide variation in outcomes across different series of patients with MDD or OCD exposed to ablative or DBS psychosurgery, including interindividual anatomical and etiological variability. Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) is an emerging technique that holds promise in its ability to achieve anatomically circumscribed, noninvasive, and reversible neuromodulation of deep brain structures. A possible role for LIFU in the personalized presurgical definition of neuromodulation targets in the individual patient is discussed, including a proposed roadmap for clinical trials addressed at testing whether this technique can help to improve psychosurgical outcomes.

Target-Specific Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Extended research has pointed to the efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in treatment of patients with treatment-refractory Tourette syndrome (TS). The four most commonly used DBS targets for TS include the centromedian nucleus-nucleus ventrooralis internus (CM-Voi) and the centromedian nucleus-parafascicular (CM-Pf) complexes of the thalamus, and the posteroventrolateral (pvIGPi) and the anteromedial portion of the globus pallidus internus (amGPi). Differences and commonalities between those targets need to be compared systematically. Objective: Therefore, we evaluated whether DBS is effective in reducing TS symptoms and target-specific differences. Methods: A PubMed literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible literature was used to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis. Results: In total, 65 studies with 376 patients were included. Overall, Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) scores were reduced by more than 50 in 69% of the patients. DBS also resulted in significant reductions of secondary outcome measures, including the total YGTSS, modified Rush Video-Based Tic Rating Scale (mRVRS), Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), and Becks Depression Inventory (BDI). All targets resulted in significant reductions of YGTSS scores and, with the exception of the CM-Pf, also in reduced YBOCS scores. Interestingly, DBS of pallidal targets showed increased YGTSS and YBOCS reductions compared to thalamic targets. Also, the meta-analysis including six randomized controlled and double-blinded trials demonstrated clinical efficacy of DBS for TS, that remained significant for GPi but not thalamic stimulation in two separate meta-analyses. Conclusion: We conclude that DBS is a clinically effective treatment option for patients with treatment-refractory TS, with all targets showing comparable improvement rates. Future research might focus on personalized and symptom-specific target selection.