Higher Pain Sensitivity Predicts Efficacy of a Wearable Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Device for Persons With Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improves pain intensity, disability and quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is one of the most frequently electrophysical agents employed in reducing the impact of FMS. This meta-analysis intended to determine the effectiveness of TENS on pain, disability, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with FMS.

METHODS

According to PRISMA, we performed a meta-analysis (CRD42023456439), searching in PubMed Medline, PEDro, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science, and Scopus, since inception up to October 2023. This review focused on controlled clinical trials evaluating the effect of TENS on pain, disability, and QoL in patients with FMS. The pooled effect was estimated using Cohen's standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI).

RESULTS

Twelve studies, providing data from 944 patients, were included (PEDro score of 5.6 points). Meta-analyses showed that TENS interventions are effective in improving pain (SMD = -0.61; 95%CI -1 to -0.16); disability (SMD = -0.27; 95%CI -0.41 to -0.12); and physical dimension of QoL (SMD = 0.26; 95%CI 0.08 to 0.44). Additionally, when TENS is used as a unique therapy, it represents the best therapeutic option for improving pain, disability, and QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis, including the largest number of studies, showed that TENS intervention is an effective therapy to reduce pain and disability and increase QoL in FMS patients.

Influence of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Pressure Pain Thresholds and Conditioned Pain Modulation in a Randomized Controlled Trial in Women With Fibromyalgia

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) effectively reduces pain in fibromyalgia (FM). The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of TENS use on pressure pain thresholds (PPT) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in individuals with FM using data from the Fibromyalgia Activity Study with TENS trial (NCT01888640). Individuals with FM were randomly assigned to receive active TENS, placebo TENS, or no TENS for 4 weeks. A total of 238 females satisfied the per-protocol analysis among the active TENS (n = 76), placebo TENS (n = 68), and no TENS (n = 94) groups. Following 4 weeks of group allocation, the active TENS group continued for an additional 4 weeks of active TENS totaling 8 weeks (n = 66), the placebo and no TENS groups transitioned to receive 4 weeks of active TENS (delayed TENS, n = 161). Assessment of resting pain, movement-evoked pain (MEP), PPT, and CPM occurred prior to and following active, placebo, or no TENS. There were no significant changes in PPT or CPM among the active TENS, placebo TENS, or no TENS groups after 4 weeks. Individuals who reported clinically relevant improvements in MEP (≥30% decrease) demonstrated increases in PPT (P < .001), but not CPM, when compared to MEP non-responders. There were no significant correlations among the change in PPT or CPM compared to MEP and resting pain following active TENS use (active TENS + delayed TENS). PPT and CPM may provide insight to underlying mechanisms contributing to pain; however, these measures may not relate to self-reported pain symptoms. PERSPECTIVE: Pressure pain threshold increased in individuals with clinically relevant improvement (≥30%) in MEP, indicating the clinical relevance of PPT for understanding mechanisms contributing to pain. CPM was not a reliable indicator of treatment response in MEP responders.