A qualitative study of caring in hospice wards in Shanghai

Practitioner accounts of end-of-life communication in Hong Kong, Mainland China and Taiwan: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Communication at the end-of-life (EOL) is complex and multidimensional. Although culture is acknowledged as a key influence, there remains a gap in knowledge about intracultural aspects of EOL communication in the Chinese context. This review presents a synthesis of practitioners' accounts of communication at the EOL in Hong Kong, Mainland China and Taiwan.

METHODS

This review was registered prospectively on PROSPERO (CRD42021297052). Five databases were systematically searched using the terms 'communication', 'End-of-Life', 'Hong Kong', 'China' and 'Taiwan'. Empirical research published between 2015 and 2021 was downloaded and appraised. Fifteen articles were included in the review.

RESULTS

Findings highlight the influence of Chinese culture and philosophy, inadequate communication skills training and psychological support for practitioners and legislative and organisational factors.

CONCLUSION

Education and training for practitioners and public education about the EOL needs strengthening. Enhanced understanding of how culture influences EOL communication will strengthen service delivery and enhance awareness in multicultural communities.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

EOL workers need practical and workplace-based support to engage in meaningful communication practices. The influence of culture and the readiness of patients and families to engage in communication are also important considerations.

Hospice preference of the family decision-makers for cancer patients in China: an exploratory study

BACKGROUND

The reasons for hospice underuse in China need exploration from the perspective of patients with cancer and their families. Furthermore, existing literature about hospice decision-making among Chinese families with cancer patients is limited. This study aimed to investigate the awareness of hospice care among families with cancer patients, their preference for healthcare at the end-of-life stage of care, and the predictors of hospice preference.

METHODS

This was an exploratory study conducted between July 2021 and January 2022. Overall, 300 decision-makers of cancer patients were recruited from the oncology ward of seven hospitals in Shanghai, China. Of these, 285 valid responses were included in the data analysis. A self-developed questionnaire about their preference for healthcare when the patient was at the end-of-life stage was completed. Descriptive analysis, t-test, chi-square test, and multivariable logistic regression were conducted to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Only 46.0% of the participants have heard of hospice care. Most participants (78.2%) reported no introduction to hospice care from their doctors. More than half of the participants (58.2%) did not have a preference for healthcare at the end-of-life stage. Seventy-eight (65.5%) of the 119 participants who had a preference chose hospice care, and the other 41 participants (34.5%) refused hospice care. Having heard of hospice care had a significant impact on preferring healthcare at the end-of-life stage (adjusted OR = 14.346, 95%CI 7.219-28.509, p < 0.001). Not being sure whether the doctor introduced hospice care before had a significant impact on having no preference for healthcare at the end-of-life stage (adjusted OR = 0.180, 95%CI 0.052-0.617, p = 0.006). Another family member being cared for at home had a significant impact on the participants' hospice preference (adjusted OR = 2.739, 95%CI 1.159-6.470, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

The end-of-life communication between healthcare providers and the families of cancer patients is insufficient. More efforts should be made in increasing the awareness of hospice care among patients with cancer and their families. Further study is needed to explore the reasons for a lack of discussion on hospice options between healthcare providers and the patients' families. Additionally, the impact of the at-home care burden on the hospice choice of families with cancer patients requires further study.

The decision for hospice care in patients with terminal illness in Shanghai: A mixed-method study

Objectives

To investigate why patients with terminal illness and their families in Shanghai choose the hospice ward and their decision-making process.

Methods

This was a mixed-method study consisting of a cross-sectional survey and a descriptive qualitative study. Medical decision-makers for patients hospitalized in hospice wards were recruited between September 2019 and July 2021. A medical decision-maker is a family member who makes medical decisions for a patient. All 146 participants completed a self-developed 10-item questionnaire that included five items about their demographic characteristics and five items about the decision-making process. The semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine participants to understand the family’s decision-making process when they chose a hospice ward. The interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Results

The mean age of the 146 participants was 57.6 years old. Of the decision-makers, 56.85% were the patients’ children. Family-dominated discussions involving other family members were the main decision-making mode (84.93%). Patient participation in the decision-making process was reported in 43.15% of families. The participation of doctors (17.81%) and nurses (2.05%) were reported in a small number of families. The most common reason for choosing the hospice ward was the inability to find any other hospital for the patients (82.19%). The most common ways to learn about the service were neighbors and friends (38.36%) and social media (28.77%). Two themes and six categories emerged from the interviews. The first theme was reasons for choosing hospice wards. The reasons included being unable to care for the patients at home, staying in a hospice ward could reduce the psychological stress for home care, being unable to be admitted into tertiary/secondary hospitals, and thinking a hospice ward was a suitable place for the family. The second theme was the decision process of choosing a hospice ward. This theme included the following two categories, i.e., ways to learn about the hospice ward and family-discussion decision mode.

Conclusion

To most families having dying patients, a hospice ward is a reasonable and balanced choice after the families experience huge care stress and practical difficulties. The participation of patients should be encouraged in the family discussion so that their wishes can be known. More efforts will be needed to guide the families with dying patients to make reasonable medical choices. Social media can be a good way to improve public awareness of hospice services in the future. Meanwhile, healthcare providers should be more involved in the decision-making process.