Fecal incontinence in irritable bowel syndrome: Prevalence and associated factors in Swedish and American patients

The aging gut: Symptoms compatible with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) in older adults in the general population

BACKGROUND

Little is known about changes in gastrointestinal symptoms compatible with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) with increasing age at the population level. The objective of this study was to describe the patterns of DGBI in individuals 65 years of age and above and contrasting them with those of younger adults.

METHODS

A community sample of 6300 individuals ages 18 and older in the US, UK, and Canada completed an online survey. Quota-based sampling was used to ensure equal proportion of sex and age groups (40% aged 18-39, 40% aged 40-64, 20% aged 65+) across countries, and to control education distributions. The survey included the Rome IV Diagnostic Questionnaire for DGBI, demographic questions, questionnaires measuring overall somatic symptom severity and quality of life, and questions on healthcare utilization, medications, and surgical history.

RESULTS

We included 5926 individuals in our analyses; 4700 were 18-64 years of age and 1226 were ages 65+. Symptoms compatible with at least one DGBI were less prevalent in participants ages 65+ vs. ages 18-64 years (34.1% vs. 41.3%, p < 0.0001). For symptoms compatible with upper GI DGBI, lower prevalence for most disorders was noted in the 65+ group. For lower GI DGBI, a different pattern was seen. Prevalence was lower in ages 65+ for irritable bowel syndrome and anorectal pain, but no differences from younger participants for the disorders defined by abnormal bowel habits (constipation and/or diarrhea) were seen. Fecal incontinence was the only DGBI that was more common in ages 65+. Having a DGBI was associated with reduced quality of life, more severe non-GI somatic symptoms, and increased healthcare seeking, both in younger and older participants.

CONCLUSION

Symptoms compatible with DGBI are common, but most of these decrease in older adults at the population level, with the exception of fecal incontinence which increases. This pattern needs to be taken into account when planning GI health care for the growing population of older adults.

The Mexican consensus on fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence is the involuntary passage or the incapacity to control the release of fecal matter through the anus. It is a condition that significantly impairs quality of life in those that suffer from it, given that it affects body image, self-esteem, and interferes with everyday activities, in turn, favoring social isolation. There are no guidelines or consensus in Mexico on the topic, and so the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología brought together a multidisciplinary group (gastroenterologists, neurogastroenterologists, and surgeons) to carry out the «Mexican consensus on fecal incontinence» and establish useful recommendations for the medical community. The present document presents the formulated recommendations in 35 statements. Fecal incontinence is known to be a frequent entity whose incidence increases as individuals age, but one that is under-recognized. The pathophysiology of incontinence is complex and multifactorial, and in most cases, there is more than one associated risk factor. Even though there is no diagnostic gold standard, the combination of tests that evaluate structure (endoanal ultrasound) and function (anorectal manometry) should be recommended in all cases. Treatment should also be multidisciplinary and general measures and drugs (lidamidine, loperamide) are recommended, as well as non-pharmacologic interventions, such as biofeedback therapy, in selected cases. Likewise, surgical treatment should be offered to selected patients and performed by experts.

Co-occurrence of fecal incontinence with constipation or irritable bowel syndrome indicates the need for personalized treatment

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the prevalence and symptoms of fecal incontinence (FI) in relation to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-associated FI), constipation (constipation-associated FI), and isolation (isolated FI).

METHODS

Data were analyzed from 3145 respondents without organic comorbidities known to influence defecation function from the general Chinese population who filled in the online Groningen Defecation and Fecal Continence questionnaire. FI, IBS, and constipation were evaluated with the Rome IV criteria.

KEY RESULTS

The prevalence of FI was 10.5% (n = 329) in the non-comorbidity group. After multivariable logistic regression analysis, IBS (odds ratio [OR]: 12.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.06-17.36) and constipation (OR: 4.38, 95% CI: 3.27-5.85) were the most significant factors contributing to FI. Based on this finding, 106/329 (32.2%) had IBS-associated FI, 119/329 (36.2%) had constipation-associated FI, and 104/329 (31.6%) had isolated FI. Among the 329 FI respondents, there was a high prevalence of IBS and constipation-related symptoms, including abdominal pain (81.5%) and abdominal bloating (77.8%) for IBS and straining during defecation (75.4%), incomplete defecation (72.3%), defecation blockage (63.2%), anal pain during defecation (59.3%), and hard stools (24%) for constipation. The patients with IBS-associated FI asked for specialists' help less frequently than those with isolated FI. Interestingly, among the patients with constipation-associated FI, 56.3% used anti-diarrhea medicine.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

The prevalence of IBS-associated FI, constipation-associated FI, and isolated FI is comparably high. It is important to diagnose and target the cause of FI to provide personalized and cause-targeting care instead of treating only the FI symptoms.

Prevalence and impact of faecal incontinence among individuals with Rome IV irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Little is known about faecal incontinence (FI) in individuals with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

AIMS

To compare characteristics of people with IBS reporting FI, compared with people with IBS who do not report FI.

METHODS

We collected demographic, gastrointestinal and psychological symptoms, healthcare usage, direct healthcare costs, impact on work and activities of daily living, and quality of life data from individuals with Rome IV-defined IBS. We asked participants about FI, assigning presence or absence according to Rome-IV criteria.

RESULTS

Of 752 participants with Rome IV IBS, 202 (26.9%) met Rome IV criteria for FI. Individuals with FI were older (p < 0.001), more likely to have IBS-D (47.0% vs. 39.0%, p = 0.008), and less likely to have attained a university or postgraduate level of education (31.2% vs. 45.6%, p < 0.001), or to have an annual income of ≥£30,000 (18.2% vs. 32.9%, p < 0.001). They were more likely to report urgency (44.6% vs. 19.1%, p < 0.001) as their most troublesome symptom and a greater proportion had severe IBS symptom scores, abnormal depression scores, higher somatic symptom-reporting scores or higher gastrointestinal symptom-specific anxiety scores (p < 0.01 for trend for all analyses). Mean health-related quality of life scores were significantly lower among those with, compared with those without, FI (p < 0.001). Finally, FI was associated with higher IBS-related direct healthcare costs (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Among individuals with Rome IV IBS, one-in-four repo rted FI according to Rome IV criteria. Physicians should ask patients with IBS about FI routinely.

Severity and impact of accidental bowel leakage two decades after no, one, or two sphincter injuries

BACKGROUND

Information about the long-term severity and subjective impact of anal incontinence in women after 1 or 2 consecutive obstetrical anal sphincter injuries is still scarce and contradictory.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the severity and impact of anal incontinence among women with 2 previous deliveries 2 decades after birth and to analyze the relative effect of 1 vs 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries in comparison with no obstetrical anal sphincter injuries and the possible influence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury on other pelvic floor disorders.

STUDY DESIGN

We linked prospectively registered data in the Swedish Medical Birth Register with information from a postal and web-based questionnaire in 2015. Statistics Sweden identified women with 2 vaginal births from 1992 to 1998, and a simple random sample of 11,000 women was drawn from a source cohort of 64,687 women. To achieve equal-sized groups of women with 1 or 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, the latter group was oversampled from 1987 to 2000. The final study cohorts consisted of 6760 women with no obstetrical anal sphincter injury, 357 women with 1 injury, and 324 women with 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears were grouped together for analysis. Anal incontinence was defined as either fecal or isolated gas incontinence, and fecal incontinence was defined as involuntary leakage of solid or liquid stool with or without concomitant gas. Frequencies of leakage of stool and gas were dichotomized into low frequency (less than once a month) and high frequency (several times a month or more often). Pairwise comparisons were analyzed using Fisher exact tests, Mantel-Haenszel statistics, and the Mann-Whitney U test. Trends were analyzed using Mantel-Haenszel statistics and the Spearman rank correlation test. Logistic regression models were used to obtain the age- and body-mass-index -adjusted odds ratios for outcomes. Statistical significance was set at P<.05.

RESULTS

The response rate was 65.5% in the randomly selected cohort and 70.1% among women with 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Bothersome fecal incontinence occurred in 3.3% (212/6458) of women without obstetrical anal sphincter injury, in 10.4% (36/345) (adjusted odds ratio, 3.25; 95% confidence interval, 2.23-4.73) of those with 1 injury, and in 16.5% (52/315) (adjusted odds ratio, 5.16; 95% confidence interval, 3.69-7.22) of those with 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (trend P<.0001). Fecal incontinence was perceived as bothersome in 28.2% (212/753) of women without an obstetrical anal sphincter injury compared with in 43.9% (36/82) and 46.0% (52/113) of those with 1 or 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (trend P<.0001). Leakage of liquid stool occurred in 10.8% (724/6717) of those without injury, in 21.7% (77/355) of women with 1 injury, and 34.9% (113/324) of women with 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (trend P<.0001). Incontinence affecting daily life was reported by 8.6% (577/6672) of women without injury and by 19.7% (69/351) and 29.6% (96/324) of women with 1 and 2 sphincter injuries, respectively (trend P<.0001). The mean Jorge-Wexner score was 2.44, 3.26, and 3.88 for women with no, 1, or 2 sphincter injuries (trend P<.0001). Among women with a Jorge-Wexner score of 6, >50% had bothersome anal incontinence. The adjusted odds ratio for the overall effect of 1 vs 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries on measures of anal incontinence was 2.19 (95% confidence interval, 1.68-2.85) and 3.91 (95% confidence interval, 3.06-5.00), respectively, when compared with no obstetrical anal sphincter injury (both P<.0001). Having 1 or 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries had no significant effect on other pelvic floor disorders or on lower urinary tract symptoms (P=.73 and P=.69).

CONCLUSION

A consistent additive effect of 1 or 2 sphincter injuries on the severity and impact of anal incontinence was observed in women 2 decades after 2 vaginal births. This information is important for healthcare economics, clinical practice, and policy.

Characteristics of Fecal Incontinence in Male Patients in Japan

OBJECTIVES

Although community studies have shown no difference between the sexes in the prevalence of fecal incontinence (FI), few direct comparisons of disease characteristics between male and female patients have been reported. The aim of this study was to determine whether characteristics of FI differ between male and female patients in Japan.

METHODS

Included in the study were 408 (149 men, 259 women) patients with FI who visited the Matsushima Hospital Coloproctology Center between October 2016 and September 2017. We retrospectively evaluated data on age, number of bowel movements, Bristol stool form scale, number of FI, incontinence scores, anorectal manometry, comorbidities, and history of anal surgery.

RESULTS

Maximum resting pressure and maximum squeeze pressure were found to be within normal range in significantly more male than female patients (34.9% vs. 12.4%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS, 20.1% vs. 9.3%; p = 0.003) and a history of anal surgery (29.5% vs. 17.5%; p = 0.02) were more prevalent among male patients than among female patients. Use of mepenzolate as treatment was significantly more common among male patients than among female patients (16.8% vs. 6.6%, respectively; p = 0.005). Responses to the various treatments were good, regardless of sex.

CONCLUSIONS

FI appears to be more commonly accompanied by normal anal sphincter pressures in male patients than in female patients, and IBS and previous anal surgery appear to be more common among male patients than among female patients. FI appears to be controllable in most patients, regardless of sex.

Fecal incontinence in nonpregnant nulliparous women aged 25 to 64 years-a randomly selected national cohort prevalence study

BACKGROUND

The extent to which fecal incontinence is associated with obstetrical history or pelvic floor injuries is still a controversial and unresolved issue. One crucial first step toward answering this question is the need to study fecal incontinence in nonpregnant, nulliparous women.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to present detailed, descriptive measures of the accidental leakage of liquid or solid stool and gas in a randomly selected, large national cohort of nonpregnant, nulliparous women aged 25 to 64 years.

STUDY DESIGN

The Swedish Total Population Register identified the source population. Four independent, age-stratified, simple random samples in a total of 20,000 nulliparous women aged 25 to 64 years were drawn from 625,810 eligible women. Information was collected in 2014 using postal and web-based questionnaires. The 40-item questionnaire included questions about the presence and frequency of the leakage of solid and liquid stool and gas, which provided the basis for the generic terms fecal and anal incontinence. Statistical analyses of the differences between the groups were performed using the Fisher's exact test for dichotomous variables and the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables. The trend between >2 ordered categories of dichotomous variables was analyzed with Mantel-Haenszel statistics. When analyzing the trend between multiple ordered vs nonordered categorical variables, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. The age-related probability and risk increase per 10 years for incontinence parameters was calculated from logistic regression models adjusted for body mass index.

RESULTS

The study population was 9197 women, and the response rate was 52.2%, ranging from 44.7% in women aged 25 to 34 years to 62.4% among those from 55 to 64 years. All the types of incontinence, except severe isolated gas incontinence, increased with age up to 64 years. The estimated probability of fecal incontinence was 8.8% at age 25 years and 17.6% at age 64. The leakage of liquid stool was dominant, occurring in 93.1% (95% confidence interval, 91.4-94.5) of the women with fecal incontinence, whereas leakage of solid stool occurred in 33.9% (95% confidence interval, 31.1-36.7), of which approximately 80% also had concomitant leakage of liquid stool. The leakage of liquid stool increased markedly up to age 65, whereas the increase in the isolated leakage of solid stool was negligible across all ages (overall <0.4%). Liquid and solid stool, separate or in combination, co-occurred with gas in approximately 80%. The distribution pattern of the different types of leakage, single or combined, was similar in all the age groups. Both age and body mass index (kg/m²) were risk factors for fecal incontinence (P<.0001), with an interaction effect of P=.16.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal stool consistency has been identified as the strongest risk factor for accidental bowel leakage. The same pattern characterized by a dominance of liquid stool and gas leakage, prevalent concomitant leakage of solid and liquid stool, and a negligible rate of isolated leakage of solid feces was observed across all ages. The low rates of isolated leakage of solid stool support the impression that dysfunction of the continence mechanism of the pelvic floor had a negligible role for bowel incontinence, which is essential information for comparison with women with birth-related injuries.

Symptom-based latent classes of persons with irritable bowel syndrome

A large amount of interindividual variability exists in symptom experiences of persons with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Thus, consideration of multiple symptoms to identify distinct symptom subgroups may be useful in directing personalized health strategies for symptom management. We aimed to identify latent classes (i.e., subgroups) of persons with IBS who share similar patterns of symptoms using symptom-related variables (six groups of daily diary symptoms, cognitive beliefs about IBS, and IBS quality of life [QOL]); and to examine how subgroups differed in patient characteristics. Data were derived from a baseline assessment of men and women enrolled in two cognitively-focused intervention trials (N = 332). Using latent class analysis, four latent classes were identified: Class 1 (low symptoms and good QOL, n = 153), Class 2 (low symptoms and moderate QOL, n = 106), Class 3 (high symptoms with diarrhea and poor QOL, n = 38), and Class 4 (high symptoms with low diarrhea and moderate QOL, n = 35). Diarrhea, being female, less formal education, unemployment, and previous history of major depressive disorder were associated with membership in Class 3. Using these distinct symptom profiles, the next step is to explore underlying mechanisms accounting for symptom burden with the goal of designing tailored interventions to reduce that burden.

Gastrointestinal symptoms - an illness burden that affects daily work in patients with IBS

Background

Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a chronic gastrointestinal disorder characterised by recurrent abdominal pain and disturbed bowel habits and unclear aetiology. IBS is also associated with psychosocial factors, impaired quality of life and lost work productivity. This study sought to determine whether the association between IBS and lost work productivity might be accounted for by poor coping strategies and loss of confidence in the healthcare system.

Methods

Case–control design was employed sampling IBS and non-gastrointestinal (non-GI) primary healthcare seekers in a defined region in Sweden. Non-GI patients were of similar age and sex distribution to the IBS patients. Questionnaires applied in this study included instruments designed to measure confidence in the social security system and in the community, as well as questions about whether gastrointestinal problems might affect working life and Sense of coherence (SOC) questionnaire. The study’s primary hypothesis was evaluated via an a priori path model.

Results

Statistically significant differences were found between IBS cases (n = 305) and controls (n = 369) concerning abdominal pain or discomfort affecting everyday performance at work (p <  0.0001). IBS cases also showed significantly lower (p = 0.001) confidence in public healthcare. The study’s hypothesis was supported with the finding of a statistically significant indirect association via poor coping strategies, although the indirect associations were lesser in magnitude than the direct association.

Conclusions

This study found a clear association between clinically diagnosed IBS status and interference in work by gastrointestinal symptoms in which sense of coherence might be of importance.

Fecal urgency is common in constipated patients and is associated with anxiety

BACKGROUND

Fecal urgency is a symptom generally associated with diarrhea but is also reported by patients with constipation. Our aim was to (a) assess the prevalence and burden of fecal urgency in constipated patients (b) evaluate gastrointestinal and psychiatric predictors of moderate to severe fecal urgency in these patients.

METHODS

Patients presenting consecutively to a tertiary outpatient gastroenterology clinic with constipation were included. Patients were considered to have moderate to severe fecal urgency if ≥50% of bowel movements (BMs) in the past 3 months were associated with fecal urgency. Anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance were diagnosed using a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) t-score of ≥60. Abdominal pain and constipation severity were also assessed using PROMIS questionnaires. Univariable and stepwise logistic regression were used to identify predictors of moderate to severe fecal urgency.

KEY RESULTS

Of 139 constipated patients, 70.8% reported experiencing fecal urgency in the past 3 months and 25.8% reported being significantly bothered by it. Moderate to severe fecal urgency was reported by 27% of 139 patients. Frequency of loose stools (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1, 2.0) and presence of anxiety (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1, 5.0) were independent predictors of moderate to severe fecal urgency.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Fecal urgency is common in patients with constipation and is frequently bothersome to many patients. We identified clinical and psychiatric factors associated with moderate to severe fecal urgency in constipated patients with potential therapeutic implications if validated in future studies.

Fecal incontinence in people with self-reported irritable bowel syndrome: Prevalence and quality of life

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorder characterized by recurrent abdominal pain and altered bowel habits. IBS is a risk factor for fecal incontinence (FI), the unintentional passage of solid or liquid stool. FI can substantially interfere with health related quality of life (HRQL), leading to heightened anxiety and avoidance behavior. Nevertheless, relatively little research has been conducted on the prevalence of FI in IBS patients. This study evaluated the prevalence of FI in people with self-reported IBS and the relationship between FI and HRQL. 703 people who reported a diagnosis of IBS completed questionnaires on IBS symptom severity, FI symptom severity, HRQL, fear of food, anxiety about visceral sensations, and GI specific catastrophizing. Overall, 60% of people with IBS reported experiencing at least one lifetime episode of FI. In a subsample of 360 people who met strict Rome IV criteria and reported no other GI related co-morbidities, 62% reported experiencing at least one lifetime episode. While people who experienced FI more frequently had worse HRQL statistically, the differences in HRQL between people who had experienced FI and those who had not were not clinically significant. Rather than frequency of FI or physical symptom severity, quality of life was mostly determined by psychological variables, such as fear of food, anxiety, and catastrophizing. This study suggests that FI is quite prevalent in IBS patients, but that the best way to improve HRQL for IBS patients with FI may be to focus on reducing anxiety, catastrophizing and avoidance.

Irritable bowel syndrome: the clinical approach

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic and debilitating functional gastrointestinal disorder which presents with abdominal pain associated with alteration of bowel habits. IBS is a common condition affecting 9-23% of the general population, being the 80% female, with considerable impact on quality of life and health care costs. The exact pathogenesis of IBS remains elusive, but is clearly multifactorial and includes environmental and host factors. Management of patients with IBS is challenging since diagnosis and treatment could require several approaches with unsatisfactory results. In any case, the diagnosis of IBS is based on the positive identification of symptoms consistent with this condition and by excluding an underling organic disease. Before choosing therapeutic options, a strong reassuring physician-patient relationship is crucial. The therapeutic approach of IBS may consist of both non-pharmacological therapies and pharmacotherapy and should be based on prevalent symptomatology. Lifestyle modifications such as stress reduction and increased physical activity seem to be useful to improve symptoms and should be encouraged. The same for dietary modifications that represent an important first-line therapeutic option. The pharmacological treatment should take into account the predominant symptom and test one drug at a time with a predefined time point for effectiveness evaluation and dosage adjustment. This clinical review offers an updated overview on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of IBS.

Risk Factors for Fecal Urgency Among Individuals With and Without Diarrhea, Based on Data From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Fecal urgency is a common symptom among patients with gastrointestinal disorders, but can also occur in healthy individuals with normal bowel habits. There have been few studies of fecal urgency in the general population. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to analyze the prevalence of and risk factors for this symptom.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 4676 persons who completed the Bowel Health Questionnaire from the NHANES, from 2009 through 2010. The NHANES sampled a nationally representative group of adults in the United States and provides information on demographics, medical comorbidities, and dietary habits of survey participants. The Bowel Health Questionnaire provided additional information about bowel symptoms such as urgency, incontinence, constipation, and diarrhea. We identified individuals with fecal urgency and calculated differences in fecal urgency among subgroups using chi-squared analysis. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with urgency.

RESULTS

In our study population, the prevalence of fecal urgency was 3.3%; 29.5% of individuals with fecal urgency had diarrhea. The prevalence of fecal urgency was significantly higher in individuals who had diarrhea (14.8%) than in individuals without diarrhea (3.1%). Older age, female sex, poverty, urinary urge incontinence, diarrhea, and increased stool frequency were all associated with fecal urgency on multivariable analysis. Decreased fiber intake and increased carbohydrate intake were associated with urgency among individuals with diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

In an analysis of data from 4676 individuals who completed a Bowel Health Questionnaire from the NHANES, we found a significantly higher proportion of individuals with diarrhea to have fecal urgency. However, most individuals with fecal urgency do not have diarrhea. Factors associated with fecal urgency vary among individuals with and without diarrhea.

Pathophysiology of fecal incontinence in obese patients: A prospective case-matched study of 201 patients

BACKGROUND

Obesity is an emerging risk factor for fecal incontinence (FI). The aim of this study was to characterize pathophysiologic mechanisms of FI in obese patients compared with non-obese patients in a prospective case-matched study.

METHODS

The general characteristics and data of the anorectal manometry and endosonography of patients who were evaluated for FI at a single institution from 2005 to 2015 were prospectively assessed. Fecal incontinence was defined by a Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS) >4. Obesity was defined by a body mass index ≥30 kg/m² . Obese patients were case-matched with two age- and sex-matched non-obese patients.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 201 patients were included (67 obese matched with 134 non-obese). The CCIS, Knowles-Eccersley-Scott Symptom Constipation Score and quality of life score were comparable between obese and non-obese patients with FI. Factors significantly associated with obesity in FI patients were cholecystectomy (odds ratio [OR]=3.45 [1.19-10.32], P=.0230), irritable bowel syndrome - diarrhea (OR=2.94 [1.22-7.19], P=.0158), upper part of the anal canal resting pressure ≥22 mm Hg (OR=3.45 [1.45-8.76], P=.0045), maximum rectal tolerable volume ≥240 mL (OR=3.14 [1.34-7.54], P=.0082), and abdominal pressure ≥28 mm Hg (OR=2.75 [1.13-7.33], P=.0248) by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Obese patients with FI had a comparable severity of FI to that of non-obese patients with FI. Regarding obesity in patients with FI, physicians should focus on stool consistency.

Update on Rome IV Criteria for Colorectal Disorders: Implications for Clinical Practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of the review was to provide an update of the Rome IV criteria for colorectal disorders with implications for clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Rome diagnostic criteria are expert consensus criteria for diagnosing functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). The current version, Rome IV, was released in May of 2016 after Rome III had been in effect for a decade. It is the collective product of committees that included more than 100 leading functional GI experts. For functional bowel and anorectal disorders, the majority of changes relative to Rome III are relatively minor and will have little impact on clinical practice. However, notable changes with potential impact on clinical practice and research include the changes in the diagnostic criteria for IBS, the modified approach for subtyping of IBS, the view on functional bowel disorders as a spectrum of disorders, and the new definition of fecal incontinence. New features in the Rome IV diagnostic criteria for functional bowel and anorectal disorders will likely have modest influence on clinical practice, with a few exceptions.