Role of wireless motility capsule in the assessment and management of gastrointestinal dysmotility in patients with diabetes mellitus

Early Gastrointestinal Neuropathy Assessed by Wireless Motility Capsules in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

To assess the prevalence of objective signs of gastrointestinal (GI) autonomic neuropathy (AN) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). In addition, to investigate associations between objective GI findings and self-reported symptoms or other findings of AN.

METHODS

Fifty adolescents with T1D and 20 healthy adolescents were examined with a wireless motility capsule to assess the total and regional GI transit times and motility index. GI symptoms were evaluated with the GI Symptom Rating Scale questionnaire. AN was evaluated with cardiovascular and quantitative sudomotor axon reflex tests.

RESULTS

There was no difference in GI transit times in adolescents with T1D and healthy controls. Adolescents with T1D had a higher colonic motility index and peak pressure than the controls, and GI symptoms were associated with low gastric and colonic motility index (all p < 0.05). Abnormal gastric motility was associated with the duration of T1D, while a low colonic motility index was inversely associated with "time in target range" for blood glucose (all p < 0.01). No associations were found between signs of GI neuropathy and other measures of AN.

CONCLUSIONS

Objective signs of GI neuropathy are common in adolescents with T1D and it seems to require early interventions in patients at high risk of developing GI neuropathy.

Quantitative gastrointestinal function and corresponding symptom profiles in autonomic neuropathy

Purpose

Peripheral neuropathies with autonomic nervous system involvement are a recognized cause of gastrointestinal dysmotility for a wide spectrum of diseases. Recent advances in wireless motility capsule testing allow improved sampling of regional and whole gut motility to aid in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal motility disorders and may provide additional insight into segment-specific enteric involvement of peripheral neuropathies affecting autonomic nervous system function.

Methods

We utilized standardized autonomic nervous system (ANS) reflex assessment and wireless motility capsule testing to evaluate 20 individuals with idiopathic autonomic neuropathy and unexplained gastrointestinal symptoms. Additionally, we examined the relationship between quantifiable autonomic neuropathy and gastrointestinal dysmotility at specific neuroanatomical levels. Symptom profiles were evaluated using the 31-item Composite Autonomic Symptom Score questionnaire (COMPASS-31) and compared to wireless motility capsule data.

Results

We found that transit times were predominately abnormal (delayed) in the foregut (10 of 20; 50%), while contractility abnormalities were far more prominent in the hindgut (17 of 20; 85%), and that motility and symptom patterns, as assessed by the COMPASS-31 GI domain items, generally corresponded. Finally, we also found that there was neuroanatomical overlap in the presence of autonomic reflex abnormalities and WMC-based transit and/or contractility abnormalities.

Conclusions

We found that transit times were predominately abnormal in the foregut and midgut, while contractility abnormalities were far more prominent in the hindgut in individuals with idiopathic autonomic neuropathy. There was a high rate of agreement in segmental wireless motility capsule data with neuroanatomically corresponding standardized ANS function measures (e.g., cardiovagal, sudomotor, adrenergic). Expanded sudomotor testing, including additional neuroanatomical segments, could provide additional indirect assessment of visceral involvement in ANS dysfunction.

Gastrointestinal transit and contractility in diabetic constipation: A wireless motility capsule study on diabetes patients and healthy controls

BACKGROUND

Diabetic constipation is traditionally attributed to slow colonic transit, despite limited evidence. More than half of patients find treatment unsatisfactory. To improve treatment, there is a need for better diagnostic understanding of the condition.

OBJECTIVE

In this wireless motility capsule study, we aimed to investigate gastrointestinal transit and contractility in diabetes patients with and without constipation, and in healthy controls.

METHODS

We prospectively included type 1 or type 2 diabetes patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. Based on the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale we distinguished into two groups: with constipation and without constipation. Non-diabetic controls were asymptomatic. All were examined with wireless motility capsule, determining transit times and contractility parameters.

RESULTS

57 patients (42 women, 46 with type 1 diabetes) and 26 healthy controls (14 women) were included. We found no difference in transit times between diabetes patients with and without constipation. Compared to healthy controls (35:55, h:min), whole-gut transit was slower in both diabetes patients with constipation (66:15, p = 0.03) and without constipation (71:16, p < 0.001). Small bowel motility index correlated rs  = -0.32 (p = 0.01) with constipation symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes patients with constipation had similar transit times as those without constipation. Both groups had slower whole-gut transit than healthy controls. Constipation was associated with reduced small bowel, but not colonic contractility. Our results imply that other mechanisms than slow colonic transit may be more important in the pathogenesis of diabetic constipation.

Gastric Emptying Time and Volume of the Small Intestine as Objective Markers in Patients With Symptoms of Diabetic Enteropathy

Background/Aims

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) often suffer from gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, but these correlate poorly to established objective GI motility measures. Our aim is to perform a detailed evaluation of potential measures of gastric and small intestinal motility in patients with DM type 1 and severe GI symptoms.

Methods

Twenty patients with DM and 20 healthy controls (HCs) were included. GI motility was examined with a 3-dimensional-Transit capsule, while organ volumes were determined by CT scans.

Results

Patients with DM and HCs did not differ with regard to median gastric contraction frequency (DM 3.0 contractions/minute [interquartile range {IQR}, 2.9-3.0]; HCs 2.9 [IQR, 2.8-3.1]; P = 0.725), amplitude of gastric contractions (DM 9 mm [IQR, 8-11]; HCs 11 mm (IQR, 9-12); P = 0.151) or fasting volume of the stomach wall (DM 149 cm3 [IQR, 112-187]; HCs 132 cm3 [IQR, 107-154]; P = 0.121). Median gastric emptying time was prolonged in patients (DM 3.3 hours [IQR, 2.6-4.6]; HCs 2.4 hours [IQR, 1.8-2.7]; P = 0.002). No difference was found in small intestinal transit time (DM 5 hours [IQR, 3.7-5.6]; HCs 4.8 hours [IQR, 3.9-6.0]; P = 0.883). However, patients with DM had significantly larger volume of the small intestinal wall (DM 623 cm3 [IQR, 487-766]; HCs 478 cm3 [IQR, 393-589]; P = 0.003). Among patients, 13 (68%) had small intestinal wall volume and 9 (50%) had gastric emptying time above the upper 95% percentile of HCs.

Conclusion

In our study, gastric emptying time and volume of the small intestinal wall appeared to be the best objective measures in patients with DM type 1 and symptoms and gastroenteropathy.

Exploring associations between constipation, severity of neurofibromatosis type 1 and NF1 mutational spectrum

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner and is a rather common rare disease. Until recently, studies on gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with NF1 have been few and mostly described as case reports. In three previously published studies, the frequency of constipation in patients with NF1 has been found to be as high as 30%. In this study, associations between the frequency of constipation and NF1 disease severity and NF1 mutational spectrum were investigated. Among 277 patients with NF1, 49 had constipation. The highest rate of constipation was found among patients with a high perception of NF1 illness burden, and patients with constipation had a significantly higher NF1 illness burden when comparing the “not bothered” and the “very bothered” (p = 0.013). We found no significant association between constipation and the remaining measures on severity of NF1, nor between constipation and genetic variants. When observing the NF1 mutational spectrum, one variant (c.1013A>G (p.Asp338Gly/p.?) was identified in three patients with constipation of which two patients were related. The variant c.2970_2972delAAT (p.Met992del) associated with a mild NF1 phenotype was identified in two related patients with constipation. This study is the first to explore the association between symptoms of constipation, NF1 severity, and NF1 mutational spectrum. The results suggest an association between constipation and a high degree of illness burden. Awareness of this association among physicians could lead to more patients with NF1 being diagnosed with constipation. Constipation impacts on quality of life, hence a timely diagnosis and treatment will improve quality of life.

Assessment of Gastrointestinal Autonomic Dysfunction: Present and Future Perspectives

The autonomic nervous system delicately regulates the function of several target organs, including the gastrointestinal tract. Thus, nerve lesions or other nerve pathologies may cause autonomic dysfunction (AD). Some of the most common causes of AD are diabetes mellitus and α-synucleinopathies such as Parkinson’s disease. Widespread dysmotility throughout the gastrointestinal tract is a common finding in AD, but no commercially available method exists for direct verification of enteric dysfunction. Thus, assessing segmental enteric physiological function is recommended to aid diagnostics and guide treatment. Several established assessment methods exist, but disadvantages such as lack of standardization, exposure to radiation, advanced data interpretation, or high cost, limit their utility. Emerging methods, including high-resolution colonic manometry, 3D-transit, advanced imaging methods, analysis of gut biopsies, and microbiota, may all assist in the evaluation of gastroenteropathy related to AD. This review provides an overview of established and emerging assessment methods of physiological function within the gut and assessment methods of autonomic neuropathy outside the gut, especially in regards to clinical performance, strengths, and limitations for each method.

The day-night pattern of colonic contractility is not impaired in type 1 diabetes and distal symmetric polyneuropathy

Colonic contractility normally shows circadian variability regulated by sleep and especially food intake. However, individuals with type 1 diabetes have a reduced or even absent gastrocolic response to a meal, indicating that colonic contractility may be affected by the disease. We hypothesized that individuals with type 1 diabetes and distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN) have decreased motility (expressed as the motility index) and contractility of the colon and a reduced increase in motility index from night to morning compared to healthy controls and individuals with type 1 diabetes without DSPN. Cohorts of 35 individuals with type 1 diabetes and DSPN, 40 individuals with type 1 diabetes without DSPN, and 28 healthy controls were included in this post-hoc, cross-sectional analysis. We investigated, using a wireless motility capsule that measures pH, temperature, and pressure throughout the gastrointestinal tract, whether individuals with type 1 diabetes with and without DSPN, compared to healthy controls, exhibit altered colonic contractility in the evening, night, and morning. Max amplitude, mean peak amplitude, mean contraction, and motility index of the colon were calculated at the afore-designated times. Motility index of the colon tended to be higher in individuals with type 1 diabetes and DSPN compared to controls in the evening (P = .064), but the effect size was small (1.74%). There was no difference in motility index between the groups in the morning or evening. Furthermore, there was no difference in max amplitude, mean peak amplitude, or mean contraction between groups in the morning, evening, and night. As expected, overall contractility increased from night to morning in all groups, but there was no difference between groups in the increase in contractility from night to morning. Colonic contractility generally peaked in the morning, decreased in the evening, and was almost absent at night. Type 1 diabetes and/or DSPN did not impair contractility of the colon at any time point. Contractility and motility increased from morning to night unaffected by type 1 diabetes and/or DSPN.

Diabetic Enteropathy: From Molecule to Mechanism-Based Treatment

The incidence of the micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes is rising, mirroring the increase in the worldwide prevalence. Arguably, the most common microvascular complication is neuropathy, leading to deleterious changes in both the structure and function of neurons. Amongst the various neuropathies with the highest symptom burden are those associated with alterations in the enteric nervous system, referred to as diabetic enteropathy. The primary aim of this review is to provide a contemporaneous summary of pathophysiology of diabetic enteropathy thereby allowing a "molecule to mechanism" approach to treatment, which will include 4 distinct aspects. Firstly, the aim is to provide an overview of the diabetes-induced structural remodelling, biochemical dysfunction, immune-mediated alterations, and inflammatory properties of the enteric nervous system and associated structures. Secondly, the aim is to provide a synopsis of the clinical relevance of diabetic enteropathy. Thirdly, the aim is to discuss the various patient-reported outcome measures and the objective modalities for evaluating dysmotility, and finally, the aim is to outline the clinical management and different treatment options that are available. Given the burden of disease that diabetic enteropathy causes, earlier recognition is needed allowing prompt investigation and intervention, which may lead to improvements in quality of life for sufferers.

Diabetes and the Small Intestine

OPINION STATEMENT

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and its associated complications are becoming increasingly prevalent. Gastrointestinal symptoms associated with diabetes is known as diabetic enteropathy (DE) and may manifest as either diarrhea, fecal incontinence, constipation, dyspepsia, nausea, and vomiting or a combination of symptoms. The long-held belief that vagal autonomic neuropathy is the primary cause of DE has recently been challenged by newer theories of disease development. Specifically, hyperglycemia and the resulting oxidative stress on neural networks, including the nitrergic neurons and interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC), are now believed to play a central role in the development of DE. DE occurs in the majority of patients with diabetes; however, tools for early diagnosis and targeted therapy to counter the detrimental and potentially irreversible effects on the small bowel are lacking. Delay in diagnosis is further compounded by the fact that DE symptoms overlap with those of gastroparesis or can be confused with side effects from diabetes medications. Still, early recognition of the presence of DE is essential to mitigating symptoms and preventing further progression of complications including dysmotility and malabsorption. Current diagnostic modalities include manometry, wireless motility capsule (SmartPill™), and scintigraphy; however, these are not regularly utilized in clinical practice due to limited availability. Several medications are available for symptom relief in DE patients including rifaximin for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and somatostatin analogues for diarrhea. While rodent models on stem cell therapy and alteration of the microbiome are promising, there is still a great need for further research on the pathologic underpinnings and development of novel treatment modalities for DE.