Acotiamide affects antral motility, but has no effect on fundic motility, gastric emptying or symptom perception in healthy participants

The combination of L-menthol and caraway oil does not affect gastric function but increases hunger in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

The heterogeneous character of functional gastrointestinal disorders, recently renamed into disorders of gut-brain interaction, makes finding effective treatment options challenging. Compared to synthetic drugs, phytotherapy can have broader pharmacological effects and is often better tolerated. This study aimed to investigate the effect of peppermint oil and caraway oil (POCO) on gastric function and symptom levels in 32 healthy subjects in a single-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel design.

METHODS

Gastric emptying rate was assessed using a 13C-breath test. Intragastric pressure was measured using high-resolution manometry in fasted state and during intragastric infusion of a nutrient drink (350 mL or until full satiation). GI symptoms were rated on a 100 mm VAS. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models.

KEY RESULTS

POCO had no effect on intragastric pressure in fasted or fed state (p > 0.08 for all). No significant differences in gastric emptying rate were observed (p = 0.54). In the fasted state, a stronger increase in hunger and decrease in satiety were observed following POCO (p = 0.016 and p = 0.008, respectively). No differences in hunger and satiety were observed in the fed state (p > 0.31 for all). POCO induced less epigastric burning, bloating, and fullness (p < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute POCO administration did not affect gastric function in healthy subjects, but increased fasted hunger ratings. The effects of POCO on gastric function and hunger sensations in patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction, and the contribution to symptom improvement, needs to be elucidated in future studies.

A New Paradigm Shift in Gastroparesis Management

Gastroparesis, once regarded as a rare disease, is difficult to diagnose and challenging to treat; there were many breakthrough advances in the 2010s, shifting the paradigm of the understanding of this complex entity and its management. Similar to diabetes, its increasing prevalence reflects increased accessibility to diagnostic modalities and suggests that gastroparesis was underacknowledged in the past. Major developments in the three main aspects of the disease include the discovery of smooth muscle cells, interstitial cells of Cajal, PDGFRα+ cells syncytium, rather than interstitial cells of Cajal alone, as the main gastric pacemaker unit; the development of validated point-of-care diagnostic modalities such as a wireless motility capsule, the carbon 13-labeled breath test, and impedance planimetry; and the introduction of novel minimally invasive therapeutic options such as newer pharmacologic agents and gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy. All aspects of these advances will be discussed further in this review.

Current Treatment Options and Therapeutic Insights for Gastrointestinal Dysmotility and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) have been re-named as disorders of gut-brain interactions. These conditions are not only common in clinical practice, but also in the community. In reference to the Rome IV criteria, the most common FGIDs, include functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Additionally, there is substantial overlap of these disorders and other specific gastrointestinal motility disorders, such as gastroparesis. These disorders are heterogeneous and are intertwined with several proposed pathophysiological mechanisms, such as altered gut motility, intestinal barrier dysfunction, gut immune dysfunction, visceral hypersensitivity, altered GI secretion, presence and degree of bile acid malabsorption, microbial dysbiosis, and alterations to the gut-brain axis. The treatment options currently available include lifestyle modifications, dietary and gut microbiota manipulation interventions including fecal microbiota transplantation, prokinetics, antispasmodics, laxatives, and centrally and peripherally acting neuromodulators. However, treatment that targets the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the symptoms are scanty. Pharmacological agents that are developed based on the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying pathologies of these disorders might provide the best avenue for future pharmaceutical development. The currently available therapies lack long-term effectiveness and safety for their use to treat motility disorders and FGIDs. Furthermore, the fundamental challenges in treating these disorders should be defined; for instance, 1. Cause and effect cannot be disentangled between symptoms and pathophysiological mechanisms due to current therapies that entail the off-label use of medications to treat symptoms. 2. Despite the knowledge that the microbiota in our gut plays an essential part in maintaining gut health, their exact functions in gut homeostasis are still unclear. What constitutes a healthy microbiome and further, the precise definition of gut microbial dysbiosis is lacking. More comprehensive, large-scale, and longitudinal studies utilizing multi-omics data are needed to dissect the exact contribution of gut microbial alterations in disease pathogenesis. Accordingly, we review the current treatment options, clinical insight on pathophysiology, therapeutic modalities, current challenges, and therapeutic clues for the clinical care and management of functional dyspepsia, gastroparesis, irritable bowel syndrome, functional constipation, and functional diarrhea.

Early effects of acotiamide or mosapride intake on gastric emptying: a randomized 3-way crossover study using the 13C breath test

The effects of acotiamide on gastrointestinal motility have not been sufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was to determine whether single preprandial acotiamide or mosapride intake might affect the gastric emptying rate using the ¹³C breath test. Here, 11 healthy volunteers participated in a randomized three-way crossover study. The subjects received acotiamide (100 mg) or mosapride (5 mg) or placebo before liquid test meal ingestion. Gastric emptying was estimated by determining following parameters: the time required for 50% emptying of the labeled meal (T1/2), lag time for 10% emptying of the labeled meal (Tlag), gastric emptying coefficient (GEC) and regression-estimated constants (β and κ). These parameters were calculated from a ¹³CO₂ breath excretion curve using conventional formulas. The acotiamide, mosapride and placebo conditions were compared, revealing that for gastric emptying rates (values expressed as median), T1/2 (87.83571 min vs 79.95057 min vs 88.74378 min, p = 0.1496), Tlag (46.36449 min vs 42.2897 min vs 47.08094 min, p = 0.4966), GEC (4.382027 vs 4.211441 vs 4.248495, p = 0.8858), β (1.917728 vs 1.757062 vs 1.869141, p = 0.4066) and κ (0.834051 vs 0.819820 vs 0.789523, p = 0.1225) did not significantly differ. In this study, acotiamide (100 mg) or mosapride (5 mg) had no effect on gastric emptying.

Exploring the impact of real-life dosing conditions on intraluminal and systemic concentrations of atazanavir in parallel with gastric motility recording in healthy subjects

This work strived to explore gastrointestinal (GI) dissolution, supersaturation and precipitation of the weakly basic drug atazanavir in humans under different 'real-life' intake conditions. The impact of GI pH and motility on these processes was thoroughly explored. In a cross-over study, atazanavir (Reyataz®) was orally administered to 5 healthy subjects with (i) a glass of water, (ii) a glass of Coca-Cola® and (iii) a glass of water under hypochlorhydric conditions (induced by concomitant intake of a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)). After intake, GI fluids were aspirated from the stomach and the duodenum and, subsequently, analyzed for atazanavir. In parallel, blood samples were collected to assess systemic concentrations. In general, the results of this study revealed that the acidic gastric pH in combination with gastric residence time played a crucial role in the dissolution of atazanavir along the GI tract. After intake of atazanavir with a glass of water (i.e., reference condition), complete gastric dissolution was observed. After GI transfer, supersaturation was noticed for a limited amount of time (1.25 h). With respect to the Coca-Cola® condition, complete gastric dissolution was also observed. A delay in gastric emptying, highly likely caused by the caloric content (101 kcal), was responsible for delayed arrival of atazanavir into the upper small intestine, creating a longer time window of supersaturated concentrations in the duodenal segment (3.25 h) compared to the water condition. The longer period of supersaturated concentrations resulted in a slightly higher systemic exposure of atazanavir compared to the condition when atazanavir was taken with a glass of water. A remarkable observation was the creation (when the drug was given in the migrating motor complex (MMC) phase 2) or maintenance (when the drug was given in MMC phase 1) of a quiescent phase for up to 80 min. With respect to the PPI condition, negligible gastric and intestinal concentrations were observed, resulting in minimal systemic exposure for all subjects. It can be concluded that gastric pH and residence time play a pivotal role in the intestinal disposition of atazanavir in order to generate sufficiently high concentrations further down in the intestinal tract for a sufficient period of time, thus creating a beneficial driving force for intestinal absorption.