Exacerbation of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms after discontinuation of proton pump inhibitors is not associated with increased esophageal acid exposure

A Meta-analysis of PPIs Plus Alginate Versus PPIs Alone for the Treatment of GERD

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) combined with alginate versus PPIs alone in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) of PPIs combined with alginate and PPIs alone for the treatment of GERD in PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library were searched and screened, and the risk assessment of bias and statistical analysis were performed using Rev Man 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of four RCTs (608 patients) were included. Before and after treatment, the change of heartburn score in the experimental group increased compared with the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant [Standard Mean Difference (SMD)= -0.29, 95%CI (-0.78, 0.19), P > 0.05]; The change of HRDQ heartburn score increased, but the difference was not statistically significant [SMD= -0.40, 95%CI (-1.04, 0.24), P > 0.05]; The number of days without heartburn during the 28-day treatment period increased, but the difference was not statistically significant [OR= 1.16, 95%CI (0.37, 3.61), P > 0.05]; The amount of reflux score increased, but the difference was not statistically significant [SMD= -0.30, 95%CI (-0.71, 0.11), P > 0.05]; The amount of change in HRDQ regurgitation score increased, but the difference was not statistically significant [SMD= -0.05，95%CI （- 1.57，0.17）， P > 0.05]； There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events with treatment [OR= 0.93, 95%CI (0.58, 1.47), P > 0.05].

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of GERD, the efficacy of PPIs combined with alginate is improved compared with PPIs alone, but there is no significant difference, and alginate does not increase the occurrence of adverse events in PPIs treatment. In the future, more subdivisions of GERD subtypes and more high-quality studies are needed to further improve the treatment strategy of GERD-related diseases.

Two-year outcomes of anti-reflux mucosectomy in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease: A Chinese prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is an emerging and promising endoscopic treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In the current study we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ARMS in treating Chinese GERD patients.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective cohort study. ARMS was performed in GERD patients by an experienced endoscopist. The patients were required to undergo symptom assessment as well as endoscopic examination, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and impedance-pH monitoring before and after ARMS.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were enrolled. Follow-up was completed by all patients at 3 and 6 months, 11 patients at 1 year, and 8 patients at 2 years after ARMS, respectively. Symptom improvement was achieved in 66.7%, 75.0%, 72.7%, and 50.0% of the patients at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after ARMS, respectively. Postoperative dysphagia was reported by 25.0%, 25.0%, 27.3%, and 25.0% of patients at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery, none of whom required additional invasive treatment. All patients with preoperative esophagitis healed after ARMS. For impedance-pH monitoring parameters, number of acidic reflux episodes and the proportion of patients with acid exposure time (AET) >4.0% decreased significantly after ARMS.

CONCLUSIONS

ARMS was safe and effective in Chinese GERD patients. The efficacy of ARMS was not short-term and remained evident throughout the 2-year follow-up. Further multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are needed to verify our findings.

Randomised clinical trial: the use of alginates during preinvestigation proton pump inhibitor wash-out and their impact on compliance and symptom burden

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Investigation of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is usually performed off proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This can exacerbate symptoms, potentially impacting investigation accuracy if patients circumvent the preinvestigation instructions. There are no standard recommendations on how to manage PPI withdrawal. We aimed to assess the impact of structured alginate use on symptom burden.

METHODS

Participants were already established on ≥4 weeks of PPI therapy and being referred for manometry and 24-hour pH/impedance testing. Preinvestigation instructions involved stopping PPIs and H2 receptor antagonists for 1 week, but antacids and alginates were allowed until the night before. Participants were randomised to follow these standard instructions (control group), or the same instructions with the provision of Gaviscon Advance to be taken four times daily (treatment group). The primary outcome assessed change in Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life Score.

KEY RESULTS

Data for 48 patients were available for primary outcome assessment. While patients in the control group had a significant increase in symptoms (median difference 6.5, 95% CI (1 to 7), p=0.04), no change occurred in the treatment arm (median difference -1.5, 95% CI (-2, 3.5), p=0.54). There were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Structured alginate use prevents symptom exacerbation during preinvestigation PPI wash-out. These findings are limited to the 1-week wash-out period but can benefit thousands of patients undergoing investigation for gastro-oesophageal reflux each year. Further research is required to assess this effect in other settings, such as sustained PPI deprescription. The trial was funded by Reckitt Benckiser.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EudraCT registration 2019-004561-41.