Wireless motility capsule compared with scintigraphy in the assessment of diabetic gastroparesis

Comparison of Gas-sensing Capsule With Wireless Motility Capsule in Motility Disorder Patients

Background/Aims

Motility disorders are prevalent, often leading to disrupted regional or whole gut transit times. In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis between the wireless motility capsule and an innovative gas-sensing capsule to evaluate regional and whole gut transit times in individuals with diagnosed motility disorders.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 48 patients (34 women) diagnosed with functional dyspepsia and/or functional constipation according to Rome IV criteria. Patients ingested the capsules in tandem. We assessed the agreement between transit times recorded by both devices using Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Additionally, diagnostic concordance between the capsules were evaluated using confusion matrices.

Results

We observed a significant correlation between the wireless motility capsule and the gas-sensing capsule for gastric emptying time (r = 0.79, P < 0.001) and colonic transit time (r = 0.66, P < 0.001). The gas-sensing capsule exhibited a sensitivity of 0.83, specificity of 0.96, and accuracy of 0.94 when using the standard cutoff for delayed gastric emptying (5 hours). Similarly, when applying the cutoff value for delayed colonic transit (> 59 hours), the gas-sensing capsule demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.79, specificity of 0.84, and accuracy of 0.82. Importantly, the gas-sensing capsule was well-tolerated, and no serious adverse events were reported during the study.

Conclusions

Our findings underscore the gas-sensing capsule's suitability as a dependable tool for assessing regional and whole gut transit times. It represents a promising alternative to the wireless motility capsule for evaluating patients with suspected motility disorders.

Associations Between Physical Activity and Gastrointestinal Transit Times in People with Normal Weight, Overweight, and Obesity

BACKGROUND

Rapid gastric emptying is associated with obesity and overeating, whereas delayed gastric emptying is associated with anorexia. Acute effects of exercise on gastric emptying have been investigated extensively, but the influence of habitual physical activity on gastric emptying and transit time in other regions of the gastrointestinal tract is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to investigate associations between objectively measured habitual physical activity and gastrointestinal transit times in adults with varying degrees of adiposity.

METHODS

50 adults (58% women) were included in this cross-sectional study. Physical activity was measured by an accelerometer placed on the lower back for 7 d. Gastric emptying time, small bowel transit time, colonic transit time, and whole gut transit time were simultaneously evaluated by a wireless motility capsule, which was ingested together with a standardized mixed meal. Linear regression models were applied to assess the associations of total activity counts and time spent at different intensities-sedentary activity (0-100 counts/min), low light activity (101-759 counts/min), high light activity (760-1951 counts/min); moderate and vigorous activity (≥1952 counts/min)) with gastrointestinal transit times.

RESULTS

Median [Q1; Q3] age was 56.5 [46.6-65.5] y, and body mass index (BMI) was 32.1 [28.5-35.1] kg/m2. For every additional hour spent performing high light intensity physical activity, colonic transit time was 25.5 % [95% CI: 3.10, 42.7] more rapid (P = 0.028), and whole gut transit time was 16.2 % [95% CI: 1.84, 28.4] more rapid (P = 0.028) when adjusted for sex, age, and body fat. No other associations were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

More time spent on physical activity at high light intensity was associated with more rapid colonic and whole gut transit time, independent of age, sex, and body fat, whereas other intensities of physical activity and gastrointestinal transit times were not associated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov IDs (NCT03894670, NCT03854656).

A global bibliometric and visualized analysis of the status and trends of gastroparesis research

BACKGROUND

Gastroparesis has a substantial impact on the quality of life but has limited treatment options, which makes it a public health concern. No bibliometric studies on gastroparesis have been published thus far. Thus, this article aims to summarize and analyze research hotspots to provide a reference for clinical researchers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gastroparesis-related research articles were searched in the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC), and relevant information was extracted after screening. A total of 1033 documents were analyzed with the bibliometric method using Microsoft Excel, Citespace, and VOSviewer.

RESULTS

Overall, our search retrieved 1033 papers contributed by 966 research institutions from 53 countries. Since 1980, publications in this field have increased rapidly. United States (n = 645) and Temple University (n = 122) were the most productive country and institution, respectively. Parkman, with 96 publications, was the most prominent author.

CONCLUSIONS

Research hotspots in gastroparesis can be summarized into four domains: innovation in diagnostic modalities, change of oral therapeutic agents, choice of surgical interventions, and pathological mechanisms. Future research on gastroparesis should focus on the quality of life of patients, diagnostic techniques, pyloromyotomy, and transpyloric stent placement.

The Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 Questionnaire: A Sensitive Test to Detect Risk for Autonomic Neuropathy

Background and Aims

Autonomic neuropathy is a common but often neglected complication of diabetes, prediabetes, and even in individuals with an elevated risk of diabetes. The Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS) 31 is a validated and easy-to-use questionnaire regarding autonomic symptoms. We aimed to use a digitally, Norwegian version of the COMPASS 31 in people with different durations of diabetes and healthy controls to consider feasibility and to investigate if scores could discriminate between positive and negative outcomes for established tests for diabetic neuropathy, including cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) and a novel method of examining the gastrointestinal visceral sensitivity.

Method

We included 21 participants with longstanding type 2 diabetes, 15 with early type 2 diabetes, and 30 matched controls. The mean age for all groups was 69 years. Participants were phenotyped by cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests, electrical skin conductance, sural nerve electrophysiology, and the monofilament test. As a proxy for gastrointestinal visceral and autonomic nerve function, evoked potentials were measured following rapid rectal balloon distention.

Results

Participants with longstanding diabetes scored a median (IQR) of 14.9 (10.8-28.7) points, early diabetes of 7.3 (1.6-15.2), and matched controls of 8.6 (4.1-21.6), p = 0.04. Women and men scored 14.4 (5.5-28.7) and 7.8 (3.6-14.6) points, respectively, p = 0.01. Participants with definite or borderline CAN scored 14.3 (10.4-31.9) points, compared to participants with no CAN, 8.3 (3.2-21.5), p = 0.04. Lowering the diagnostic cut-off from 16 to 10 points increased the sensitivity from 0.33 to 0.83, with a decreased specificity from 0.68 to 0.55.

Conclusion

We successfully used COMPASS 31 in Norwegian. Thus, following the guidelines, we suggest clinical implementation for the assessment of autonomic neuropathy. Participants with longstanding diabetes had an increased likelihood of symptoms and signs of autonomic neuropathy. For screening purposes, the sensitivity was improved by lowering the cut-off to 10 points, with a lower score nearly excluding the diagnosis.

Wireless Monitoring of Gastrointestinal Transit Time, Intra-luminal pH, Pressure and Temperature in Experimental Pigs: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

There is no single gold standard for investigation of gastrointestinal motility function. Wireless motility monitoring involves a novel concept which provides a complex information on gastrointestinal function (gastrointestinal transit time, intra-luminal pH, pressure and temperature). Gastrointestinal motility functions of experimental pigs are very similar to those of humans. That is why porcine studies have already provided suitable experimental models for several preclinical projects.

AIMS

The aim of our study was to adopt methods of non-invasive wireless monitoring of gastrointestinal functions in experimental pigs.

METHODS

Five experimental adult female pigs were enrolled into the study. Wireless motility capsules were delivered into the porcine stomach endoscopically. Gastrointestinal transit and intra-luminal conditions were recorded for five days.

RESULTS

Records of animals provided good (3 pigs) or very good quality files (2 pigs). 31150 variables were evaluated. Mean time of the presence of capsules in the stomach was 926 ± 295 min, transfer of a capsule from the stomach into the duodenum lasted 5-34 min. Mean small intestinal transit time was 251 ± 43 min. Food intake was associated with an increase of gastric luminal temperature and a decrease of intra-gastric pressure. The highest intra-luminal pH was present in the ileum. The highest temperature and the lowest intra-luminal pressure were found in the colon. All data displayed a substantial inter-individual variability.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study has proven that a long-term function monitoring of the gastrointestinal tract by means of wireless motility capsules in experimental pigs is feasible. However, both ketamine-based induction of general anaesthesia as well as long-lasting general anaesthesia (> 6 hours) should be avoided to prevent retention of a capsule in the porcine stomach.

Stigma experiences of patients living with gastroparesis

INTRODUCTION

Stigmatization toward chronic digestive diseases is well documented. Patients perceive others hold negative stereotypes toward their disease and may internalize these beliefs as true. Because of this, stigmatization is associated with poor outcomes across disease-related and psychosocial domains. No study to date evaluates stigmatization toward patients living with gastroparesis (GP), a poorly understood disease affecting gastric motility. We aimed to gain deep understanding of stigma in patients living with gastroparesis.

METHODS

Patients with GP were recruited from two university-based gastroenterology practices as well as patient advocacy support groups. Participants underwent a semi-structured qualitative interview about their experiences with stigma related to their GP diagnosis, which were audio-recorded and transcribed to text for analysis using a grounded theory approach. Major themes with representative quotations were documented.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients participated. The majority were White, female, with idiopathic GP under the care of a gastroenterologist. All patients reported stigma related to GP. Seven major themes were found: stigma from healthcare providers, stigma within interpersonal relationships, GP as an invisible disease, blame, unsolicited suggestions on how to manage disease, disclosure, and stigma resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to describe stigma experiences in patients with GP. The results suggest patients experience considerable stigmatization toward their condition from multiple sources. Patients also demonstrated resistance to negative beliefs, which can serve as a protective factor for the negative effects of disease stigma. Clinicians should be aware of stigma in GP patients, including their own potential internal biases and behaviors.

Gastric function in diabetic gastroparesis assessed by ultrasound and scintigraphy

BACKGROUND

Gastroparesis is a severe diabetes complication characterized by delayed gastric emptying. We examined patients with symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis using gastric emptying scintigraphy and ultrasound drink test. The primary aim was to investigate how ultrasound could provide information about gastric motility features in diabetic gastroparesis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We prospectively included 58 patients with diabetes (48 type 1) with symptoms of gastroparesis and 30 healthy controls. Patients were examined with ultrasound of the stomach in a seated position after drinking 500 ml low-caloric meat soup, at the same time recording dyspeptic symptoms. The following day, they were examined with gastric emptying scintigraphy, defining gastroparesis as >10% retention after 4 h.

KEY RESULTS

We found motility disturbances in the proximal stomach measured by ultrasound in patients with diabetic gastroparesis. A linear mixed effects model including repeated ultrasound measurements revealed a slower decrease of the proximal stomach size in gastroparesis compared to healthy controls (p < 0.01), and the proximal diameter at 20 min was correlated to scintigraphy at 4 h (r = 0.510, p = 0.001). The antrum in patients with diabetic gastroparesis was twice as large compared to healthy controls (p = 0.009), and fasting antral size was correlated to gastric emptying scintigraphy (r = 0.329, p = 0.013). Both diabetes patients with and without gastroparesis had impaired accommodation (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

On ultrasound, we found delayed reduction of proximal stomach size and impaired accommodation after a liquid meal in patients with gastroparesis, emphasizing the role of the proximal stomach. Furthermore, we found antral distention in gastroparesis patients.

Diabetic Gastroenteropathy: Soothe the Symptoms or Unravel a Cure?

Autonomic neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus, and especially complications related to gastrointestinal neuropathy, are often overlooked in the clinic. Diabetic gastroenteropathy affects every segment of the gastrointestinal tract and generates symptoms that may include nausea, early satiety, vomiting, abdominal pain, constipation, and diarrhea. Severe cases can be complicated by weight loss, dehydration, and electrolyte disturbances. The pathophysiology is complex, the diagnostics and treatment options are multidisciplinary, and there is generally a lack of evidence for the treatment options. The aims for this review are first to summarize the pathophysiology and describe possible and expected symptoms and complications.Further, we will try to supply the clinician with a straightforward tool for diagnostics, and then, we shall summarize established treatment options, including diet recommendations, pharmacological and non-pharmacological options. Finally, we will explore the multiple possibilities of novel treatment, looking at medications related to the pathophysiology of neuropathy, other manifestations of autonomic neuropathies, and symptomatic treatment for other gastrointestinal disorders, also including new knowledge of endosurgical and neuromodulatory treatment. The overall goal is to increase awareness and knowledge on this frequent diabetic complication and to provide better tools for diagnosis and treatment. Ultimately, we hope to encourage further research in this field, as there are clear shortcomings in terms of biomarkers, pathophysiology, as well as treatment possibilities. In conclusion, diagnosis and management of diabetic gastroenteropathy are challenging and often require multidisciplinary teams and multimodal therapies. Treatment options are sparse, but new pharmacological, endoscopic, and neuromodulatory techniques have shown promising results in initial studies.

Gastrointestinal transit and contractility in diabetic constipation: A wireless motility capsule study on diabetes patients and healthy controls

BACKGROUND

Diabetic constipation is traditionally attributed to slow colonic transit, despite limited evidence. More than half of patients find treatment unsatisfactory. To improve treatment, there is a need for better diagnostic understanding of the condition.

OBJECTIVE

In this wireless motility capsule study, we aimed to investigate gastrointestinal transit and contractility in diabetes patients with and without constipation, and in healthy controls.

METHODS

We prospectively included type 1 or type 2 diabetes patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. Based on the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale we distinguished into two groups: with constipation and without constipation. Non-diabetic controls were asymptomatic. All were examined with wireless motility capsule, determining transit times and contractility parameters.

RESULTS

57 patients (42 women, 46 with type 1 diabetes) and 26 healthy controls (14 women) were included. We found no difference in transit times between diabetes patients with and without constipation. Compared to healthy controls (35:55, h:min), whole-gut transit was slower in both diabetes patients with constipation (66:15, p = 0.03) and without constipation (71:16, p < 0.001). Small bowel motility index correlated rs  = -0.32 (p = 0.01) with constipation symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes patients with constipation had similar transit times as those without constipation. Both groups had slower whole-gut transit than healthy controls. Constipation was associated with reduced small bowel, but not colonic contractility. Our results imply that other mechanisms than slow colonic transit may be more important in the pathogenesis of diabetic constipation.

Diagnostic Evaluation of Gastric Motor and Sensory Disorders

Disorders of gastric motor and sensory function affect 10%-20% of the world's population and adversely impact nutrition, quality of life, work productivity, and health care costs. Classifying these disorders can be challenging given the heterogeneity of symptom presentation, the presence of symptoms unexplained by endoscopic, radiographic and/or laboratory evaluation, and overlap with other luminal gastrointestinal disorders. Accurately diagnosing these highly prevalent disorders relies upon an understanding of epidemiology and risk factors, the ability to take a careful clinical history focused on symptoms, and the presence of predisposing medical, surgical, and psychological conditions. A variety of diagnostic studies are now available to assess gastric motor function and identify maladaptive relaxation, accommodation, and abnormal sensation. FDA-approved treatment options are limited and thus many patients undergo a series of empirical treatment trials that target individual symptoms, often without much benefit. This article provides updated recommendations for identifying and classifying the most common gastric motor and sensory disorders using currently accepted diagnostic tests, and provides a brief supplemental overview on treatment options. "Things sweet to taste prove in digestion sour." -Shakespeare, Richard II, 1595.

Diabetic diarrhoea: A study on gastrointestinal motility, pH levels and autonomic function

BACKGROUND

Chronic diarrhoea is a common, but poorly investigated diabetes complication. Autonomic neuropathy is a leading pathophysiological theory founded on old, small studies. Studies of gastrointestinal motility and pH levels are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

Using new diagnostic methods, we aimed to find out if diabetic diarrhoea was associated with alterations in gastrointestinal motility, pH levels and autonomic function.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients (42 women, 46 with type 1 diabetes) were prospectively included. Symptoms were evaluated with the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale, defining ≥4 points as cases with diarrhoea. Patients scoring <4 were used as controls. We used the wireless motility capsule to measure gastrointestinal transit times, pH levels and contractility parameters. Autonomic function was assessed by measuring heart rate variability, baroreflex sensitivity and orthostatic hypotension.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (30%) had diarrhoea. Compared with controls, cases had slower gastric emptying (21:46 vs. 4:14, h:min, p = 0.03) and faster colonic transit (18:37 vs. 54:25, p < 0.001). Cases had increased intraluminal pH in the antrum (2.4 vs. 1.2, p = 0.009), caecum (7.3 vs. 6.4, p = 0.008) and entire colon (7.1 vs. 6.7, p = 0.05). They also had a decreased pH difference across the pylorus (3.3 vs. 4.9, p = 0.004) and ileocaecal junction (0.6 vs 1.0, p = 0.009). The groups did not differ in autonomic function, but diastolic blood pressure drop correlated r_s = -0.34 (p = 0.04) with colonic transit time.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with diabetic diarrhoea had altered gastrointestinal transit and intraluminal pH levels, but minimal changes in autonomic function. Our results suggest that tests of gastrointestinal function are clinically useful in diabetic diarrhoea.

Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in diabetes is associated with autonomic dysfunction

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) is prevalent in diabetes. Pathophysiological theories imply autoimmune destruction, lack of trophic effects of insulin or impaired neuronal stimulation, but the relationship between PEI and autonomic dysfunction is largely unknown. In a pilot study, we aimed to investigate if patients with diabetes and PEI had impaired autonomic function.

METHODS

We measured faecal elastase in 59 patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes, using a cut-off-value <200 μg/g to define PEI. Based on faecal elastase results, patients were stratified into matched case (n = 8) and control groups (n = 13). We used heart rate variability, baroreflex sensitivity and orthostatic hypotension tests to assess autonomic dysfunction.

RESULTS

All baroreflex sensitivity parameters were reduced in cases with PEI compared with controls (all p < .05). The heart rate variability parameters root mean square of successive RR interval differences (p = .05) and high frequency (p = .04) were also reduced. We found no difference in orthostatic hypotension between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first-of-its-kind study, we found that diabetes patients with PEI had reduced autonomic function compared with matched controls. Although numbers are small, results support the hypothesis that autonomic dysfunction could be a contributor to PEI in diabetes.

Gastroparesis Symptoms Associated with Intestinal Hypomotility: An Explorative Study Using Wireless Motility Capsule

Objective

Gastric emptying measurements are mandatory in gastroparesis diagnostics, but the association between delayed emptying and symptoms is questionable. It is imperative to find biomarkers better correlated to symptom generation. Hence, we examined the association between symptom severity and gastrointestinal motility measured by wireless motility capsule.

Patients and Methods

In this prospective single-centre study, patients with gastroparesis symptoms were simultaneously investigated with gastric emptying scintigraphy and wireless motility capsule, measuring regional transit times and contractility parameters. Symptom severity was assessed with the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM), including the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI).

Results

We included 107 patients (70% women). In the whole patient group, nausea correlated with the gastric (r_s = −0.31, p = 0.007), small bowel (r_s = −0.41, p < 0.001) and colonic (r_s = −0.33, p = 0.012) motility indices. In patients with idiopathic etiology, nausea correlated with small bowel motility index (r_s = −0.81, p < 0.001) and mean stomach pressure (r_s = −0.64, p = 0.013). We also found negative correlations between total GCSI score and maximum pressure of the small bowel (r_s = −0.77, p < 0.001) and colon (r_s = −0.74, p = 0.002). In diabetes patients, total PAGI-SYM score correlated with colonic motility index (r_s = −0.34, p = 0.012), and mean pressure of the colon correlated with upper abdominal pain (r_s = −0.37, p = 0.007). We found no association between symptoms, gastric emptying nor any other transit times.

Conclusion

In patients with gastroparesis symptoms, we found that symptom severity was associated with intestinal hypomotility. Based on these results, gastroparesis diagnostics should also include an evaluation of the small bowel and colon.

Liraglutide accelerates colonic transit in people with type 1 diabetes and polyneuropathy: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, such as liraglutide, reduce hyperglycaemia and induce weight loss and are used as a treatment in diabetes. However, common adverse effects include nausea, loss of appetite and prolonged gastric emptying. It is not known whether these changes are centrally generated or if liraglutide alters the enteric motility.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of liraglutide on gastrointestinal function and symptoms.

METHODS

A total of 48 adults with type 1 diabetes and confirmed distal symmetric polyneuropathy were randomised to receive liraglutide 1.8 mg/day or placebo for 26 weeks. Regional transit times and motility indexes were assessed with a wireless motility capsule, whereas symptoms were evaluated using the validated gastroparesis cardinal symptom index.

RESULTS

Liraglutide treatment reduced large bowel transit time (31.7%, p = 0.04) and decreased motility index (6.1%, p = 0.04) compared to placebo, whereas the groups did not differ in gastric emptying or small-bowel transit times. Liraglutide increased postprandial fullness with 29% (p = 0.01). Increased small bowel transit time was associated with decreased bloating (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Liraglutide accelerates large bowel transit and decreases motility index, which may indicate better coordination of propulsive motility. This potentially improves the function of the enteric nervous system, leading to normalised colonic function and positive effects in type 1 diabetes.