Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter motor dynamics during swallow in children

Characterization of pharyngeal contractile integral using pharyngeal manometry in children

OBJECTIVES

Pharyngeal contractile integral (PhCI) is the product of mean pharyngeal contractile amplitude, length, and duration, and provides a single metric for the vigor of entire pharyngeal contraction. A major limitation in children is lack of characterization of PhCI on high-resolution pharyngeal manometry. We aimed to determine and compare the values of PhCI in children with the abnormal and normal videofluoroscopic study of swallow (VFSS).

METHODS

Children who underwent high-resolution pharyngeal and esophageal manometry (HRPM/HREM), as well as VFSS, were divided into two groups; "normal VFSS" and "abnormal VFSS" groups. PhCI was calculated from the pharyngo-esophageal manometry analysis software (MMS, v9.5, Laborie Medical Technologies), and compared in these two groups.

RESULTS

Of 67 children, 9 had abnormal VFSS (mean age 64 ± 50 months; 66.7% males), while 58 had normal VFSS (mean age 123 ± 55 months; 47% males). The mean PhCI in abnormal and normal VFSS groups was 82.00 ± 51.90 and 147.28 ± 53.89 mmHg.s.cm, respectively (p = 0.001). Subjects with abnormal VFSS were significantly younger than those with normal VFSS (p = 0.003). However, after adjusting for the VFSS result, age was no longer related to PhCI (p = 0.364). In subgroup analysis of children presenting with dysphagia, the mean PhCI in abnormal (9 subjects) and normal (36 subjects) VFSS groups was 82.00 ± 51.90 and 141.86 ± 50.39 mmHg.s.cm, respectively (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

PhCI was significantly lower in children with abnormal VFSS than in those with normal VFSS. We did not find a significant impact of age on PhCI in our pediatric populations.

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Dysfunction in Children with Type 1 Laryngeal Cleft after Failed Primary Cleft Repair

Changes in pharyngeal and upper-esophageal-sphincter (UES) motor dynamics contribute to swallowing dysfunction. Children with type 1 laryngeal clefts can present with swallowing dysfunction and associated symptoms which may persist even after the initial endoscopic intervention. This study sought to characterize pharyngeal and esophageal motor function in children with type 1 laryngeal clefts who had persistent presenting symptoms after their initial therapeutic intervention. We retrospectively analyzed high-resolution esophageal manometry studies of children ≤ 18 years old with type 1 laryngeal clefts who had an esophageal manometry study performed for persistent symptoms after an initial repair. A total of 16 children were found to have significantly increased UES resting pressure, UES pre- and post-swallow maximum pressures, and duration of UES contraction during swallows in comparison to nine age-matched controls of children without pharyngeal anatomical abnormalities. There was no difference between UES residual pressures or pharyngeal dynamics between the two groups. UES resting and residual pressures did not correlate with VFFS in penetration and aspiration scores of children with type 1 laryngeal clefts status post repair. Our study is the first to identify specific changes in UES motor function in patients with type 1 laryngeal cleft post initial repair.