1
|
Palte I, Stewart S, Rives H, Curtis JA, Enver N, Tritter A, Andreadis K, Mocchetti V, Schnoll-Sussman F, Soumekh A, Zarnegar R, Katz P, Rameau A. Virtual Reality for Pain Management During High-Resolution Manometry: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Laryngoscope 2024; 134:1118-1126. [PMID: 37497865 PMCID: PMC10818016 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE High-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. HRM is typically performed in the office with local anesthesia only, and many patients find it unpleasant and painful. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of the use of a virtual reality (VR) headset on pain and anxiety outcomes in patients with dysphagia undergoing HRM. METHODS Patients with dysphagia were prospectively recruited and randomized to undergo HRM with and without VR distraction. Data collected included the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 (STAI-6), the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, heart rate, and galvanic skin response (GSR) tracings. RESULTS Forty subjects completed the study, including 20 subjects in the intervention arm and 20 in the control arm. There was evidence of a significant positive effect of VR on calmness (p = 0.0095) STAI-6 rating, as well as on physiologic measures of pain with significantly decreased GSR rise time (p = 0.0137) and average rate of change of conductance change (p = 0.0035). CONCLUSION The use of VR during HRM catheter insertion increased calmness compared to control. Change of skin conductance was also reduced in the VR group, suggesting decreased physiologic pain. This study supports the consideration of the use of VR as a distraction tool to improve patient comfort during HRM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Laryngoscope, 134:1118-1126, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilan Palte
- Sean Parker Institute for the Voice, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah Stewart
- Sean Parker Institute for the Voice, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hal Rives
- Sean Parker Institute for the Voice, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - James A. Curtis
- Sean Parker Institute for the Voice, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Necati Enver
- Sean Parker Institute for the Voice, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew Tritter
- Sean Parker Institute for the Voice, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Texas Voice Performance Institute, Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, UTHealth Houston – McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katerina Andreadis
- Sean Parker Institute for the Voice, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Valentina Mocchetti
- Sean Parker Institute for the Voice, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Amir Soumekh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rasa Zarnegar
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Philip Katz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anaïs Rameau
- Sean Parker Institute for the Voice, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bangdiwala SI. When to p and when not to p. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023; 35:e14672. [PMID: 37668305 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
The p-value was proposed in the early 20th century as a potentially useful metric for statistical inference and was defined as "the probability of the observed result, plus more extreme results, if the null hypothesis were true," in the context of a formal statistical testing process. A century later, the scientific community uses it extensively, mostly inappropriately, and often interprets it incorrectly. This editorial briefly reviews the history of the p-value, provides how to properly interpret it, and recommends when to use it and when not to use it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shrikant I Bangdiwala
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clinical Update Findings about pH-Impedance Monitoring Features in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11113158. [PMID: 35683545 PMCID: PMC9181144 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11113158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is commonly based on non-specific symptoms and findings and a positive response to an empirical therapeutic trial. The therapeutic response is, however, unpredictable, and many patients need pH-impedance monitoring to confirm the diagnosis. Methods: A review of the recent literature was conducted in PubMED, Scopus, and Embase about the pH-study features of LPR patients. A summary of last evidence was proposed. Results: The awareness of otolaryngologists about indications and interpretation of pH-impedance monitoring is low. The hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH) is the most reliable examination determining the type and composition of hypopharyngeal reflux events (HRE) and the LPR features. The use of HEMII-pH is important to confirm the diagnosis in selected patients because non-specificity of symptoms and findings. There are no international consensus guidelines for the LPR diagnosis at the HEMII-pH. However, most studies supported the occurrence of >1 acid/weakly acid/nonacid HRE as diagnostic threshold. HREs are more frequently gaseous, weakly/nonacid compared with reflux events of gastroesophageal reflux. HREs occurred as daytime and upright, which does not support the value of double proton pump inhibitors or bedtime alginate. Oropharyngeal pH-monitoring is another approach reporting different sensitivity and specificity outcomes from HEMII-pH. The use of Ryan score for the LPR diagnosis at the oropharyngeal pH monitoring may be controversial regarding the low consideration of alkaline HREs. Conclusions: The awareness of otolaryngologists about HEMII-pH indication, features, and interpretation is an important issue regarding the high prevalence of LPR in outpatients consulting in otolaryngology. The HEMII-pH findings may indicate a more personalized treatment considering type and occurrence time of HREs.
Collapse
|