Gastric sensorimotor function and its clinical measurement

Rome Foundation and international neurogastroenterology and motility societies' consensus on idiopathic gastroparesis

To establish a consensus on the definition and management of idiopathic gastroparesis, international experts (selected by neurogastroenterology and motility societies and initiated by the Rome Foundation) devised 144 statements using the Delphi method, with at least 80% agreement required. This consensus defined idiopathic gastroparesis as the presence of symptoms associated with delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Nausea and vomiting were identified as cardinal symptoms. Frequently co-existing symptoms are early satiation and postprandial fullness. Diagnosis requires the presence of these symptoms alongside delayed gastric emptying, measured by a 4 h scintigraphy or gastric emptying breath test of a mixed composition meal in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Therapeutic options with proven efficacy were sparse. Dietary adjustments, nutritional support (per guidelines from the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism for substantial weight loss or intractable vomiting), and opioid cessation were recommended by a consensus opinion. Antiemetic and prokinetic agents were also considered potentially beneficial. This consensus offers a global perspective on idiopathic gastroparesis.

Resolution of severe gastroparesis induced by parasympathetic surge following facial trauma: a case report

BACKGROUND

Gastroparesis is a condition that affects the motility of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, causing a delay in the emptying process and leading to nausea, vomiting, bloating, and upper abdominal pain. Motility treatment along with symptom management can be done using antiemetics or prokinetics. This study highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of gastroparesis and suggests a potential link between facial trauma and symptom remission, indicating the need for further investigation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 46-year-old Hispanic man with hypertension, type 2 diabetes (T2D), and hyperlipidemia on amlodipine 10 mg, lisinopril 5 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg, and insulin glargine presented with a diabetic foot ulcer with probable osteomyelitis. During hospitalization, the patient developed severe nausea and vomiting. The gastroenterology team advised continuing antiemetic medicine and trying very small sips of clear liquids. However, the patient didn't improve. Therefore, the gastroenterology team was contacted again. They advised having stomach emptying tests to rule out gastroparesis as the source of emesis. In addition, they recommended continuing metoclopramide, and starting erythromycin due to inadequate improvement. Studies found a 748-min stomach emptying time. Normal is 45-90 min. An uneventful upper GI scope was done. Severe gastroparesis was verified, and the gastroenterology team advised a percutaneous jejunostomy or gastric pacemaker for gastroparesis. Unfortunately, the patient suffered a mechanical fall resulting in facial trauma. After the fall, the patient's nausea eased, and emesis stopped. He passed an oral liquids trial after discontinuation of erythromycin and metoclopramide.

CONCLUSION

This case exemplifies the difficulties in diagnosing and treating gastroparesis. An interesting correlation between parasympathetic surges and recovery in gastroparesis may be suggested by the surprising remission of symptoms following face injuries.

Gastric Alimetry Expands Patient Phenotyping in Gastroduodenal Disorders Compared with Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy

INTRODUCTION

Gastric emptying testing (GET) assesses gastric motility, however, is nonspecific and insensitive for neuromuscular disorders. Gastric Alimetry (GA) is a new medical device combining noninvasive gastric electrophysiological mapping and validated symptom profiling. This study assessed patient-specific phenotyping using GA compared with GET.

METHODS

Patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms underwent simultaneous GET and GA, comprising a 30-minute baseline, 99m TC-labelled egg meal, and 4-hour postprandial recording. Results were referenced to normative ranges. Symptoms were profiled in the validated GA App and phenotyped using rule-based criteria based on their relationships to the meal and gastric activity: (i) sensorimotor, (ii) continuous, and (iii) other.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were assessed, 77% female. Motility abnormality detection rates were as follows: GET 22.7% (14 delayed, 3 rapid), GA spectral analysis 33.3% (14 low rhythm stability/low amplitude, 5 high amplitude, and 6 abnormal frequency), and combined yield 42.7%. In patients with normal spectral analysis, GA symptom phenotypes included sensorimotor 17% (where symptoms strongly paired with gastric amplitude, median r = 0.61), continuous 30%, and other 53%. GA phenotypes showed superior correlations with Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index, Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index, and anxiety scales, whereas Rome IV Criteria did not correlate with psychometric scores ( P > 0.05). Delayed emptying was not predictive of specific GA phenotypes.

DISCUSSION

GA improves patient phenotyping in chronic gastroduodenal disorders in the presence and absence of motility abnormalities with increased correlation with symptoms and psychometrics compared with gastric emptying status and Rome IV criteria. These findings have implications for the diagnostic profiling and personalized management of gastroduodenal disorders.

Gastric Alimetry in the Management of Chronic Gastroduodenal Disorders: Impact to Diagnosis and Health Care Utilization

INTRODUCTION

Chronic gastroduodenal symptoms are frequently overlapping within existing diagnostic paradigms, and current diagnostic tests are insensitive to underlying pathophysiologies. Gastric Alimetry has emerged as a new diagnostic test of gastric neuromuscular function with time-of-test symptom profiling. This study aimed to assess the impact to diagnosis and health care utilization after the introduction of Gastric Alimetry into clinical care.

METHODS

Consecutive data of patients from 2 tertiary centers with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms (Rome-IV defined or motility disorder) having integrated care and Gastric Alimetry testing were evaluated. Changes in diagnoses, interventions, and management were quantified. Pretest and posttest health care utilization was reported. A preliminary management framework was established through experiential learning.

RESULTS

Fifty participants (45 women; median age 30 years; 18 with gastroparesis, 24 with chronic nausea and vomiting syndrome, and 6 with functional dyspepsia) underwent Gastric Alimetry testing. One-third of patients had a spectral abnormality (18% dysrhythmic/low amplitude). Of the remaining patients, 9 had symptoms correlating to gastric amplitude, while 19 had symptoms unrelated to gastric activity. Gastric Alimetry aided management decisions in 84%, including changes in invasive nutritional support in 9/50 cases (18%; predominantly de-escalation). Health care utilization was significantly lower post-Gastric Alimetry testing when compared with the average utilization cost in the year before Gastric Alimetry testing (mean ± SD $39,724 ± 63,566 vs $19,937 ± 35,895, P = 0.037).

DISCUSSION

Gastric Alimetry aided diagnosis and management of patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms by enabling phenotype-informed care. The high majority of results aided management decisions, which was associated with reduced health care utilization.

Gastric Alimetry® Test Interpretation in Gastroduodenal Disorders: Review and Recommendations

Chronic gastroduodenal symptoms are prevalent worldwide, and there is a need for new diagnostic and treatment approaches. Several overlapping processes may contribute to these symptoms, including gastric dysmotility, hypersensitivity, gut-brain axis disorders, gastric outflow resistance, and duodenal inflammation. Gastric Alimetry® (Alimetry, New Zealand) is a non-invasive test for evaluating gastric function that combines body surface gastric mapping (high-resolution electrophysiology) with validated symptom profiling. Together, these complementary data streams enable important new clinical insights into gastric disorders and their symptom correlations, with emerging therapeutic implications. A comprehensive database has been established, currently comprising > 2000 Gastric Alimetry tests, including both controls and patients with various gastroduodenal disorders. From studies employing this database, this paper presents a systematic methodology for Gastric Alimetry test interpretation, together with an extensive supporting literature review. Reporting is grouped into four sections: Test Quality, Spectral Analysis, Symptoms, and Conclusions. This review compiles, assesses, and evaluates each of these aspects of test assessment, with discussion of relevant evidence, example cases, limitations, and areas for future work. The resultant interpretation methodology is recommended for use in clinical practice and research to assist clinicians in their use of Gastric Alimetry as a diagnostic aid and is expected to continue to evolve with further development.

Principles and clinical methods of body surface gastric mapping: Technical review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Chronic gastric symptoms are common, however differentiating specific contributing mechanisms in individual patients remains challenging. Abnormal gastric motility is present in a significant subgroup, but reliable methods for assessing gastric motor function in clinical practice are lacking. Body surface gastric mapping (BSGM) is a new diagnostic aid, employs multi-electrode arrays to measure and map gastric myoelectrical activity non-invasively in high resolution. Clinical adoption of BSGM is currently expanding following studies demonstrating the ability to achieve specific patient subgrouping, and subsequent regulatory clearances. An international working group was formed in order to standardize clinical BSGM methods, encompassing a technical group developing BSGM methods and a clinical advisory group. The working group performed a technical literature review and synthesis focusing on the rationale, principles, methods, and clinical applications of BSGM, with secondary review by the clinical group. The principles and validation of BSGM were evaluated, including key advances achieved over legacy electrogastrography (EGG). Methods for BSGM were reviewed, including device design considerations, patient preparation, test conduct, and data processing steps. Recent advances in BSGM test metrics and reference intervals are discussed, including four novel metrics, being the 'principal gastric frequency', BMI-adjusted amplitude, Gastric Alimetry Rhythm Index™, and fed: fasted amplitude ratio. An additional essential element of BSGM has been the introduction of validated digital tools for standardized symptom profiling, performed simultaneously during testing. Specific phenotypes identifiable by BSGM and the associated symptom profiles were codified with reference to pathophysiology. Finally, knowledge gaps and priority areas for future BSGM research were also identified by the working group.

Comparison of Gastric Alimetry® body surface gastric mapping versus electrogastrography spectral analysis

Electrogastrography (EGG) non-invasively evaluates gastric motility but is viewed as lacking clinical utility. Gastric Alimetry® is a new diagnostic test that combines high-resolution body surface gastric mapping (BSGM) with validated symptom profiling, with the goal of overcoming EGG's limitations. This study directly compared EGG and BSGM to define performance differences in spectral analysis. Comparisons between Gastric Alimetry BSGM and EGG were conducted by protocolized retrospective evaluation of 178 subjects [110 controls; 68 nausea and vomiting (NVS) and/or type 1 diabetes (T1D)]. Comparisons followed standard methodologies for each test (pre-processing, post-processing, analysis), with statistical evaluations for group-level differences, symptom correlations, and patient-level classifications. BSGM showed substantially tighter frequency ranges vs EGG in controls. Both tests detected rhythm instability in NVS, but EGG showed opposite frequency effects in T1D. BSGM showed an 8× increase in the number of significant correlations with symptoms. BSGM accuracy for patient-level classification was 0.78 for patients vs controls and 0.96 as compared to blinded consensus panel; EGG accuracy was 0.54 and 0.43. EGG detected group-level differences in patients, but lacked symptom correlations and showed poor accuracy for patient-level classification, explaining EGG's limited clinical utility. BSGM demonstrated substantial performance improvements across all domains.

Gastric Alimetry ® improves patient phenotyping in gastroduodenal disorders compared to gastric emptying scintigraphy alone

Objectives

Gastric emptying testing (GET) assesses gastric motility, however is non-specific and insensitive for neuromuscular disorders. Gastric Alimetry® (GA) is a new medical device combining non-invasive gastric electrophysiological mapping and validated symptom profiling. This study assessed patient-specific phenotyping using GA compared to GET.

Methods

Patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms underwent simultaneous GET and GA, comprising a 30-minute baseline, 99m TC-labelled egg meal, and 4-hour postprandial recording. Results were referenced to normative ranges. Symptoms were profiled in the validated GA App and phenotyped using rule-based criteria based on their relationships to the meal and gastric activity: i) sensorimotor; ii) continuous; and iii) other.

Results

75 patients were assessed; 77% female. Motility abnormality detection rates were: GET 22.7% (14 delayed, 3 rapid); GA spectral analysis 33.3% (14 low rhythm stability / low amplitude; 5 high amplitude; 6 abnormal frequency); combined yield 42.7%. In patients with normal spectral analysis, GA symptom phenotypes included: sensorimotor 17% (where symptoms strongly paired with gastric amplitude; median r=0.61); continuous 30%; other 53%. GA phenotypes showed superior correlations with GCSI, PAGI-SYM, and anxiety scales, whereas Rome IV Criteria did not correlate with psychometric scores (p>0.05). Delayed emptying was not predictive of specific GA phenotypes.

Conclusions

GA improves patient phenotyping in chronic gastroduodenal disorders in the presence and absence of motility abnormalities with improved correlation with symptoms and psychometrics compared to gastric emptying status and Rome IV criteria. These findings have implications for the diagnostic profiling and personalized management of gastroduodenal disorders.

Study Highlights

1) WHAT IS KNOWN Chronic gastroduodenal symptoms are common, costly and greatly impact on quality of lifeThere is a poor correlation between gastric emptying testing (GET) and symptomsGastric Alimetry® is a new medical device combining non-invasive gastric electrophysiological mapping and validated symptom profiling 2) WHAT IS NEW HERE Gastric Alimetry generates a 1.5x higher yield for motility abnormalities than GETWith symptom profiling, Gastric Alimetry identified 2.7x more specific patient categories than GETGastric Alimetry improves clinical phenotyping, with improved correlation with symptoms and psychometrics compared to GET.