An endogenous basis for synchronisation characteristics of the circadian rhythm in proliferating Lemna minor plants

A non-cell-autonomous circadian rhythm of bioluminescence reporter activities in individual duckweed cells

The circadian clock is responsible for the temporal regulation of various physiological processes in plants. Individual cells contain a circadian oscillator consisting of a clock gene circuit that coordinates physiological rhythms within the plant body in an orderly manner. The coordination of time information has been studied from the perspective of cell-cell local coupling and long-distance communication between tissues based on the view that the behavior of circadian oscillators represents physiological rhythms. Here, we report the cellular circadian rhythm of bioluminescence reporters that are not governed by the clock gene circuit in expressing cells. We detected cellular bioluminescence rhythms with different free-running periods in the same cells using a dual-color bioluminescence monitoring system in duckweed (Lemna minor) transfected with Arabidopsis CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1::luciferace+ (AtCCA1::LUC+) and Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S::modified click-beetle red-color luciferase (CaMV35S::PtRLUC) reporters. Co-transfection experiments with the two reporters and a clock gene-overexpressing effector revealed that the AtCCA1::LUC+ rhythm, but not the CaMV35S::PtRLUC rhythm, was altered in cells with a dysfunctional clock gene circuit. This indicated that the AtCCA1::LUC+ rhythm is a direct output of the cellular circadian oscillator, whereas the CaMV35S::PtRLUC rhythm is not. After plasmolysis, the CaMV35S::PtRLUC rhythm disappeared, whereas the AtCCA1::LUC+ rhythm persisted. This suggests that the CaMV35S::PtRLUC bioluminescence has a symplast/apoplast-mediated circadian rhythm generated at the organismal level. The CaMV35S::PtRLUC-type bioluminescence rhythm was also observed when other bioluminescence reporters were expressed. These results reveal that the plant circadian system consists of both cell-autonomous and noncell-autonomous rhythms that are unaffected by cellular oscillators.

Sixth International Conference on Duckweed Research and Applications Presents Lemnaceae as a Model Plant System in the Genomics and Postgenomics Era

The 6th International Conference on Duckweed Research and Applications (6th ICDRA) was organized at the Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) located in Gatersleben, Germany, from 29 May to 1 June 2022. The growing community of duckweed research and application specialists was noted with participants from 21 different countries including an increased share of newly integrated young researchers. The four-day conference focused on diverse aspects of basic and applied research together with practical applications of these tiny aquatic plants that could have an enormous potential for biomass production.

Spatially specific mechanisms and functions of the plant circadian clock

Like many organisms, plants have evolved a genetic network, the circadian clock, to coordinate processes with day/night cycles. In plants, the clock is a pervasive regulator of development and modulates many aspects of physiology. Clock-regulated processes range from the correct timing of growth and cell division to interactions with the root microbiome. Recently developed techniques, such as single-cell time-lapse microscopy and single-cell RNA-seq, are beginning to revolutionize our understanding of this clock regulation, revealing a surprising degree of organ, tissue, and cell-type specificity. In this review, we highlight recent advances in our spatial view of the clock across the plant, both in terms of how it is regulated and how it regulates a diversity of output processes. We outline how understanding these spatially specific functions will help reveal the range of ways that the clock provides a fitness benefit for the plant.

A spatial model of the plant circadian clock reveals design principles for coordinated timing

Individual plant cells possess a genetic network, the circadian clock, that times internal processes to the day‐night cycle. Mathematical models of the clock are typically either “whole‐plant” that ignore tissue or cell type‐specific clock behavior, or “phase‐only” that do not include molecular components. To address the complex spatial coordination observed in experiments, here we implemented a clock network model on a template of a seedling. In our model, the sensitivity to light varies across the plant, and cells communicate their timing via local or long‐distance sharing of clock components, causing their rhythms to couple. We found that both varied light sensitivity and long‐distance coupling could generate period differences between organs, while local coupling was required to generate the spatial waves of clock gene expression observed experimentally. We then examined our model under noisy light‐dark cycles and found that local coupling minimized timing errors caused by the noise while allowing each plant region to maintain a different clock phase. Thus, local sensitivity to environmental inputs combined with local coupling enables flexible yet robust circadian timing.