Causes and treatments of achalasia, and primary disorders of the esophageal body

Does the nissen fundoplication procedure improve esophageal dysmotility in patients with barrett's esophagus?

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate esophageal dysmotility (ED) and the extent of Barrett's esophagus (BE) before and after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in patients previously diagnosed with BE and ED.

METHODS

twenty-two patients with BE diagnosed by upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy with biopsies and ED diagnosed by conventional esophageal manometry (CEM) were submitted to a LNF, and followed up with clinical evaluations, upper GI endoscopy with biopsies and CEM, for a minimum of 12 months after the surgical procedure.

RESULTS

: sixteen patients were male (72.7%) and six were females (27.3%). The mean age was 55.14 (± 15.52) years old. and the mean postoperative follow-up was 26.2 months. The upper GI endoscopy showed that the mean length of BE was 4.09 cm preoperatively and 3.91cm postoperatively (p=0.042). The evaluation of esophageal dysmotility through conventional manometry showed that: the preoperative median of the lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (LESRP) was 9.15 mmHg and 13.2 mmHg postoperatively (p=0.006). The preoperative median of the esophageal contraction amplitude was 47.85 mmHg, and 57.50 mmHg postoperatively (p=0.408). Preoperative evaluation of esophageal peristalsis showed that 13.6% of the sample presented diffuse esophageal spasm and 9.1% ineffective esophageal motility. In the postoperative, 4.5% of patients had diffuse esophageal spasm, 13.6% of aperistalsis and 22.7% of ineffective motor activity (p=0.133).

CONCLUSION

LNF decreased the BE extension, increased the LES resting pressure, and increased the amplitude of the distal esophageal contraction; however, it was unable to improve ED.

Electrical lower esophageal sphincter augmentation in patients with GERD and severe ineffective esophageal motility-a safety and efficacy study

Background

Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF), even if performed in specialized centers, can be followed by long-term side effects such as dysphagia, gas bloating or inability to belch. Patients with an ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and concurrent GERD are prone to postoperative dysphagia after LF. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of electrical lower esophageal sphincter stimulation in patients with IEM and GERD.

Methods

This is a prospective, open-label single center study. Patients with PPI-refractory GERD and ineffective esophageal motility were included for lower esophageal sphincter electrical stimulation (LES-EST). Patients underwent prospective follow-up including physical examination, interrogation of the device and were surveyed for changes in the health-related quality of life score.

Results

According to power analysis, 17 patients were included in this study. Median distal contractile integral (DCI) was 64 mmHg s cm (quartiles 11.5–301). Median total % pH < 4 was 8.9 (quartiles 4–21.6). Twelve patients (70.6%) underwent additional hiatal repair. At 1-month follow-up, none of the patients showed any clinical or radiological signs of dysphagia. There were no procedure related severe adverse events. Mean total HQRL improved from baseline 37.53 (SD 15.07) to 10.93 (SD 9.18) at follow-up (FUP) (mean difference 24.0 CI 15.93–32.07) p < 0.001.

Conclusions

LES-EST was introduced as a potential technique to avoid side effects of LF. LES-EST significantly improved health related quality of life and does not impair swallowing in patients with GERD and ineffective esophageal motility.

Alternative therapies for GERD: a way to personalized antireflux surgery

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder, known to affect about 20% of the Western population. Although conventional medical or surgical treatment has proven effective, there is certainly room for improvements. As only 10% of GERD patients are finally treated by antireflux surgery, a large therapeutic window exists. This treatment gap consists of patients who are not effectively treated with proton pump inhibitor but do not want to run the potential risks of conventional surgery. During the last two decades, several novel and intriguing options for the surgical treatment of GERD have been introduced and found their way into clinical use. The following summary will give an update of certain alternative therapeutic options to treat GERD or its pathological consequences.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy: an evolving treatment for achalasia

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) was first performed in Japan in 2008 for uncomplicated achalasia. With excellent results, it was adopted by highly skilled endoscopists around the world and the indications for POEM were expanded to include advanced sigmoid achalasia, failed surgical myotomy, patients with previous endoscopic treatments and even other spastic oesophageal motility disorders. With increased uptake and performance of POEM, variations in technique and improved management of adverse events have been developed. Now, 6 years since the first case and with >3,000 procedures performed worldwide, long-term data has shown the efficacy of POEM to be long-lasting. A growing body of literature also exists pertaining to the learning curve, application of novel technologies, extended indications and physiologic changes with POEM. Ultimately, this once experimental procedure is evolving towards becoming the preferred treatment for achalasia and other spastic oesophageal motility disorders.

Effect of laparoscopic antireflux surgery on esophageal motility

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The effect of laparoscopic antireflux surgery on esophageal motility is incompletely understood, and any indication for this procedure in patients with motility disorder is disputed in literature. We evaluated the influence of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication on impaired esophageal motility.

METHODS

In this pathological manometric study, we divided the patients into two groups preoperatively: the hypomotility group (mean amplitude of esophageal contraction wave <40 mm Hg; HYPO group, n = 11) and the normal group (mean amplitude of esophageal contraction wave >40 mm Hg; NORM group, n = 43). The amplitudes of esophageal contraction waves 3 and 8 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter and the percentage of peristaltic contraction waves of the tubular esophagus were analyzed pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

In total, 54 patients with GERD underwent esophageal manometry before and 6 months after Nissen fundoplication. The length and pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter were increased in both groups postoperatively (p < 0.01). Patients in the HYPO group (n = 11) showed a statistically significant increase of mean amplitude of esophageal contraction (32.8 vs. 57.3 mm Hg; p < 0.01), while no change was found in the NORM group (n = 43). A total of 72% of patients with preoperative motility disorder showed normal postoperative manometry.

CONCLUSION

Nissen fundoplication normalizes esophageal motility, especially in patients with preoperative hypomotility. Patients with impaired esophageal motility should not per se be excluded from antireflux surgery.