Questioning the association between bisphosphonates and atypical femoral fractures

Musculoskeletal and neurocognitive clinical significance of adult hypophosphatasia

Hypophosphatasia (HPP), also called Rathbun disease, is a rare genetic disorder that is caused by the loss-of-function mutation in the ALPL gene encoding tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase. Doctor Rathbun first described the case of a 3-week-old infant who presented with severe osteopenia, rickets, and multiple radiographic fractures, and died shortly after of epileptic seizure and respiratory distress. The term "hypophosphatasia" was coined as the patients' alkaline phosphatase levels were significantly low. Since then, our understanding of HPP has evolved, and now we appreciate causative genetic mutation and the broad spectrum of clinical presentation depending on the age of onset, severity, and skeletal involvement: perinatal, infantile, childhood, adult and odontohypophosphatasia. The new development of enzyme replacement with asfostase alfa has saved the lives of severe form of hypophosphatasia. However, it is still unclear and remains challenging how to manage adult HPP that often presents with mild and non-specific symptoms such as muscle pain, joint stiffness, fatigue, anxiety, or low bone mass, which are common in the general population and not necessarily attributed to HPP. In this review, we will present 3 unique cases of adult HPP and discuss the pathophysiology, clinical presentation particularly neuromuscular and neurocognitive symptoms and management of adult HPP.

Bisphosphonates and Atypical Femur Fractures: Is the Relationship Causal or Casual?

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are a time-tested drug class with multivariate use cases. They are used in pathologies ranging from osteoporosis to Paget's disease, and also help in accelerated fracture healing. They have been used to treat both benign and malignant lesions of the skeletal system since a long time. However, there have been reports of increased incidences of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) in patients exhibiting chronic use of bisphosphonates in the past years. This has led to the widespread dissuasion of physicians and practitioners from using the drug class. By means of this review of the literature, the authors aim to investigate the relationship between BP use and its association with AFFs. The review focuses on and elucidates the basic pharmacology of BPs and goes on to illustrate the indications of BPs in various pathologies of the musculoskeletal system, further exploring the effects of BPs on the healing of various bony fractures. The authors also explore the incidences of other pathologies, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw and nephropathies associated with BP use, and elaborate on their features. Through this review, the authors have tried to educate and induce critical thinking on the part of clinicians and medical professionals in regard to prescribing BPs to patients that need them, by keeping in mind the risk-reward relationship that accompanies their use.

Regulation of Skeletal Homeostasis

Landmark advances in skeletal biology have arisen mainly from the identification of disease-causing mutations and the advent of rapid and selective gene-targeting technologies to phenocopy human disease in mice. Here, we discuss work on newly identified mechanisms controlling the remodeling of bone, communication of bone cells with cells of other lineages, and crosstalk between bone and vital organs as these relate to the therapeutic targeting of the skeleton.

Retrospective review of patients with atypical bisphosphonate related proximal femoral fractures

INTRODUCTION

Patients may be at an increased risk of atypical proximal femoral fractures with prolonged bisphosphonate use.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients who sustained a subtrochanteric fracture of the femur in our department between April 2009 and March 2014. The radiographs were reviewed for features of atypical femoral fractures as described by the American Society of Bone Mineral Research.

RESULTS

185 patients were coded according to the National Hip Fracture Database as having sustained a subtrochanteric fracture of the femur. Of these, 26 patients had radiographic findings consistent with an atypical subtrochanteric fracture. 5 patients were excluded as their histology confirmed malignancy. 12 patients were taking bisphosphonates on admission. All 12 patients were females taking alendronic acid on admission, who sustained the fracture as the result of minimal or no trauma and underwent long gamma nail fixation. The mean age was 71.6 years (range 62-79 years). The mean length of time on bisphosphonates prior to admission was 8.33 years (range 3-25 years). 9/12 patients had pre-existing symptoms for between 5days and 2 years prior to admission. 1 patient sustained a broken gamma nail 14 weeks post-operatively requiring revision. The mean time to discharge from theatre was 16days (range 5-57days). The mean time to radiological union in the patients in whom there was evidence was 24 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small group of patients, management of this fracture pattern can be complex with the potential for delayed or non-union and prodromal symptoms are common.

[Periprosthetic fractures following total hip and knee arthroplasty: Risk factors, epidemiological aspects, diagnostics and classification systems]

Periprosthetic fractures following hip and knee arthroplasty are potentially severe complications. As a fundament in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, specific classification systems are necessary to ensure an optimal individualized treatment of these sometimes complicated fractures. This review article summarizes the epidemiological aspects, risk factors and diagnostics of periprosthetic hip and knee fractures. The most frequently used location related fracture classifications systems are explained. In addition, the recently introduced unified classification system (UCS), which is applicable to any location of periprosthetic fractures, is described in detail. Initial studies have shown a reliable applicability of the UCS to periprosthetic hip and knee fractures.

Recurrent Proximal Femur Fractures in a Teenager With Osteogenesis Imperfecta on Continuous Bisphosphonate Therapy: Are We Overtreating?

Long-term bisphosphonate (BP) therapy in adults with osteoporosis is associated with atypical femoral fractures, caused by increased material bone density and prolonged suppression of bone remodeling which may reduce fracture toughness. In children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), long-term intravenous BP therapy improves bone structure and mass without further increasing the already hypermineralized bone matrix, and is generally regarded as safe. Here we report a teenage girl with OI type IV, who was started on cyclical intravenous pamidronate therapy at age 6 years because of recurrent fractures. Transiliac bone biopsy revealed classical structural features of OI but unusually low bone resorption surfaces. She made substantial improvements in functional ability, bone mass, and fracture rate. However, after 5 years of pamidronate therapy she started to develop recurrent, bilateral, nontraumatic, and proximal femur fractures, which satisfied the case definition for atypical femur fractures. Some fractures were preceded by periosteal reactions and prodromal pain. Pamidronate was discontinued after 7 years of therapy, following which she sustained two further nontraumatic femur fractures, and continued to show delayed tibial osteotomy healing. Despite rodding surgery, and very much in contrast to her affected, untreated, and normally mobile mother, she remains wheelchair-dependent. The case of this girl raises questions about the long-term safety of BP therapy in some children, in particular about the risk of oversuppressed bone remodeling with the potential for microcrack accumulation, delayed healing, and increased stiffness. The principal concern is whether there is point at which benefit from BP therapy could turn into harm, where fracture risk increases again. This case should stimulate debate whether current adult atypical femoral fracture guidance should apply to children, and whether low-frequency, low-dose cyclical, intermittent, or oral treatment maintenance regimens should be considered on a case-by-case basis. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Audit of Atypical Femoral Fractures and a Description of Some of Their Features

PURPOSE

Atypical femoral fractures (AFF) are recently described events related to osteoporosis and, potentially, a rare result of antiresorptive treatment.

METHODS

We set out to audit the diagnosis of AFF in an acute hospital. Charts and radiographs were reviewed retrospectively from patients diagnosed with subtrochanteric femoral fractures according to hospital discharge coding at Vancouver General Hospital (VGH), Canada, from January 2005 to March 2013.

RESULTS

A total of 3084 patients were discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of hip fracture between 2005 and 2013. Of these, 204 were coded as having had subtrochanteric fractures; 178 of the patients thus coded had radiographic evidence of other fracture types-usually intertrochanteric fractures. Eleven patients did not have available radiographs. Of the remaining 193 patients whose radiographs were reviewed, 24 (12.4%) fulfilled the published criteria for AFF.

OUR OBSERVATIONS WERE

1) laterality: 13 of 24 AFF (54.2%) were right-sided; 2) there was only one incomplete AFF in this series: a completed fracture was an inclusion criterion, but 1 patient with an AFF had both that fracture and an incomplete fracture and further foci of periosteal or endosteal foci of new bone (PENB) involving the contralateral femur; 3) radiologists had only diagnosed AFF in only 1 of the 24 patients with characteristic radiographic signs of AFF; 4) all but 1 patient had a focus of periosteal and/or endosteal new bone (PENB) through which the fracture line invariably passed, and in the 1 exception the radiography was too poor to be sure of this but there was a symmetrical contralateral focus of PENB; 5) in 19 of 24 patients there was an adequate image of part of the contralateral femur and of these 12 (63%) had a contralateral focus of PENB situated ±2.5 cm from the index lesion site when measured from the upper aspect of the greater trochanter, and in another patient a prior fracture of the contralateral femur had been treated surgically and it was at a symmetrical contralateral location from the index fracture.; 6) in 3 of the 19 patients multiple foci of PENB were detected on the lateral aspect of the contralateral femur even though the examination was of limited extent; and 7) AFFs were associated with bisphosphonate medication in 75% of the patients studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital discharge coding misclassified a great majority of femoral fractures as subtrochanteric. As an essential criteria for diagnosing AFF is their subtrochanteric location, this misclassification impaired our ability to retrospectively search for AFF patients. Radiologists tended not to report AFF when typical radiographic characteristics were present. Bilateral and multifocal disease is of interest in pointing to the diagnosis and in suggesting that the mechanism of injury in respect of these unusual fractures is more complex than simple low-energy trauma.

Proceedings of the 2015 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: Clinical Applications of Scientific Advances in Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease

The 2015 Santa Fe Bone Symposium was a venue for healthcare professionals and clinical researchers to present and discuss the clinical relevance of recent advances in the science of skeletal disorders, with a focus on osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease. Symposium topics included new developments in the translation of basic bone science to improved patient care, osteoporosis treatment duration, pediatric bone disease, update of fracture risk assessment, cancer treatment-related bone loss, fracture liaison services, a review of the most significant studies of the past year, and the use of telementoring with Bone Health Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes, a force multiplier to improve the care of osteoporosis in underserved communities.

Bisphosphonates for cancer treatment: Mechanisms of action and lessons from clinical trials

A growing body of evidence points toward an important anti-cancer effect of bisphosphonates, a group of inexpensive, safe, potent, and long-term stable pharmacologicals that are widely used as osteoporosis drugs. To date, they are already used in the prevention of complications of bone metastases. Because the bisphosphonates can also reduce mortality in among other multiple myeloma, breast, and prostate cancer patients, they are now thoroughly studied in oncology. In particular, the more potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates have the potential to improve prognosis. The first part of this review will elaborate on the direct and indirect anti-tumoral effects of bisphosphonates, including induction of tumor cell apoptosis, inhibition of tumor cell adhesion and invasion, anti-angiogenesis, synergism with anti-neoplastic drugs, and enhancement of immune surveillance (e.g., through activation of γδ T cells and targeting macrophages). In the second part, we shed light on the current clinical position of bisphosphonates in the treatment of hematological and solid malignancies, as well as on ongoing and completed clinical trials investigating the therapeutic effect of bisphosphonates in cancer. Based on these recent data, the role of bisphosphonates is expected to further expand in the near future outside the field of osteoporosis and to open up new avenues in the treatment of malignancies.

The safety and tolerability profile of therapies for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

At a time when the prevalence of osteoporosis and related fractures is increasing, initiation and continuation of pharmacologic therapies for prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis have declined. This decline has been at least in part attributable to concerns about safety of these agents, such as atypical fractures with bisphosphonates and breast cancer with estrogen/progestin therapy, particularly when they are used long term by older women. However, in many cases, absolute risk of serious adverse effects is small and should be balanced against the larger potential for fracture reduction. Here, we review the safety and tolerability of available therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Taking into consideration their relative efficacy, we also provide strategies for optimization of the risk:benefit ratio.