Safety and efficacy of large balloon dilatation under fluoroscopy

Vacuum sealing drainage combined with naso-intestinal and gastric decompression tubes for the treatment of esophagogastrostomy neck fistula

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical results of the vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) combined with a naso-intestinal nutritional tube (NIT) and a gastric decompression tube (GDT) for the treatment of esophagogastrostomy neck fistula (ENF).

METHODS

From January 2018 to October 2020, twenty patients (13 men and 7 women, ages 46-72) with ENF secondary to esophagogastrostomy were treated with VSD combined with NIT and GDT. Technical and clinical success rates, the incidence of early/late complications, the time of fistula closure (TFC) and therapy-related indicators were analyzed. The Karnofsky score and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score were compared before and after triple treatment.

RESULTS

Technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 85%, respectively. Early complications occurred in 5/20 (25%) patients, and late complications occurred in 8/20 (40%) patients. The median TFC was 18 days (range 10-23). All therapy-related indicators were normalized posttreatment. The Karnofsky score and ECOG score after treatment were significantly different compared with pretreatment scores (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

VSD combined with NIT and GDT is a safe and effective strategy for ENF, while severe strictures warrant further research.

Balloon dilatation complications during esophagogastric anastomotic stricture treatment under fluoroscopy: Risk factors, prevention, and management

BACKGROUND

Balloon dilatation (BD) is a common treatment for esophagogastric anastomotic stricture (EAS), but with complications. This study investigates the risk factors, prevention, and management of BD complications to provide clinical guidance.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 378 patients with EAS treated by BD from March 2011 to June 2021. The association between esophagogastric anastomotic rupture outcome and patient and stricture characteristics and treatment were analyzed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

BD was performed 552 times and technical success, 98.0%; overall clinical success, 97.8%; major adverse events, 1.3%; minor adverse events, 9.4%; mortality, 0.3%. Logistic regression showed that age (p = 0.080), sex (p = 0.256), interval from surgery to stricture development (p = 0.817), number of dilatations (p = 0.054), cause of stricture (p ≥ 0.168), and preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.679) were not associated with anastomotic rupture. Balloon diameter (p < 0.001), preoperative radiotherapy (p = 0.003), and chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.021) were correlated with anastomotic rupture. All patients with type I and II ruptures resumed oral feeding without developing into type III rupture. Type III rupture occurred in six cases, who resumed oral feeding after 7-21 days of nasal feeding and liquid feeding. One patient died of massive bleeding after BD.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic treatment for type I and II ruptures and transnasal decompression and jejunal nutrition tubes for type III rupture, are suggested pending rupture healing. Tumor recurrence, preoperative radiotherapy, and balloon diameter affected the anastomotic rupture outcome.