Could medications and biologic factors affect post-orthodontic tooth movement changes? A systematic review of animal studies

Characteristics of Orthodontic Treatment in Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review

Background: Survival rates of cancer patients have increased globally and across age groups. Challenges arising from craniofacial growth-development disturbances and dental abnormalities might warrant modifications to standard orthodontic pathways of care. Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically summarize and critically assess the available literature regarding the characteristics of orthodontic treatment in cancer survivors. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was conducted in seven databases for studies on malignant tumor survivors having undergone orthodontic intervention with fixed appliances following cancer treatment up to August 2023. The outcomes of interest included quantitative data regarding various characteristics of orthodontic treatment and the post-treatment period. The risk of bias was assessed individually with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: Out of 347 records, 4 cohort studies were eventually included in the qualitative synthesis. Leukemia was the most common malignancy type, with treatment involving mainly chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. The duration of orthodontic treatment in cancer survivors varied. Occlusal results, quality of life, and satisfaction were comparable to healthy peers. However, in some survivors' groups, treatment was shorter and the final results were compromised. Root resorption and oral mucositis were reported among the treated cancer survivors. Reduced occlusal outcome stability during the retention period was also reported. Conclusions: Overall, the duration of orthodontic treatment varied among cancer survivors. The occlusal results achieved were similar to those of their healthy peers, though potentially less stable. Patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between cancer survivors and healthy individuals treated orthodontically.

Influence of risedronate on orthodontic tooth movement in rodents: a systematic review and case report

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonates have an inhibitory impact on osteoclastic activity, reducing bone resorption. However, the influence of risedronate on tooth movement is not well-defined.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review assessed the effect of risedronate intake on orthodontic tooth movement. A case report was also provided.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers searched six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, Lilacs, Scopus, and Open Grey). The searches were carried out in April/2020, and an update was set in place in June/2023. Therefore, the searches considered a timeline from the databases' inception date until June/2023, with no publication date and/or language restrictions. The clinical question focused on evaluating the orthodontic tooth movement and relapse movement (Outcome) in animals (Population) exposed to risedronate (Exposure), compared to control groups (Comparison). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were applied, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020168581). The risk of bias was determined using the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation protocol (SYRCLE).

RESULTS

Two studies in rats and one in guinea pigs were included in the systematic review. The studies reported a decrease in orthodontic tooth movement, a reduction in the relapse movement, and a reduced number of positive tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) cells, with a significantly reduced number of bone gaps after the administration of risedronate in rats. A case report illustrated the effects of risedronate administration in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Based on the systematic review, risedronate seems to impair orthodontic tooth movement and relapse due to a decrease in bone resorption cells.

Direct 3D-Printed Orthodontic Retainers. A Systematic Review

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has shed light on many fields in medicine and dentistry, including orthodontics. Direct 3D-printed prosthetics, implants or surgical devices are well-documented. The fabrication of orthodontic retainers using CAD technology and additive manufacturing is an emerging trend but the available data are scarce. The research approach of the present review included keywords in Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar up to December 2022. The searching process concluded with five studies eligible for our project. Three of them investigated directly 3D-printed clear retainers in vitro. The other two studies investigated directly 3D-printed fixed retainers. Among them, one study was in vitro and the second was a prospective clinical trial. Directly 3D-printed retainers can be evolved over time as a good alternative to all the conventional materials for retention. Devices that are 3D-printed are more time and cost efficient, offer more comfortable procedures for both practitioners and patients and the materials used in additive manufacturing can solve aesthetic problems, periodontal issues or problems with the interference of these materials with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). More well-designed prospective clinical trials are necessary for more evaluable results.

Tissue Engineering Supporting Regenerative Strategies to Enhance Clinical Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics: A Scoping, Perspective Review

The personalized regenerative therapeutic strategies applicable in the structural and functional repair of maxillofacial/dental defects are expected to extend beyond the limits of what is currently possible in the management of dentofacial anomalies and treating malocclusions. The application of undifferentiated stem cells (SCs), including signaling molecule control and individualized tissue engineering based on targeted therapies, has been proposed to overcome therapeutic limitations and complications associated with treatments for craniofacial defects, including severe orthodontic discrepancies. This scoping, prospective review discusses comprehensively the current knowledge and prospects for improving clinical outcomes by the application of novel cell-required and cell-free regenerative strategies in biomedicine. The existing evidence, although scant, suggests that patients receiving an orthodontic treatment could benefit from precise tissue augmentation, allowing enhancement of tooth movement generated by orthognathic forces; faster, more predictable alignment of dental arches; optimal management of periodontal complications; and prevention of external root resorption. Ultimately, enriching orofacial tissues and “customizing” the repair of congenital/acquired defects in the craniofacial region can be vastly enhanced to provide a positive therapeutic outcome and improve patients’ quality of life.

Dynamics and observations of long-term orthodontic tooth movement and subsequent relapse in C57BL/6 mice

The risk of relapse associated with orthodontic treatment is a major problem. Despite extensive research and discussion regarding the risk of orthodontic relapse, the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate relapse following orthodontic treatment in mice (C57BL/6) tested via the coil spring method based on tooth movement at 21 days and mechanical retention at 7 days after completion of the procedure. During the experiment, relapse was observed and evaluated over 7 days. At the end of orthodontic tooth movement, the average distance was 259.6 (± 10.9) µm, and tooth movement was observed in all mice. No significant differences in distance were observed at the end of the experimental treatment period or after 7 days of mechanical retention. The distance at the start of observation was 258.6 (± 10.4) µm, whereas that at the end was 155.4 (± 12.4) µm, indicating that the distance had decreased significantly. Relative to the total relapse distance over the 7-day period, 45.7 (± 4.3)% of the relapse was observed on Day 0-1. The mouse model established in the current study provides an effective and reproducible method for the optimal evaluation of relapse. Our findings clarified that most of the relapse occurs within 7 days during the initial observation stage.

May alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks affect the rate of orthodontic tooth movement? A systematic review of animal studies

BACKGROUND

Humans may consume various beverages in everyday life. Previous research has shown that the administration of different substances (medicinal or not) may affect bone turnover and, thus, orthodontic tooth movement. It would be anticipated that the substances contained in beverages could have an impact on tooth movement, as well.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate in a systematic way and appraise the quality of the available evidence from animal studies regarding the impact of various drinks or the main ingredients included in beverages on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement.

SEARCH METHODS

Search without restriction in six databases (including grey literature) and hand searching were performed until March 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We looked for controlled animal studies investigating the effect of drinks, or the main ingredients included in beverages, on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

After study retrieval and selection, relevant data was extracted, and the risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE's Risk of Bias Tool. The quality of available evidence was assessed with the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.

RESULTS

The initially identified records were finally reduced to nine studies conducted on animals. Carbonated soft drinks were shown to decrease the rate of tooth movement, but alcohol consumption did not have an impact. Exploratory meta-analysis showed that caffeine exhibited an acceleratory effect after 3 weeks of force application. Exploratory meta-regression results indicated that high dosages of caffeine reduced the rate of tooth movement.

CONCLUSIONS

The located animal experiments reported that caffeine accelerates, carbonated drinks decelerate, while alcohol does not affect the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. However, due to various limitations it remains unclear whether caffeine, alcohol, or carbonated drinks finally influence tooth movement in animal studies.

REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/jyhbd/).

Does exogenous female sex hormone administration affect the rate of tooth movement and root resorption? A systematic review of animal studies

Background

The long-term use of contraceptive methods that contain estrogens, progestogens or combinations of the above among women aged 15 to 49 years is extensive. Both estrogens and progestogens affect bone metabolism.

Objective

To systematically investigate and appraise the quality of the available evidence from animal studies regarding the impact of exogenous administration of female sex hormones on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and root resorption.

Search methods

Search without restriction in seven databases (including grey literature) and hand searching were performed until May 2021.

Selection criteria

We looked for controlled animal studies investigating the effect from exogenous administration of formulations containing female sex hormones on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and root resorption.

Data collection and analysis

After study retrieval and selection, relevant data was extracted, and the risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE’s Risk of Bias Tool. The quality of available evidence was assessed with the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.

Results

Three studies were identified, all being at unclear risk of bias. Overall, administration of progesterone and the combinations of estradiol with norgestrel and desogestrel were shown to significantly decrease the rate of orthodontic tooth movement when given for longer periods (>3 weeks). Inconsistent information was detected for shorter periods of consumption. Estradiol, with desogestrel use, resulted in less root resorption. The quality of the available evidence was considered to be low.

Conclusions

Exogenous administration of female sex hormones may decelerate in the long term the rate of tooth movement and decrease orthodontically induced root resorption in animals. Until more information becomes available, an orthodontist should be able to identify a patient consuming such substances and understand the potential clinical implications and adverse effects that may arise.

Registration

PROSPERO: CRD42017078208; https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

The rationale for orthodontic retention: piecing together the jigsaw

Retaining teeth in their corrected positions following orthodontic treatment is one of the most challenging aspects of orthodontic practice. Despite much research, the rationale for retention is not entirely clear. Teeth tend to revert to their pre-treatment positions due to periodontal and gingival, soft tissue, occlusal and growth factors. Changes may also follow normal dentofacial ageing and are unpredictable with great variability. In this overview, each of these factors are discussed with their implications for retention, along with adjunctive procedures to minimise relapse. The state of current knowledge, methods used to assess relapse, factors regarded as predictive of or associated with stability as well as overcorrection are outlined. Potential areas requiring further investigation are suggested. The way in which the clinician may manage current retention practice, with a need for individualised retention plans and selective retainer wear, is also considered.

Orthodontic retention: what's on the horizon?

Orthodontic retention remains one of the great challenges in orthodontics. In this article, we discuss what is on the horizon to help address this challenge, including biological approaches to reduce relapse, treating patients without using retainers, technological developments, personalised medicine and the impact of COVID-19 on approaches to orthodontic retention.