Pan Y, Wei L, Zheng Z, Bi W. An evaluation of bone depth at different three-dimensional paths in infrazygomatic crest region for miniscrew insertion: A cone beam computed tomography study.
Heliyon 2024;
10:e25827. [PMID:
38352741 PMCID:
PMC10863323 DOI:
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25827]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the difference and distribution of bone depth at different three-dimensional simulated paths to help optimize the insertion path for miniscrew placement in the infrazygomatic crest.
Methods
Cone beam computed tomography scans of 80 adults (38 males and 42 females; mean age, 27.0 years) were assessed. For each subject, bone depth of 81 simulated insertion paths at different insertion points and three-dimensional angulations was measured in 160 infrazygomatic crests; the differences were evaluated using the adjusted Friedman test. The bone deficiency ratio for each path was calculated. Distributions of measurements were analyzed and reported as specially designed colormaps.
Results
Bone depth increased, and bone deficiency ratio reduced mesially to distally (P < 0.001), apically to coronally (P < 0.01), and at a greater gingival and distal inclination (P < 0.05). The maximum bone depth (10.72 mm) was observed 13 mm above the maxillary occlusal plane in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary second molar. The minimum bone depth (3.4 mm) was observed 17 mm above the maxillary occlusal plane in the distobuccal root of the maxillary first molar. No bone deficiency was detected at the paths of 13 mm above the maxillary occlusal plane at a gingival inclination of 70° and distal inclination of 30° in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary second molar. The highest bone deficiency ratio is present 17 mm above the maxillary occlusal plane at a gingival inclination of 60° and a distal inclination of 0° in the distobuccal root of the maxillary first molar (89/160).
Conclusion
Insertion paths located at 13 mm above the maxillary occlusal plane in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary second molar were optimal. A gingival inclination of 70° and a distal inclination of 30° could be beneficial. The distobuccal root of the maxillary first molar region or above the 17 mm insertion plane may not be recommended.
Collapse