Assessing the corneal power change after refractive surgery using Scheimpflug imaging

Comparison of Corneal Power Difference Maps with Achieved Myopic Correction Using Scheimpflug Tomography After LASIK, PRK, and SMILE

Purpose

To compare corneal power difference maps (∆maps) obtained from the Pentacam in patients with 1 year follow-up after LASIK, PRK, and SMILE with further stratification to low, moderate, and high myopia.

Patients and methods

This retrospective study was comprised of patients who had preoperative and 1-year postoperative power maps that were obtained-front sagittal (SagF), refractive power (RP), true net power (TNP), and total corneal refractive power (TCRP)-for evaluation. Measurements were recorded and compared at the 4mm, 5mm and 6mm pupil and apex zones. Comparisons were made between each specific power ∆map and the surgically induced refractive change (SIRC). Further analysis of the ∆maps was performed based on degree of myopia (high, moderate, and low). Correlation and agreement were also assessed with regression and limits of agreement (LoA).

Results

There were 172 eyes in the LASIK group, 187 eyes in the PRK group, and 46 eyes in the SMILE group. In the LASIK group, TNP ∆map at 5mm pupil zone had the least absolute mean difference with SIRC (0.007 ± 0.42D). In the PRK group, TNP ∆map at 5mm apex zone was most accurate compared to SIRC (0.066 ± 0.45D). In the SMILE group, TCRP ∆map at 4mm apex zone had the closest absolute value when compared to SIRC (0.011 ± 0.50D). There was good correlation and agreement for all three surgery groups, LASIK: r = 0.975, LoA -0.83D to +0.83D, PRK: r = 0.96, LoA -0.83D and +0.95D, and SMILE: r = 0.922, LoA -0.97 D to +0.99D.

Conclusion

TNP ∆maps most accurately measured corneal power in the LASIK and PRK groups while TCRP ∆maps were most accurate in the SMILE group. The degree of myopia may change which ∆map is most accurate.

Methods of Corneal Vertex Centration and Evaluation of Effective Optical Zone in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

Inappropriate small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) centration methods can affect the decentration of the effective optical zone (EOZ) after operation, which can subsequently lead to the decline of postoperative visual quality. We aimed to provide an overview of corneal vertex (CV) centration methods and an evaluation of the size and decentration of the EOZ in SMILE. We described the CV centration methods for patients with myopia, myopic astigmatism, hyperopia, and large kappa angle. The measurement methods of the EOZ were evaluated from the aspects of corneal morphology and corneal refractive power. Additionally, we summarized the advantages and disadvantages of measuring decentration based on topographic mapping and intraoperative video-captured images. Finally, we discussed the relationship between the EOZ and visual quality. Based on our review, clinicians should consider the following when choosing CV centration methods and evaluating EOZ postoperatively. First, the tear film mark center or topographic map comparison method is preferred for the correction of myopia, low myopic astigmatism, hyperopia, and large kappa angle (>0.2 mm). Triple marking centration is recommended for high myopic astigmatism (-3.5 diopters). Second, the total corneal power better reflects the change in refractive power than the topographic method. The measurement of the area rather than the diameter of the total corneal refractive power is more suitable for the evaluation of noncircular EOZs after high myopia astigmatism (<-2.0 diopters). Third, for the evaluation of decentration, the tangential curvature difference map method is preferred as it is not influenced by offset pupils. Finally, a large EOZ after SMILE may improve patient tolerance to decentration.

The effects of programmed optical zones on achieved corneal refractive power with myopic astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a vector analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of different programmed optical zones (POZs) on achieved corneal refractive power (CRP) with myopic astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

In total, 113 patients (113 eyes) were included in this retrospective study. The eyes were divided into two groups according to POZ: group A (6.5, 6.6, and 6.7 mm, n = 59) and group B (6.8, 6.9, and 7.0 mm, n = 54). Fourier vector analysis was applied to evaluate the error values between the attempted and achieved corneal refractive power (CRP). Alpins vector analysis was used to calculate surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), difference vector (DV), magnitude of error (ME), and astigmatism correction index (ACI). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess potential factors associated with the error values.

RESULTS

The error values in the group with large POZ were closer to zero, and significantly associated with the POZ at 2 and 4 mm of the cornea (β =  - 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] [- 0.80, - 0.20]; β =  - 0.37, 95% CI [- 0.63, - 0.10], P < 0.05, respectively). For the correction of astigmatism, the values of SIA, ME, and ACI were lower in group B than in group A (P < 0.05). The fitting curves between TIA and SIA were y = 0.83x + 0.19 (R² = 0.84) and y = 1.05x + 0.04 (R² = 0.90), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Smaller POZs resulted in higher error values between the achieved- and attempted-CRP in the SMILE procedure, which should be considered when performing surgery.

Evaluation of the Effects of Myopic Astigmatism Correction and Anterior Corneal Curvature on Functional Optical Zone After SMILE

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of different degrees of myopic astigmatism correction and preoperative anterior corneal curvature on the functional optical zone (FOZ) following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 68 patients (106 eyes) treated with SMILE were grouped according to myopic astigmatism correction: control (0.00 diopters [D]), moderate astigmatism (-0.50 to -2.00 D), and high astigmatism (> -2.00 D). The FOZ was measured and compared between the three groups for 3 months. Correlations between attempted correction, anterior corneal curvature, corneal aberrations, and the FOZ were analyzed.

RESULTS

The preoperative mean treatment spherical equivalent was comparable among the three groups. The average FOZ was 5.06 ± 0.24 mm in the control group, 5.19 ± 0.25 mm in the moderate astigmatism group, and 5.35 ± 0.20 mm in the high astigmatism group The FOZ showed statistically significant differences among the three groups (P < .001), particularly between the high astigmatism group and the other two groups (P < .001 and .018). Correlation analysis showed that the total higher order aberrations, coma, and spherical aberration change were correlated with the FOZ (P < .001). Preoperative steep keratometry, average keratometry, and corneal astigmatism were significantly correlated with the FOZ (P < .05). The correlation remained after excluding the influence of attempted correction on the FOZ (P < .05). After adjusting for other risk factors using multiple linear regression analysis, there was still a significant positive association between preoperative steep keratometry and the FOZ (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with higher myopic astigmatism achieved a larger FOZ and less induced horizontal coma than the control and moderate astigmatism groups. A larger FOZ after SMILE can be achieved in eyes with steeper keratometry. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(2):135-141.].

Comparison between the change in total corneal astigmatism and actual change in refractive astigmatism in transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK), laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FsLASIK)

PURPOSE

To compare changes in astigmatism by refraction and total corneal astigmatism after tPRK, LASIK and FsLASIK.

SETTING

Specialty Eye Hospital Svjetlost, Zagreb, Croatia.

DESIGN

Partially masked, semi-randomized, prospective, case-by-case, interventional, clinical study.

METHODS

Patients with a stable refraction (-0.75DS to -8.00DS, astigmatism ≤1.00DC) underwent tPRK, LASIK or FsLASIK without complication. Astigmatism was measured at both corneal surfaces over the central 3.2 mm zone (approximately using Pentacam HR^TM) preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Pentacam and refraction data were subjected to vector analysis to calculate the surgically induced changes in i) total corneal astigmatism (SIA_TCA) ii) any astigmatism by refraction (SIA_R) and the vectorial difference (DV) between SIA_TCA and SIA_R.

RESULTS

Reporting key findings (p < .01), there was a significant difference between mean SIA_TCA and SIA_R powers after tPRK (75eyes) but not after LASIK (100eyes) or FsLASIK (100eyes). Mean (±sd,95% CIs) values for DV powers were, tPRK -1.13DC(±0.71, -1.29 to -0.97), LASIK -0.39DC(±0.23,-0.44 to -0.34), FsLASIK -0.55DC(±0.38,-0.62 to -0.47). The differences were significant. For the tPRK and FsLASIK cases, linear regression revealed significant associations between I) SIA_TCA (x) &DV (z) powers (tPRK z = 1.586x-0.179, r  =  0.767, p < .01; FsLASIK z  =  0.442x-0.303, r  =  .484,p < .01), II) sines of SIA_TCA (x₁) &DV (z₁) axes (tPRK, z₁ = 0.523 × ₁ + 0.394, r = .650,p < .01; FsLASIK z₁ = 0.460 × ₁-0.308, r = .465,p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

tPRK is more prone to unintended changes in astigmatism. The difference between SIA_TCA & SIA_R after tPRK or FsLASIK is mediated by SIA_TCA. Photoablating deeper regions of the cornea reduces the gap between SIA_TCA & SIA_R.

7-Year Results of SMILE for High Myopia: Visual and Refractive Outcomes and Aberrations

PURPOSE

To evaluate the 7-year visual, refractive, and optical outcomes following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia and myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

Sixty-nine eyes (69 patients) undergoing SMILE between March 2011 and January 2012 at Aarhus University Hospital were included. Preoperative, 3-month, 3-year, and 7-year evaluation included: manifest refraction and uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, total corneal refractive power (TCRP), average keratometry (Km), aberrations, and central corneal thickness (CCT).

RESULTS

Preoperative spherical equivalent averaged -7.53 ± 1.18 diopters (D). Twenty-seven eyes were targeted emmetropia. In the emmetropic eyes, the postoperative logMAR UDVA remained stable (P = .11). When including all eyes, UDVA became worse from 3 to 7 years (3 months: 0.050 ± 0.16 logMAR; 3 years: 0.044 ± 0.21 logMAR; 7 years: 0.131 ± 0.29 logMAR; P < .027), whereas CDVA remained stable (3 months: -0.07 ± 0.09 logMAR; 3 years: -0.09 ± 0.08 logMAR; 7 years: -0.09 ± 0.08 logMAR, P > .99). At 7 years, 59.4% and 81.2% were within ±0.50 and ±1.00 D of target refraction, respectively. Average refractive regression was significant from 3 months to 7 years (-0.34 ± 0.69 D) and from 3 to 7 years (-0.25 ± 0.41 D, P < .05). After exclusion of three outliers with high myopic correction (< 9.63 D) and considerable regression (<-1.50 D), the average regression over 7 years was -0.25 ± 0.49 D (P = .004) with no significant change from 3 to 7 years (P = .069). Average CCT, TCRP, and anterior Km significantly increased (P < .001), whereas the posterior Km and total corneal aberrations remained stable (P > .092).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term visual outcome remained stable after SMILE, but with an average regression of -0.34 D over 7 years. A minor group with high myopic correction exhibited considerable refractive regression years after SMILE. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(10):654-661.].

Scheimpflug analysis of corneal power changes after hyperopic small incision lenticule extraction

Purpose

To assess the ability of the Pentacam in predicting the corneal power after hyperopic small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

Twenty-five eyes of 22 patients underwent hyperopic SMILE were prospectively followed. All patients finished at least 6 months visit. Cornea power was obtained by Pentacam HR, in the format of mean keratometry (Km), equivalent keratometry (EKR) and total cornea refractive power (TCRP). Calculation of TCRP were centered on either the corneal apex or the pupil center within a ring or zone, giving a total of four different subtypes naming AR、AZ、PR、PZ. Clinical history method (CHM) was regarded as a gold standard and was compared with other cornea power parameters.

Results

Center difference had no impact on the TCRP values (PR vs AR and PZ vs AZ, P > 0.05). Compared with CHM, no difference was found in Km, EKR 4.0 mm, EKR 4.5 mm, PR 3.0 mm, PR 4.0 mm, AR 3.0 mm and AR 4.0 mm. PR 4.0 mm showed the least difference with CHM (− 0.14 ± 1.03D, P > 0.05). The 95% limit of agreement (LOA) of the TCRPs and CHM was not close. The top two were PR 3.0 mm and PR 4.0 mm, LOA of which were − 2.20 to 1.84 D and − 2.18 to 1.68 D respectively. Central cornea thickness was correlated with error (TCRP – CHM) of PR 4.0 mm (r = 0.58, P = 0.003).

Conclusions

The Pentacam topographer is an alternative method of measuring corneal power in eyes after hyperopic SMILE. The optimal options seem to be the TCRP (PR 4.0 mm). The agreement needs more verifications.

Astigmatism prediction in small-incision lenticule extraction

PURPOSE

To investigate whether postoperative-induced refractive astigmatism after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) could be predicted by preoperative objective astigmatism measured with autorefraction, keratometry, and Scheimpflug tomography.

SETTING

University eye clinic.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Only eyes without preoperative subjective astigmatism treated with SMILE for myopia were included. Postoperative subjective astigmatism was compared with preoperative objective astigmatism. Examinations were performed before SMILE and 3 months postoperatively and included subjective refraction, keratometry, autorefraction, and Scheimpflug tomographer measurements. Astigmatism was analyzed using double-angle plots and multivariate statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 358 eyes of 358 patients were included. The mean preoperative sphere was -7.33 diopter (D) ± 1.46 (SD). The postoperative spherical equivalent was -0.30 ± 0.49 D. Postoperatively, 79.6% and 98.9% of patients had a subjective cylinder ≤0.50 D and ≤1.00 D, respectively. Preoperative objective astigmatism measured with keratometry, autorefraction, and Scheimpflug tomography was significantly different (P < .05) from postoperative subjective refraction when all patients were analyzed; for patients with postoperative refractive astigmatism ≥0.50 D, preoperative astigmatism with keratometry and Scheimpflug tomography was not significantly different from postoperative refractive astigmatism. Preoperative objective astigmatism ≥0.50 D increased the risk ratio of postoperative subjective astigmatism ≥0.50 D by 2.2 (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative objective astigmatism could not be directly interchanged with postoperative subjective astigmatism, but the presence of preoperative astigmatism ≥0.50 D doubled the risk of inducing a postoperative subjective astigmatism ≥0.50 D. Extra care when performing subjective refraction should be taken in the presence of high objective astigmatism.

Intrastromal Lenticule Rotation for Treatment of Astigmatism Up to 10.00 Diopters Ex Vivo in Human Corneas

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of intrastromal lenticule rotation (ISLR) as a novel technique for management of astigmatism up to 10.00 diopters (D).

METHODS

Eighteen human donor corneas were mounted on an artificial anterior chamber. After laser application and dissection, the lenticule was rotated 90° in the intrastromal pocket. Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam HR; Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) was acquired preoperatively and following ISLR. The attempted astigmatic correction was twice the cylindrical magnitude of the lenticule referenced to the corneal plane: 4.80 D (5.00 D group, n = 9) and 9.32 D (10.00 D group, n = 9), respectively. The change in keratometric astigmatism was evaluated by vector analysis.

RESULTS

In the 5.00 D group, ISLR caused a mean absolute surgical induced astigmatism (SIA) of 5.30 ± 1.14 D with a correction index (CI) of 1.14 ± 0.25 and an angle of error (AoE) of -0.80° ± 4.61°. In the 10.00 D group, the SIA averaged 9.57 ± 1.10 D with a CI of 1.03 ± 0.12 and an AoE of 2.75° ± 3.60°. The average total corneal refractive power (TCRP) increased 1.36 ± 0.67 and 1.95 ± 1.57 D in the 5.00 D and 10.00 D groups, respectively. Postoperative optical coherence tomography revealed stromal redistribution in the periphery of the optical zone with tissue addition in the preoperative steep meridian and tissue reduction in the preoperative flat meridian.

CONCLUSIONS

ISLR seemed feasible and precise for management of regular astigmatism up to 10.00 D ex vivo in human donor corneas. A myopic shift was observed in TCRP. The in vivo corneal remodeling after ISLR warrants investigation. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(7):451-458.].

Comprehensive evaluation of total corneal refractive power by ray tracing in predicting corneal power in eyes after small incision lenticule extraction

PURPOSE

To assess the prediction accuracy of four variations of total corneal refractive power (TCRP) by the ray tracing method in determining corneal power in eyes after myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

Forty eyes of forty patients who had undergone myopic SMILE were enrolled in this prospective study. Manifest refraction and Pentacam HR were performed preoperatively and three months or more postoperatively. Mean keratometry (Km), true net power (TNP), equivalent keratometry readings (EKR) and 4 subtypes of TCRP (pupil centered or apex centered within a ring or a zone)-TCRPpupil,ring, TCRPpupil,zone, TCRPapex,ring and TCRPapex,zone-were recorded and compared to the theoretical postoperative keratometry value using the clinical history method (CHM).

RESULTS

The only keratometric values that showed no statistically significant differences from the CHM were 4.0 mm and 4.5 mm EKR, 6.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone and TCRPapex,zone. Pearson's correlation test revealed that 4.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone exhibited the highest correlation coefficient (r = 0.974) followed by TCRPapex,zone 4.0 mm (0.972) and EKR 4.5 mm (0.970). The 95% limits of agreement (LOA) of the 4.0 mm EKR and CHM, the 4.5 mm EKR and CHM, the 6.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone and CHM, the 6.0 mm TCRPapex,zone and CHM were (-1.27 to 1.22 D), (-1.04 to 0.98 D), (-1.39 to 1.08 D) and (-1.38 to 0.96 D), respectively, while the modified 4.0 mm TCRPpupil,zone (TCRPpuil,zone + 0.70 D) and TCRPapex,zone (TCRPapex,zone+0.70 D) yielded the narrowest 95% LOA of (-0.96 to 0.95 D) and (-0.96D, 1.05 D).

CONCLUSIONS

Total corneal refractive power using the ray tracing method could predict corrected corneal power derived from the CHM in eyes following SMILE surgery after simple modification.

Comparative study of wave-front aberration and corneal Asphericity after SMILE and LASEK for myopia: a short and long term study

Background

The study compares the wave-front aberration and corneal asphericity from multiple perspectives after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratomileusis for mild to moderate myopia in a short and long time period.

Methods

This prospective and comparative study included 32 eyes in the SMILE group, with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of − 4.1 ± 0.9D and 32 eyes in the LASEK group, with a mean SE of − 3.7 ± 1.0D. Visual acuity, refractive error, wave-front aberration, corneal Q value and corneal refractive power were analyzed pre-, 3 months and 3 years post-operatively.

Results

There was no significant difference in refractive error, wave-front aberration, corneal Q value and corneal refractive power before treatment. Three months postoperative, Q value within 6 mm (SMILE: 0.46 ± 0.27, LASEK: 0.63 ± 0.28, p = 0.02), the relative peripheral corneal power (5-8 mm: p < 0.05), change of higher order aberration (SMILE: 0.10 ± 0.16, LASEK: 0.24 ± 0.20, p = 0.004) and spherical aberration (SA, SMILE: -0.07 ± 0.30, LASEK: -0.41 ± 0.40, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the SMILE than in LASEK group. The visual acuity, refractive error, coma, peripheral Q value, central corneal power had no significant difference between the two groups. Three years post-operation, the corneal power distribution results and SA were similar to that of 3-month, while the Q value had no significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusion

In the early stage after SMILE, the HOAs was lower, the corneal refractive power from central to periphery was more uniform than after LASEK; and in the long-term run, SMILE still preceded LASEK in the corneal asphericity and aberration.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12886-019-1084-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Surgically induced astigmatism in canines following sutured dorsonasal vs dorsotemporal clear corneal incisions

OBJECTIVES

To investigate use of the Pentacam® HR for evaluation of surgically induced corneal astigmatism (SIA) in canines undergoing bilateral phacoemulsification and determine differences between dorsonasal and dorsotemporal clear corneal incisions.

ANIMALS

Client-owned canines undergoing bilateral phacoemulsification.

PROCEDURES

Patients received anterior segment imaging pre-operatively, immediately post-operatively, and 2-4 months post-operatively (follow-up). Total corneal refractive power was used to determine SIA. Surgically induced astigmatism was compared between right and left eyes, representing dorsotemporal and dorsonasal incisions, respectively. Repeated measures analyses were used between time points and paired t test compared SIA between eyes.

RESULTS

Complete imaging series were obtained for seven patients. Follow-up imaging occurred at a median of 112 days (range 60-132 days) post-operatively. For repeated measures analyses, significant differences were found between pre- and immediate post-operative values (P < 0.01), and between immediate post-operative and follow-up values (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between pre-operative and follow-up values. Surgically induced astigmatism was significantly different between right and left eyes, with values of 2.01 ± 1.24 D and 3.05 ± 1.58 D at 3 mm radius (P < 0.05), and 2.04 ± 1.18 D and 3.06 ± 1.27 D at 4 mm radius (P < 0.05) for dorsotemporal and dorsonasal incisions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary investigation revealed improvement of corneal SIA 2-4 months post-operatively, but development of significantly more SIA in dorsonasal vs dorsotemporal incisions. This prompts consideration of patient or microscope rotation to create a more dorsotemporal incision when possible.

Agreement of post-LASIK corneal power and corneal thickness measurements by pentacam and GALILEI corneal tomography systems

BACKGROUND

Post-LASIK corneal conditions cannot be accurately measured by traditional optometric approaches. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the agreement of two rotating Scheimpflug cameras in corneal assessment.

METHODS

Fifty otherwise healthy volunteers who had undergone LASIK were recruited in this study. The values of mean and central total corneal power (TCP), including TCP1, TCP2, and TCP-IOL, were measured by GALILEI Scheimpflug camera. The values of total corneal refractive power (TCRP) readings at both 2 mm ring and 3 and 4 mm zones were detected by Pentacam Scheimpflug camera. Central corneal thickness (CCT) and thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) were quantified by GALILEI and Pentacam respectively. Paired t-tests and Bland-Altman analyses were used to evaluate statistical differences between measurement results obtained by GALILEI and by Pentacam.

RESULTS

Among these 50 subjects, the mean and central TCP1 values (37.31 ± 2.61 and 37.27 ± 2.64) derived from GALILEI measurements were consistent with the TCRP values (37.08 ± 2.76, 37.11 ± 2.74, and 37.19 ± 2.68; p > 0.05) determined by Pentacam at the 2 mm ring apex, 3 mm zone apex, and 4 mm zone apex. There were no statistically significant differences in central corneal thickness (CCT) values measured by the two cameras (463.64 ± 55.67 μm for GALILEI and 470.69 ± 44.04 μm for Pentacam, respectively; p > 0.05). However, the limits of agreement were wide when comparing mean TCP1 (-1.4 to 1.8 D, -1.4 to 1.8 D, and -1.3 to 1.6 D), central TCP1 (-1.2 to 1.6 D, -1.2 to 1.6 D, and -1.2 to 1.4 D) and CCT (-77.2-63.0 μm).

CONCLUSION

Corneal power and corneal thickness are disparate post-LASIK evaluation parameters when comparing the utility of GALILEI with that of Pentacam.

Corneal power changes with Scheimpflug rotating camera after hyperopic LASIK

To evaluate surgically induced refractive change (SIRC) by manifest refraction and corneal power changes using an automated keratometer and Scheimpflug rotating camera, and to find the best keratometric measurements reflecting SIRC after hyperopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).This retrospective study included 18 eyes of 18 patients undergoing hyperopic LASIK using the Schwind Amaris 750S excimer laser. All measurements were performed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Cycloplegic manifest refractions were performed and keratometric measurements were obtained via an RK-5 automated keratometer and a Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera. Sim K, true net power (TNP), and total corneal refractive power (TCRP) at 2.0 to 5.0 mm were analyzed using a Scheimpflug camera.The mean manifest refractive changes in the spherical equivalent (SE) at the corneal plane were 2.32 ± 1.65 D at 12 months postoperatively. The refractive power changes by the automated keratometer and Sim K were significantly less than SIRC (P = .043 and P = .048, respectively). Both TNP and the TCRP in the 5.0 mm zone produced lesser mean differences with SIRC (0.05 D and 0.06 D) and showed closer agreements with SIRC on Bland-Altman plots and higher correlation coefficients with SIRC.Corneal power measured on the anterior corneal surface underestimated SIRC. TCRP at the 5.0 mm zone provided by a Pentacam Scheimpflug camera reflected the SIRC accurately and precisely, and would be applicable for prediction of intraocular power before cataract surgery and follow-up measurement of corneal refractive power.

Functional Optical Zone After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction as Stratified by Attempted Correction and Optical Zone

PURPOSE

To compare the functional optical zone (OZ) with different levels of myopia and different OZ groups after small-incision lenticule extraction.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 249 patients (120 men) after small-incision lenticule extraction correction. We grouped participants according to attempted correction [low: spherical equivalent (SE) > -3.0 D; moderate: -6.0 D ≥ SE ≥ -3.0 D; high: SE ≥ -6.0 D] and planned functional optical zone (PFOZ) (OZ-1: PFOZ ≤ 6.3 mm; OZ-2: 6.3 mm < PFOZ ≤ 6.5; OZ-3: PFOZ > 6.5 mm), and we compared the achieved functional optical zone (AFOZ) and total corneal aberration, using Scheimpflug imaging, 1 month postoperatively. Correlations between corneal aberration and AFOZ were analyzed.

RESULTS

The AFOZ was smaller than the PFOZ in all 3 refraction groups (reduction: low, 0.78 ± 0.72 mm; moderate, 1.22 ± 0.60 mm; and high: 1.49 ± 0.58 mm, P < 0.001). There was no difference in the AFOZ among the 3 OZ groups. Total corneal aberration increased more in the high myopia group (total higher-order aberration, coma, and spherical aberration, P < 0.001), which also correlated with the AFOZ.

CONCLUSIONS

The discrepancy between the AFOZ and PFOZ increased with greater attempted correction. Attempted correction and AFOZ influence corneal aberration.

Biological Lenticule Implantation for Correction of Hyperopia: An Ex Vivo Study in Human Corneas

PURPOSE

To evaluate changes in corneal tomography after stromal lenticule implantation ex vivo, with respect to the dependency of the lenticule thickness and implantation depth on the corneal curvature and the postoperative biomechanical strength at increased chamber pressure.

METHODS

Twenty-eight human donor corneas underwent pocket implantation of refractive stromal lenticules. Four groups were created by the combination of two implantation depths (110 and 160 µm) and two lenticule thicknesses (95 µm = 4.00 diopters [D], 150 µm = 8.00 D). Sagittal keratometry and total corneal refractive power (TCRP_{4mm,apex,zone}) were obtained for the front and back curvature with Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) at chamber pressures of 15 and 40 mm Hg.

RESULTS

The anterior curvature steepening was comparable between the 4.00 D and 8.00 D groups (P > .141), but more pronounced with 110 µm implantation depth (P < .038). The posterior curvature flattened significantly more after implantation of 8.00 D than 4.00 D lenticules (P < .002), but was similar at 110 and 160 µm implantation depths (P > .071). Average ΔTCRP for the 4.00 D and 8.00 D groups was 3.10 ± 0.60 and 5.30 ± 1.66 diopters (D) at 110-µm depth, respectively (P = .003), but 1.99 ± 0.79 and 3.36 ± 1.45 D at 160-µm depth, respectively (P = .066). The relative correction achieved was 66% to 78% at 110-µm depth and 42% to 50% at 160-µm depth, but similar when using 4.00 D and 8.00 D lenticules. Increased chamber pressure caused significant anterior and posterior curvature steepening after implantation in all four groups (P < .001), but not before implantation (P > .632).

CONCLUSIONS

The power of the implanted lenticule must be higher than the intended correction, and customized to the chosen implantation depth. Biomechanical strength seems to decrease after lenticule implantation. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(4):245-252.].

Calculations of actual corneal astigmatism using total corneal refractive power before and after myopic keratorefractive surgery

Purpose

To calculate actual corneal astigmatism using the total corneal refractive astigmatism for the 4-mm apex zone of the Pentacam (TCRP4astig) and keratometric astigmatism (Kastig) before and after photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis

Methods

Uncomplicated 56 eyes after more than 6 months from the surgery were recruited by chart review. Various corneal astigmatisms were measured using the Pentacam and autokeratometer before and after surgery. Three eyes were excluded and 53 eyes of 38 subjects with with-the-rule astigmatism (WTR) were finally included. The astigmatisms were investigated using polar value analysis. When TCRP4astig was set as an actual astigmatism, the efficacy of arithmetic or coefficient adjustment of Kastig was evaluated using bivariate analysis.

Results

The difference between the simulated keratometer astigmatism of the Pentacam (SimKastig) and Kastig was strongly correlated with the difference between TCRP4astig and Kastig. TCRP4astig was different from Kastig in magnitude rather than meridian before and after surgery; the preoperative difference was due to the posterior cornea only; however, the postoperative difference was observed in both anterior and posterior parts. For arithmetic adjustment, 0.28 D and 0.27 D were subtracted from the preoperative and postoperative magnitudes of Kastig, respectively. For coefficient adjustment, the preoperative and postoperative magnitudes of Kastig were multiplied by 0.80 and 0.66, respectively. By arithmetic or coefficient adjustment, the difference between TCRP4astig and adjusted Kastig would be less than 0.75 D in magnitude for 95% of cases.

Conclusions

Kastig was successfully adjusted to TCPR4astig before and after myopic keratorefractive surgery in cases of WTR. For use of TCRP4astig directly, SimKastig and Kastig should be matched.

Comparison of Corneal Power and Astigmatism between Simulated Keratometry, True Net Power, and Total Corneal Refractive Power before and after SMILE Surgery

Purpose. To compare the mean corneal power (Km) and total astigmatism (Ka) estimated by three methods: simulated keratometry (simK), true net power (TNP), and total corneal refractive power (TCRP) before and after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery. Methods. A retrospective, cross-sectional study. SimK, TNP, and TCRP from a Scheimpflug analyzer were obtained from 144 patients before and 6 months after SMILE surgery. Km and Ka were recorded as the mean of individual paracentral rings of 1.0 to 8.0 mm (R1 to R8). The surgically induced changes in Km (delta-simK, delta-TNP, and delta-TCRP) and Ka (delta-simKa, delta-TNPa, and delta-TCRPa) were compared to the changes in spherical equivalent of the cycloplegic refraction (delta-SE) and astigmatism (delta-RA). Results. Preoperatively, astigmatism values were greatest with simKa from R1 to R5 and greatest with TCRPa from R6 to R8. Astigmatism values were smallest with TNPa from R1 to R7. Postoperatively, astigmatism values were greatest with simKa from R1 to R5 and greatest with TCRPa from R6 to R8. Delta-TCRP₃ and Delta-TCRP₄ matched delta-SE most closely, and delta-TCRPa₃ matched delta-RA most closely. Conclusions. TCRP proved to be the most accurate method in estimating corneal power and astigmatism both before and after SMILE surgery.

Corneal powers measured with a rotating Scheimpflug camera

BACKGROUND/AIM

Keratometry measures the anterior corneal curvature only. Corneal power is calculated by multiplication with the keratometric refractive index, which takes into account the average negative posterior corneal power. The aim of this study was to calculate and compare various expressions for total corneal power assessed with Scheimpflug camera techniques, which also measure the posterior corneal curvature.

METHODS

We used the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera to measure the equivalent power, total corneal refractive power (based on Snell's law ray tracing), and simulated keratometry (keratometric refractive index=1.3375) over the central 3.0 mm zone in 951 eyes. The keratometric refractive index of the equivalent power and the total corneal refractive power was calculated as the ratio between these values and the anterior corneal curvature.

RESULTS

The equivalent power, total corneal refractive power, and simulated keratometry all differed statistically significantly (analysis of variance, p<0.001) and averaged 42.26 (±1.46) dioptres (D), 42.78 (±1.51) D and 43.42 (±1.49) D. The calculated keratometric refractive indices for equivalent and total corneal refractive power averaged 1.3284 (±0.0009) and 1.3324 (±0.0015). The error of using these calculated keratometric refractive indices rather than the measured values for equivalent and total corneal refractive power averaged 0 (±0.11 D) and -0.01 D (±0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Pentacam rotating camera assessment of total corneal power over the central 3.0 mm zone differed significantly for simulated keratometry, equivalent power and Snell's law ray tracing.