The relationship between baseline axial length and axial elongation in myopic children undergoing orthokeratology

Clinical Investigation of Short-Term Axial Elongation Control After Orthokeratology Lens Correction: Exploring Its Predictive Role in Long-Term Therapeutic Efficacy

OBJECTIVE

This study was developed with the goal of exploring the efficacy of orthokeratology (OK) as an approach to controlling axial length (AL) growth and identifying factors predictive of the long-term efficacy of this approach.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study that enrolled 157 myopic children 7 to 15 years of age undergoing OK correction for over 3 years. The short- and long-term effectiveness of this approach at 1 and 3 years post-OK correction, respectively, was assessed. All participants were classified into two groups based on whether they exhibited good or poor long-term efficacy outcomes. Measurements of changes in AL were made at baseline and at 1 and 3 years post-OK. Univariate analyses and binary logistic regression approaches were used to evaluate baseline age, baseline spherical equivalent refraction, baseline keratometry (K) values of flat and steep meridians, and short-term effectiveness with the goal of identifying predictors of long-term efficacy.

RESULTS

Univariate analyses led to the identification of significant differences in baseline age, baseline spherical equivalent refraction, baseline AL, and short-term efficacy between these two groups (P<0.05), whereas gender, baseline flat K, and baseline steep K did not differ significantly (P>0.05). In binary logistic regression analyses, baseline AL (P=0.017) and short-term efficacy (P<0.001) were both found to significantly influence long-term efficacy. Receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated that short-term efficacy offered an area under the curve value >0.8, consistent with its highly accurate performance as a predictor of long-term efficacy.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that short-term efficacy outcomes can feasibly be used to predict the long-term effectiveness of OK correction in children. In patients exhibiting poor short-term efficacy, timely replacement or the incorporation of additional treatment modalities may aid efforts to better control the progression of myopia.

Different efficacy in myopia control: Comparison between orthokeratology and defocus-incorporated multiple segment lenses

PURPOSE

To compare the efficiency of orthokeratology (OK) and defocus-incorporated multiple segment (DIMS) lenses in myopia control in children.

METHODS

This prospective study involved 540 subjects (7-14 years) categorized into three groups: DIMS lenses (180 cases), OK lenses (180 cases), or single-vision spectacles (SVS) (180 cases). After a one-year follow-up, changes in axial length (AL) and differences among the groups were analyzed. The subjects were further divided into a low myopia degree subgroup (LM, -1.50 D ≤ SE ≤ -0.50 D), a moderate myopia degree subgroup (MM, -3.00 D ≤ SE ＜ -1.50 D), and a high myopia degree subgroup (HM, -5.00 D ≤ SE ＜ -3.00 D). A one-way ANOVA and multiple linear regression analysis were used to compare AL elongation and the factors influencing the different groups.

RESULTS

A total of 496 (92 %) subjects completed the study. The mean AL change in the OK lenses, DIMS lenses, and SVS were 0.20±0.18 mm, 0.30±0.22 mm, and 0.38±0.19 mm, respectively (P < 0.001). In the LM subgroup, the OK and DIMS groups showed similar AL changes, but both exhibited slower changes than the SVS group (P = 0.001). In the MM and HM subgroups, the OK lens performed the shortest AL elongation compared with the DIMS lenses and SVS (P < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed that the AL change was associated with age (β = -0.038 and P = 0.005), initial AL (β = -0.010 and P = 0.011), initial SE (β = 0.028 and P = 0.007), and interventions using OK lenses (β = -0.172 and P = 0.020) and DIMS lenses (β = -0.089 and P = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

Over a one-year treatment period, OK and DIMS lenses can significantly retard AL elongation compared with SVS. In addition, the OK lenses were more effective than the DIMS lenses in controlling AL in patients with higher degrees of myopia.

Relative corneal refractive power shift and inter-eye differential axial growth in children with myopic anisometropia treated with bilateral orthokeratology

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between relative corneal refractive power shift (RCRPS) and axial length growth (ALG) in bilateral myopic anisometropes treated with orthokeratology.

METHODS

A total of 102 children with myopic anisometropia in this prospective interventional study were randomly assigned to the spectacle group and orthokeratology group. Axial length (AL) and corneal topography was measured at baseline and the 12-month follow-up visit. ALG was defined as the difference between the two measurements, and RCRPS profiles were calculated from two axial maps obtained.

RESULTS

In the orthokeratology group, the ALG in the more myopic eye (0.06 ± 0.15 mm) was significantly smaller than that in the less myopic eye (0.15 ± 0.15 mm, p < 0.001), and the interocular difference in AL significantly decreased following 1-year treatment, from 0.47 ± 0.32 to 0.38 ± 0.28 mm (p < 0.001). However, in the spectacle group, the ALG was similar between the two eyes, and the interocular difference in AL did not change significantly over one year (all p > 0.05). The interocular difference in ALG in the orthokeratology group was significantly correlated with the interocular difference in RCRPS (dRCRPS, β=-0.003, p < 0.001) and the interocular difference in baseline AL (β=-0.1179, p < 0.001), with R2 being 0.6197.

CONCLUSION

Orthokeratology was effective in decreasing the magnitude of anisometropia. The interocular variation in RCRPS is an important factor accounting for the reduction of interocular ALG difference in anisomyopic children post-orthokeratology. These results provide insight into establishing eye-specific myopia control guidelines during orthokeratology treatment for myopic anisometropes.

Sleep Quality is Associated with Axial Length Elongation in Myopic Children Receiving Orthokeratology: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

To identify potential demographic and lifestyle factors associated with progression of myopia with orthokeratology (ortho-k) treatment via follow-up of axial length (AL).

Methods

In this retrospective observational study, demographics, ocular parameters, near-work distance, outdoor activities, and sleep quality were analyzed in 134 children with myopia aged 8~15 years using ortho-k and a follow-up for one year.

Results

Compared with the slow progression group, the participants in the fast progression group were younger in age (10.55 ±1.70 years vs 9.90 ±1.18 years, P = 0.009), demonstrated higher spherical equivalent (SE) value (-2.52 ±0.63 diopters (D) vs -3.05 ±0.89 D, P < 0.001), shorter near-work distance (P = 0.010), and poorer sleep quality (Pittsburgh sleep quality index [PSQI], 4.79 ±1.29 vs 3.81 ±1.38, P < 0.001) in the one-year follow-up. Furthermore, multivariate linear regression analyses showed that baseline age (B =-0.020, P = 0.020), SE (B = 0.0517, P < 0.001), and total PSQI (B=0.026, P = 0.001) were associated with axial elongation. Advanced logistic regression analyses demonstrated that shorter average near-work distance (P = 0.034), higher SE value (P = 0.023), and poorer sleep quality (P = 0.003) were associated with fast axial elongation.

Conclusion

Sleep quality is one of the key factors associated with axial elongation in children with myopia after using ortho-k for one year. Further studies are required to confirm this observation and expand its practical applications.

Comparison of two different orthokeratology lenses and defocus incorporated soft contact (DISC) lens in controlling myopia progression

BACKGROUND

To compare axial elongation in 8-11-year-old myopes wearing orthokeratology (OK) lenses with different back optic zone diameters (BOZD), defocus incorporated soft contact (DISC) lenses, and single-vision soft contact lenses (SCLs).

METHODS

A total of 122 children (aged 8-11 years) with spherical equivalent refraction (SER) between - 1.00 D and - 4.00 D were enrolled in this prospective study and randomly assigned to four groups: 5.0 mm-BOZD OK, 6.2 mm-BOZD OK, DISC, and single-vision SCLs. Children in each group were further divided into subgroups stratified by the average baseline SER: low myopic eyes (SER: - 1.00 D to - 2.50 D) and moderate myopic eyes (SER: - 2.50 D and over). Axial length (AL) was measured at baseline and after one year.

RESULTS

The 5.0 mm-BOZD OK, 6.2 mm-BOZD OK, and DISC groups exhibited significantly slower AL elongation than the SCL group. The proportion of slow progressors (AL elongation ≤ 0.18 mm/year) in the first three groups was 42%, 23%, and 29%, respectively. Furthermore, one-year AL elongation was significantly smaller in the 5.0 mm-BOZD OK group compared with the 6.2 mm-BOZD OK group. Regardless of SER, children in the 5.0 mm-BOZD OK and DISC groups showed comparably slower AL elongation than those in the SCL group. However, fitting with 6.2 mm-BOZD OK lenses significantly retarded AL elongation in moderate myopic eyes, but not in low myopic eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 5.0 mm-BOZD OK lenses, 6.2 mm-BOZD OK lenses, and DISC lenses were effective in retarding AL elongation in 8-11-year-old myopes compared with single-vision SCLs, but for children with SER less than - 2.50 D, fitting with 5.0 mm-BOZD OK lenses and DISC lenses yielded better myopia control efficacy compared to wearing single-vision SCLs or 6.2 mm-BOZD OK lenses.

Efficacy of the Euclid orthokeratology lens in slowing axial elongation

PURPOSE

The Euclid Emerald lens designs for orthokeratology have been available in global markets for over 20 years and is used extensively by clinicians for slowing myopia progression in children. This paper comprehensively reviews data from published studies of the efficacy of this lens.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic search was performed in March 2023 using Medline with the following search terms: orthokeratology AND myopi* AND (axial or elong*) NOT (review or meta).

RESULTS

The original search identified 189 articles, of which 140 reported axial elongation. Of those, 49 reported data on the Euclid Emerald design. Unique axial elongation data could be extracted from 37 papers-14 of which included an untreated control group. Among these, the mean 12-month efficacy-the difference in axial elongation between orthokeratology wearers and controls-was 0.18 mm (range: 0.05-0.29 mm), and the mean 24-month efficacy was 0.28 mm (range: 0.17-0.38 mm). The orthokeratology wearers in 23 studies without an untreated comparison group showed similar axial elongation to those in the 14 studies with a control group. For example, the mean 12-month axial elongation for the studies with controls was 0.20 ± 0.06 mm compared with 0.20 ± 0.07 mm for the studies without controls.

CONCLUSIONS

This extensive body of literature on a single device for myopia control is unique and demonstrates the efficacy of this design in slowing axial elongation in myopic children.

Retrospective Analysis of Axial Length Changes in Overnight Orthokeratology in an Academic Myopia Control Clinic

SIGNIFICANCE

Although the myopia control efficacy of orthokeratology lenses has been established with clinical trials, reports of axial length change in non-study-based patient care are scarce. This study investigates the use of orthokeratology lenses for myopia control in a clinical population and compares axial elongation against those published in recent clinical investigations.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate factors affecting axial elongation during use of orthokeratology lenses for myopia control in an academic clinical setting.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective consecutive case series from the Myopia Control Clinic at the Herbert Wertheim School of Optometry at the University of California, Berkeley (Berkeley, CA). Patients ranging from 5 to 18 years old using orthokeratology for at least 1 year were included in the study. Data from 102 patients' eyes were analyzed at baseline (before the initiation of treatment) and after 1 year of wear (12 ± 3 months). Multivariate analysis was undertaken to identify factors significantly associated with axial elongation over this period.

RESULTS

Mean (±standard deviation) spherical equivalent refraction and axial length at baseline were -2.54 (±1.21) D and 24.53 (±0.82) mm, respectively. By the 1-year follow-up, eyes had shown significant axial elongation (0.18 ± 0.24 mm; P < .001), which was found to be inversely correlated with age ( P < .001). Race, sex, baseline axial length, and baseline refraction were not significantly associated with axial elongation.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors influencing axial length and the magnitude of axial elongation in our orthokeratology patient population are consistent with orthokeratology treatment groups from published randomized clinical trials and support the use of these lenses for myopia control in a clinical practice setting.