Feasibility and repeatability of ocular biometry measured with IOLMaster 700 in a large population-based study

Suitability of multifunction devices Myah and Myopia Master for monitoring myopia progression in children and adults

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of using multifunction instruments to measure axial length for monitoring myopia progression in children and adults.

METHODS

Axial length was measured in 60 children (aged 6-18 years) and 60 adults (aged 19-50 years) with multifunction instruments (Myah and Myopia Master) and stand-alone biometers (Lenstar LS900 and IOLMaster 700). Repeatability (measurements by the same examiner) and reproducibility (measurements by different examiners) were computed as the within-subject standard deviation (Sw) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA). Inter-instrument agreement was computed as intraclass correlation coefficients. The threshold for detecting myopic progression was taken as 0.1 mm. Measures were repeated only in children following the administration of 1% tropicamide to determine the impact of cycloplegia on axial length.

RESULTS

Overall, the IOLMaster 700 had the best repeatability in children (0.014 mm) and adults (0.009 mm). Repeatability Sw values for all devices ranged from 0.005 to 0.021 mm (children) and 0.003 to 0.016 mm (adults). In children, reproducibility fell within 0.1 mm 95% of the time for the Myah, Myopia Master and IOLMaster 700. Agreement among all devices was classified as excellent (ICC 0.999; 95% CI 0.998-0.999), but the 95% LoA among the Myah, Myopia Master and Lenstar LS900 was ≥0.1 mm. Cycloplegia had no statistically significant effect on axial length (all p > 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

The Myah and Myopia Master multifunction instruments demonstrated good repeatability and reproducibility, and their accuracy was comparable to stand-alone biometers. Axial length measurements using different instruments can be considered interchangeable but should be compared with some caution. Accurate axial length measurements can be obtained without cycloplegia. The multifunction instruments Myah and Myopia Master are as well suited for monitoring myopia progression in children as the stand-alone biometers IOLMaster 700 and Lenstar LS900.

Current Concepts and Recent Updates of Optical Biometry- A Comprehensive Review

One of the most recent advancements in the field of cataract surgery is optical biometry. With the advent of optical biometry ocular measurements are now simpler, quicker, and more precise. The devices have made intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations easier in difficult situations too, such as in cases with extremes of axial lengths, silicone filled eyes, cataract surgery in post-keratoplasty eyes, post Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) eyes, etc. The gold standard for IOL power calculation in the present day is by the use of optical biometry devices. The anatomical measurements by these devices are highly precise and because of these measurements and the incorporation of various IOL power calculation formulas the optical biometry devices give the accurate power and the post-operative visual outcome is highly satisfactory among the patients. The growing use of these devices has made cataract the most commonly performed refractive surgical procedure nowadays. In the current scenario, optical biometry has widespread acceptance in almost all countries and has many advantages over ultrasound or immersion biometry. Cataract surgeons can obtain easy and reliable measurements from these devices. Refractive surprises have also decreased considerably with their use. This article will comprehensively review the principles of the various optical biometry devices, the parameters used in each of the devices, the advantages and disadvantages, and add more like what all this article will add.

Biometry challenges in the longest eyes we have encountered to date

Purpose

This report aims to present biometry challenges and solutions for a patient with the longest eyes we have encountered to date.

Observations

A 41-year-old woman with a history of Crouzon syndrome, extreme axial myopia, and posterior segment staphylomas was referred for cataract evaluation. Optical biometry was attempted using two partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry devices that were available in 2011. Neither device could measure the axial length (AL) of either eye, unfortunately. We were able to measure them by A scan ultrasound, however, with results of 40.59 mm for the right eye and 38.29 mm for the left eye. Shortly thereafter, she underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation under topical anesthesia. Twelve years later, she returned for repeat optical biometry with 3 newer generation devices, 2 of which utilized swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). Only 1 SS-OCT device, the Argos biometer, was able to obtain AL measurements, and they were 40.54 mm and 40.84 mm for the right and left eyes, respectively.

Conclusions and importance

Biometry measurement using optical biometers on a patient with ALs greater than 40 mm was impossible in 2011 because of the relatively short gate for acceptable readings. Ultrasound biometry can also be challenging due to the presence of posterior staphylomas. However, a newer SS-OCT with a longer AL measurement capability enabled readings to be obtained more recently.

Repeatability and agreement of the MYAH and Lenstar

SIGNIFICANCE

Validation of new biometry instruments against the gold standard and establishing repeatability are important before being utilized for clinical and research applications.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate intersession repeatability of the MYAH optical biometer and corneal topographer and examine agreement with the Lenstar LS900 optical biometer in healthy young adults.

METHODS

Forty participants (mean age, 25.2 ± 3.1 years) presented for two visits, 2 to 4 days apart. At each visit, measurements for right eyes were collected with the MYAH and Lenstar LS 900 and included axial length, corneal power, white-to-white distance, and pupil diameter. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the intrasession agreement between the MYAH and Lenstar for each parameter and intersession repeatability for the two devices. For each device, coefficient of variation and intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated, and paired t tests between visits were performed to assess intersession repeatability.

RESULTS

Good agreement (mean difference [95% limits of agreement]) between the MYAH and Lenstar was found for axial length (-0.01 [-0.07 to 0.04] mm), corneal power (-0.02 D [-0.15 to 0.19 d]), white-to-white distance (-0.13 [-0.43 to 0.17] mm), and pupil diameter (-0.27 [-0.79 to 1.33] mm). The limits of agreement, coefficient of variations, and intraclass correlation coefficients for MYAH-measured parameters were -0.04 to 0.04, 0.06%, and >0.99 for axial length; -0.24 to 0.19, 0.18%, and >0.99 for corneal power; -1.05 to 1.15, 0.57%, and 0.96 for white-to-white distance; and -0.17 to 0.21, 7.0%, and 0.76 for pupil diameter, with no significant difference between visits (p>0.05 for all), indicating good intersession repeatability. Similar intersession repeatability was also noted for Lenstar.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings show good intersession repeatability of the MYAH and good agreement with the Lenstar for axial length, corneal power, and white-to-white distance in young adults. Pupil diameter was more variable, likely due to the dynamic nature of the pupil. This study provides validation and supports the use of the MYAH for ocular biometry.

Repeatability and Agreement of Chord Mu between Scheimpflug Tomography and Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography

PURPOSE

To evaluate repeatability and agreement of chord mu between Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam HR) and sweptsource optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer (IOLMaster 700).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 63 eyes from 33 patients were included. Chord mu, X and Y Cartesian distances between the corneal vertex and the pupil center (Px and Py), and the pupil diameter were compared using two instruments. Repeatability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CoV), and within-subject standard deviation (Sw). Interdevice agreement was evaluated using paired t-tests and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

Although Sw values for all parameters were similar between the two devices, CoV values of chord mu and pupil diameter were lower, and ICC values of those parameters were higher, in the IOLMaster 700 than in the Pentacam HR. Chord mu and pupil diameter values were higher in IOLMaster 700 than Pentacam HR (p < 0.01). The width of the 95% limit of agreement was wide for all parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

IOLMaster 700 showed better repeatability than Pentacam HR in chord mu, Px, Py, and pupil diameter values. Because there were statistically significant differences and a low level of agreement in chord mu and pupil diameter values between the two devices, they cannot be used interchangeably.