Comparison of AO Titanium Locking Plate and Screw Fixation versus Anterograde Intramedullary Fixation for Isolated Unstable Metacarpal and Phalangeal Fractures

Comparison of Intramedullary Screw Fixation, Plating, and K-Wires for Metacarpal Fracture Fixation: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Metacarpal fractures are common injuries with multiple options for fixation. Our purpose was to compare outcomes in metacarpal fractures treated with intramedullary screw fixation (IMF), Kirschner wires (K-wires), or plating.

METHODS

A systematic literature review using the MEDLINE database was performed for studies investigating metacarpal fractures treated with IMF, plating, or K-wires. We identified 34 studies (9 IMF, 8 plating, 17 K-wires). A meta-analysis using both mixed and fixed effects models was performed. Outcome measures included mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, total active motion (TAM), grip strength, time to radiographic healing, and rates of infection and reoperation.

RESULTS

Patients with IMF had significantly lower DASH scores (0.6 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-1.0]) compared with K-wires (7.4 [4.8-9.9]) and plating (9.8 [5.3-14.3]). Intramedullary screw fixation also had significantly lower rates of reoperation (4%, [2%-7%]), compared with K-wires (11% [7%-16%]) and plating (11% [0.07-0.17]). Grip strength was significantly higher in IMF (104.4% [97.0-111.8]) compared with K-wires (88.5%, [88.3-88.7]) and plating (90.3%, [85.4-95.2]). Mean odds ratio time was similar between IMF (21.0 minutes [10.4-31.6]) and K-wires (20.8 minutes [14.0-27.6]), but both were shorter compared with plating (52.6 minutes [33.1-72.1]). There were no statistically significant differences in time to radiographic healing, TAM, or rates of reoperation or infection.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis compared the outcomes of metacarpal fixation with IMF, K-wires, or plating. Intramedullary screw fixation provided statistically significant lower DASH scores, higher grip strength, and lower rates of reoperation, suggesting that it is a comparable method of fixation to K-wires and plating for metacarpal fractures.

[Translated article] Closed reduction and intramedullary fixation of fifth metacarpal neck fractures: Retrograde vs. anterograde technique. Prospective study

INTRODUCTION

The fifth metacarpal fracture is a frequent pathology that can cause deformity and functional impairment for the adequate grip of the hand. Reintegration into daily or working activities is related to the treatment received and rehabilitation. In fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal, internal fixation with a Kirschner's wire is a conventional treatment method with variants that affect its outcome.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To compare the functional and clinical results of the treatment of fifth metacarpal fracture with the use of retrograde vs. antegrade Kirschner wires.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Comparative, longitudinal, prospective study at a third-level trauma centre in patients with a fifth metacarpal neck fracture, with clinical, radiographic and Quick DASH scale follow-up at the 3rd, 6th, and 8th postoperative week.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included (58 men, 2 women), age of 29.63±10.15 years, with a fifth metacarpal fracture, treated by closed reduction and stabilisation with a Kirschner wire. The antegrade approach showed a metacarpophalangeal flexion range at 8 weeks of 89.11° (p<0.001; 95% CI [-26.81; -11.42]), a DASH scale value of 18.17 (p<0.001; 95% CI [23.45; 39.12]), and an average of 27.35 days to return to work (p=0.002; 95% CI [16.22; 62.14]), compared with the retrograde approach.

CONCLUSION

Stabilisation with antegrade Kirschner wire showed superior functional results, and metacarpophalangeal range of motion, compared to those operated via retrograde approach.

Closed reduction and intramedullary fixation of fifth metacarpal neck fractures: Retrograde vs. anterograde technique. Prospective study

INTRODUCTION

The fifth metacarpal fracture is a frequent pathology that can cause deformity and functional impairment for the adequate grip of the hand. Reintegration into daily or working activities is related to the treatment received and rehabilitation. In fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal, internal fixation with a Kirschner's wire is a conventional treatment method with variants that affect its outcome.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To compare the functional and clinical results of the treatment of fifth metacarpal fracture with the use of retrograde versus antegrade Kirschner wires.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Comparative, longitudinal, prospective study at a third-level trauma center in patients with a fifth metacarpal neck fracture, with clinical, radiographic and Quick DASH scale follow-up at the 3rd, 6th, and 8th postoperative week.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included (58 men, 2 women), age of 29.63±10.15 years, with a fifth metacarpal fracture, treated by closed reduction and stabilization with a Kirschner wire. The antegrade approach showed a metacarpophalangeal flexion range at 8 weeks of 89.11° (p<0.001; 95% CI [-26.81; -11.42]), a DASH scale value of 18.17 (p<0.001; 95% CI [23.45; 39.12]), and an average of 27.35 days to return to work (p=0.002; 95% CI [16.22; 62.14]), compared with the retrograde approach.

CONCLUSION

Stabilization with antegrade Kirschner wire showed superior functional results, and metacarpophalangeal range of motion, compared to those operated via retrograde approach.

Cost Comparison of Kirschner Wire Versus Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Metacarpal and Phalangeal Fractures

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary screw fixation is a relatively new technique for fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. The objective of this study was to compare health care-associated costs and outcomes for intramedullary screw versus Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation of hand fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing intramedullary screw fixation of hand fractures at a single center during 2016-2019 inclusive was conducted. Health care-associated costs were compared with age-matched and fracture pattern-matched controls who underwent K-wire fixation.

RESULTS

Fifty patients met the study inclusion criteria, incorporating 62 fractures (29 K-wire, 33 intramedullary screw fixation). The median age was 34.6 years (18.0-90.1 years). There was no significant difference in primary operative costs (£1130.4 ± £162.7 for K-wire vs £1087.0 ± £104.2 for intramedullary screw), outpatient follow-up costs (£958.7 ± £149.4 for K-wire vs £782.4 ± £143.8 for intramedullary screw), or total health care-associated costs (£2089.1 ± £209.0 for K-wire vs £1869.4 ± £195.3 for intramedullary screw). However, follow-up costs were significantly lower for the uncomplicated intramedullary screw cohort (£847.1 ± £109.1 for K-wire vs £657.5 ± £130.8 for intramedullary screw, P = .05). Subgroup analysis also revealed that overall costs were significantly higher for buried K-wire techniques. Complication rates, time to return to active work, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified significantly lower outpatient follow-up costs for uncomplicated intramedullary screw fixation of hand fractures compared with K-wires, along with a trend toward lower overall health care-associated costs. In addition, buried K-wire techniques were also found to carry a significantly higher financial burden. Higher powered prospective studies are required to determine indirect costs.

Biomechanical analysis of locking plates for fixation of metacarpal shaft fractures: A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

There appears to be a paucity of knowledge about the biomechanics of locking plates for the fixation of metacarpal shaft fractures. A thorough understanding of the biomechanics of locking plates is needed to apply them correctly, optimize outcomes, and avoid complications. The purpose of this study is to investigate the biomechanics of the fixation of metacarpal fractures using locking plate-screw constructs with different numbers of screws.

HYPOTHESIS

The difference in the number of screws in the locking plate influenced the biomechanical outcome of the metacarpal fracture.

METHODS

Finite element models of third metacarpal fractures with locking plate-screw constructs were established, and the magnitude and distribution of their stresses and displacements were investigated when a vertical load of 100N was applied.

RESULTS

For the metacarpal fracture with a locking plate and screws, the stress in the metacarpal was largely shared by the plate-screw construct. For the plate-screw construct, the stress is concentrated in the area close to the fracture line, and the 6-screw Group has the lowest failure risk since it has the lowest plate stress and the second-lowest screw stress. The implant-bone construct with 8 screws has better biomechanical stability because of minimal displacement, but increased stress on both the metacarpal bone and the screws, leading to increased failure rates.

DISCUSSION

The stresses in the metacarpal were mostly shared by the plate-screw constructs and the screws closest to the fracture line were the most likely to break or loosen. For the implant-bone constructs, the locking plate with 2 screws was the most vulnerable to break or loosen, whereas the locking plate with 6 screws was the least likely to break or loosen. The implant-bone construct with 8 screws had better biomechanical stability, but the stresses in both the metacarpal and the screws were increased, which increased the risk of failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, basic science study.

Corrective osteotomy for distal condylar malunion of the proximal phalanx in adolescents: comparison of K-wire and locking plate fixation

This retrospective study reviewed 28 patients, aged 10 to 17 years, who underwent corrective osteotomy for malunion of the proximal phalangeal distal condyles at a mean of 9 weeks (range 2-52) from injury. There were 19 patients treated with K-wire and nine patients with locking plates. The two groups were comparable for trauma mechanism, fracture type, time delay from injury and the type of initial treatment. The K-wire group had a shorter duration of operation and shorter time to union than the plating group. For both groups, postoperative radiographs showed significant correction, which remained unchanged until the final follow-up (minimum 12 months), although greater residual coronal angulation was found in the K-wire group. The outcomes in 17 of the 28 patients were graded as excellent or good according to the Al-Qattan classification, with no difference between the groups. The complication rate was also similar between the groups, while the locking plate group had a higher rate of secondary surgery.Level of evidence: III.

Intramedullary Headless Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Fractures: A Radiographic Analysis for Optimal Screw Choice

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate variations in radiographic metacarpal anatomy as it relates to intramedullary (IM) fixation of metacarpal fractures and to compare this anatomy with available headless screw dimensions. Methods: We radiographically analyzed posteroanterior and lateral (LAT) radiographs of 120 metacarpals across 30 patients without structural abnormalities. Primary outcomes included IM isthmus diameter, isthmus location, metacarpal cascade, and head entry point collinear with IM canal. Measurements were compared with a list of commercially available headless screws used for IM fixation. Results: The average largest isthmus diameter was in the small metacarpal (3.4 mm), followed by the index (2.8 mm), long (2.7 mm), and ring (2.7 mm) metacarpals. The average cascade angle between long and index, long and ring, and long and small metacarpals was 0°, 24°, and 27°, respectively. The appropriate head entry point ranged between 25% and 35% from the dorsal surface of the metacarpal head on a LAT view. The retrograde isthmus location of the index and long finger was 39.2 and 38.1 mm, respectively. Twenty-five screws from 7 manufacturers were analyzed with sizes ranging from 1.7 to 4.5 mm. Only 8 of 17 screws between 2.3 and 3.5 mm had a length range above 35 mm. Conclusions: Metacarpal head entry point and cascade angle can help identify the appropriate reduction with the guide pin starting point in the dorsal 25% to 35% of the metacarpal head. Surgeons should be mindful to choose the appropriate fixation system in light of the variations between metacarpal isthmus size, isthmus location, and available screw lengths.

Effect of Joint Use of External Minifixator and Titanium Lockplate on Total Active Motion Range and Hand Function Recovery in Comminuted Metacarpal and Phalanx Fracture Patients

Objective

To explore the effect of joint use of external minifixator and titanium lockplate on total active motion (TAM) range and hand function recovery in comminuted metacarpal and phalanx fracture patients.

Methods

The medical data of 70 patients with comminuted metacarpal and phalanx fracture treated in our hospital from June 2017 to June 2020 were screened for the retrospective study, and the patients were divided into the control group (Kirschner wire internal fixation) and the study group (an external minifixator with titanium lockplate) according to the treatment modalities, with 35 cases each. After treatment, the clinical efficacy of patients was compared between the two groups.

Results

No between-group differences in patients' general data were observed (P > 0.05); the time for hospital stay and fracture healing was obviously shorter in the study group than that in the control group (P < 0.05); after treatment, the study group obtained significantly higher TAM range good rate (P < 0.05), significantly higher Carroll hand function test pass rate (P < 0.05), and obviously better grip strength of both hands and score on digital opposition of thumb than those in the control group (P < 0.05); and after surgery, the study group had significantly lower incidence rates of complications such as infection, local inflammation, displacement of bone, and adhesion of tendon that those in the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Joint use of an external minifixator and titanium lockplate can effectively promote the TAM range and accelerate hand function recovery for comminuted metacarpal and phalanx fracture patients and is conducive to reducing the incidence of postoperative complications, which is safe and has significant efficacy.

Management of extra-articular shaft fractures of the non-thumb metacarpals: plate-screw fixation versus K-wire fixation

Metacarpal fractures are common injuries and comprise nearly 36% to 42% of all fractures in the hand. The majority of these can be managed non-surgically. Operative fixation when needed, can be done by a variety of techniques. In this study, we have compared the outcomes of two techniques, plate-screw fixation and K-wire fixation. We have conducted a prospective, non-randomized, comparative study of patients who presented with extra-articular metacarpal shaft fractures of non-thumb metacarpals over a period of 18 months. 30 patients were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria and were alternately allotted to the plate-screw group and the K-wire group. At admission, patient demographics, clinical features, number of fractures, and fracture patterns were recorded, and radiographs were taken. In the plate-screw group, low-profile plates and screws were used, and in the K-wire group, 1 or 2 K-wires were used for fixation after fracture reduction. Hand mobilization exercises were started within one week in the plate-screw group, while in the K-wire group full mobilization was allowed at 4 weeks post-surgery. The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was calculated and compared between the two groups at 6 months and 12 months after surgery. The mean 6-month DASH score in the plate-screw group was 6.3287±2.2453, while it was 17.1627±6.2103 in the K-wire group (p value <0.001). At the end of 1-year follow-up, the mean DASH score in the plate-screw group was 5.1080±1.6637, and in the K-wire group, it was 5.1073±1.9392 (p value =0.848). In conclusion, extra-articular metacarpal shaft fractures of the non-thumb metacarpals treated by plate-screw fixation had significantly better DASH scores and hence better functional outcomes at the end of 6 months. However, at the end of 1 year, the DASH scores in both the groups were almost similar, suggesting similar functional outcomes in the long term.

Intramedullary percutaneous fixation of metacarpal fractures: screw versus connected K-wires

The purpose of the present study was to determine clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients treated with limited-open retrograde intramedullary headless screw fixation for metacarpal neck and shaft fractures (group I) versus percutaneous antegrade and retrograde intramedullary double pinning linked by a connector (group II). We designed a retrospective comparative study, with the inclusion of two groups (20 patients each) of metacarpal unstable fractures. Both groups showed similar outcomes at the final follow-up, except for extension lag (significantly better in group II) and return to sport (significantly better in group I). Intramedullary screw fixation did not accelerate bone union and range of motion recovery in the early follow-up. In conclusion, limited-open retrograde intramedullary headless screw fixation and percutaneous connected antegrade and retrograde intramedullary double pinning are both reliable techniques of fixation for metacarpal neck and shaft fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Retrograde intramedullary headless compression screws for treatment of extra-articular thumb metacarpal base fractures

The purpose of the study was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of extra-articular fractures involving the base of the thumb metacarpal treated with fixation using a retrograde intramedullary cannulated headless screw. A review of prospectively collected data was conducted on a consecutive series of 13 patients, treated with headless screw fixation for acute displaced fractures. All workers resumed full duties, while non-workers returned to unlimited leisure activities within a mean of 42 days. At 3 months follow-up, all range of motion measurements in the treated and untreated thumb were similar. Mean visual analogue pain score was 0.8 at rest and 1.4 during exercise and mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 5. All patients achieved radiographic union by 8 weeks. We conclude that the intramedullary headless screw fixation is safe and reliable for base of thumb metacarpal fractures, allowing for early postoperative motion and good functional recovery. Level of evidence: IV.

Comparison of Miniplate and K-wire in the Treatment of Metacarpal and Phalangeal Fractures

Introduction

Metacarpal and phalangeal fractures are common upper limb fractures due to direct blows, axial loading, and torsional loading injuries. The universal goal in treating all fractures for the patient to achieve normal motion, but the ideal technique for stabilization is still debated. For internal fixation, Kirschner wires (K-wires) or miniplates can be used, and each carries certain advantages. No previous study has compared K-wire use to miniplate use in treating metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. Therefore, we conducted this randomized control trial to evaluate the outcomes of K-wire and miniplate use in treating metacarpal and phalangeal fractures.

Materials and methods

This randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, from February 2017 to February 2018. Seventy-five patients were included in this study and randomly assigned into two groups. One group was treated with K-wire fixation, and the other group was treated with miniplate fixation. We assessed total active motion (TAM), range of motion (ROM), duration of injury, and complication rate. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). P values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Mean surgical time, pain scale, and time of union of K-wire treated patients was 38.63±3.64 minutes, 4.17±1.11, and 12.95±3.38 weeks, respectively. The success of the union was noted in 38 K-wire patients (95%). Total active ROM was greater in miniplate fixation patients compared with K-wire treated patients, but this difference was statistically significant. Similarly, TAM was also greater in the miniplate fixation patients compared to the K-wire treated patients, but this difference was also not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Both K-wire fixation and miniplate fixation are equally effective in terms of TAM, ROM, and complications when used to treat metacarpal and phalangeal fractures.

Transverse and oblique fractures of the diaphysis of the fifth metacarpal: surgical outcomes for antegrade intramedullary pinning versus combined antegrade and retrograde intramedullary pinning

The purpose of this study was to develop a technique allowing a faster return to previous activities after surgical treatment of short transverse and oblique fractures of the diaphysis of the fifth metacarpal. It consisted of an anterograde and retrograde centromedullary double pinning connected. Our series included 40 patients of average age 25 years including 2 women. In 20 cases (group I), an anterograde centromedullary pinning with a 1.6- or 2-mm pin was performed followed by a 6-week orthosis and then 2-week self-education. In 20 cases (group II), an anterograde and retrograde centromedullary double pinning was performed using 2 1.5-mm pins connected by a connector (MétaHUS^®, Arex™). A first pin was introduced into the canal antegrade, then the second retrograde. The 2 externalized pins were connected, and self-rehabilitation was encouraged. Mean tourniquet time was 14.75 min (group I) and 15.8 min (group II), respectively. At the last follow-up, the average pain was 0.35/10 and 0.2/10, the Quick DASH 0.68/100 and 0.57/100, the strength of the hand 94.65% and 94.35%, the active flexion MCP 98.5% and 99%, respectively. MCP active extension was 98.5% and 98.75%; the sick leave was 8.4 and 6.3 weeks. All fractures healed without recovery with 3 complications: 2 infections on pins, in each group, 1 CRPS1 (group I). Our results seem to show that the technique of anterograde and retrograde centromedullary double pinning connected in the treatment of short transverse and oblique fractures of the diaphysis of the fifth metacarpal gives results at least as good as the reference technique with a non-negligible socioeconomic advantage, a less time off work.

A Comparison of Locking Plates and Intramedullary Pinning for Fixation of Metacarpal Shaft Fractures

BACKGROUND

Metacarpal shaft fractures that necessitate surgery are frequently fixated with either intramedullary pins or plates and screws. This study compared outcome measurements of these two techniques.

METHODS

Patients operated on for closed shaft fractures of metacarpals 2-5 were examined at least 1 year after injury. All fractures were fixated by pinning between years 2013 and 2015 and by locking plates and screws between 2016 and 2017. Evaluation included range of motion measurements for all fingers compared with the contralateral hand; comparison of grip strength; finger alignment and rotation; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score; and radiographic measurements of fracture reduction and healing.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with 39 fractured metacarpals treated by pinning were compared with 29 patients with 35 fractured metacarpals treated by locking plate and screws. Both groups had similar characteristics and preoperative fracture patterns on radiograph. Patients in the plate group were found to have significantly improved outcomes in total range of motion of the operated digits (loss of 4° extension, 10° flexion, and 14° total vs 10° extension, 19° flexion, and 29° total), grip strength (93% vs 83% of contralateral hand), rotational deformity (5 digits, 1° vs 15 digits, 6°), and DASH score (10.5 vs 15.6). Radiographic bone healing time (59 vs 50 days) and operative time (58 vs 41 minutes) were both significantly longer in fractures fixated by plates.

CONCLUSIONS

Fixation with locking plates allows earlier mobilization without need for splinting. Our study supports the use of this method over intramedullary pinning for metacarpal shaft fractures.

Closed Intramedullary Locking Nailing for Metacarpal Fractures: A Retrospective Study of Sixty-Six Fractures

Introduction: Metacarpal fractures are frequent injuries in the young male working population and the majority are treated non-operatively. There is a growing trend to surgically treat these fractures, with the aim of reducing the deformity and shortening the rehabilitation period. The aim of this retrospective case series is to report on our experience and clinical outcomes of using percutaneous flexible locking nails for the management of displaced metacarpal fractures. This study is a retrospective review of 66 fractures that were managed at our centre over a 7-year period.

Materials and Methods: Records of 60 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Indications for surgery were a displaced metacarpal shaft or neck fracture with associated rotational deformity, or multiple metacarpal fractures. The fracture was reduced by closed manipulation, and a flexible pre-bent locked intramedullary nail (1.6mm diameter) was inserted through a percutaneous dorsal antegrade approach, facilitated by a specially designed pre-fabricated awl. The implant was removed at union. Patients were followed-up in clinic until the fracture had united.

Results: The mean union time was seven weeks (range 2 to 22 weeks) and there were nine (14%) delayed unions (>3 months) and no non-unions. The nail had migrated in three cases (5%) and caused skin impingement in two cases (3%). There was one infected case (2%). Rotational clinical deformity was evident for two (3%) cases.

Conclusion: The use of a minimally-invasive locked intramedullary nailing for unstable metacarpal fractures has a significantly low complication rate, with predictable union times and good functional outcomes.