Pull out Strength of Dual Outer Diameter Pedicle Screws Compared to Uncemented and Cemented Standard Pedicle Screws: A Biomechanical in vitro Study

Intraoperative lateral wall breach simulation in the cadaveric spine and the impact of thread designs of screws on pullout strength in the osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae: A biomechanical study in human cadavers

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed (1) to simulate pedicle screw pullout after intraoperative external wall perforation and (2) to assess restoration strength with different thread designs in the pedicle screw instrumentation for osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae.

METHODS

Twenty fresh-frozen human cadaveric thoracic vertebra bodies were prepared and divided into 4 groups: group 1, 5.5 mm × 45 mm polyaxial single thread pedicle screws (PASTS); group 2, after wall injury 5.5 mm × 45 mm PASTS; group 3, 6.5 mm × 45 mm PASTS after wall injury; and group 4: 6.5 mm × 45 mm polyaxial mixed-threaded screws after wall injury. While group 1 was the control group, groups 2, 3, and 4 were used as study groups after the lateral wall breach. All prepared screw units were placed on a universal pullout measurement testing device.

RESULTS

The mean bone mineral density for 20 thoracic vertebrae was 0.57 ± 0.12 g/cm2 (range 0.53-0.6 g/cm2 ). The mean pullout strength was 474.90 Newtons (N) for group 1, 412.85 N for group 2, 475.4 N for group 3, and 630.74N for group 4. The lateral wall breach caused a 14.1 % decrease in average pullout strength compared with the initial screw pullout. Mixed (double)-threaded screws increased pullout strength compared to 6.5 mm screws (P=.036) Conclusion: Using a 1 mm thicker polyaxial pedicle screw or mixed (double)-threaded pedicle screw seems to increase pullout strength; however, this was statistically significant only for group 4. In the thoracic spine, the redirection possibility of the pedicle screw is limited, and augmentation with cement will not be appropriate due to the risk of wall injury-related leakage. Therefore, care should be taken to avoid violating the lateral cortex by using appropriate pedicle entry points and trajectories.

Pullout strength of pedicle screws using cadaveric vertebrae with or without artificial demineralization

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the differences in the pullout strength and displacement of pedicle screws in cadaveric thoracolumbar vertebrae with or without artificial demineralization.

METHODS

Five human lumbar and five thoracic vertebrae from one cadaver were divided into two hemivertebrae. The left-side specimens were included in the simulated osteopenic model group and the right-side bones in a control group. In the model group, we immersed each specimen in HCl (1 N) solution for 40 minutes. We measured bone mineral density (BMD) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computerized tomography. We inserted polyaxial pedicle screws into the 20 pedicles of the cadaveric lumbar and thoracic spine after measuring the BMD of the 2 hemivertebrae of each specimen. We measured the pullout strength and displacement of the screws before failure in each specimen using an Instron system.

RESULTS

The average pullout strength of the simulated osteopenic model group was 76% that of the control group. In the control and model groups, the pullout strength was 1678.87±358.96 N and 1283.83±341.97 N, respectively, and the displacement was 2.07±0.34 mm and 2.65±0.50 mm, respectively (p<.05). We detected positive correlations between pullout strength and BMD in the control group and observed a negative correlation between displacement and BMD in the model group.

CONCLUSIONS

By providing an anatomically symmetric counterpart, the human cadaveric model with or without demineralization can be used as a test bed for pullout tests of the spine. In the simulated osteopenic model group, pullout strength was significantly decreased compared with the untreated control group.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Decreased bone mineral density may significantly reduce the pullout strength of a pedicle screw, even though the range is osteopenic rather than osoteoporotic.

Misaligned spinal rods can induce high internal forces consistent with those observed to cause screw pullout and disc degeneration

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Manual contouring of spinal rods is often required intraoperatively for proper alignment of the rods within the pedicle screw heads. Residual misalignments are frequently reduced by using dedicated reduction devices. The forces exerted by these devices, however, are uncontrolled and may lead to excessive reaction forces. As a consequence, screw pullout might be provoked and surrounding tissue may experience unfavorable biomechanical loads. The corresponding loads and induced tissue deformations are however not well identified. Additionally, whether the forced reduction alters the biomechanical behavior of the lumbar spine during physiological movements postoperatively, remains unexplored.

PURPOSE

To predict whether the reduction of misaligned posterior instrumentation might result in clinical complications directly after reduction and during a subsequent physiological flexion movement.

STUDY DESIGN

Finite element analysis.

METHODS

A patient-specific, total lumbar (L1-S1) spine finite element model was available from previous research. The model consists of poro-elastic intervertebral discs with Pfirrmann grade-dependent material parameters, with linear elastic bone tissue with stiffness values related to the local bone density, and with the seven major ligaments per spinal motion segment described as nonlinear materials. Titanium instrumentation was implemented in this model to simulate a L4, L5, and S1 posterolateral fusion. Next, coronal and sagittal misalignments of 6 mm each were introduced between the rod and the screw head at L4. These misalignments were computationally reduced and a physiological flexion movement of 15° was prescribed. Non-instrumented and well-aligned instrumented models were used as control groups.

RESULTS

Pulling forces up to 1.0 kN were required to correct the induced misalignments of 6 mm. These forces affected the posture of the total lumbar spine, as motion segments were predicted to rotate up to 3 degrees and rotations propagated proximally to and even affect the L1-2 level. The facet contact pressures in the corrected misaligned models were asymmetrical suggesting non-physiological joint loading in the misaligned models. In addition, the discs and vertebrae experienced abnormally high forces as a result of the correction procedure. These effects were more pronounced after a 15° flexion movement following forced reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that the correction of misaligned posterior instrumentation can result in high forces at the screws consistent with those reported to cause screw pullout, and may cause high-tissue strains in adjacent and downstream spinal segments.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Proper alignment of spinal posterior instrumentation may reduce clinical complications secondary to unfavorable biomechanics.

Comparison of the Pull-Out Strength between a Novel Micro-Dynamic Pedicle Screw and a Traditional Pedicle Screw in Lumbar Spine

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the strength of a novel micro-dynamic pedicle screw by comparing it to the traditional pedicle screw.

METHODS

Forty-five lumbar vertebrae received a traditional pedicle screw on one side and a micro-dynamic pedicle screw on the other side as follows (traditional group vs micro-dynamic group): 15 vertebrae underwent instant pull-out testing; 15 vertebrae underwent 5000-cyclic fatigue loading testing; and 15 vertebrae underwent 10,000-cyclic fatigue loading testing and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scanning. The peek pull-out force and normalized peek pull-out force after instant pull-out testing, 5000-cyclic and 10,000-cyclic fatigue loading testing were recorded to estimate the resistance of two types of screws. Bone mineral density was recorded to investigate the strength of the different screws in osteoporotic patients. And the semidiameter of the screw insertion area on micro-CT images after fatigue were compared to describe the performance between screw and bone surface.

RESULTS

The bone mineral density showed a weak correlation with peek pull-out force (r = 0.252, P = 0.024). The peek pull-out force of traditional pedicle screw after 10,000-cyclic fatigue loading were smaller than that of instant pull-out test in both osteoporotic (P = 0.017) and healthy group (P = 0.029), the peek pull-out force of micro-dynamic pedicle screw after 10,000-cyclic fatigue loading was smaller than that in instant pull-out test in osteoporotic group (P = 0.033), but no significant difference in healthy group (P = 0.853). The peek pull-out force in traditional group and micro-dynamic group underwent instant pull-out testing (P = 0.485), and pull-out testing after 5000-cyclic fatigue loading testing (P = 0.184) did not show significant difference. However, the peek pull-out force in micro-dynamic group underwent pull-test after 10,000-cyclic fatigue loading testing was significantly greater than that measured in traditional group (P = 0.005). The normalized peek pull-out force of traditional groups underwent instant pull-out testing, pull-out test after 5000-cyclic and 10,000-cyclic fatigue loading testing significantly decreased as the number of cycles increased (P < 0.001); meanwhile, the normalized peek pull-out force of micro-dynamic groups remained consistent regardless of the number of cycles (P = 0.133). The semidiameter after the fatigue loading test of the traditional screw insertion area was significantly larger than that of the micro-dynamic screw insertion area (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

The novel micro-dynamic pedicle screw provides stronger fixation stability in high-cyclic fatigue loading and non-osteoporotic patients versus the traditional pedicle screw, but similar resistance in low-cycle fatigue testing and osteoporotic group vs the traditional pedicle screw.

Biomechanical Comparison of Pull-out Strength of Different Cementation and Pedicle Screw Placement Techniques in a Calf Spine Model

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that an entire pedicle screw tract cement augmentation has greater strength than traditional techniques.

METHOD

Twenty-four fresh frozen calf lumbar spines were randomized into three study groups, each having eight vertebrae: (1) screw cemented after vertebroplasty; (2) fenestrated cemented screw; and (3) cementation of the entire pedicle screw tract. For the right side screws, two pedicle screws were inserted in each vertebra with the standard position in the sagittal plane, whereas the left side screws were placed at a 30° angle craniocaudal plane. From the recorded force-displacement curves, the maximum peak load (failure load) of each screw was determined. The mode of failure was screw stripping at all levels tested.

RESULTS

The pull-out strength for standard screw replacement at the sagittal plane was 1843.3 N, 1707.45 N, and 5365.1 N consecutively. The failure load value in the standard position in the sagittal plane in the cementation of the entire pedicle screw tract group was significantly higher than that in the fenestrated cemented screw group and screw cemented after vertebroplasty (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The standard pedicle screw position in the sagittal plane showed a significant pull-out strength than the others (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The pull-out strength of the cementation of the entire pedicle screw tract was 2.5 times higher than the others. The pull-out strength of the pedicle screws in malposition obtained the same strength to the standard positions after the augmentation procedure in our study.

Bisegmental posterior stabilisation of thoracolumbar fractures with polyaxial pedicle screws: Does additional balloon kyphoplasty retain vertebral height?

We retrospectively evaluated single-level compression fractures (T12-L3) scheduled for a short-segment POS (posterior-only stabilization) using polyaxial screws. Patients averaged 55.7 years (range, 19–65). Patients received either POS or, concomitantly, BK (balloon kyphoplasty) of the fractured vertebrae as well. Primary endpoint was the radiological outcome at the last radiographic follow-up prior to implant removal. POS together with BK of the fractured vertebrae resulted in a significant improvement of the local kyphosis angle and vertebral body compression rates immediately post-OP. During the further course of FU, a considerable loss of correction was observed post-OP in both groups. (Local KA: pre-OP/ post-OP/ FU: 12.6±4.8/ 3.35±4.8/ 11.6±6.0; anterior vertebral body compression%: pre-OP/post-OP/ FU: 71.94±12.3/ 94.78±19.95/ 78.17±14.74). VAS was significantly improved from 7.2±1.3 pre-OP to 2.7±1.3 (P<0.001) at FU. We found a significant restoration of the vertebral body height by BK. Nevertheless, follow-up revealed a noticeable loss of reduction. Given the fact that BK used together with polyaxial screws did not maintain intra-operative reduction, our data do not support this additional maneuver when used together with bi-segmental polyaxial pedicle screw fixation.