A Novel Approach for Reconstruction of Finger Neurocutaneous Defect: A Sensory Reverse Dorsal Digital Artery Flap from the Neighboring Digit

Repair of Finger Pulp Defect and Sensory Reconstruction Using Reverse Homodigital Artery Island Flap With Palmar Cutaneous Branches of the Proper Digital Nerve

OBJECTIVE

To illustrate the clinical outcomes of the reverse digital proper artery island flap with anastomosing the palmar cutaneous branches of the proper digital nerve for the reconstruction of finger pulp defects.

METHODS

From December 2007 to December 2017, a total of 20 patients with finger pulp defects were treated with reverse digital proper artery island flap for innervated construction. Functional outcomes, aesthetic appearance, and complications were evaluated. Functional outcomes were assessed according to range of motion, sensory grade (S0-S4), static 2-point discrimination, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, and Cold Intolerance Severity Score. Aesthetic appearance was evaluated according to the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.

RESULTS

All flaps survived completely without any complications, and all patients were followed up for at least 12 months. The average static 2-point discrimination, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament, and Cold Intolerance Severity Score results of the injured fingers were 6.35 mm (range, 5-8 mm), 3.64 (range, 2.83-4.17), and 19 (range, 8-24), respectively. All patients achieved recovery in sensation from S3+ to S4. The active ranges of motion of the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and distal interphalangeal joints of the affected fingers were satisfactory. Based on the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, 11 patients were strongly satisfied, and 9 were satisfied with the appearance of the injured finger.

CONCLUSIONS

The reverse digital proper artery island flap with anastomosing the palmar cutaneous branches of the proper digital nerve is an effective and reliable alternative for the reconstruction of finger pulp defect. In the recovery of sensation, this flap leads to satisfactory effects.

Clinical application of an expanded reverse-island flap with two dorsal metacarpal arteries and dorsal metacarpal nerves in index- and middle-finger-degloving injury repair and amputation reconstruction

The dorsal metacarpal artery flap (DMAF) is irrefutable as an effective way of repairing long finger defects, and hand surgeons might consider using it for long finger reconstruction or degloved injury repair. Unfortunately, the DMAF containing a single dorsal metacarpal artery (DMA) hinders the treatment effect. The sensory restoration of long fingers and the reconstruction of phalangeal joints and tendon grafts are unsolved challenges as well. We reported our experience in reconstructing the index and middle finger by a reverse-island flap with two DMAs and dorsal metacarpal nerves (DMNs) with blood supply. We reviewed ten patients with finger-crush injuries affecting eight index fingers and two middle fingers. Degloving injuries occurred in two patients, and finger amputations occurred in eight others. Two patients received simple flap reconstruction, and eight received finger reconstruction, including seven from abandoned phalangeal joints and tendon grafts of the severed finger and one from the iliac crest bone graft. All patients underwent finger reconstruction by an expanded reverse-island flap consisting of two DMAs and DMNs up to a maximal size of 9 × 8 cm². Postoperative follow-up evaluation showed a satisfactory appearance and functional recovery of the reconstructed fingers. We posit that the expanded reverse-island flap involving two DMAs and DMNs constitutes a feasible and safe option for restoring a severely damaged index or middle finger, particularly for patients who are unwilling to undergo toe-to-finger transplantation to reconstruct the injured long fingers.

Reverse digital artery island flap with versus without sensory nerve coaptation for finger pulp reconstruction

PURPOSE

Whether an innervated reverse digital artery island flap is superior to a non-innervated reverse digital artery island flap still remains controversial. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of the two flaps in repairing finger pulp soft tissue defects.

METHODS

Medical records of patients who underwent finger pulp reconstruction between January 2007 and December 2017 were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 45 patients were included. Twenty underwent sensory nerve reconstruction with cutaneous branches of the proper digital nerve, and 25 underwent the surgery without sensory nerve reconstruction. Surgical results, complications and sensory function were collected for analysis. Sensory function was assessed by static two-point discrimination and the modified sensory evaluation standard of British Medical Research Council.

RESULTS

The average operation time of innervated flaps was 23 min longer than non-innervated flaps. All 45 flaps survived completely. There was no significant difference in complications between groups. The average follow-up was 22 months. At the final follow-up, five non-innervated flaps had no recovery of static two-point discrimination. The average static two-point discrimination of the remaining 20 non-innervated flaps was larger than that of innervated flaps. Innervated flaps consistently achieved higher sensory function grades according to the modified sensory evaluation standard of British Medical Research Council.

CONCLUSION

An innervated reverse digital artery island flap can achieve better sensory function recovery in a shorter time. This procedure did not increase the incidence of complications, although it extended the operation time. It has proven to be a good technique for finger pulp reconstruction.

Pedicled flap from the first dorsal branch of the proper palmar digital artery of the fingers: An anatomy study

The pedicled flap from the first dorsal branch of the proper palmar digital artery (FBPPDA) of the fingers is an option for reconstructing digital skin defects. It has the advantage of being innervated by the dorsal branch of the proper palmar digital nerve (DBPPDN) associated with the artery. However, no studies on the anatomical variations of the neurovascular pedicle have been performed yet. The objective of our study was to evaluate the anatomical variations in the neurovascular pedicle, determine its relationships with other anatomical structures, describe the dissection technique for the FBPPDA and explore potential indications. We conducted an anatomical study with eight upper limbs from fresh adult cadavers. Twenty-six fingers (6 index, 6 middle, 8 ring, 8 little) were dissected after intra-arterial silicone injection. We found a pedicle composed of the FBPPDA and the DBPPDN in all fingers. The artery arises an average 19mm from the bifurcation of the common palmar digital artery. The DBPPDN's configuration relative to the FBPPDA varied; in the main variant - found in 58% of cases - the nerve was superficial and proximal position to the artery. After its origin, the pedicle ran on the superficial aspect of the extensor hood along an oblique path from proximal to distal and from palmar to dorsal. Its path ended with its penetration into the skin paddle of the flap just upstream the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. The skin paddle corresponded to the functional skin unit represented by the dorsal surface of the middle phalanx and that of the PIP joint. Its average length was 33mm (26-40) and its average width was 21mm (15-30). The arc of rotation was sufficient to reach homodigital and heterodigital cutaneous defects. Based on our findings, this flap is a reliable and reproducible option for finger skin defects. The size of its paddle and its innervation make it an interesting alternative to conventional flaps.

Clinical effect of thumb finger reconstruction using dorsal foot flap transplant for treating thumb defects

It was found that conventional toe graft alone could not meet the patients' needs for wound repair, so we hypothesized that it would be more effective to treat thumb and finger defect by toe graft with dorsalis foot flap. This prospective study was conducted in 104 thumb defect patients to investigate the clinical effect of thumb reconstruction using toe graft with dorsal foot flap for the treatment of thumb defects. These patients were randomly divided into the dorsal foot group and the control group by randomized double-blind method, with 52 patients in each group. The second toe was used for thumb reconstruction transplant in both the groups. After thumb reconstruction, the abdominal pedicled flap was used to repair the surgical wound in the control group whereas the dorsal foot flap was used to repair the surgical wound in the dorsal foot group. Three months after surgery, the efficacy of surgical treatment, evaluation of two-point discrimination, postoperative complications, function of reconstructed thumb, operation time, and hospitalization time were recorded and compared between the two groups. MHOQ questionnaire was used to evaluate and compare the patients' satisfaction with finger reconstruction in both the groups. The surgical therapeutic effect, the function of the reconstructed thumb, and satisfaction with finger reconstruction were significantly higher in the dorsal foot group compared to the control group (all p < 0.05). The postoperative two-point discrimination, postoperative complication rate, operation time, and hospitalization time of patients in the dorsal foot group were significantly lower compared to the control group (all p < 0.05). Thumb finger reconstruction using the second toe transplant with dorsal foot flap had a beneficial effect on thumb defect patients. It can effectively improve finger function and sensory recovery of patients while reducing complications.