Biomechanical Comparison of Three Internal Fixation Techniques for Stabilizing Posterior Pelvic Ring Disruption: A 3D Finite Element Analysis

Semi-automated finite element analyses of surgically treated acetabular fractures to investigate the biomechanical behaviour of patient-specific compared to conventional implants

BACKGROUND

In acetabular fracture surgery, understanding the biomechanical behaviour of fractures and implants is beneficial for clinical decision-making about implant selection and postoperative (early) weightbearing protocols. This study outlines a novel approach for creating finite element models (FEA) from actual clinical cases. Our objectives were to (1) create a detailed semi-automatic three-dimensional FEA of a patient with a transverse posterior wall acetabular fracture and (2) biomechanically compare patient-specific implants with manually bent off-the-shelf implants.

METHODS

A computational study was performed in which we developed three finite element models. The models were derived from clinical imaging data of a 20-year-old male with a transverse posterior wall acetabular fracture treated with a patient-specific implant. This implant was designed to fit the patient's anatomy and fracture configuration, allowing for optimal placement and predetermined screw trajectories. The three FEA models included an intact hemipelvis for baseline comparison, one with a fracture fixated with a patient-specific implant, and another with a conventional implant. Two loading conditions were investigated: standing up and peak walking forces. Von Mises stress and displacement patterns in bone, implants and screws were analysed to assess the biomechanical behaviour of fracture fixation with either a patient-specific versus a conventional implant.

RESULTS

The finite element models demonstrated that for a transverse posterior wall type fracture, a patient-specific implant resulted in lower peak stresses in the bone (30 MPa and 56 MPa) in standing-up and peak walking scenario, respectively, compared to the conventional implant model (46 MPa and 90 MPa). The results suggested that patient-specific implant could safely withstand standing-up and walking after surgery, with maximum von Mises stresses in the implant of 156 MPa and 371 MPa, respectively. The results from the conventional implant indicate a likelihood of implant failure, with von Mises stresses in the implant (499 MPa and 1000 MPa) exceeding the yield stress of stainless steel.

CONCLUSION

This study presents a workflow for conducting finite element analysis of real clinical cases in acetabular fracture surgery. This concept of personalized biomechanical fracture and implant assessment can eventually be applied in clinical settings to guide implant selection, compare conventional implants with innovative patient-specific ones, optimizing implant designs (including shape, size, materials, screw positions), and determine whether immediate full weight-bearing can be safely permitted.

Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison of Sacral and Lumbopelvic Fixation Techniques

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Pelvic ring fractures are becoming more common in the aging population and can prove to be fatal, having mortality rates between 10% and 16%. Stabilization of these fractures is challenging and often require immediate internal fixation. Therefore, it is necessary to have a biomechanical understanding of the different fixation techniques for pelvic ring fractures.

METHODS

A previously validated three-dimensional finite element model of the lumbar spine, pelvis, and femur was used for this study. A unilateral pelvic ring fracture was simulated by resecting the left side of the sacrum and pelvis. Five different fixation techniques were used to stabilize the fracture. A compressive follower load and pure moment was applied to compare different biomechanical parameters including range of motion (contralateral sacroiliac joint, L1-S1 segment, L5-S1 segment), and stresses (L5-S1 nucleus stresses, instrument stresses) between different fixation techniques.

RESULTS

Trans-iliac-trans-sacral screw fixation at S1 and S2 showed the highest stabilization for horizontal and vertical displacement at the sacral fracture site and reduction of contralateral sacroiliac joint for bending and flexion range of motion by 165% and 121%, respectively. DTSF (Double transiliac rod and screw fixation) model showed highest stabilization in horizontal displacement at the pubic rami fracture site, while the L5_PF_W_CC (L5-Ilium posterior screw fixation with cross connectors) and L5_PF_WO_CC (L5-Ilium posterior screw fixation without cross connectors) showed higher rod stresses, reduced L1-S1 (approximately 28%), and L5-S1 (approximately 90%) range of motion.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer sacral screw fixations were superior in stabilizing sacral and contralateral sacroiliac joint range of motion. Lumbopelvic fixations displayed a higher degree of stabilization in the horizontal displacement compared to vertical displacement of pubic rami fracture, while also indicating the highest rod stresses. When determining the surgical approach for pelvic ring fractures, patient-specific factors should be accounted for to weigh the advantages and disadvantages for each technique.

A systematic comparison between FEBio and PolyFEM for biomechanical systems

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Finite element simulations are widely employed as a non-invasive and cost-effective approach for predicting outcomes in biomechanical simulations. However, traditional finite element software, primarily designed for engineering materials, often encountered limitations in contact detection and enforcement, leading to simulation failure when dealing with complex biomechanical configurations. Currently, a lot of model tuning is required to get physically accurate finite element simulations without failures. This adds significant human interaction to each iteration of a biomechanical model. This study addressed these issues by introducing PolyFEM, a novel finite element solver that guarantees inversion- and intersection-free solutions with completely automatic collision detection. The objective of this research is to validate PolyFEM's capabilities by comparing its results with those obtained from a well-established finite element solver, FEBio.

METHODS

To achieve this goal, five comparison scenarios were formulated to assess and validate PolyFEM's performance. The simulations were reproduced using both PolyFEM and FEBio, and the final results were compared. The five comparison scenarios included: (1) reproducing simulations from the FEBio test suite, consisting of static, dynamic, and contact-driven simulations; (2) replicating simulations from the verification paper published alongside the original release of FEBio; (3) a biomechanically based contact problem; (4) creating a custom simulation involving high-energy collisions between soft materials to highlight the difference in collision methods between the two solvers; and (5) performing biomechanical simulations of biting and quasi-stance.

RESULTS

We found that PolyFEM was capable of replicating all simulations previously conducted in FEBio. Particularly noteworthy is PolyFEM's superiority in high-energy contact simulations, where FEBio fell short, unable to complete over half of the simulations in Scenario 4. Although some of the simulations required significantly more simulation time in PolyFEM compared to FEBio, it is important to highlight that PolyFEM achieved these results without the need for any additional model tuning or contact declaration.

DISCUSSION

Despite being in the early stages of development, PolyFEM currently provides verified solutions for hyperelastic materials that are consistent with FEBio, both in previously published workflows and novel finite element scenarios. PolyFEM exhibited the ability to tackle challenging biomechanical problems where other solvers fell short, thus offering the potential to enhance the accuracy and realism of future finite element analyses.

Patient-specific bone material modelling can improve the predicted biomechanical outcomes of sacral fracture fixation techniques: A comparative finite element study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the biomechanical efficacy of six iliosacral screw fixation techniques for treating unilateral AO Type B2 (Denis Type II) sacral fractures using literature-based and QCT-based bone material properties in finite element (FE) models.

METHODS

Two FE models of the intact pelvis were constructed: the literature-based model (LBM) with bone material properties taken from the literature, and the patient-specific model (PSM) with QCT-derived bone material properties. Unilateral transforaminal sacral fracture was modelled to assess different fixation techniques: iliosacral screw (ISS) at the first sacral vertebra (S1) (ISS1), ISS at the second sacral vertebra (S2) (ISS2), ISS at S1 and S2 (ISS12), transverse iliosacral screws (TISS) at S1 (TISS1), TISS at S2 (TISS2), and TISS at S1 and S2 (TISS12). A 600 N vertical load with both acetabula fixed was applied. Vertical stiffness (VS), relative interfragmentary displacement (RID), and the von Mises stress values in the screws and fracture interface were analysed.

RESULTS

The lowest and highest normalised VS was given by ISS1 and TISS12 techniques for LBM and PSM, with 137 % and 149 %, and 375 % and 472 %, respectively. In comparison with the LBM, the patient-specific bone modelling increased the maximum screw stress values by 19.3, 16.3, 27.8, 2.3, 24.4 and 7.8 % for ISS1, ISS2, ISS12, TISS1, TISS2 and TISS12, respectively. The maximum RID values were between 0.10 mm and 0.47 mm for all fixation techniques in both models. The maximum von Mises stress results on the fracture interface show a substantial difference between the two models, as PSM (mean ± SD of 15.76 ± 8.26 MPa) gave lower stress values for all fixation techniques than LBM (mean ± SD of 28.95 ± 6.91 MPa).

CONCLUSION

The differences in stress distribution underline the importance of considering locally defined bone material properties when investigating internal mechanical parameters. Based on the results, all techniques demonstrated clinically sufficient stability, with TISS12 being superior from a biomechanical standpoint. Both LBM and PSM models indicated a consistent trend in ranking the fixation techniques based on stability. However, long-term clinical trials are recommended to confirm the findings of the study.

Sacroiliac versus transiliac-transsacral screw osteosynthesis in osteoporotic pelvic fractures: a biomechanical comparison

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic fractures were often associated with high-energy trauma in young patients, but data show a significant increase in osteoporotic pelvic fractures in old age due to the progressive demographic change. There is an ongoing discussion about the best fixation techniques, which are ranging from lumbopelvic fixation to sacral bars or long transiliac-transsacral (TITS) screws. This study analyzes TITS screw osteosynthesis and sacroiliac screw osteosynthesis (SI), according to biomechanical criteria of fracture stability in osteoporotic human pelvic cadavers ex vivo.

METHODS

Ten osteoporotic cadaveric pelvises were randomized into two groups of 5 pelvises each. An FFP-IIc fracture was initially placed unilaterally and subsequently surgically treated with a navigated SI screw or a TITS screw. The fractured side was loaded in a one-leg stance test setup until failure. Interfragmentary movements were assessed by means of optical motion tracking.

RESULTS

No significant difference in axial stiffness were found between the SI and the TITS screws (21.2 ± 4.9 N and 18.4 ± 4.1 N, p = 0.662). However, there was a significantly higher stability of the fracture treatment in the cohort with TITS-screws for gap angle, flexion, vertical movement and overall stability. The most significant difference in the cycle interval was between 6.000 and 10.000 for the gap angle (1.62 ± 0.25° versus 4.60 ± 0.65°, p = 0.0001), for flexion (4.15 ± 0.39 mm versus 7.60 ± 0.81 mm, p = 0.0016), interval 11.000-15.000 for vertical shear movement (7.34 ± 0.51 mm versus 13.99 ± 0.97 mm, p < 0.0001) and total displacement (8.28 ± 0.66 mm versus 15.53 ± 1.07 mm, p < 0.0001) for the TITS and the SI screws.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this biomechanical study suggest a clear trend towards greater fracture stability of the TITS screw with significantly reduced interfragmentary movement. The application of a TITS screw for the treatment of the osteoporotic pelvic ring fracture may be prioritized to ensure the best possible patient care.

Analysis and multiple index evaluation of SPO distribution of bone traction needles for pelvic fracture reduction

For robot-assisted pelvic fracture reduction, at least two bone needles need to be inserted into the ilium of the affected pelvis, and the robot clamping device is connected with the bone needles. The biomechanical properties of the pelvic musculoskeletal tissues are different with the different Spatial Position and Orientation (SPO) of the bone needles. In order to determine the optimal SPO of bone needle pairs, the constraints between the bone needles and the pelvis are analyzed, and the SPO vectors of 150 groups bone needles are obtained by the KNN-hierarchical clustering method; a batch modeling method of bone needles with different SPO is proposed. 150 finite element models of damaged pelvic musculoskeletal tissue with different SPO of bone needles are established and simulated. The stress and strain distribution homogenization of musculoskeletal tissue with bone needles as evaluation index, the simulation results of 150 models are evaluated. Results show that, the anterior superior iliac spine and the anterior inferior iliac spine are suitable regions to place bone needles in the pelvis, and the optimal distribution of the needle combination is found in this region. The overall stress and strain distribution of the damaged pelvic musculoskeletal tissue under the large reduction force is the best.

Biomechanical evaluation of a healed acetabulum with internal fixators: finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of complicated acetabular fracture with internal fixation usually has high risk of failure because of unbefitting fixation. However, evaluation of the biomechanical effect of internal fixation under physiological loading for fracture healing is still generally rarely performed. The purpose of this study is to analyze the biomechanical characteristics of a healed acetabulum with designed internal fixators under gait and to explore the biomechanical relationship between the healed bone and the internal fixator.

METHODS

A patient-specific finite element model of whole pelvis with designed internal fixators was constructed based on the tomographic digital images, in which the spring element was used to simulate the main ligaments of the pelvis. And the finite element analysis under both the combination loading of different phases and the individual loading of each phase during the gait cycle was carried out. The displacement, von Mises stress, and strain energy of both the healed bone and the fixation were calculated to evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of the healed pelvis.

RESULTS

Under the combination loading of gait, the maximum difference of displacement between the left hip bone with serious injury and the right hip bone with minor injury is 0.122 mm, and the maximum stress of the left and right hemi-pelvis is 115.5 MPa and 124.28 MPa, respectively. Moreover, the differences of average stress between the bone and internal fixators are in the range of 2.3-13.7 MPa. During the eight phases of gait, the stress distribution of the left and right hip bone is similar. Meanwhile, based on the acetabular three-column theory, the strain energy ratio of the central column is relatively large in stance phases, while the anterior column and posterior column of the acetabular three-column increase in swing phases.

CONCLUSIONS

The acetabular internal fixators designed by according to the anatomical feature of the acetabulum are integrated into the normal physiological stress conduction of the pelvis. The design and placement of the acetabular internal fixation conforming to the biomechanical characteristics of the bone is beneficial to the anatomical reduction and effective fixation of the fracture, especially for complex acetabular fracture.

Finite Element Analysis and Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation for Posterior Pelvic Ring with Sacrum Dysplasia

OBJECTIVE

Posterior pelvic ring sacroiliac screws are preferred by clinicians for their good biomechanical performance. However, there are few studies on mechanical analysis and intraoperative screw insertion of the dysplastic sacrum and sacroiliac screw. This study investigated the biomechanical performance of oblique sacroiliac screws (OSS) in S1 combined with transiliac-transsacral screws (TTSs) in S2 for pelvic fracture or sacroiliac dislocation with dysplastic sacrum and evaluated the safety of screw placement assisted by the navigation template.

METHODS

Six models were established, including one OSS fixation in the S2 segment, one transverse sacroiliac screw (TSS) fixation in the S2 segment, one TTS fixation in the S2 segment, one OSS fixation in the S1 and S2 segments, one OSS fixation in the S1 segment and one TSS fixation in the S2 segment, one OSS fixation in the S1 segment and one TTS fixation in the S2 segment. Then, finite element analysis (FEA) was performed. Twelve dysplastic sacrum patients with pelvis fracture or sacroiliac dislocation underwent OSS insertion in the S1 combined with TTS insertion in the S2 under the assistance of the patient-specific locked navigation template. Grading and Matta scores were evaluated after surgery.

RESULTS

In the one-screw fixation group, the vertical displacements of the sacrum surface of S2 OSS, S2 TSS and S2 TTS were 1.23, 1.42, and 1.22 mm, respectively, and the maximum stress of screw were 139.45 MPa, 144.81 MPa, 126.14 MPa, respectively. In the two-screw fixation group, the vertical displacements of the sacrum surface of the S1 OSS + S2 OSS, S1 OSS + S2 TSS and S1 OSS + S2 TTS were 0.91, 1.06, and 0.75 mm, respectively, and the maximum stress of screw were 149.26 MPa, 167.13 Pa, 136.76 MPa, respectively. Clinically, a total of 12 TTS and OSS were inserted under the assistance of navigation templates, with a surgical time of 55 ± 7.69 min, bleeding of 57.5 ± 18.15 ml and radiation times of 14.5 ± 4.95. One of the TTS and one of the OSS were grade 1, and the other screws were grade 0. The Matta scores of nine patients were excellent, and three patents were good.

CONCLUSION

OSS in the S1 combined with TTS in the S2 had the best mechanical stability in six models, and it is safe for screw insertion assisted by the patient-specific locked navigation template.

Different Lengths of Percutaneous Transverse Iliosacral Screw in Geometric Osseous Fixation Pathway: A Finite-Element Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the biomechanical performances of the sacroiliac screw fixation of the first sacral vertebra with different lengths of screws using the Finite-Element Method.

METHODS

First, pelvic CT images were generated from a healthy volunteer, and multislice sagittal views were produced to determine the axis for the first sacral vertebra geometric osseous fixation pathway (GOFP). Subsequently, according to the geometric size and mechanical parameters of the iliosacral screw, the screw models with the same diameter of 7.3 mm and different lengths of 80 mm, 90 mm, 100 mm, 110 mm, 120 mm, 130 mm and 140 mm were built. Then the seven screws were assembled with the pelvic model. The maximum von Mises stress and the shape variables were evaluated for the pelvis and the screws.

RESULTS

Results are shown for the pelvic and GOFP screw, respectively. The simulation results show that the maximum von Mises stress in the cortex of the pelvic ring of the pelvis with the 130-mm length screw is the lowest among the pelvic models with different screws. Moreover, the peak displacement of the pelvis with the 130-mm length screw is the smallest. These results indicate that under the standing condition, a 130-mm length screw can decrease the stress concentration and result in a more effective transfer of stress within the reconstructed pelvis. In addition, the displacement of the screw with a 130-mm length is the smallest among all the considered screws. The peak von Mises stresses in the 130-mm length screw and the cortex are still within a low and elastic range below the yielding strengths of the materials.

CONCLUSION

Through the finite element analysis, the GOFP can be used as a safe and effective way for iliosacral screw fixation. The optimal length of the screw may be 130 mm length.

Applicable safety analysis and biomechanical study of iliosacral triangular osteosynthesis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the applicable safety and biomechanical stability of iliosacral triangular osteosynthesis (ITO) through 3D modeling and finite element (FE) analysis.

METHODS

Pelvic CT imaging data from 100 cases were imported into Mimics software for the construction of 3D pelvic models. The S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws and S2 sacroiliac screws were placed in the S2 segment with optimal distribution and their compatibility rate on the S2 safe channel was observed and analyzed. In the FE model, the posterior pelvic ring was fixed with two transsacral screws (TTS), triangular osteosynthesis (TO) and ITO, respectively. Four different loading methods were implemented in sequence to simulate the force in standing, flexion, right bending, and left twisting, respectively. The relative displacement and change in relative displacement of the three fixing methods were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The theoretical compatibility rate of S2AI screw and S2 sacroiliac screw in S2 segment was 94%, of which 100% were in males and 88% in females. In the FE model, in terms of overall relative displacement, TTS group showed the smallest relative displacement, the ITO group showed the second smallest, and the TO group the largest relative displacement. The change in relative displacement of the TTS group displayed the smaller fluctuations in motion. The change in relative displacement of the TO group under right bending and left twisting displayed larger fluctuations, while the ITO group under flexion displayed larger fluctuations.

CONCLUSIONS

The simultaneous placement of S2AI screw and S2 sacroiliac screw in the S2 segment is theoretically safe. Although the biomechanical stability of ITO is slightly lower than TTS, it is better than TO, and can be used as a new method for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injuries.

S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study

Background

Five different sacral fracture fixation methods were compared using finite element (FE) analysis to study their biomechanical characteristics.

Methods

Denis type I sacral fractures were created by FE modeling. Five different fixation methods for the posterior pelvic ring were simulated: sacroiliac screw (SIS), lumbopelvic fixation (LPF), transiliac internal fixator (TIFI), S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation (S2AI-S1) and S2AI screw and contralateral S1 pedicle screw fixation (S2AI-CS1). Four different loading methods were implemented in sequence to simulate the force in standing, flexion, right bending and left twisting, respectively. Vertical stiffness, relative displacement and change in relative displacement were recorded and analyzed.

Results

As predicted by the FE model, the vertical stiffness of the five groups in descending order was S2AI-S1, SIS, S2AI-CS1, LPF and TIFI. In terms of relative displacement, groups S2AI-S1 and S2AI-CS1 displayed a lower mean relative displacement, although group S2AI-CS1 exhibited greater displacement in the upper sacrum than group S2AI-S1. Group SIS displayed a moderate mean relative displacement, although the displacement of the upper sacrum was smaller than the corresponding displacement in group S2AI-CS1, while groups LPF and TIFI displayed larger mean relative displacements. Finally, in terms of change in relative displacement, groups TIFI and LPF displayed the greatest fluctuations in their motion, while groups SIS, S2AI-S1 and S2AI-CS1 displayed smaller fluctuations.

Conclusion

Compared with SIS, unilateral LPF and TIFI, group S2AI-S1 displayed the greatest biomechanical stability of the Denis type I sacral fracture FE models. When the S1 pedicle screw insertion point on the affected side is damaged, S2AI-CS1 can be used as an appropriate alternative to S2AI-S1.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02805-8.

[Application of channel screw combined with skin-stretching technique in treatment of pelvic fracture with severe Morel-Lavallée lesion]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of channel screw combined with skin-stretching technique in treatment of pelvic fracture with severe Morel-Lavallée lesion.

METHODS

Between January 2017 and May 2020, 11 patients with pelvic fractures complicated with severe Morel-Lavallée lesions were treated with channel screw combined with skin-stretching technique. There were 8 males and 3 females, with an average age of 39.2 years (range, 28-58 years). Causes of injury included traffic accident in 9 cases and falling from hight in 2 cases. The time from injury to hospital admission ranged from 1 to 6 days (mean, 3.7 days). According to the Tile classification, the pelvic fractures were rated as type C1 in 7 cases, type C2 in 3 cases, and type C3 in 1 case. The sites of Morel-Lavallée lesions were buttocks in 8 cases, hips in 2 cases, and thigh in 1 case. There was 1 case of rectal injury, 1 case of splenic rupture, 3 cases of craniocerebral injury, 2 cases of chest injury, 4 cases of spinal fracture, and 6 cases of sacral nerve injury. X-ray films were performed to observe reduction and healing of fracture. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated by Matta standard at 1 week after operation. Wound healing and complications were observed. Majeed scoring was used to evaluate hip function and Gibbons sacral nerve injury grading was used to evaluate neurological function recovery.

RESULTS

The patients underwent 4-7 operations, with an average of 5.8 operations. The time of first operation (pelvic fracture fixation, debridement, and skin distractor installation) was 115-275 minutes, with an average of 186.5 minutes. The amount of intraoperative blood loss was 30-80 mL, with an average of 45.5 mL. All patients were followed up 6-12 months, with an average of 8.3 months. The quality of fracture reduction according to the Matta standard was excellent in 7 cases, good in 2 cases, and fair in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 81.8%. All fractures healed at 3-6 months after operation, with an average of 4.5 months. At last follow-up, the hip functions were excellent in 7 cases and good in 4 cases according to Majeed scoring, with an excellent and good rate of 100%. Among the 6 patients complicated with sacral nerve injury, the Gibbons sacral nerve injury grading reached gradeⅠ for 4 cases, gradeⅡ for 1 case, and grade Ⅲ for 1 case. The wounds of 9 cases were sutured directly after skin-stretching treatment for 25-32 days, with an average of 28 days. The dermal edge necrosis occurred in 1 case, and the defect was repaired by free skin grafting. The skin superficial dry necrosis of the wound occurred in 1 case, and healed by dressing change.

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of pelvic fracture complicated with severe Morel-Lavallée lesion, the channel screw and skin-stretching technique showed their own advantages, which can obtain early fracture fixation and good wound healing.

Minimally invasive posterior locked compression plate osteosynthesis shows excellent results in elderly patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis

Purpose

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are common in older patients. We evaluated the clinical outcome of using a minimally invasive posterior locked compression plate (MIPLCP) as therapeutic alternative.

Methods

53 Patients with insufficiency fractures of the posterior pelvic ring were treated with MIPLCP when suffering from persistent pain and immobility under conservative treatment.

After initial X-ray, CT-scans of the pelvis were performed. In some cases an MRI was also performed to detect occult fractures. Postoperatively patients underwent conventional X-ray controls. Data were retrospectively analyzed for surgical and radiation time, complication rate, clinical outcome and compared to the literature.

Results

Patients (average age 79.1 years) underwent surgery with operation time of 52.3 min (SD 13.9), intra-operative X-ray time of 9.42 s (SD 9.6), mean dose length product of 70.1 mGycm (SD 57.9) and a mean hospital stay of 21.2 days (SD 7.7).

13% patients (n = 7) showed surgery-related complications, such as wound infection, prolonged wound secretion, irritation of the sacral root or clinically inapparent screw malpositioning. 17% (n = 9) showed postoperative complications (one patient died due to pneumonia 24 days after surgery, eight patients developed urinal tract infections).

42 patients managed to return to previous living situation. 34 were followed-up after a mean period of 31.5 (6–90) months and pain level at post-hospital examination of 2.4 (VAS) with an IOWA Pelvic Score of 85.6 (55–99).

Conclusion

We showed that MIPLCP osteosynthesis is a safe surgical alternative in patients with FFP 3 and FFP 4. This treatment is another way of maintaining a high level of stability in the osteoporotic pelvic ring with a relatively low complication rate, low radiation and moderate operation time and a good functional outcome.

Plate versus sacroiliac screw fixation for treating posterior pelvic ring fracture: a Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether plate fixation or sacroiliac (SI) screw fixation is the better treatment for posterior pelvic ring disruption is controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the two fixation methods.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies comparing plate and SI screw fixations in posterior pelvic ring injuries. Intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, and clinical/radiological scores were compared between the techniques.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and nine in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included 202 patients who underwent plate fixation and 258 patients who underwent SI screw fixation. The incision length and mean blood loss were greater in the plate group than in the SI screw group (standard mean difference (SMD) = 7.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.18-11.40; SMD = 5.09, 95% CI: 2.08-8.09, respectively). Patients in the SI screw group had more X-ray exposure than those in the plate group (SMD = -5.96, 95% CI: -7.95-3.97). There were no differences in operation time and intraoperative complications (SMD = -1.42, 95% CI: -3.90-1.05; OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.05-18.60, respectively). The duration of hospital stay was longer in the plate group (SMD = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.74-2.68). There were no differences in postoperative neurological complications, infection rate, and nonunion rate (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 0.20-13.21; OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 0.74-5.94; OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.26-4.87, respectively), but implant loosening was more common in the SI screw group (OR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.04-0.87). There was no difference in revision surgery (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.02-2.14). The total excellent rating according to the postoperative Majeed functional and Matta scores was higher in the SI screw group (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20-0.91; OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08-0.74, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

SI screw fixation was superior to plate fixation in the functional and radiological scores, but implant loosening was more common for the treatment posterior pelvic ring injuries.