Non-equivalent Results from Different Anteversion Measurements Methods for the Evaluation of the Acetabular Cup Orientation in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Reliability and accuracy of intraoperative fluoroscopy assessment of acetabular cup anteversion in supine direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty

Poor implantation positioning of hip prostheses is considered the primary factor affecting postoperative joint wear. Cup anteversion in direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is often excessive. Intraoperative fluoroscopy (IF) are effective for improving implant placement accuracy. This study aimed to analyze IF's reliability and accuracy in assessing intraoperative anteversion. Sixty-two consecutive hips underwent primary THA utilizing DAA alongside IF for cup placement. Intraoperative anteversion was measured using IF images, while postoperative CT and standard anteroposterior (AP) radiographs were used to calculate true anteversion component angles. Differences and correlations between intraoperative and true anteversions were analyzed, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) determined the inter- and intra-observer reliabilities. Excellent intra- and inter-observer reliabilities were observed for all radiographic and CT methods (ICC > 0.9). Strong correlations (PCC > 0.6) existed between anteversion measured on IF image and postoperative CT and AP pelvic measurements. Intraoperative anteversion measured on IF images (16.8 ± 3.2°) was smaller than anteversion measured postoperatively on AP X-rays (21.3 ± 4.7°, P < 0.001) and CT (22.0 ± 4.9°, P < 0.001), with average differences of 4.5°and 5.3°, respectively. Under several influencing factors, the accuracy of IF in assessing cup anteversion in DAA-THA may be limited. However, this still requires large-sample experiments for verification.

The accuracy and precision of acetabular implant measurements from CT imaging

The placement of acetabular implant components determines the short- and long-term outcomes of total hip replacement (THR) and a number of tools have been developed to assist the surgeon in achieving cup orientation to match the surgical plan. However, the accuracy and precision of 3D-CT for the measurement of acetabular component position and orientation is yet to be established. To investigate this, we compared measurements of cobalt chrome acetabular components implanted into 2 different bony pelvic models between a coordinate measuring Faro arm and 3 different low dose CT images, including 3D-CT, 2D anterior pelvic plane (APP) referenced CT and 2D scanner referenced (SR) CT. Intra-observer differences were assessed using the Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The effect of imaging the pelvis positioned in 3 different orientations within the CT scanner was also assessed. The measured parameters were the angles of inclination and version. 3D-CT measurements were found to closely match the "true values" of the component position measurements, compared with the 2D-CT methods. ICC analysis also showed good agreement between the coordinate measuring arm (CMA) and 3D-CT but poor agreement between the 2D SR method, in the results from two observers. When using the coordinate system of the CT scanner, the measurements consistently produced the greatest error; this method yielded values up to 34° different from the reference digitising arm. However, the difference between the true inclination and version angles and those measured from 3D APP CT was below half a degree in all cases. We concluded that low radiation dose 3D-CT is a validated reference standard for the measurement of acetabular cup orientation.

Reliability and Validity of Standing Lateral Radiograph Method for Measuring Acetabular Component Version: A Modified Cross-table Lateral Radiograph Method

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of the X-ray incidence angle on cup version measurements and the reliability and validity of standing lateral (SL) radiography for measuring cup versions.

METHODS

Cup versions under different X-ray incidence angles were investigated by the 3D simulation analysis. Ninety-three patients, who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with postoperative SL radiographs and CT scans between April 2020 and December 2021, were retrospectively analyzed. SL radiography was taken under naturally standing position, correcting for the measurement error of pelvic tilt in cross-table lateral (CL) radiography. Cup versions were measured on SL radiographs and CT images by two qualified orthopedic physicians. The intra- and inter-observer reliabilities were assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient. The consistency between radiographic and CT measurements was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

No significant differences in cup version measurements were observed between groups of different X-ray incidence angles (P = 0.663) in the 3D simulation analysis. All measurements had excellent intra- and inter-observer reliabilities, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of >0.95. Mean cup version measurements from SL radiographs correlated well with those from CT scans (r = 0.853, P < 0.001). The mean difference between radiographic and CT measurements was -0.49° (range -12.62° to 10.37°, SD 3.95°), and the majority of differences were within the 95% limits of agreement.

CONCLUSION

The cup versions measured with SL radiography were close to the CT measurements. SL radiograph method is reliable and valid for measuring acetabular component version after THA.

Lewinnek Safe Zone References are Frequently Misquoted

Background

Optimal acetabular component orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a necessity in achieving a stable implant. Although there has been considerable debate in the literature concerning the safe zone, to date, there has not been any review to determine if these references are consistent with the definition applied by Lewinnek et al. in 1978. Therefore, this article aims to examine the available literature in the PubMed database to determine how often a correct reference to the safe zone as defined by Lewinnek was applied to discussions regarding THA.

Methods

A search for literature in the PubMed database was performed for articles from 1978 to 2019. Search criteria included terms ‘Lewinnek,’ ‘safe zone,’ and ‘total hip arthroplasty.’ Exclusions included abstract-only articles, non-English articles, articles unrelated to THA, and those lacking full content.

Results

A review of literature yielded 147 articles for inclusion. Overall, only 11% (17) cited the Lewinnek article correctly. Forty-five percent (66) of articles referenced measurements in the supine position, 18% (26) referenced other positions, and 37% (55) did not specify. Nineteen percent (28) reported measurements of the acetabular cup orthogonal to the anterior pelvic plane, while 73% (108) did not, and 7% (11) did not specify. Twenty-three percent (34) measured from computed tomography scans instead of other methods.

Conclusions

In the discussion of the safe zone regarding THA, only 11% of articles listed are consistent with the definition established by Lewinnek. This warrants further investigation into a consistent application of the term and its implications for THA implant stability and dislocation rates.

Radiographic assessment of the cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a literature review

Optimal acetabular cup orientation is of substantial importance to good long-term function and low complication rates after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The radiographic anteversion (RA) and inclination (RI) angles of the cup are typically studied due to the practicability, simplicity, and ease of interpretation of their measurements. A great number of methods have been developed to date, most of which have been performed on pelvic or hip anteroposterior radiographs. However, there are primarily two influencing factors for these methods: X-ray offset and pelvic rotation. In addition, there are three types of pelvic rotations about the transverse, longitudinal, and anteroposterior axes of the body. Their effects on the RA and RI angles of the cup are interactively correlated with the position and true orientation of the cup. To date, various fitted or analytical models have been established to disclose the correlations between the X-ray offset and pelvic rotation and the RA and RI angles of the cup. Most of these models do not incorporate all the potential influencing parameters. Advanced methods for performing X-ray offset and pelvic rotation corrections are mainly performed on a single pelvic AP radiograph, two synchronized radiographs, or a two-dimensional/three-dimensional (2D-3D) registration system. Some measurement systems, originally developed for evaluating implant migration or wear, could also be used for correcting the X-ray offset and pelvic rotation simultaneously, but some drawbacks still exist with these systems. Above all, the 2D-3D registration technique might be an alternative and powerful tool for accurately measuring cup orientation. In addition to the current methods used for postoperative assessment, navigation systems and augmented reality are also used for the preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance of cup placement. With the continuing development of artificial intelligence and machine learning, these techniques could be incorporated into robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery in the future.