Spino-Pelvic Thresholds for Prevention of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Following Combined Anterior Column Realignment and Short Posterior Spinal Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Kyphosis

Lateral Anterior Column Release in Short Lumbar Fusion… Is It Worth It?

BACKGROUND

Radiographic adjacent segment disease (ASD) ranges from 10% to 84%, depending on technique. Occurrence of symptomatic ASD is lower, with a range of 1.9% to 13%. ASD can be very debilitating and necessitate further procedures, leading to high morbidity. Herein, we explore the occurrence of adjacent segment disease when performing anterior column release in lateral interbody fusion.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, 120 total patients who underwent lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) at our facility from 2013 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed, allowing for a minimum of 3 years for follow-up time. Surgical variables and spinopelvic parameters were measured and collected by our team. Statistical measures of significance were calculated using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 29.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty total patients were included. 73.3% of patients had percutaneous screws, and 11.7% had open. Thirteen patients underwent LLIF with anterior column release (ACR). The mean lumbar lordosis (LL) was 50.1 ± 12.9, pelvic incidence (PI) was 52.8 ± 11.2, sacral slope was 33.6 ± 9.2, pelvic tilt was 18.1 ± 6.8, and sagittal vertical axis was 6.8 mm ± 30.5.Twenty four total patients had ASD after LLIF. In univariable analysis, ACR (P < 0.001) and PI-LL Mismatch (P < 0.035) were risk factors for developing ASD. In multivariable analysis, greater PI-LL mismatch was predictive of ASD (P < 0.005, OR = 1.097, and 95% confidence interval = 1.029-1.171), as was ACR (P < 0.001, OR = 9.667, and 95% confidence interval = 2.669-35.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher PI-LL mismatch after lumbar interbody fusion, and performance of an ACR during LLIF increased the likelihood of developing symptomatic ASD in our patients. Considering ACR to achieve the goal of correcting spinopelvic parameters should be carefully evaluated when undertaking a lateral approach.

An evidence based conceptual framework for the multifactorial understanding of proximal junctional kyphosis

Introduction

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a debilitating pathology that arises from a variety of etiologies. Spinal fusion surgery is the mainstay of treatment for those who do not achieve symptom relief with conservative interventions. Fusion surgery can be complicated by a secondary deformity termed proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK).

Research question

This scoping review evaluates the modern body of literature analyzing risk factors for PJK development and organizes these factors according to a multifactorial framework based on mechanical, tissue or demographic components.

Materials and methods

An extensive search of the literature was performed in PubMed and Embase back to the year 2010. Articles were assessed for quality. All risk factors that were evaluated and those that significantly predicted the development of PJK were compiled. The frequency that a risk factor was predictive compared to the number of times it was evaluated was calculated.

Results

150 articles were reviewed. 57.3% of papers were of low quality. 76% of risk factors analyzed were focusing on the mechanical contribution to development of PJK versus only 5% were focusing on the tissue-based contribution. Risk factors that were most frequently predictive compared to how often they were analyzed were Hounsfield Units of vertebrae, UIV disc degeneration, paraspinal muscle cross sectional area and fatty infiltration, ligament augmentation, instrument characteristics, postoperative hip and lower extremity radiographic metrics, and postoperative teriparatide supplementation.

Discussion and conclusion

This review finds a multifactorial framework accounting for mechanical, patient and tissue-based risk factors will improve the understanding of PJK development.

Pelvic Incidence as a Predictor of Proximal Junctional Failure in Patients Undergoing Anterior Column Realignment with Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Release to Restore Lordosis in Adult Spinal Deformity: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To identify variables that may contribute to the development of proximal junctional failure (PJF) in patients with long lumbo-sacral and thoraco-lumbo-pelvic constructs undergoing anterior column realignment (ACR) with anterior longitudinal ligament release (ALLR).

METHODS

Data of patients with adult spinal deformity who underwent ACR with ALLR at L3-4 were collected retrospectively from medical records and a prospectively maintained spine research database between 2016 and 2022.

RESULTS

Eleven (41%) developed PJF at a mean of 24 ± 21 months from the index surgery. The cohort was then divided into 2 groups for analysis, 13 subjects in the high pelvic incidence (PI) group (defined as PI ≥ 55°) and 14 subjects in the low PI group (defined as PI < 55°). Visual Analog Scale for back pain and Oswestry Disability Index decreased from 9.5 to 2.1 and 61 to 10 in the high PI group, and from 8.9 to 2.4 and 60.9 to 10.3 in the low PI group, respectively. PI (P = 0.004), sacral slope (P = 0.005), and postoperative PI-lumbar lordosis mismatch (P = 0.02) were found to be significant predictors of PJF. The receiver operator curve revealed a cutoff PI value ≤ 53° (95% confidence interval: 52°-64°), below which the risk of PJF becomes significantly higher in patients undergoing ACR with ALLR at L3-4.

CONCLUSIONS

PI may be a predictor of PJF and highly correlates with ACR-ALLR levels. In patients undergoing L3-4 ACR-ALLR, a PI value of ≤53° is associated with a significantly elevated risk of PJF. Preoperative planning of ACR-ALLR level based on normal sagittal alignment in otherwise healthy individuals may mitigate the risk of PJF development in patients with adult spinal deformity treated with ACR-ALLR.

A Modified Anterior Column Realignment With Partial Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Release in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective radiological analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the radiological outcome after a modified anterior column realignment (mACR) with partial anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) release in oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Anterior column realignment (ACR) remains a powerful sagittal correction technique in minimally invasive adult spinal deformity surgery and is often combined with posterior column osteotomy (PCO) to achieve more lordosis. OLIF is ideal for ACR because the anterior-to-psoas corridor typically involves the anterolateral half of the disk.

METHODS

This study included 112 operated disk levels of 101 consecutive patients who underwent OLIF between L2-L3 and L4-L5 using a 12° lateral cage. The mACR was performed at 73 (65.2%) levels with 30% to 50% sectioning of the ALL. Each operated level was grouped according to the mACR and additional PCO as: (1) no mACR, OLIF only (n=39); (2) mACR with no PCO (n=18); (3) mACR with grade 1 PCO (n=27); (4) mACR with grade 2 PCO (n=22); or (5) mACR with grade 3 PCO (n=6).

RESULTS

At the last follow-up, the mean disk lordotic angles were 10.9±2.9°, 12.6±3.0°, 13.3±3.9°, 16.7±3.2°, and 16.8±2.4° in the no mACR, mACR with no PCO, mACR with grade 1 PCO, mACR with grade 2 PCO, and mACR with grade 3 PCO groups, respectively ( P <0.001). The mean increases in disk lordotic angle were 5.8±4.1°, 12.1±6.1°, 13.5±8.7°, 15.8±6.7°, and 17.9±6.2° in each group, respectively ( P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ACR can be performed with partial ALL release under direct vision in OLIF without deep dissection into the ventral disk space. The mACR in OLIF is a simple, safe, and effective technique for anterior column lengthening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Variation in Global Spinal Sagittal Parameters in Asymptomatic Adults with 11 Thoracic Vertebrae, four Lumbar Vertebrae, and six Lumbar Vertebrae

Objective

To investigate the prevalence of 11 thoracic vertebrae (TVs), four lumbar vertebrae (LVs) and six LVs among asymptomatic Chinese volunteers, and the influence of spine variations on the global spinal sagittal parameters.

Methods

A total of 389 asymptomatic Chinese volunteers were recruited. Each subject underwent a full‐spine X‐ray examination with measurement of global spinal sagittal parameters. The radiographs were examined by a spine surgeon and a radiologist to determine the variation in the number of vertebrae. These parameters were used to compare individuals with five LVs to those with 11 TVs, four LVs, and six LVs.

Results

The study population included 12 individuals (3.1%) with seven cervical vertebrae (C) + 11 thoracic vertebrae (T) + five lumbar vertebrae (L), 8 (2.1%) with 7C + 11T + 6L, 8 (2.1%) with 7C + 12T + 4L, and 15 (3.9%) with 7C + 12T + 6L. Compared to the 7C + 12T + 5L individuals, those with 7C + 11T + 5L had significantly lower C₆–T₅ Cobb values (P < 0.05); 7C + 12T + 4L individuals had significantly greater thoracic inlet angles (P < 0.05) and significantly lower pelvic tilt (P < 0.05); individuals with 7C + 12T + 6L had significantly greater sacral slope, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and L1–5 Cobb values (all P < 0.05), but significantly lower thoracic inlet angle (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in any of the parameters examined between the 7C + 11T + 6L group and the 7C + 12T + 5L group.

Conclusions

Asymptomatic adults with 7C + 12T + 6L, 7C + 12T + 4L, and 7C + 11T + 5L presented with different spinal sagittal alignment compared to those with 7C + 12T + 5L. Compared to variation in the number of LVs, the variation in the number of TVs had less effect on global spinal sagittal parameters. Spinal surgeons and researchers should be aware of the effects of variation in numbers of TVs and LVs on global spinal parameters and sagittal balance.