Treatment of Spinal Tuberculosis of GATA Type III: Primary Posterior Debridement Combined with Osteotomy Parallel to the Endplates for Reconstruction

A novel classification of osteotomized debridement based on the range of focus in treating active thoracolumbar tuberculosis: a multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Osteotomized debridement (OD) is increasingly used in the treatment of active thoracolumbar tuberculosis (TB). So far, no nomenclature has been established to describe the patterns of OD, and thus the surgical outcomes cannot be directly analyzed and compared among the patients treated with different extents of OD. The purpose of this study was to establish a reliable classification of OD for further study of spinal TB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective study. The proposed classification included 6 grades of OD based on sagittal range of vertebral body destruction: grade 0 involves single-level intervertebral disc and adjacent superficial endplates; grade 1 involves adjacent endplates and vertebral bodies, but no pedicle is involved; grade 2 involves adjacent endplates, vertebral bodies, and a lower or upper pedicle; grade 3 involves adjacent endplates, vertebral bodies, and both of lower and upper pedicles; grade 4 involves an entire vertebral body and an adjacent lower or upper pedicle; grade 5 involves two continuous entire vertebral bodies. Two hundred and five patients with active thoracolumbar TB who underwent OD surgery were included, and all ODs were classified. The reliability of this classification was evaluated twice by 10 readers, and Fleiss kappa coefficients were calculated.

RESULTS

In the 205 patients, 208 ODs were performed. Grade 2 OD was the commonest type (98/208, 47.1%), followed by grade 1 (50/208, 24.0%), grade 3 (26/208, 12.5%), grade 0 (20/208, 9.6%), grade 4 (8/208, 3.8%), and grade 5 (6/208, 2.9%). The average accuracy of the two readings was 86.2% and 90.1%, respectively. The intra-rater reliability for the classification was "almost perfect agreement" with a Fleiss kappa coefficient average of 0.92. The inter-rater reliability was "almost perfect agreement" with a coefficient average of 0.89 for two readings.

CONCLUSIONS

This classification proved to be intuitive and reliable. The graded OD provides a platform for preoperative evaluation and allows comparative analysis of clinical outcomes in different extents of OD.

Application of Image-Fusion 3D Printing Model in Total En Bloc Spondylectomy for Spinal Malignant Tumors

Purpose

To examine the effects of 3D printing model in total en bloc spondylectomy (TES).

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of 41 cases of spinal tumors at our institution between 2017 and 2020, in which TES was applied. There were 19 cases with 3D printing model and 22 cases without 3D printing model. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, excision range, complications, VAS, and ASIA grades were recorded. Statistical methods were used to analyze the data. KaplanMeier survival curve was made to evaluate the survival.

Result

There were significant differences in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups. The rate of R0 resection and tumor envelope preservation were higher in 3D group than that in non-3D group. In 3D group, the complications included surgical site infection (5.2%) and cerebrospinal fluid leak (15.7%). In non-3D group, the complications included cerebrospinal fluid leak (27.3%) and nerve root injury (13.6%). The pain and neurological dysfunction were significantly relieved before and after surgery in 3D group. However, the neurological relief in non-3D group patients was not complete. The VAS scores of non-3D group at 6 months after surgery were much higher than that of 3D group.

Conclusion

The application of 3D printing model not only helps surgeons observe the morphology, invasion range, and anatomic relationship of the tumor preoperatively, but also assists surgeons to judge, locate, and separate the tumor intraoperatively. For spinal malignancies, the 3D printing model is worth promoting.