Diagnostic Value of MRI Lamellated Hyperintense Synovitis in Periprosthetic Infection of Hip

Imaging approach to prosthetic joint infection

The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains challenging, despite multiple available laboratory tests for both serum and synovial fluid analysis. The clinical symptoms of PJI are not always characteristic, particularly in the chronic phase, and there is often significant overlap in symptoms with non-infectious forms of arthroplasty failure. Further exacerbating this challenge is lack of a universally accepted definition for PJI, with publications from multiple professional societies citing different diagnostic criteria. While not included in many of the major societies' guidelines for diagnosis of PJI, diagnostic imaging can play an important role in the workup of suspected PJI. In this article, we will review an approach to diagnostic imaging modalities (radiography, ultrasound, CT, MRI) in the workup of suspected PJI, with special attention to the limitations and benefits of each modality. We will also discuss the role that image-guided interventions play in the workup of these patients, through ultrasound and fluoroscopically guided joint aspirations. While there is no standard imaging algorithm that can universally applied to all patients with suspected PJI, we will discuss a general approach to diagnostic imaging and image-guided intervention in this clinical scenario.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Total Hip Arthroplasty

This article reviews evidence for performing various imaging studies in patients with total hip prostheses. Routine follow-up is generally performed with radiography. Radiographs are also usually the initial imaging modality for patients with symptoms related to the prosthesis. Following acute injury with pain, noncontrast CT may add information to radiographic examination regarding the presence and location of a fracture, component stability, and bone stock. Image-guided joint aspiration, noncontrast MRI, and white blood cell scan and sulfur colloid scan of the hip, are usually appropriate studies for patients suspected of having periprosthetic infection. For evaluation of component loosening, wear, and/or osteolysis, noncontrast CT or MRI are usually appropriate studies. Noncontrast MRI is usually appropriate for identifying adverse reaction to metal debris related to metal-on-metal articulations. For assessing patients after hip arthroplasty, who have trochanteric pain and nondiagnostic radiographs, ultrasound, or MRI are usually appropriate studies. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

The role of advanced metal artifact reduction MRI in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

Identification and diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are challenging, requiring a multi-disciplinary approach involving clinical evaluation, laboratory tests, and imaging studies. MRI is advantageous to alternative imaging techniques due to superior soft tissue contrast and absence of ionizing radiation. However, the presence of metallic implants can cause signal loss and artifacts. Metal artifact suppression (MARS) MRI techniques have been developed that mitigate metal artifacts and improve periprosthetic soft tissue visualization. This paper provides a review of the various MARS MRI techniques, their clinical applicability and accuracy in PJI diagnosis and evaluation, and current challenges and future perspectives.

Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging for patients with periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to provide a critical systematic review of the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a noninvasive method to assess periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs).

METHODS

The electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE were searched, since their inception up to March 27, 2022. The included studies evaluated the reproducibility and accuracy of MRI features to diagnose PJIs. The article quality assessment was conducted by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2).

RESULTS

Among 1909 studies identified in the initial search, 8 studies were eligible for final systematic review. The included studies evaluated the reproducibility and accuracy of MRI features to diagnose PJIs. Seven of 8 studies showed good to excellent reliability, but only one article among them in which accuracy was evaluated had a low risk of bias. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen coefficient (κ) varied between 0.44 and 1.00. The accuracy varied between 63.9% and 94.4%. Potential MRI features, such as lamellated hyperintense synovitis, edema, fluid collection, or lymphadenopathy, might be valuable for diagnosing PJIs.

CONCLUSION

The quality of the evidence regarding the role of MRI for PJIs diagnosis was low. There is preliminary evidence that MRI has a noteworthy value of distinguishing suspected periprosthetic joint infection in patients with total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty, but the definition of specific MRI features related to PJIs diagnosis lacks consensus and standardization. Large-scale studies with robust quality were required to help make better clinical decisions in the future.

Metal Artifact Reduction MRI in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection

A 54-year-old woman presented with progressive right hip pain after hip arthroplasty 9 years earlier. The emerging role of metal artifact reduction MRI in the noninvasive diagnosis of infectious synovitis as the surrogate marker for periprosthetic hip joint infection and differentiation from other synovitis types is discussed.

Simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI for the detection of periprosthetic joint infections after knee or hip arthroplasty: a prospective feasibility study

Purpose

This study investigated the diagnostic value of simultaneous 18F-fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee.

Methods

Sixteen prostheses from 13 patients with suspected PJI were prospectively examined using PET/MRI. Image datasets were evaluated in consensus by a radiologist and a nuclear physician for the overall diagnosis of ‘PJI’ (yes/no) and its anatomical involvement, such as the periprosthetic bone margin, bone marrow, and soft tissue. The imaging results were compared with the reference standard obtained from surgical or biopsy specimens and subjected to statistical analysis.

Results

Using the reference standard, ten out of the 13 prostheses (ten hips, threes knees) were diagnosed with PJI. Using PET/MRI, every patient with PJI was correctly diagnosed (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 100%). Considering the anatomical regions, the sensitivity and specificity were 57% and 50% in the periprosthetic bone margin, 75% and 33% in the bone marrow, and 100% and 100% in the soft tissue.

Conclusion

PET/MRI can be reliably used for the diagnosis of PJI. However, assessment of the periprosthetic bone remains difficult due to the presence of artefacts. Thus, currently, this modality is unlikely to be recommended in clinical practice.

Bone and Joint Infections: The Role of Imaging in Tailoring Diagnosis to Improve Patients' Care

Imaging is needed for the diagnosis of bone and joint infections, determining the severity and extent of disease, planning biopsy, and monitoring the response to treatment. Some radiological features are pathognomonic of bone and joint infections for each modality used. However, imaging diagnosis of these infections is challenging because of several overlaps with non-infectious etiologies. Interventional radiology is generally needed to verify the diagnosis and to identify the microorganism involved in the infectious process through imaging-guided biopsy. This narrative review aims to summarize the radiological features of the commonest orthopedic infections, the indications and the limits of different modalities in the diagnostic strategy as well as to outline recent findings that may facilitate diagnosis.

Imaging update in arthroplasty

Imaging of metal implants has historically been difficult, regardless of the applied modality. The number of primary arthroplasties is increasing over the years. With it, we expect the number of symptomatic complications to increase as well. Acquiring accurate imaging for diagnosis and treatment planning for these cases is of paramount importance. Significant advancements have been made to reduce artifacts, leading to better imaging representation of arthroplasty. This review article would give a background on the current ways of imaging arthroplasty and metal implants, covering recent advances in imaging techniques.

The natural trends of C-reactive protein after hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture without infection

The aim of this study was to estimate the degree of normalization of C-reactive protein (CRP) at 2-weeks and 4-weeks after hip arthroplasty after femoral neck fracture. We also wished to determine whether the degree of CRP normalization differs after total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared to bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BH). We also wanted to analyze the patient factors that may influence CRP normalization.We conducted a retrospective study of 135 patients who had undergone THA (32 cases) or BH (103 cases) for femoral neck fracture by single surgeon from January 2015 to December 2019. We analyzed CRP levels during the preoperative period, the early postoperative period, the 2-week postoperative period, and the 4-week postoperative period.In THA, CRP was normalized in 4 patients (12.5%) and in 15 patients (46.9%) within 2-weeks and 4-weeks after surgery, respectively. In BH, CRP was normalized in 16 patients (15.5%) and in 52 patients (50.5%) within 2-weeks and 4-weeks after surgery, respectively. There were no statistical differences between THA and BH. Compared to women, men were 3.78 (95% confidence interval, 1.05-13.63) times less likely to have normalized CRP at 2-weeks after surgery (P = .042). Compared to women, men were 3.01 (95% confidence interval, 1.44-6.27) times less likely to have normalized CRP at 4-weeks after surgery (P = .003).Only 50% of patient's CRP level was normalized during 4-week postoperative period. In men, CRP levels were significantly higher than women in whole period. In the case of THA, the CRP level was higher only in early postoperative period compared to BH, and there was no difference since then.