1
|
Guan J, Feng N, Yu X, Yang K. Comparison of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails and cohort studies. Syst Rev 2024; 13:170. [PMID: 38970142 PMCID: PMC11227242 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02600-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As an emerging technology in robot-assisted (RA) surgery, the potential benefits of its application in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) lack substantial support from current evidence. OBJECTIVE We aimed to investigate whether the RA TLIF is superior to FG TLIF in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. METHODS We systematically reviewed studies comparing RA versus FG TLIF for lumbar degenerative diseases through July 2022 by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL (EBSCO), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, VIP, and the Cochrane Library, as well as the references of published review articles. Both cohort studies (CSs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Evaluation criteria included the accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw placement, proximal facet joint violation (FJV), radiation exposure, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical revision. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias and ROBINS-I Tool. Random-effects models were used, and the standardized mean difference (SMD) was employed as the effect measure. We conducted subgroup analyses based on surgical type, the specific robot system used, and the study design. Two investigators independently screened abstracts and full-text articles, and the certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. RESULTS Our search identified 539 articles, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that RA had 1.03-folds higher "clinically acceptable" accuracy than FG (RR: 1.0382, 95% CI: 1.0273-1.0493). And RA had 1.12-folds higher "perfect" accuracy than FG group (RR: 1.1167, 95% CI: 1.0726-1.1626). In the case of proximal FJV, our results indicate a 74% reduction in occurrences for patients undergoing RA pedicle screw placement compared to those in the FG group (RR: 0.2606, 95%CI: 0.2063- 0.3293). Seventeen CSs and two RCTs reported the duration of time. The results of CSs suggest that there is no significant difference between RA and FG group (SMD: 0.1111, 95%CI: -0.391-0.6131), but the results of RCTs suggest that the patients who underwent RA-TLIF need more surgery time than FG (SMD: 3.7213, 95%CI: 3.0756-4.3669). Sixteen CSs and two RCTs reported the EBL. The results suggest that the patients who underwent RA pedicle screw placement had fewer EBL than FG group (CSs: SMD: -1.9151, 95%CI: -3.1265-0.7036, RCTs: SMD: -5.9010, 95%CI: -8.7238-3.0782). For radiation exposure, the results of CSs suggest that there is no significant difference in radiation time between RA and FG group (SMD: -0.5256, 95%CI: -1.4357-0.3845), but the patients who underwent RA pedicle screw placement had fewer radiation dose than FG group (SMD: -2.2682, 95%CI: -3.1953-1.3411). And four CSs and one RCT reported the number of revision case. The results of CSs suggest that there is no significant difference in the number of revision case between RA and FG group (RR: 0.4087,95% CI 0.1592-1.0495). Our findings are limited by the residual heterogeneity of the included studies, which may limit the interpretation of the results. CONCLUSION In TLIF, RA technology exhibits enhanced precision in pedicle screw placement when compared to FG methods. This accuracy contributes to advantages such as the protection of adjacent facet joints and reductions in intraoperative radiation dosage and blood loss. However, the longer preoperative preparation time associated with RA procedures results in comparable surgical duration and radiation time to FG techniques. Presently, FG screw placement remains the predominant approach, with clinical surgeons possessing greater proficiency in its application. Consequently, the integration of RA into TLIF surgery may not be considered the optimal choice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42023441600.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianbin Guan
- Honghui-Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710054, China
- Shannxi Key Laboratory of Spine Bionic Treatment, Xi'an, China
| | - Ningning Feng
- Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Xing Yu
- Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Kaitan Yang
- Honghui-Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710054, China.
- Truma Rehabilitation Department, Honghui-Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710054, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saway B, Cunningham C, Pereira M, Sowlat M, Elawady S, Porto G, Barley J, Nordmann N, Frankel B. Robotic endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A single institution case series. World Neurosurg X 2024; 23:100390. [PMID: 38746041 PMCID: PMC11091683 DOI: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Robotic-assisted, endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (RE-TLIF) is a promising, minimally invasive surgical option for degenerative lumbar spondylosis/spondylolisthesis; however, outcomes data and efficacy are limited, especially in multilevel disease. Here, we present the first reported series of patients that underwent either single or multilevel RE-TLIF. Methods A retrospective review was performed on 23 consecutive patients who underwent a single level or multilevel RE-TLIF by a single surgeon. Variables included demographics, perioperative results, pain scores, and functional outcome scores. Results Eighteen patients (78.3 %) underwent single level RE-TLIF and 5 patients (21.7 %) underwent multilevel RE-TLIF. The median reduction of visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain (LBP) of all subjects was 6 (IQR = 4.5, 6.5) with no significant difference between single level and multilevel RE-TLIF (p = 0.565). The median reduction of VAS for leg pain of all subjects 7 (IQR = 6, 8) with no significant difference between single level and multilevel RE-TLIF (p = 0.702). Median blood loss was 25 cc (IQR = 25, 25) and 50 cc (IQR = 25, 100) for single and multilevel RE-TLIF, respectively (p = 0.025), whereas median length of stay was 1 (IQR = 1, 1; mean = 1.0 ± 00.18) days and 1 (IQR = 1, 2; mean = 1.4 ± 00.54) days, respectively (p = 0.042). One major complication was observed requiring reoperation for demineralized bone matrix migration resulting in an L5 radiculopathy. Conclusions Single and multi-level RE-TLIF appears to be a safe and efficacious approach with comparable outcomes to open and other minimally invasive approaches. Additionally, we observed favorable accuracy in robot-assisted pedicle screw, endoscope, and interbody device placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B.F. Saway
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Neurosurgery, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - C. Cunningham
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Neurosurgery, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - M. Pereira
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Neurosurgery, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - M. Sowlat
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Neurosurgery, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - S.S. Elawady
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Neurosurgery, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - G. Porto
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Neurosurgery, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - J. Barley
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Neurosurgery, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Nathan Nordmann
- Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, Division of Neurosurgery, Springfield, IL, 62702, USA
| | - B. Frankel
- Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, Division of Neurosurgery, Springfield, IL, 62702, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu YD, Xu DF, Deng Q, Zhang YJ, Guo TF, Peng RD, Li JJ. Treatment of lumbar disc herniation with robot combined with unilateral biportal endoscopic technology: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12:3235-3242. [PMID: 38898830 PMCID: PMC11185407 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i17.3235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This reported procedure combines the orthopedic surgical robot with the unilateral biportal endoscopy-lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-LIF), utilizing the UBE's wide viewing field and operating space to perform minimally invasive decompressive fusion of the lesioned segment, and the orthopedic surgical robot's intelligence and precision to perform percutaneous pedicle screw placement. The advancement of this procedure lies in the superposition of advantages and offsetting disadvantages of the two new technologies, and the maximum effect of treatment is achieved with maximum minimization of invasiveness and precision under the monitoring of imaging instruments to maximize the benefit of patients, and this review reports a case of multiple-segment lumbar decompression and fusion surgery for lumbar disc herniation via robot-assisted UBE for reference. CASE SUMMARY A 44-year-old patient presented to our hospital. Combining various clinical data, we diagnosed the patient with lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy, lumbar spondylolisthesis, and lumbar spinal stenosis. We developed a surgical plan of "UBE decompression + UBE-LIF + orthopedic surgery robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw implantation for internal fixation". The results were satisfactory. CONCLUSION We present an extremely rare case of multiple-segment lumbar decompression and fusion surgery for lumbar disc herniation via robot-assisted UBE and achieved good results. Therefore, the technique is worthy of clinical promotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan-Dong Liu
- Graduate School, Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730030, Gansu Province, China
| | - Duo-Fang Xu
- Graduate School, Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730030, Gansu Province, China
| | - Qiang Deng
- Spinal Disease Treatment Center, Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
| | - Yan-Jun Zhang
- Department of Spinal Orthopedics II, Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
| | - Tie-Feng Guo
- Department of Spinal Orthopedics II, Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
| | - Ran-Dong Peng
- Department of Osteomyelitis, Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
| | - Jun-Jie Li
- Department of Spinal Orthopedics II, Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu X, Shi X, Hu W, Ma H, Gao Y, Wang H, Jiang Z. Clinical Application and Curative Effect Analysis of Postural Awareness Surgical Tool Assisted Nail Placement in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Orthop Surg 2024; 16:1109-1116. [PMID: 38509016 PMCID: PMC11062864 DOI: 10.1111/os.14038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The pedicle screw technique has been widely used in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis orthopedic surgery, but misplacement of screws may damage important structures such as blood vessels and nerves around the pedicle, resulting in serious consequences. Therefore, our research team has independently developed a surgical tool to assist in the placement of pedicle screws. This study aims to investigate the safety and accuracy of postural awareness tool assisted nail placement in orthopedic surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. METHOD A retrospective analysis was performed on 24 adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis admitted to our hospital from July 2019 to July 2022, including 10 males and 14 females, with an average age of 14.88 ± 2.36 years (10-19 years). The mean follow-up was 15.67 ± 2.20 months (12-20 months). We divided the patients into postural awareness group (n = 12) and C-arm group (n = 12) according to whether the postural awareness surgical tool was used during the operation. All patients were treated with posterior spinal orthopedic surgery. The postural awareness group was assisted by pedicle screw placement with a postural awareness surgical tool, while the C-arm group was given a pedicle screw placement with freehand technique. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, nail placement related complications, nail placement accuracy, and scoliosis correction rate were recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS The operative time, intraoperative blood loss and fluoroscopy times in the postural awareness group were significantly lower than those in the C-arm group, with statistical significance (p < 0.05). The postural awareness group implanted 163 screws with an accuracy rate of 91.41%, while the C-arm group implanted 159 screws with an accuracy rate of 83.02%. The accuracy rate of screw placement in the postural awareness group was higher than that in the C-arm group, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.024). According to the imaging of the patients, there was no significant difference between the Cobb Angle of the main bend measured at three time points before surgery, 1 week after surgery and the last follow-up between the two groups. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the rate of lateral curvature correction between the two groups. CONCLUSION The application of postural awareness surgical tool in posterior orthopedic surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis can improve screw placement accuracy, shorten screw placement time, and make auxiliary screw placement safer and more accurate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- XiaoNan Wu
- Department of Spinal Cord SurgeryPeople's Hospital of Henan UniversityZhengzhouChina
| | - Xinge Shi
- Department of Spinal Cord SurgeryHenan Provincial People's HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Weiran Hu
- Department of Spinal Cord SurgeryHenan Provincial People's HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Haohao Ma
- Department of Spinal Cord SurgeryHenan Provincial People's HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Yan‐Zheng Gao
- Department of Spinal Cord SurgeryHenan Provincial People's HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Haoxu Wang
- Department of Spinal Cord SurgeryZhengzhou University People's HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Zhengfa Jiang
- Department of OrthopedicsThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu Y, Shen R, Li S, Luo T, Rong L, Zhang L. Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. World Neurosurg 2024; 185:327-337.e1. [PMID: 38369106 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to systematically evaluate the optimal surgical fusion approach for lumbar spondylolisthesis, to provide the latest and most reliable evidence for future clinical practice. METHODS A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Ovid-Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus databases was conducted from inception to September 1, 2023, to identify relevant records. Two independent reviewers performed the literature screening, data extraction, and assessment of study quality. RESULTS Fifteen randomized controlled trials involving 892 patients met the inclusion criteria. The network evidence plot showed that posterolateral fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) were the most used fusion techniques. The network meta-analysis results revealed that minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) had a significantly greater improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) compared to endoscopic-TLIF, while PLIF had a significantly better fusion effect than posterolateral fusion. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences were observed between other fusion surgeries in terms of improving ODI, fusion rate, complications, or the improvement of visual analog scale-low back pain. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve results indicated that MIS-TLIF had the greatest potential for improving ODI, visual analog scale-low back pain, and complications, while PLIF had the greatest potential for increasing fusion rates. However, the existing selection bias, measurement bias, reporting bias, and publication bias may have reduced the reliability of the meta-analysis results. CONCLUSIONS Among the various fusion surgeries for lumbar spondylolisthesis, MIS-TLIF appears to provide the greatest benefit to patients. However, more high-quality, large-scale studies are needed to further investigate the treatment efficacy of different fusion surgeries for lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingjie Wu
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruoqi Shen
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shengke Li
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ting Luo
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Limin Rong
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liangming Zhang
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jia H, Zhang Z, Qin J, Bao L, Ao J, Qian H. Management for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a network meta-analysis and systematic review basing on randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 2024; 110:3050-3059. [PMID: 38446872 PMCID: PMC11093486 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consensus on the various interventions for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and major scientific websites until 01 November 2023, to screen eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the treatment of DLS. The seven most common DLS interventions [nonsurgical (NS), decompression only (DO), decompression plus fusion without internal fixation (DF), decompression plus fusion with internal fixation (DFI), endoscopic decompression plus fusion (EDF), endoscopic decompression (ED), and circumferential fusion (360F)] were compared. The primary (pain and disability) and secondary (complications, reoperation rate, operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and satisfaction) outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Data involving 3273 patients in 16 RCTs comparing the efficacy of different interventions for DLS were reported. In terms of improving patient pain and dysfunction, there was a significant difference between surgical and NS. EDF showed the greatest improvement in short-term and long-term dysfunction (probability, 7.1 and 21.0%). Moreover, EDF had a higher complication rate (probability 70.8%), lower reoperation rate (probability, 20.2%), and caused greater blood loss (probability, 82.5%) than other surgical interventions. Endoscopic surgery had the shortest hospitalization time (EDF: probability, 42.6%; ED: probability, 3.9%). DF and DFI had the highest satisfaction scores. CONCLUSIONS Despite the high complication rate of EDF, its advantages include improvement in pain, lower reoperation rate, and shorter hospitalization duration. Therefore, EDF may be a good option for patients with DLS as a less invasive surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jun Ao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hu Qian
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li Y, Liu H, Xue A, Chen J, Zhou W, Li Q, Yin G, Zhao S. Clinical Outcome Analysis of Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Insertion in the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis Complicated with Spinal Fractures. World Neurosurg 2024; 184:e331-e339. [PMID: 38296040 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.01.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vague spinal anatomical landmarks in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) make intraoperative insertion of pedicle screws difficult under direct vision. Currently, the clinical outcome is significantly improved with robot guidance. This study aims to explore the efficacy of robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion in treating AS combined with spinal fractures. METHODS Forty patients (341 screws) who underwent pedicle screw insertion with AS complicated with spinal fractures were included. According to different surgical methods, 16 patients (135 screws) were classified into the robot group and 24 (206 screws) into the free-hand group. Intraoperative blood loss, operative duration, and adverse events were compared between the 2 groups. Gertzbein and Robbins classification was used to classify the accuracy of screw position. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Visual Analog Scale, Japanese Orthopedic Association, and Oswestry Disability Index. RESULTS No statistically significant differences between baseline data of the groups. The difference in the blood loss between groups wasn't significant, nor was the operative duration. No severe adverse events related to pedicle screw insertion were reported in either group. Notably, the accuracy of screw insertion was significantly higher in the robot group (129/135) than in the free-hand group (182/206). The lateral perforation prevalence didn't differ among groups. Visual Analog Scale in the third month postoperatively was lower in the robot group than in the free-hand group, with a significant difference. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrates statistically superior accuracy and surgical outcome of robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion in the treatment of AS complicated with spinal fractures compared with the traditional free-hand operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Jiangsu Institute of Functional Reconstruction and Rehabilitation, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Spinal Cord Disease Research Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Jiangsu Institute of Functional Reconstruction and Rehabilitation, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Spinal Cord Disease Research Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ao Xue
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Jiangsu Institute of Functional Reconstruction and Rehabilitation, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Spinal Cord Disease Research Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jian Chen
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Jiangsu Institute of Functional Reconstruction and Rehabilitation, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Spinal Cord Disease Research Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Wei Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Jiangsu Institute of Functional Reconstruction and Rehabilitation, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Spinal Cord Disease Research Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Qingqing Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Jiangsu Institute of Functional Reconstruction and Rehabilitation, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Spinal Cord Disease Research Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Guoyong Yin
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Jiangsu Institute of Functional Reconstruction and Rehabilitation, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Spinal Cord Disease Research Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Shujie Zhao
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Jiangsu Institute of Functional Reconstruction and Rehabilitation, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Spinal Cord Disease Research Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sarikonda A, Tecce E, Leibold A, Mansoor Ali D, Thalheimer S, Heller J, Prasad S, Sharan A, Jallo J, Harrop J, Vaccaro AR, Sivaganesan A. What is the Marginal Cost of Using Robot Assistance or Navigation for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion? A Time-Driven Activity-Based Cost Analysis. Neurosurgery 2024:00006123-990000000-01078. [PMID: 38465927 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Our primary objective was to compare the marginal intraoperative cost of 3 different methods for pedicle screw placement as part of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs). Specifically, we used time-driven activity-based costing to compare costs between robot-assisted TLIF (RA-TLIF), TLIF with intraoperative navigation (ION-TLIF), and freehand (non-navigated, nonrobotic) TLIF. METHODS Total cost was divided into direct and indirect costs. We identified all instances of RA-TLIF (n = 20), ION-TLIF (n = 59), and freehand TLIF (n = 233) from 2020 to 2022 at our institution. Software was developed to automate the extraction of all intraoperatively used personnel and material resources from the electronic medical record. Total costs were determined through a combination of direct observation, electronic medical record extraction, and interdepartmental collaboration (business operations, sterile processing, pharmacy, and plant operation departments). Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to compare costs between TLIF modalities, accounting for patient-specific factors as well as number of levels fused, surgeon, and hospital site. RESULTS The average total intraoperative cost per case for the RA-TLIF, ION-TLIF, and freehand TLIF cohorts was $24 838 ± $10 748, $15 991 ± $6254, and $14 498 ± $6580, respectively. Regression analysis revealed that RA-TLIF had significantly higher intraoperative cost compared with both ION-TLIF (β-coefficient: $7383 ± $1575, P < .001) and freehand TLIF (β-coefficient: $8182 ± $1523, P < .001). These cost differences were primarily driven by supply cost. However, there were no significant differences in intraoperative cost between ION-TLIF and freehand TLIF (P = .32). CONCLUSION We demonstrate a novel use of time-driven activity-based costing methodology to compare different modalities for executing the same type of lumbar fusion procedure. RA-TLIF entails significantly higher supply cost when compared with other modalities, which explains its association with higher total intraoperative cost. The use of ION, however, does not add extra expense compared with freehand TLIF when accounting for confounders. This might have implications as surgeons and hospitals move toward bundled payments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Advith Sarikonda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eric Tecce
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adam Leibold
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniyal Mansoor Ali
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sara Thalheimer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joshua Heller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Srinivas Prasad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ashwini Sharan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jack Jallo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James Harrop
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alexander R Vaccaro
- Rothman Orthopedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ahilan Sivaganesan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Li JR, Yan Y, Wu XG, He LM, Feng HY. Biomechanical evaluation of Percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2024; 27:285-295. [PMID: 36847747 DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2023.2183348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
In order to analyze and evaluate the stability of lumbar spine and the risk of cage subsidence after different minimally invasive fusion operations, two finite element models Percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PE-PLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) were established. The results showed that compared with MIS-TLIF, PE-PLIF had better segmental stability, lower pedicle screw rod system stress, and lower risk of cage subsidence. The results suggest that the cage with appropriate height should be selected to ensure the segmental stability and avoid the risk of the subsidence caused by the cage with large height.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Rui Li
- Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Yang Yan
- College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xiao-Gang Wu
- College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China
| | - Li-Ming He
- Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Hao-Yu Feng
- Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aurouer N, Guerin P, Cogniet A, Gangnet N, Pedram M, Piechaud PT, Mangione P. Pedicle screw placement accuracy in robot-assisted versus image-guided freehand surgery of thoraco-lumbar spine (ROBARTHRODESE): study protocol for a single-centre randomized controlled trial. Trials 2024; 25:106. [PMID: 38310274 PMCID: PMC10837855 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-07908-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic spinal surgery may result in better pedicle screw placement accuracy, and reduction in radiation exposure and length of stay, compared to freehand surgery. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to compare screw placement accuracy of robot-assisted surgery with integrated 3D computer-assisted navigation versus freehand surgery with 2D fluoroscopy for arthrodesis of the thoraco-lumbar spine. METHODS This is a single-centre evaluator-blinded RCT with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants (n = 300) will be randomized into two groups, robot-assisted (Mazor X Stealth Edition) versus freehand, after stratification based on the planned number of pedicle screws needed for surgery. The primary outcome is the proportion of pedicle screws placed with grade A accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins classification) on postoperative computed tomography images. The secondary outcomes are intervention time, operation room occupancy time, length of stay, estimated blood loss, surgeon's radiation exposure, screw fracture/loosening, superior-level facet joint violation, complication rate, reoperation rate on the same level or one level above, functional and clinical outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index, pain, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, sensory and motor status) and cost-utility analysis. DISCUSSION This RCT will provide insight into whether robot-assisted surgery with the newest generation spinal robot yields better pedicle screw placement accuracy than freehand surgery. Potential benefits of robot-assisted surgery include lower complication and revision rates, shorter length of stay, lower radiation exposure and reduction of economic cost of the overall care. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05553028. Registered on September 23, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Morad Pedram
- ELSAN Group, Hôpital Privé Saint Martin, Pessac, France
| | - Pierre-Thierry Piechaud
- Elsan Group, Clinique St Augustin, Cellule Recherche Clinique Nouvelle Aquitaine, Bordeaux, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shen X, Gao YC, Zhang P, Song P, Jiang ZL, Wang F, Xuan WB, Gao ZX. Is unilateral-approach full-endoscopic lumbar fusion effective for single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis with bilateral symptoms? A preliminary report of 43 CT analysis. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024; 33:409-416. [PMID: 37378709 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07667-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the clinical results and radiological parameters changes after unilateral-approach endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) for lumbar spondylolisthesis with bilateral symptoms. METHODS 43 single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis patients with bilateral lower limb symptoms were included from June 2020 to May 2022. All patients underwent unilateral-approach Endo-LIF and postoperative computed tomography. Radiological parameters including disk height (DH), degree of upper vertebral slip (DUVS), and foramen intervertebral parameters including bilateral foraminal height (FH), contralateral foraminal areas (FA) were evaluated. The clinical outcomes including low back pain and bilateral leg pain were evaluated using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before and after surgery. RESULTS All cases were successfully completed surgery and followed for average 15.16 ± 5.2 months. DH (44% ± 11%) and DUVS were significantly improvement postoperatively compared with preoperatively (p < 0.05). Statistically significant increases in bilateral FH (25% ± 11% on the surgical side, 17% ± 8% on the contralateral side) and contralateral FA (26% ± 6%) were observed (p < 0.05). The VAS and the ODI scores were significantly decreased in comparison with the preoperative scores (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Unilateral-approach with contralateral indirect decompression in Endo-LIF can acquire satisfactory clinical outcomes. Therefore, unilateral-approach Endo-LIF may be a promising option for lumbar spondylolisthesis with bilateral symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu Shen
- School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Yu-Cheng Gao
- School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Pei Zhang
- School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Peng Song
- School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Zan-Li Jiang
- School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Feng Wang
- School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Wen-Bin Xuan
- School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Zeng-Xin Gao
- School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
- Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing Lishui People's Hospital, Zhongda Lishui Brach, Nanjing, 210009, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jung B, Han J, Shahsavarani S, Abbas AM, Echevarria AC, Carrier RE, Ngan A, Katz AD, Essig D, Verma R. Robotic-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Surgery on the Accuracy of Spine Pedicle Screw Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2024; 16:e54969. [PMID: 38410625 PMCID: PMC10896625 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Spinal fusion is a common method by which surgeons decrease instability and deformity of the spinal segment targeted. Pedicle screws are vital tools in fusion surgeries and advancements in technology have introduced several modalities of screw placement. Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in robot-assisted (RA) versus fluoroscopic-guided (FG) techniques. The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were systematically reviewed from January 2007 through to August 8, 2022, to identify relevant studies. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was determined using the Gertzbein-Robbins (GR) classification system. Facet joint violation (FJV), total case radiation dosage, total case radiation time, total operating room (OR) time, and total case blood loss were collected. Twenty-one articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Successful screw accuracy (GR Grade A or B) was found to be 1.02 (95% confidence interval: 1.01 - 1.04) times more likely with the RA technique. In defining accuracy solely based on the GR Grade A criteria, screws placed with RA were 1.10 (95% confidence interval: 1.06 - 1.15) times more likely to be accurate. There was no significant difference between the two techniques with respect to blood loss (Hedges' g: 1.16, 95% confidence interval: -0.75 to 3.06) or case radiation time (Hedges' g: -0.34, 95% CI: -1.22 to 0.53). FG techniques were associated with shorter operating room times (Hedges' g: -1.03, 95% confidence interval: -1.76 to -0.31), and higher case radiation dosage (Hedges' g: 1.61, 95% confidence interval: 1.11 to 2.10). This review suggests that RA may slightly increase pedicle screw accuracy and decrease per-case radiation dosage compared to FG techniques. However, total operating times for RA cases are greater than those for FG cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bongseok Jung
- Orthopedic Spine Surgery, Northwell Health, Manhasset, USA
- Orthopedics, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, Hempstead, USA
| | - Justin Han
- Orthopedic Spine Surgery, Northwell Health, Manhasset, USA
| | | | - Anas M Abbas
- Orthopedic Spine Surgery, Northwell Health, Manhasset, USA
| | | | | | - Alex Ngan
- Orthopedic Spine Surgery, Northwell Health, Manhasset, USA
| | - Austen D Katz
- Orthopedic Spine Surgery, Northwell Health, Manhasset, USA
| | - David Essig
- Orthopedic Spine Surgery, Northwell Health, Manhasset, USA
| | - Rohit Verma
- Orthopedic Spine Surgery, Northwell Health, Manhasset, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang X, Liu HC, Ma YH, Zhu QS, Zhu YH. Effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:37. [PMID: 38231423 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01768-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
Robot-assisted (RA) technology has been widely used in spine surgery. This analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of RA minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and fluoroscopy-assisted (FA) MIS-TLIF for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases (DLSD). PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were systematically searched, and the outcomes included surgical parameters [operation time, blood loss, number of fluoroscopic, accuracy of pedicle screw position, superior facet joint violation (FJV)], and clinical indexes (Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, clinical efficacy, hospital stays, complications). Eleven articles involving 1066 patients were included. RA group produced better results than the FA group in operation time (WMD = - 6.59; 95% CI - 12.79 to - 0.40; P = 0.04), blood loss (WMD = - 34.81; 95% CI - 50.55 to - 19.08; P < 0.0001), number of fluoroscopic (WMD = - 18.24; 95% CI - 30.63 to - 5.85; P = 0.004), accuracy of pedicle screw position: Grade A (OR = 3.16; 95% CI 2.36-4.23; P < 0.00001), Grade B (OR = 0.39; 95% CI 0.28-0.54; P < 0.00001), Grade C (OR = 0.27; 95% CI 0.13-0.54; P = 0.0002), and Grade D (OR = 0.17; 95% CI 0.03-0.98; P = 0.05), FJV: Grade 0 (OR = 3.27; 95% CI 1.34-8.02; P = 0.010), Grade 1 (OR = 0.24; 95% CI 0.16-0.38; P < 0.00001), Grade 2 (OR = 0.24; 95% CI 0.12-0.51; P = 0.0002), and Grade 3 (OR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.07-0.93; P = 0.04). But no significant differences in VAS score, ODI, JOA score, clinical efficacy, hospital stays, and complications. These results demonstrate a significant improvement in the intraoperative course of the RA technique. However, RA-MIS-TLIF has not yet demonstrated significant advantages in terms of postoperative symptom relief and functional improvement. Future research and clinical practice should further explore the efficacy of this technique to optimize outcomes and quality of life for patients with DLSD. The study was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42023454405).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Hao-Chuan Liu
- Department of Spine Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Yi-Hang Ma
- Department of Spine Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Qing-San Zhu
- Department of Spine Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, Jilin, China.
| | - Yu-Hang Zhu
- Department of Spine Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, Jilin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Asada T, Simon CZ, Lu AZ, Adida S, Dupont M, Parel PM, Zhang J, Bhargava S, Morse KW, Dowdell JE, Iyer S, Qureshi SA. Robot-navigated pedicle screw insertion can reduce intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay: analysis of 1,633 patients utilizing propensity score matching. Spine J 2024; 24:118-124. [PMID: 37704046 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Navigation and robotic technologies have emerged as an alternative option to conventional freehand techniques for pedicle screw insertion. However, the effectiveness of these technologies in reducing the perioperative complications of spinal fusion surgery remains limited due to the small cohort size in the existing literature. PURPOSE To investigate whether utilization of robotically navigated pedicle screw insertion can reduce the perioperative complications of spinal fusion surgery-including reoperations-with a sizeable cohort. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients who underwent primary lumbar fusion surgery between 2019 and 2022. OUTCOME MEASURES Perioperative complications including readmission, reoperation, its reasons, estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay. METHODS Patients' data were collected including age, sex, race, body mass index, upper-instrumented vertebra, lower-instrumented vertebra, number of screws inserted, and primary procedure name. Patients were classified into the following two groups: freehand group and robot group. The variable-ratio greedy matching was utilized to create the matched cohorts by propensity score and compared the outcomes between the two group. RESULTS A total of 1,633 patients who underwent primary instrumented spinal lumbar fusion surgery were initially identified (freehand 1,286; robot 347). After variable ratio matching was performed with age, sex, body mass index, fused levels, and upper instrumented vertebrae level, 694 patients in the freehand group and 347 patients in robot groups were selected. The robot group showed less estimated blood loss (418.9±398.9 vs 199.2±239.6 ml; p<.001), shorter LOS (4.1±3.1 vs 3.2±3.0 days; p<.001) and similar operative time (212.5 vs 222.0 minutes; p=.151). Otherwise, there was no significant difference in readmission rate (3.6% vs 2.6%; p=.498), reoperation rate (3.2% vs 2.6%; p=.498), and screw malposition requiring reoperation (five cases, 0.7% vs one case, 0.3%; p=1.000). CONCLUSIONS Perioperative complications requiring readmission and reoperation were similar between fluoroscopy guided freehand and robotic surgery. Robot-guided pedicle screw insertion can enhance surgical efficiency by reducing intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay without extending operative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyuki Asada
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Chad Z Simon
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Amy Z Lu
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Samuel Adida
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Marcel Dupont
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Philip M Parel
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Joshua Zhang
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Satyaj Bhargava
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Kyle W Morse
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - James E Dowdell
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Heard JC, Lee YA, D’Antonio ND, Narayanan R, Lambrechts MJ, Bodnar J, Purtill C, Pezzulo JD, Farronato D, Fitzgerald P, Canseco JA, Kaye ID, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Kepler CK, Schroeder GD. The impact of robotic assistance for lumbar fusion surgery on 90-day surgical outcomes and 1-year revisions. JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE 2024; 15:15-20. [PMID: 38644906 PMCID: PMC11029112 DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_145_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the (1) 90-day surgical outcomes and (2) 1-year revision rate of robotic versus nonrobotic lumbar fusion surgery. Methods Patients >18 years of age who underwent primary lumbar fusion surgery at our institution were identified and propensity-matched in a 1:1 fashion based on robotic assistance during surgery. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and surgical outcomes, including 90-day surgical complications and 1-year revisions, were collected. Multivariable regression analysis was performed. Significance was set to P < 0.05. Results Four hundred and fifteen patients were identified as having robotic lumbar fusion and were matched to a control group. Bivariant analysis revealed no significant difference in total 90-day surgical complications (P = 0.193) or 1-year revisions (P = 0.178). The operative duration was longer in robotic surgery (287 + 123 vs. 205 + 88.3, P ≤ 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that robotic fusion was not a significant predictor of 90-day surgical complications (odds ratio [OR] = 0.76 [0.32-1.67], P = 0.499) or 1-year revisions (OR = 0.58 [0.28-1.18], P = 0.142). Other variables identified as the positive predictors of 1-year revisions included levels fused (OR = 1.26 [1.08-1.48], P = 0.004) and current smokers (OR = 3.51 [1.46-8.15], P = 0.004). Conclusion Our study suggests that robotic-assisted and nonrobotic-assisted lumbar fusions are associated with a similar risk of 90-day surgical complications and 1-year revision rates; however, robotic surgery does increase time under anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy C. Heard
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Yunsoo A. Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nicholas D. D’Antonio
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rajkishen Narayanan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark J. Lambrechts
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John Bodnar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Caroline Purtill
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joshua D. Pezzulo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dominic Farronato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Pat Fitzgerald
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jose A. Canseco
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ian David Kaye
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alan S. Hilibrand
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexander R. Vaccaro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher K. Kepler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gregory D. Schroeder
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ahmetspahic A, Burazerovic E, Jankovic D, Kujaca E, Rizvanovic H, Omerhodzic I, Sefo H, Granov N. RoboticScope-Assisted Microanastomosis in a Chicken Leg Model. Asian J Neurosurg 2023; 18:782-789. [PMID: 38161617 PMCID: PMC10756782 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Many recent studies show that exoscopes are safe and effective alternatives to operating microscopes (OM). Developments of robotics and automation are present in neurosurgery with the appearance of a newer device such as RoboticScope (RS) exoscope with a digital three-dimensional (3D) image and a head-mounted display. The body of the RS is connected to a six-axis robotic arm that contains two video cameras, and serves as stereovision. This robotic arm allows accurate 3D camera motions over the field of view, giving the user a great degree of freedom in viewpoint selection. The surgeons may specify the direction and speed of the robotic arm using simple head movements when the foot pedal is pressed. Since its development in 2020, the RS has occasionally been used in neurosurgery for a multitude of procedures. Methods This study showcases vessel microanastomosis training on chicken legs using the RS. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of the RS without a comparative analysis of the standard OM. The study was conducted in 2023 during a month-long trial period of the device at the Department of Neurosurgery of the Clinical Center of the University of Sarajevo. All procedures including RS-assisted anastomosis were performed by a neurosurgeon in anastomosis training (A.A.) supervised by a senior vascular neurosurgeon (E.B.). For the purpose of the study, we evaluated occlusion time in minutes, bypass patency with iodine, and overall satisfaction of the trainee in terms of light intensity, precision of automatic focus, mobility of the device, ergonomics, and convenience of the helmet. Results Ten RS-assisted microanastomoses were performed by interrupted suturing technique with 10.0 nylon thread. Bypass training included seven "end-to-side," two "end-to-end," and one "side-to-side" microanastomoses. The smallest vessel diameter was 1 mm. Occlusion time improved by training from 50 to 24 minutes, with contrast patency of the anastomoses in all cases without notable leakage of the contrast, except one case. Complete satisfaction of the trainee was achieved in 7 out of 10 cases. During this period, we also performed different RS-assisted surgeries including a single indirect bypass, convexity brain tumor resection, and microdiscectomies. Conclusion RS provides a new concept for microanastomosis training as an alternative or adjunct to the standard microscope. We found a full-time hands-on microsuturing without the need for manual readjustment of the device as an advantage as well as instant depth at automatic zooming and precise transposition of the focus via head movements. However, it takes time to adapt and get used to the digital image. With the evolution of the device helmet's shortcomings, the RS could represent a cutting-edge method in vessel microanastomosis in the future. Nevertheless, this article represents one of the first written reports on microanastomosis training on an animal model with the above-mentioned device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adi Ahmetspahic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of the University of Sarajevo, Bolnička 25, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Department of Medicine, Sarajevo School of Science of Technology., Hrasnicka cesta 3a, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Eldin Burazerovic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of the University of Sarajevo, Bolnička 25, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Dragan Jankovic
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University, Trg Svetog Trojstva3, Osijek, Croatia
| | - Eleonora Kujaca
- Department of Medicine, Sarajevo School of Science of Technology., Hrasnicka cesta 3a, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Hana Rizvanovic
- Department of Medicine, Sarajevo School of Science of Technology., Hrasnicka cesta 3a, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Ibrahim Omerhodzic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of the University of Sarajevo, Bolnička 25, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Department of Medicine, University of Sarajevo, Cekalusa 90, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Haso Sefo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of the University of Sarajevo, Bolnička 25, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Nermir Granov
- Department of Medicine, University of Sarajevo, Cekalusa 90, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang J, Miao J, Zhan Y, Duan Y, Wang Y, Hao D, Wang B. Spine Surgical Robotics: Current Status and Recent Clinical Applications. Neurospine 2023; 20:1256-1271. [PMID: 38171293 PMCID: PMC10762389 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2346610.305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
With the development of artificial intelligence and the further deepening of medical-engineering integration, spine surgical robot-assisted (RA) technique has made significant progress and its applicability in clinical practice is constantly expanding in recent years. In this review, we have systematically summarized the majority of literature related to spine surgical robots in the past decade, and not only classified robots accordingly, but also summarized the latest research progress in RA technique for screw placement such as cervical, thoracic, and lumbar pedicle screws, cortical bone trajectory screws, cervical lateral mass screws, and S2 sacroiliac screws; guiding targeted puncture and placement of endoscope via the intervertebral foramen; complete resection of spinal tumor tissue; and decompressive laminectomy. In addition, this report also provides a detailed evaluation of RA technique's advantages and disadvantages, and clarifies the accuracy, safety, and practicality of RA technique. We consider that this review can help clinical physicians further understand and familiarize the current clinical application status of spine surgical robots, thereby promoting the continuous improvement and popularization of RA technique, and ultimately benefiting numerous patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiangtao Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
- Medical School of Yan’an University, Yan’an, China
| | - Junxian Miao
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
- Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xi’an, China
| | - Yi Zhan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
- Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xi’an, China
| | - Yongchao Duan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
- Department of Intraoperative Imaging, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| | - Yuanshun Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third People’s Hospital of Xining, Qinghai, China
| | - Dingjun Hao
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| | - Biao Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sun WX, Huang WQ, Li HY, Wang HS, Guo SL, Dong J, Chen BL, Lin YP. Clinical efficacy of robotic spine surgery: an updated systematic review of 20 randomized controlled trials. EFORT Open Rev 2023; 8:841-853. [PMID: 37909700 PMCID: PMC10646522 DOI: 10.1530/eor-23-0125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine whether using robots in spine surgery results in more clinical advantages and fewer adverse consequences. Methods Between October 1990 and October 2022, a computer-based search was conducted through the databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine, VIP databases, and WAN FANG. The study only included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of robot-assisted surgery with those of conventional spine surgery. The review was conducted following PRISMA 2020, and AMSTAR-2 was used to evaluate the methodological quality. R version 4.2.1 was used in the meta-analysis. The Cochrane Collaboration Tool was used for evaluating the risk of bias. Results This study analyzed 954 participants from 20 RCTs involving cervical spondylosis, lumbar degenerative disease, scoliosis, etc. The robot-assisted group outperformed the freehand group in terms of intraoperative blood loss, number of screws in grade A position, grade A + B position, radiation dose, and hospital stay. Operation duration, visual analog scale scores of low back pain, Oswestry disability index, and radiation exposure time did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusions Although robotic spine surgery is more accurate in pedicle screw placement than conventional methods, the robot group did not demonstrate an advantage in terms of clinical efficacy. Studies of complications and cost-effectiveness are still very rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-xi Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei-qiang Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hua-yang Li
- State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hong-shen Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sheng-li Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jie Dong
- Huizhou Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Huizhou, China
| | - Bo-lai Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong-peng Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tian J, Zhang H. Effect of bone cement-reinforced pedicle screws combined with fusion repositioning therapy on lumbar spine function and postoperative complications in patients with severe lumbar spondylolisthesis. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2023; 33:101156. [PMID: 37323938 PMCID: PMC10265474 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To retrospectively study the efficacy of bone cement-enhanced pedicle screws combined with interbody fusion reduction in the treatment of severe lumbar spondylolisthesis, its effect on lumbar function and complications. Methods From January 2019 to June 2021, 82 cases of severe lumbar spondylolisthesis in our hospital were analyzed. According to the different treatment plans, the patients were divided into two groups: A and B, in which group A patients were treated with pedicle screws combined with fusion and reduction, and group B patients were treated with bone cement reinforced pedicle screws combined with fusion and reduction. Perioperative indexes, pain severity (VAS), Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI), and low back and leg pain score of Japan Orthopedic Association (JOA), spondylolisthesis reduction, intervertebral space height, intervertebral foramen height, complications, and screw loosening were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the amount of intraoperative bleeding between group A and group B (P > 0.05). The operation time of group B was longer than that of group A, and the hospitalization time was shorter than that of group A. The vertebral fusion rate of group B was higher than that of group A (P < 0.05). The VAS, ODI and JOA scores at the last follow-up in both groups were lower than those before surgery, and group B was lower than group A (P < 0.05). Compared with the preoperative period, the postoperative slippage degree grading improved in both groups, while the improvement rate in group B was higher than that in group A (P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the scores of intervertebral foramen height and intervertebral space height in both groups were higher than those before operation, and those in group B were higher than those in group A (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of complications and screw loosening between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Compared with conventional screw treatment, bone cement-reinforced pedicle screws combined with fusion repositioning can further improve the repositioning rate of slipped vertebrae in the treatment of severe LSL, while achieving a better intervertebral fusion rate. Therefore, the treatment of severe LSL with bone cement reinforced pedicle fusion and reduction is a safe and effective method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jincai Tian
- Department of Spinal, Ningxia Yinchuan Guolong Hospital, Yinchuan, 750000, Ningxia, China
| | - Hairong Zhang
- Department of Emergency, Ningxia Yinchuan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Yinchuan, 750000, Ningxia, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Li Y, Wang Y, Ma X, Ma J, Dong B, Yang P, Sun Y, Zhou L, Shen J. Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between robot-assisted and freehand pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18:359. [PMID: 37189203 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03774-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Meta-analysis and systematic review. BACKGROUND Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement technique offers greater accuracy than the traditional freehand screw placement technique. However, it is controversial whether there is a difference between the two procedures in terms of improved clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science to identify potentially eligible articles. Indispensable data such as the year of publication, study type, age, number of patients, sex distribution, and outcomes were extracted. The outcome indicators of interest included Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) score, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and post-operative length of stay. RevMan 5.4.1 was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of eight studies with 508 participants were included. Eight were related to ΔVAS, six were related to ΔODI, seven were related to operative time, five were related to intraoperative blood loss, and seven were related to the length of hospitalization. The results showed that, in terms of ΔVAS (95% CI, -1.20 to -0.36, P = 0.0003) and ΔODI (95% CI, -2.50 to -0.48, P = 0.004), robot-assisted pedicle screw placement technique scored higher than traditional freehand technique. Additionally, the intraoperative blood loss (95% CI, -140.34 to -10.94, P = 0.02) and the length of hospitalization (95% CI, -2.59 to -0.31, P = 0.01) for patients who underwent robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement were less than that of those who underwent the conventional freehand screw placement. No significant difference was found between robot-assisted techniques and conventional freehand techniques in pedicle screw placement in surgical time (95% CI, -2.24 to 26.32, P = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted technique helps improve short-term clinical outcomes, reduce intraoperative blood loss and patient suffering, and shorten recovery time compared to the freehand technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiyang Li
- Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University (Tianjin Hospital), Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China
- Tianjin Orthopedic Institute, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics and Medical Engineering, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Wang
- Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University (Tianjin Hospital), Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China
- Tianjin Orthopedic Institute, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics and Medical Engineering, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China
| | - Xinlong Ma
- Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University (Tianjin Hospital), Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China.
- Tianjin Orthopedic Institute, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China.
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics and Medical Engineering, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China.
| | - Jianxiong Ma
- Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University (Tianjin Hospital), Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China.
- Tianjin Orthopedic Institute, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China.
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics and Medical Engineering, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China.
| | - Benchao Dong
- Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University (Tianjin Hospital), Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China
- Tianjin Orthopedic Institute, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics and Medical Engineering, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China
| | - Peichuan Yang
- Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University (Tianjin Hospital), Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China
- Tianjin Orthopedic Institute, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics and Medical Engineering, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China
| | - Yadi Sun
- Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University (Tianjin Hospital), Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China
- Tianjin Orthopedic Institute, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics and Medical Engineering, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China
| | - Liyun Zhou
- Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University (Tianjin Hospital), Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China
- Tianjin Orthopedic Institute, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics and Medical Engineering, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiahui Shen
- Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University (Tianjin Hospital), Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China
- Tianjin Orthopedic Institute, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics and Medical Engineering, Tianjin, 300050, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Accuracy and digital screw path design of TiRobot-assisted pedicle screw placement for lumbar spondylolisthesis. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2023; 47:309-317. [PMID: 36331595 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05615-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate lumbar spondylolisthesis screw placement assisted by TiRobot in terms of digital screw path design, accurate implementation, and accuracy evaluation method. METHODS In this study, we enrolled 40 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis between December 2020 and August 2021 who underwent spine surgery at the Affiliated Hospital of PuTian University. Pre-operative computed tomography position and screw path designation, intra-operative pedicle screw placement according to pre-operative planning, and post-operative evaluation of the accuracy of screw placement were performed. 3D coordinates of the entry and exit points before and after the operation were collected. The qualified points at different levels of accuracy were counted. The screw placement accuracy was based on the absolute difference using the Chi-squared test. RESULTS In total, 194 screws were successfully implanted with no screws penetrating the cortex. The absolute difference of entry points X, Y, and Z coordinates before and after the operation was 0.425 ± 0.294 mm, 0.417 ± 0.310 mm, and 0.466 ± 0.327 mm, respectively. The corresponding values in terms of exit points were 0.702 ± 0.470 mm, 0.963 ± 0.595mm, and 0.983 ± 0.566 mm, respectively. No obvious differences in coordinates before and after the operation were observed with an entry point degree of accuracy of ≥ 1.2 mm and exit point degree of accuracy of ≥ 2.1 mm. Therefore, the real surgery was consistent with the design. CONCLUSIONS TiRobot-assisted lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery achieved optimal path designation and precise surgery.
Collapse
|
22
|
Lopez IB, Benzakour A, Mavrogenis A, Benzakour T, Ahmad A, Lemée JM. Robotics in spine surgery: systematic review of literature. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2023; 47:447-456. [PMID: 35849162 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05508-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Over 4.83 million spine surgery procedures are performed annually around the world. With the considerable caseload and the precision needed to achieve optimal spinal instrumentation, technical progress has helped to improve the technique's safety and accuracy with the development of peri-operative assistance tools. Contrary to other surgical applications already part of the standard of care, the development of robotics in spine surgery is still a novelty and is not widely available nor used. Robotics, especially when coupled with other guidance modalities such as navigation, seems to be a promising tool in our quest for accuracy, improving patient outcomes and reducing surgical complications. Robotics in spine surgery may also be for the surgeon a way to progress in terms of ergonomics, but also to respond to a growing concern among surgical teams to reduce radiation exposure. METHOD We present in this recent systematic review of the literature realized according to the PRISMA guidelines the place of robotics in spine surgery, reviewing the comparison to standard techniques, the current and future indications, the learning curve, the impact on radiation exposure, and the cost-effectiveness. RESULTS Seventy-six relevant original studies were identified and analyzed for the review. CONCLUSION Robotics has proved to be a safe help for spine surgery, both for the patient with a decrease of operating time and increase in pedicular screw accuracy, and for the surgical team with a decrease of radiation exposure. Medico-economic studies demonstrated that despite a high buying cost, the purchase of a robot dedicated for spine surgery is cost-effective resulting in lesser revision, lower infection, reduced length of stay, and shorter surgical procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignacio Barrio Lopez
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 09, France
| | - Ahmed Benzakour
- Centre Orléanais du Dos, Pôle Santé Oréliance, Saran, France
| | - Andreas Mavrogenis
- First Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | - Jean-Michel Lemée
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 09, France. .,INSERM CRCI2NA Team 5, GLIAD, Angers, France.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Feasibility of outpatient robot assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL 2022; 13:100192. [PMID: 36620079 PMCID: PMC9813734 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Lumbar interbody fusion is a common spine procedure. 199,140 elective lumbar fusions were performed in the United States in 2015. Robot assisted (RA) pedicle screw placement has advanced minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS) making short stay transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF) with same day or next day discharge a possibility for select patients. Methods This study is a retrospective case series of a single surgeon's experience with RA MIS TLIF using the Globus ExcelsiusGPS system. Patients undergoing RA MIS TLIF at an outpatient surgery center between August 2020 and February 2021 were included in the study. Results Twenty-three patients met inclusion criteria. Ninety-six RA pedicle screws and 25 interbody cages were placed. 96/96 (100%) pedicle screws and 25/25 (100%) interbodies were found to be in satisfactory position using intraoperative x-ray. None of the instrumentation required re-placement or revision intraoperatively. 20/23 (87%) patients were able to discharge within 24 hours of the procedure. 2/23 (8.7%) patients discharged on the day of surgery. One patient of 23 (4.3%) required discharge to an inpatient rehabilitation facility post operatively. 0/23 (0%) patients required readmission for pain control. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of outpatient RA MIS TLIF for select patients. Future directions include a larger study to elucidate characteristics of the best candidates for outpatient RA MIS TLIF.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
The transition to performing procedures robotically generally entails a period of adjustment known as a learning curve as the surgeon develops a familiarity with the technology. However, no study has comprehensively examined robotic learning curves across the field of neurosurgery. We conducted a systematic review to characterize the scope of literature on robotic learning curves in neurosurgery, assess operative parameters that may involve a learning curve, and delineate areas for future investigation. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched. Following deduplication, articles were screened by title and abstract for relevance. Remaining articles were screened via full text for final inclusion. Bibliographic and learning curve data were extracted. Of 746 resultant articles, 32 articles describing 3074 patients were included, of which 23 (71.9%) examined spine, 4 (12.5%) pediatric, 4 (12.5%) functional, and 1 (3.1%) general neurosurgery. The parameters assessed for learning curves were heterogeneous. In total, 8 (57.1%) of 14 studies found reduced operative time with increased cases, while the remainder demonstrated no learning curve. Six (60.0%) of 10 studies reported reduced operative time per component with increased cases, while the remainder indicated no learning curve. Radiation time, radiation time per component, robot time, registration time, setup time, and radiation dose were assessed by ≤ 4 studies each, with 0-66.7% of studies demonstrated a learning curve. Four (44.4%) of 9 studies on accuracy showed improvement over time, while the others indicated no improvement over time. The number of cases required to reverse the learning curve ranged from 3 to 75. Learning curves are common in robotic neurosurgery. However, existing studies demonstrate high heterogeneity in assessed parameters and the number of cases that comprise the learning curve. Future studies should seek to develop strategies to reduce the number of cases required to reach the learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan A Shlobin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair Street, Suite 2210, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| | - Jonathan Huang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair Street, Suite 2210, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Chengyuan Wu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ma H, Zhang F, Ying Q, Pan B, Li Y, Ge H, Cao Y, Jiang T, Dai M, Ji C. Long-Term Clinical and Imaging Results of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Orthop Surg 2022; 15:400-412. [PMID: 36479592 PMCID: PMC9891977 DOI: 10.1111/os.13588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The efficacies and safety of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) remains controversial, and long-term clinical efficacies in particular need to be explored. This study is designed accordingly, therefore, we searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, OVID, and SinoMed for literature, regardless of publication date or language. Taking 12 months after operation as the shortest limit, the outcome measures were extracted, including visual analog scale (VAS), Oswetry dysfunction index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, intervertebral disk height (IDH), foraminal height (FH), lumbar lordosis (LL), segment lordosis (SL), slip ratio, and incidence of surgical complications. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.4 and Stata 16.0, and results were expressed with MD and 95% CI, and two-sided p-values with p < 0.05 being statistically significant. In total, 17 clinical studies (n = 689 patients) were screened, with an average patient age of 63.4 years. Our study revealed that VAS decreased by 4.55 (low back pain) and 5.46 (leg pain) points, respectively. And ODI score decreased by an average of 33.82% while JOA score increased by an average of 11.56 points. In terms of imaging indicators, mean IDH and FH increased by 4.18 and 4.91 mm, mean LL and SL improved by 9.22° and 2.46°, respectively. Besides, mean slip ratio decreased by 10.45%. The incidence of complications was statistically analyzed in 18 studies, with a rate of 4%-54% and an overall incidence of 19%. To sum up, our study was the first to focus on the long-term efficacies of OLIF treatment for DLS, and to provide further clinical evidence. However, long-term follow-up multicenter randomized controlled trials are still needed for further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Ma
- School of Public HealthZhejiang Chinese Medical UniversityHangzhou, ZhejiangChina,Wenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhou, ZhejiangChina
| | - Fanyi Zhang
- Wenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhou, ZhejiangChina
| | - Qijie Ying
- Wenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhou, ZhejiangChina
| | - Baoze Pan
- Wenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhou, ZhejiangChina
| | - Yuting Li
- Wenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhou, ZhejiangChina
| | - Hongping Ge
- Wenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhou, ZhejiangChina
| | - Yu Cao
- Wenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhou, ZhejiangChina
| | | | - Meifen Dai
- Wenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhou, ZhejiangChina
| | - Conghua Ji
- School of Public HealthZhejiang Chinese Medical UniversityHangzhou, ZhejiangChina
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
林 书, 谭 科, 胡 豇, 万 仑, 王 跃. [Effectiveness of modified orthopedic robot-assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty in treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture]. ZHONGGUO XIU FU CHONG JIAN WAI KE ZA ZHI = ZHONGGUO XIUFU CHONGJIAN WAIKE ZAZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF REPARATIVE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 2022; 36:1119-1125. [PMID: 36111475 PMCID: PMC9626289 DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202204013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of orthopedic robot with modified tracer fixation (short for modified orthopedic robot) assisted percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in treatment of single-segment osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). Methods The clinical data of 155 patients with single-segment OVCF who were admitted between December 2017 and January 2021 and met the selection criteria was retrospectively analyzed. According to the operation methods, the patients were divided into robot group (87 cases, PKP assisted by modified orthopedic robot) and C-arm group (68 cases, PKP assisted by C-arm X-ray fluoroscopy). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, T value of bone mineral density, therapeutic segment, grade of vertebral compression fracture, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, midline vertebral height, and Cobb angle between the two groups (P>0.05). The effectiveness evaluation indexes of the two groups were collected and compared. The clinical evaluation indexes included the establishment time of working channel, dose of intraoperative fluoroscopy, the amount of injected cement, VAS score before and after operation, and the occurrence of complications. The imaging evaluation indexes included the degree of puncture deviation, the degree of bone cement diffusion, the leakage of bone cement, the midline vertebral height and the Cobb angle before and after operation. Results The establishment time of working channel in robot group was significantly shorter than that in C-arm group, and the dose of intraoperative fluoroscopy was significantly larger than that in C-arm group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the amount of injected cement between the two groups (t=1.149, P=0.252). The patients in two groups were followed up 10-14 months (mean, 12 months). Except that the intraoperative VAS score of the robot group was significantly better than that of the C-arm group (P<0.05), there was no significant difference between the two groups at other time points (P>0.05). No severe complication such as infection, spinal cord or nerve injury, and pulmonary embolism occurred in the two groups. Five cases (5.7%) in robot group and 7 cases (10.2%) in C-arm group had adjacent segment fracture, and the difference in incidence of adjacent segment fracture between the two groups was not significant (χ2=1.105, P=0.293). Compared with C-arm group, the deviation of puncture and the diffusion of bone cement at 1 day after operation, the midline vertebral height and Cobb angle at 1 month after operation and last follow-up were significantly better in robot group (P<0.05). Eight cases (9.1%) in the robot group and 16 cases (23.5%) in the C-arm group had cement leakage, and the incidence of cement leakage in the robot group was significantly lower than that in the C-arm group (χ2=5.993, P=0.014). There was no intraspinal leakage in the two groups. Conclusion Compared with traditional PKP assisted by C-arm X-ray fluoroscopy, modified orthopedic robot-assisted PKP in the treatment of single-segment OVCF can significantly reduce intraoperative pain, shorten the establishment time of working channel, and improve the satisfaction of patients with operation. It has great advantages in reducing the deviation of puncture and improving the diffusion of bone cement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- 书 林
- 四川省医学科学院•四川省人民医院骨科(成都 610072)Department of Orthopedics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science, People’s Hospital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P. R. China
| | - 科 谭
- 四川省医学科学院•四川省人民医院骨科(成都 610072)Department of Orthopedics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science, People’s Hospital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P. R. China
| | - 豇 胡
- 四川省医学科学院•四川省人民医院骨科(成都 610072)Department of Orthopedics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science, People’s Hospital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P. R. China
| | - 仑 万
- 四川省医学科学院•四川省人民医院骨科(成都 610072)Department of Orthopedics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science, People’s Hospital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P. R. China
| | - 跃 王
- 四川省医学科学院•四川省人民医院骨科(成都 610072)Department of Orthopedics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science, People’s Hospital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Prabhu MC, Jacob KC, Patel MR, Pawlowski H, Vanjani NN, Singh K. History and Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Neurospine 2022; 19:479-491. [PMID: 36203277 PMCID: PMC9537838 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2244122.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is a popular surgical technique for lumbar arthrodesis, widely considered to hold great efficacy while conferring an impressive safety profile through the minimization of soft tissue damage. This elegant approach to lumbar stabilization is the byproduct of several innovations throughout the past century. In 1934, Mixter and Barr's paper in the New England Journal of Medicine elucidated the role of disc herniation in spinal instability and radiculopathy, prompting surgeons to explore new approaches and instruments to access the disc space. In 1944, Briggs and Milligan published their novel technique, the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), involving continuous removal of vertebral bone chips and replacement of the disc with a round bone peg. The following decades witnessed several PLIF modifications, including the addition of long pedicle screws. In 1982, Harms and Rolinger sought to redefine the posterior corridor by approaching the disc space through the intervertebral foramen, establishing the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). In the 1990s, lumbar spine surgery experienced a paradigm shift, with surgeons placing increased emphasis on tissuesparing minimally invasive techniques. Spurred by this revolution, Foley and Lefkowitz published the novel MIS-TLIF technique in 2002. The MIS-TLIF has demonstrated comparable surgical outcomes to the TLIF, with an improved safety profile. Here, we present a view into the history of the posterior-approach treatment of the discogenic radiculopathy, culminating in the MIS-TLIF. Additionally, we evaluate the hallmark characteristics, technical variability, and reported outcomes of the modern MIS-TLIF and take a brief look at technologies that may define the future MIS-TLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C. Prabhu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kevin C. Jacob
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Madhav R. Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hanna Pawlowski
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nisheka N. Vanjani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA,Corresponding Author Kern Singh Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St, Suite #300, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lai YP, Lin YH, Wu YC, Shih CM, Chen KH, Lee CH, Pan CC. Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement Led to Lower Screw Loosening Rate than Fluoroscopy-Guided Technique in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11174989. [PMID: 36078918 PMCID: PMC9456711 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11174989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement for spine surgery has become popular in recent years. This study compares clinical, radiographic outcomes and the screw loosening rate between robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement in patients who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). We retrospectively examined 108 patients with the degenerative lumbar disease who underwent TLIF. According to whether the robotic system was used, patients were assigned to either the robot-assisted (Ro TLIF, n = 29) or fluoroscopy-guided TLIF (FG TLIF, n = 79) group. Radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcomes, including leg and back pain visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), were assessed. Loosening signs were noted in 48 out of 552 pedicle screws. The screw loosening rate was higher in the FG TLIF (10.2%) than Ro TLIF group (4.3%). A significant correlation was found between screw loosening and age, the number of level(s) fused, and the ratio of the average distance from the pedicle screw to the upper endplate to vertebral body height. VAS-leg, VAS-back, and ODI showed significant improvements in both groups postoperatively (all p < 0.05). These results indicated that robot-assisted pedicle screw placement in TLIF had a lower screw loosening rate and similar patient-reported outcomes compared with the fluoroscopy-guided technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-Po Lai
- Department of Orthopedics, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Hsien Lin
- Department of Orthopedics, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
| | - Yun-Che Wu
- Department of Orthopedics, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Min Shih
- Department of Orthopedics, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
- Department of Physical Therapy, Hungkuang University, Taichung 43304, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Hui Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
- Department of Computer Science & Information Engineering, College of Computing and Informatics, Providence University, Taichung 43301, Taiwan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Intelligent Technology, Hungkuang University, Taichung 43304, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Hung Lee
- Department of Orthopedics, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Hungkuang University, Taichung 43304, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Chou Pan
- Department of Orthopedics, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
- Department of Rehabilitation Science, Jenteh Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Miaoli 35664, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-4-23592525 (ext. 5101)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gu S, Li H, Wang D, Dai X, Liu C. Application and thinking of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2022; 10:272. [PMID: 35433926 PMCID: PMC9011304 DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background This study sought to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Methods The clinical data of 55 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases treated at our hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Of the 55 patients, 35 who underwent MIS-TLIF were included in the MIS-TLIF group, and 20 who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) were included in the PLIF group. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, operation time, incision length, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, postoperative landing time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative interbody fusion rate, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The patients in both groups were followed-up for at least 1.5 years (range, 18–30 months; with an average of 27.5±2.6 months). There was no significant difference in the operation time, incision length, intraoperative bleeding, VAS score for low back and leg pain, ODI score, interbody fusion rate, hospitalization expenses, and complication rate between the two groups (P>0.05). One patient had nail failure in the MIS-TLIF group, 1 patient in each group had nerve root irritation, and 1 patient in each group had superficial incision infection and local suture dehiscence. The postoperative drainage volume, postoperative landing time, and postoperative hospital stay of the MIS-TLIF group were less than those of the PLIF group (P<0.05). Conclusions Compared to PLIF, the use of MIS-TLIF in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases has a number of advantages, including more complete intraoperative hemostasis, less postoperative drainage, earlier landing, and faster discharge, and also significantly improves postoperative lumbar discomfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shao Gu
- Department of Orthopedics Center (Spinal Surgery Ward), Yan'an Hospital of Kunming City, Kunming, China
| | - Haifeng Li
- Department of Orthopedics Center (Spinal Surgery Ward), Yan'an Hospital of Kunming City, Kunming, China
| | - Daxing Wang
- Department of Orthopedics Center (Spinal Surgery Ward), Yan'an Hospital of Kunming City, Kunming, China
| | - Xuejun Dai
- Department of Orthopedics Center (Spinal Surgery Ward), Yan'an Hospital of Kunming City, Kunming, China
| | - Chengwei Liu
- Department of Orthopedics Center (Spinal Surgery Ward), Yan'an Hospital of Kunming City, Kunming, China
| |
Collapse
|