Usefulness of a Multiplex PCR Assay for the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infections in the Routine Setting

Identification of prosthetic joint infections with 16S amplicon metagenomic sequencing - comparison with standard cultivation approach

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are commonly diagnosed via culture-based methods, which may miss hard-to-grow pathogens. This study contrasts amplicon metagenomic sequencing (16S AS) with traditional culture techniques for enhanced clinical decision-making. We analyzed sonicate fluid from 27 patients undergoing revision arthroplasty using both methods, emphasizing the distinction between contaminants and true positives. Our findings show moderate agreement between the two methods, with a Cohen's kappa of 0.490, varying across bacterial genera (Cohen's kappa -0.059 to 1). The sensitivity of 16S AS compared to culture was 81% (95% CI, 68% to 94%). Sequencing revealed greater microbial diversity, including anaerobic genera like Anaerococcus and Citrobacter. Interestingly, several culture-negative PJI samples showed diverse bacteria via 16S AS. Despite rigorous controls and algorithms to eliminate contaminants, confirming bacteria presence with 16S AS remains a challenge. This highlights the need for improved PJI diagnostic methods, while also pointing out the limitations of next-generation sequencing (NGS) as a clinical diagnostic tool.

Multiplex PCR test as an intra-operative diagnostic tool for periprosthetic joint infection in presumed aseptic revision hip and knee arthroplasty: a 1-year follow-up study of 200 cases

Automated custom-made multiplex PCR techniques (mPCR) have become commercially available and are designed for intra-operative screening of concurrent periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of a positive mPCR test in presumed aseptic revision total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasties after a 1-year follow-up. In an earlier study, such an automated mPCR technique (Unyvero ITI G2; Curetis, Holzgerlingen, Germany) was tested on intra-operatively obtained synovial fluid in 200 patients with a presumed aseptic TKA or THA revision. At the time of revision, no therapeutic consequences were attached to a positive test result since treating personnel were blinded for the test results. We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of cases with respect to the occurrence of PJIs using the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria during a 1-year follow-up postoperatively. A total of 10 out of 200 patients had a positive mPCR test result at the time of revision. Of these 10 cases, none encountered outcome parameters fulfilling the criteria to diagnose PJIs in the first year after surgery, and one required re-revision surgery for reasons other than infection. Of the other 190 negative mPCR cases, none developed a PJI. A positive mPCR test at the time of presumed aseptic revision surgery did not correspond with intra-operatively obtained tissue cultures, and none of the encountered positive mPCR tests had developed a PJI at the 1-year follow-up. We recommend careful evaluation and monitoring of modern diagnostic tests before widespread use.

Multicenter evaluation of BioFire JI panel related to improved microbiological diagnostics on acute osteoarticular infections

Microbiological diagnosis of osteoarticular infections (OI) is crucial for a successful treatment. A prospective multicenter study including 262 synovial fluids with suspicion of acute OI was performed between July 2021 and October of 2022. BioFire Joint Infection Panel multiplex-PCR test was performed and results were compared with conventional cultures of synovial fluid specimens. In total, 136 microorganisms were detected, and fourteen samples were positive for more than one microorganism. In monomicrobial infections (n = 87) agreement with culture was 69%. In 26 samples, the multiplex PCR yield an additional positive result when culture result was negative. It helped in the detection of fastidious microorganisms as K. kingae and N. gonorrhoeae. This multiplex PCR has proven to be a useful technique that can be used for patients with high suspicion of acute OI in a rapid and automated manner.

Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis: A Narrative Review

Replacement of native joints aims to restore patients' quality of life by relieving pain and improving joint function. While periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) affects a small percentage of patients, with an estimated incidence of 1-9% following primary total joint replacement, this postoperative complication necessitates a lengthy hospitalisation, extended antibiotic treatment and further surgery. It is highlighted that establishing the correct diagnosis of periprosthetic infections is critical in order for clinicians to avoid unnecessary treatments in patients with aseptic failure. Of note, the PJI diagnosis could not purely rely upon clinical manifestations given the fact that heterogeneity in host factors (e.g., age and comorbidities), variability in infection period, difference in anatomical location of the involved joint and discrepancies in pathogenicity/virulence of the causative organisms may confound the clinical picture. Furthermore, intra-operative contamination is considered to be the main culprit that can result in early or delayed infection, with the hematogenous spread being the most prevalent mode. To elaborate, early and hematogenous infections often start suddenly, whereas chronic late infections are induced by less virulent bacteria and tend to manifest in a more quiescent manner. Last but not least, viruses and fungal microorganisms exert a role in PJI pathogenesis.

Real-Life Experience and Diagnostic Utility of the BioFire Joint Infection PCR Panel in Bone and Joint Infections: Analysis of a Prospective Validation Study

INTRODUCTION

Microbiological diagnosis is central for adequate treatment of bone and joint infections. Culture-based methods have a limited diagnostic sensitivity and a long turnaround time (TAT). The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of BioFire Joint Infection Panel Investigational Use Only version (hereafter BioFire)-a sample-to-result multiplex PCR panel-with culture-based methods and 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) PCR and sequencing, when available.

METHODS

This study presents a retrospective analysis of a prospective validation study of the BioFire panel. Specimens were obtained from consecutive patients evaluated for suspected bone and joint infections and processed using culture, BioFire, and 16S rRNA PCR and sequencing. Final clinical diagnosis was used as the reference for definition of infection.

RESULTS

Samples, including synovial fluid, bone and periarticular tissue, were obtained from 57 patients, 39 of whom were finally diagnosed with a bone or joint infection. Cultures were positive in 27/39 infected patients and in 3/18 uninfected patients (sensitivity 69%, specificity 83%). BioFire was positive in 22/39 infected patients and in none of the uninfected patients (sensitivity 56%, specificity 100%). Sensitivity for PCR panel organisms was 92% (22/24) and sensitivity for organisms identified by any microbiological modality was 69% (22/32). Gram stain results were positive in 13/39 infected patients and in none of the uninfected patients (sensitivity 33%, specificity 100%). 16S rRNA was positive in 20/28 infected patients and in 0/12 uninfected patients (sensitivity 71%, specificity 100%). Net machine time for BioFire-1 h-was shorter than the mean TAT for Gram stain results, which was 4 h.

CONCLUSION

BioFire offered equivalent diagnostic performance with superior TAT for bone and joint infections, compared with conventional methods.

The Challenge of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis: From Current Methods to Emerging Biomarkers

Due to the increase in the life span and mobility at older ages, the number of implanted prosthetic joints is constantly increasing. However, the number of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), one of the most severe complications after total joint arthroplasty, also shows an increasing trend. PJI has an incidence of 1-2% in the case of primary arthroplasties and up to 4% in the case of revision operations. The development of efficient protocols for managing periprosthetic infections can lead to the establishment of preventive measures and effective diagnostic methods based on the results obtained after the laboratory tests. In this review, we will briefly present the current methods used in PJI diagnosis and the current and emerging synovial biomarkers used for the prognosis, prophylaxis, and early diagnosis of periprosthetic infections. We will discuss treatment failure that may result from patient factors, microbiological factors, or factors related to errors during diagnosis.

Molecular Diagnosis of Osteoarticular Implant-Associated Infection: Available Techniques and How We Can Use Them

Despite recent advances during the last few years, microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections remains a challenge. Molecular biology techniques have been developed to try to overcome this problem, and recently, many of them have become available for many laboratories. Some of them, especially commercial multiplex PCR-based assays and universal 16S rDNA homemade PCR assays, are now available in many laboratories. Moreover, new technologies have appeared, especially metagenomics and next-generation sequencing. These techniques have demonstrated their potential in many studies but appear to be experimental at present. A few studies have evaluated the possible use of these methods in the clinical routine, and a review of the critical aspects for the selection of a molecular method (accuracy, complexity, cost) was performed. Finally, a proposal for a protocol that includes molecular biology techniques was made according to the literature published in this field. In conclusion, molecular biology techniques are ready to be used in the clinical routine of a microbiology laboratory, but their use must be carried out in accordance with the many special characteristics of each laboratory. In all cases, the interpretation of the results must be conducted by a multidisciplinary team with experience in the management of these patients.