R-wave sensing in an implantable cardiac monitor without ECG-based preimplant mapping: results from a multicenter clinical trial

Implantation of a novel insertable cardiac monitor: preliminary multicenter experience in Europe

BACKGROUND

The LUX-Dx™ is a novel insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) introduced into the European market since October 2022.

PURPOSE

The aim of this investigation was to provide a comprehensive description of the ICM implantation experience in Europe during its initial year of commercial use.

METHODS

The system comprises an incision tool and a single-piece insertion tool pre-loaded with the small ICM. The implantation procedure involves incision, creation of a device pocket, insertion of the ICM, verification of sensing, and incision closure. Patients receive a mobile device with a preloaded App, connecting to their ICM and transmitting data to the management system. Data collected at European centers were analyzed at the time of implantation and before patient discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 368 implantation procedures were conducted across 23 centers. Syncope (235, 64%) and cryptogenic stroke (34, 9%) were the most frequent indications for ICM. Most procedures (338, 92%) were performed in electrophysiology laboratories. All ICMs were successfully implanted in the left parasternal region, oriented at 45° in 323 (88%) patients. Repositioning was necessary after sensing verification in 9 (2%) patients. No procedural complications were reported, with a median time from skin incision to suture of 4 min (25th-75th percentiles 2-7). At implantation, the mean R-wave amplitude was 0.39 ± 0.30 mV and the P-wave visibility was 91 ± 20%. Sensing parameters remained stable until pre-discharge and were not influenced by patient characteristics or indications. Procedural times were fast, exhibited consistency across patient groups, and improved after an initial experience with the system. Operator Operator feedback on the system was positive. Patients reported very good ease of use of the App and low levels of discomfort after implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

LUX-Dx™ implantation appears efficient and straightforward, with favorable post-implantation sensing values and associated with positive feedback from operators and patients.

A case report of undetected cardiac arrest in a patient with an insertable cardiac monitor

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are small electrocardiographs implanted subcutaneously to automatically record electrocardiograms when arrhythmia is detected in patients with syncope. If the ICM misses a significant arrhythmia, it may delay the diagnosis of arrhythmogenic syncope and put the patient at risk. Herein, we describe a case of undetected cardiac arrest in a patient with ICM. An 87-year-old man with syncope was admitted to the hospital. After 8 days of monitoring, the cause could not be determined, and an ICM was implanted. Nine hours after implantation, the patient experienced cardiopulmonary arrest. Despite a body surface electrocardiogram showing ventricular flatline and fibrillation, the ICM failed to record. The cause of failure to record was considered to be the fluctuation in the R-wave amplitude of the ICM and noise oversensing. In conclusion, albeit infrequently, ICMs might overlook life-threatening arrhythmias. Even in cases where the ICM fails to detect an arrhythmia matching the symptoms, it may not be feasible to entirely rule out the presence of arrhythmias.

Learning objective

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are used to diagnose arrhythmogenic syncope. However, extremely infrequently, ICM may fail to record life-threatening arrhythmias. Failure to capture arrhythmias can happen due to an unfortunate combination of factors such as a low amplitude of the recorded R wave and noise. Even in cases where the ICM does not detect an arrhythmia that matches the symptoms, it may not be feasible to completely exclude the presence of arrhythmias.

Piezoelectric nanogenerators for self-powered wearable and implantable bioelectronic devices

One of the recent innovations in the field of personalized healthcare is the piezoelectric nanogenerators (PENGs) for various clinical applications, including self-powered sensors, drug delivery, tissue regeneration etc. Such innovations are perceived to potentially address some of the unmet clinical needs, e.g., limited life-span of implantable biomedical devices (e.g., pacemaker) and replacement related complications. To this end, the generation of green energy from biomechanical sources for wearable and implantable bioelectronic devices gained considerable attention in the scientific community. In this perspective, this article provides a comprehensive state-of-the-art review on the recent developments in the processing, applications and associated concerns of piezoelectric materials (synthetic/biological) for personalized healthcare applications. In particular, this review briefly discusses the concepts of piezoelectric energy harvesting, piezoelectric materials (ceramics, polymers, nature-inspired), and the various applications of piezoelectric nanogenerators, such as, self-powered sensors, self-powered pacemakers, deep brain stimulators etc. Important distinction has been made in terms of the potential clinical applications of PENGs, either as wearable or implantable bioelectronic devices. While discussing the potential applications as implantable devices, the biocompatibility of the several hybrid devices using large animal models is summarized. This review closes with the futuristic vision of integrating data science approaches in developmental pipeline of PENGs as well as clinical translation of the next generation PENGs. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Piezoelectric nanogenerators (PENGs) hold great promise for transforming personalized healthcare through self-powered sensors, drug delivery systems, and tissue regeneration. The limited battery life of implantable devices like pacemakers presents a significant challenge, leading to complications from repititive surgeries. To address such a critical issue, researchers are focusing on generating green energy from biomechanical sources to power wearable and implantable bioelectronic devices. This comprehensive review critically examines the latest advancements in synthetic and nature-inspired piezoelectric materials for PENGs in personalized healthcare. Moreover, it discusses the potential of piezoelectric materials and data science approaches to enhance the efficiency and reliability of personalized healthcare devices for clinical applications.

Factors affecting electrogram sensing in an insertable cardiac monitor: Insights from surface electrocardiogram mapping analysis

BACKGROUND

Fidelity of electrogram sensing may reduce false alerts from an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of vector length, implant angle, and patient factors on electrogram sensing using surface electrocardiogram (ECG) mapping.

METHODS

Twelve separate precordial single-lead surface ECGs were acquired from 150 participants at 2 interelectrode distances (75 and 45 mm), at 3 vector angles (vertical, oblique, and horizontal), and in 2 postures (upright and supine). A subset of 50 patients also received a clinically indicated ICM implant in 1:1 ratio (Reveal LINQ [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN]/BIOMONITOR III [Biotronik, Berlin, Germany]). All ECGs and ICM electrograms were analyzed by blinded investigators using DigitizeIt software (V2.3.3, Braunschweig, Germany). The P-wave visibility threshold was set at > 0.015 mV. Logistic regression was used to identify factors affecting P-wave amplitude.

RESULTS

A total of 1800 tracings from 150 participants (44.5% [n = 68] female; median age 59 [35-73] years) were assessed. The median P- and R-wave amplitudes were 45% and 53% larger with vector lengths of 75 and 45 mm, respectively (P < .001 for both). The oblique orientation yielded the best P- and R-wave amplitudes, while posture change did not affect P-wave amplitude. Mixed effects modeling found that visible P-waves occur more frequently with a vector length of 75 mm than with 45 mm (86% vs 75%, respectively; P < .0001). A longer vector length improved both P-wave amplitude and visibility in all body mass index categories. There was a moderate correlation of P- and R-wave amplitudes from the ICM electrograms to those from surface ECG recordings (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.74 and 0.80, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Longer vector length and oblique implant angle yielded the best electrogram sensing and are relevant considerations for ICM implantation procedures.

Revisiting where to apply preimplant mapping to improve P‐wave sensing of insertable cardiac monitors

Background

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are used for long‐term cardiac rhythm monitoring. They have proven useful in diagnosing arrhythmias. They are conventionally inserted at the 4th intercostal space without preimplant mapping.

Method

We develop a new method, VisP, that finds an optimal insertion position by applying the lightweight preimplant mapping to nine candidate positions beyond the conventional ones. We retrospectively analyze consecutive 60 patients who underwent ICM insertion (Reveal LINQ™) between April 2019 and March 2021 and compare the two groups with and without VisP.

Results

After 9 patients were excluded because of ectopic atrial rhythms or atrial fibrillation, 51 patients were analyzed. Thirty‐one patients underwent the conventional insertion (non‐mapping), whereas 20 patients underwent VisP. VisP achieved large P‐wave amplitudes while retaining the R‐wave amplitude for all patients; in contrast, P waves were not detected for 11 patients out of the 31 patients in the non‐mapping group (35%). On average, the P‐wave amplitude was 0.065 mV for VisP, compared to 0.029 mV for the non‐mapping group (p‐value< .001). The average R‐wave amplitude was 0.69 mV for VisP and 0.71 mV for non‐mapping (p‐value = .88), indicating the R‐wave difference is insignificant between the two groups. VisP selected the 4th, 3rd, and 2nd intercostal spaces for 7, 11, and 2 patients, respectively, meaning that 13 out of the 20 cases (65%) fell out of the conventional insertion location of the 4th intercostal space.

Conclusions

VisP improves the diagnostic ability of ICMs by finding an optimal position that yields reliable sensing of P waves while keeping high R‐wave sensing.

R-wave amplitude changes with posture and physical activity over time in an insertable cardiac monitor

Background

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are accepted tools in cardiac arrhythmia management. Consistent R-wave amplitude (RWA) is essential for optimal detection.

Objectives

Assess RWAs with posture/activities at insertion and at 30 days.

Methods

Participants (n = 90) with Confirm Rx™ ICM had RWAs measured in different postures (supine, right-side [RS], left-side [LS], sitting, and standing) and defined physical activities (including isometric push [IPUSH] and pull) at 2 time points. ICMs were inserted in 45° to sternum and parasternal orientations.

Results

There were significant reductions at insertion with RS, LS, sitting, or standing vs supine (reference position) (all P < .05). At 30 days, significant changes only occurred with LS and sitting (P < .05). Sex had an effect on RWAs, with females having significant variability at insertion (supine vs RS, LS, sitting, standing, and IPUSH; all P < .05). Males showed large RWA interpatient variabilities but minimal differences between positions vs supine. At 30 days, RS, LS, and sitting positions remained significant for females (P < .05), while in males RWAs were higher than at insertion for most postures and activities. The orientation 45° to sternum had consistently higher RWAs vs parasternal orientation at both time points (P < .0001). In females, ICM orientation had no significant effect on RWAs; however, in males the 45° to sternum produced higher RWAs. ICM movement from the insertion site showed no correlation with RWA changes.

Conclusion

The mean RWAs were higher at 30 days with less interparticipant and interpostural variability; males had higher RWAs compared to females; 45° to sternum orientation had higher RWAs; and ICM migration from the insertion site did not affect RWAs.

Analysis of the determining factors of detectable P-wave and amplitude of QRS complex sensed by implantable loop recorder

BACKGROUND

Determining factors for sufficient QRS amplitude and discernible P-wave sensing in implantable loop recorder (ILR) are unknown. We aimed to investigate determining factors and ILR implantation angle that may improve QRS complex and P-wave sensing in ILR.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 220 patients who underwent ILR implantation or follow-up analysis. Patient demographic, clinical, echocardiography, electrocardiography, heart angle, and ILR angle data were collected as predictor variables. Associations between ILR QRS amplitude/P-wave detectability and each predictor variable were investigated.

RESULTS

Univariate linear regression showed that ILR QRS amplitude was significantly associated with age, height, ILR angle, and QRS amplitudes of 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) (lead I, II, aVR [inverted aVR], aVF, V1-V6) and Holter ECG (lead V3, V5). Among discrete variables, only left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) affected ILR QRS amplitude (P = .016). A multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that ILR angle (β = -0.008, P < .001), lead aVR amplitude (β = 0.469, P = .003), Holter lead V5 amplitude (β = 0.116, P = .049), Age (β = -0.005, P = .014), and LVH (β = 0.213, P = .031) were independent determinants of ILR QRS amplitude. Logistic regression revealed that heart angle significantly affected ILR P-wave detectability (β = 0.12, P = .008). Multiple logistic regression revealed that heart angle (β = 0.121, P = .013) and lead V1 amplitude (β = 28.1, P = .034) were independent determinants of ILR P-wave detectability.

CONCLUSION

ILR insertion angle, lead aVR QRS amplitude, Holter lead V5 QRS amplitude, age, and LVH are determinants of ILR QRS amplitude. Heart angle and lead V1 P-wave amplitude of 12-lead ECG are determinants of ILR P-wave detectability.

A novel adaptive insertable cardiac monitor algorithm improves the detection of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia in silico

INTRODUCTION

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) provide a minimally invasive method of continuous monitoring for abnormal heart rhythms. While the benefits of ICMs are clear, current algorithm performance can be improved. The objective of this study is to assess the performance of a novel adaptive atrial fibrillation (AF) detection algorithm and separately programmable atrial tachycardia (AT) algorithm.

METHODS

A dual-stage detect-and-verify AF algorithm and separately programmable AT algorithm were developed. Sensitivity and PPV across a range of settings were determined in silico by comparison with an adjudicated Holter data set (n = 1966 with 229 patient days). Finally, the ability to improve performance through simulated remote programming was assessed.

RESULTS

The dual-stage algorithm detected AF in all true AF patients (76/76) resulting in a patient-level sensitivity of 100%. Episode-level sensitivity and PPV ranged from 97.6% to 100% and 79.1% to 98.5%, respectively. Thirty-six false-positive episodes were observed and 32 (88.9%) of these were corrected with programming changes. Decoupling of AF and AT durations improved PPV from a range of 10%-22% to a range of 95%-100%.

CONCLUSIONS

AF and AT algorithms were designed with novel features including an adaptive morphology assessment for AF detection and separately programmable durations for AT detection. In silico performance yielded improved PPVs while maintaining high sensitivity across a range of settings. Importantly, programming changes that may be made remotely with this system reduced false positives. These algorithms allow clinicians to individualize arrhythmia detection settings thereby improving data management and reducing clinic burden.

Surface mapping demonstrates compatibility of implantable loop monitor with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device

Syncope in patients with continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device may be associated with arrhythmia and difficult to determine without an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. We present a patient with continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device, no implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and recurrent syncope. An implantable loop recorder was successfully implanted with surface mapping without noise interference.

Diagnostic accuracy of R-wave detection by insertable cardiac monitors

BACKGROUND

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICM) allow prolonged rhythm monitoring, but the diagnostic performance can be hampered by false positive arrhythmia alerts related to inadequate R-wave sensing. This study assesses the prevalence and predictors of inadequate R-wave sensing (both over- and undersensing) among different ICM types.

METHODS

Patients implanted with an ICM at Ghent University Hospital between January 2017 and August 2018 were included. ICM tracings recorded at interrogation or transmitted by remote monitoring were reviewed for inadequate R-wave sensing leading to false arrhythmia alerts. Patient and implant characteristics were retrieved from the medical records and implant reports.

RESULTS

The study screened 135 patients (age 59 ± 19 years, 44% female) implanted with different ICM types: Reveal LINQ™ and XT (Medtronic): n = 92 (68%), Confirm and Confirm Rx (Abbott): n = 35 (26%), and BioMonitor 2 (Biotronik): n = 8 (6%). ICM tracings were analyzed in 112 patients (83%). False arrhythmia alerts occurred in 22 (20%) patients, most frequently related to undersensing (77%). False diagnosis of bradycardia or pause was documented in 64%, false high ventricular rates in 14%, and false atrial fibrillation alerts in 22%. Occurrence of R-wave changes was not related to patient characteristics or implant R-wave sensing. A trend toward higher number of inadequate R-wave sensing seems to occur with nonparasternal implant sites (P = .074).

CONCLUSIONS

False arrhythmia alerts due to inadequate R-wave sensing occurred in 20% of ICM patients independent of implant features and patient characteristics.

Miniaturized implantable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector (BIOMONITOR III): Insertion procedure assessment, sensing performance, and home monitoring transmission success

BACKGROUND

Implantable Cardiac Monitors (ICMs) are used for long-term monitoring of arrhythmias. BIOMONITOR III is a novel ICM with a miniaturized profile, long sensing vector due to a flexible antenna, simplified implantation with a dedicated insertion tool for pocket formation and ICM placement in a single step, and daily automatic Home Monitoring (HM) function.

METHODS

In 47 patients undergoing BIOMONITOR III insertion for any ICM indication, 16 investigators at 10 Australian sites assessed handling characteristics of the insertion tool, R-wave amplitudes, noise burden, P-wave visibility, and HM transmission success. Patients were followed for 1 month.

RESULTS

All 47 attempted insertions were successful. Median time from skin incision to removal of the insertion tool after ICM insertion was 39 s (IQR 19-65) and to wound closure and cleaning was 4.7 min (IQR 3.5-7.8). All aspects of the insertion tool were rated as "good" or "excellent" in ≥97.9% and "fair" in ≤2.1% of patients, except for "force needed for tunnelling" (91.5% good/excellent, 8.5% fair). Based on HM data, R-waves in the first month were stable at 0.70 ± 0.37 mV. Median noise burden (disabling automatic rhythm evaluation) was 0.19% (IQR 0.00-0.93), equivalent to 2.7 min (IQR 0.0-13.4) per day. In HM-transmitted ECG strips with regular sinus rhythm, P-waves were visible in 89 ± 24% of heart cycles. Patient-individual automatic Home Monitoring transmission success was 98.0% ± 5.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel ICM performed well in all aspects studied, including fast insertion, reliable R-wave sensing, good P-wave visibility, and highly successful HM transmissions.

Placement of Reveal LINQ Device in the Left Anterior Axillary Position

Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are utilized for long-term rhythm monitoring. Typical placement of the Medtronic Reveal LINQ along the left parasternal border may compromise the quality and/or feasibility of future imaging studies. We sought to evaluate the utility of placing an ILR in the left anterior axillary position and the impact on the quality of cardiac imaging. We reviewed patients from May 2017 to June 2018 who had placement of a Reveal LINQ device in the left anterior axillary position. Demographic, procedural, and clinical data were collected via retrospective review. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were reviewed for image quality after ILR placement. Eight patients met inclusion criteria for this study (median age 6 years, 50% female). Six patients (75%) had an ILR placed in the operating room, while all others were placed in the electrophysiology lab. All patients demonstrated acceptable R waves for diagnostic evaluation (median = 0.85 mV, range 0.24-1.7 mV). Cardiac MRI was obtained in 7 patients following ILR placement with diagnostic image quality and no adverse events. One device was explanted 28 days after placement due to concern for possible infection. No other devices required removal or revision (median follow up duration 11 months, IQR 8-13.5). ILR placement in the left anterior axillary position can record adequate signals in pediatric patients. In addition, axillary ILR device position may allow for completion of cardiac imaging, particularly cardiac MRI, without significant artifacts which is critical for patients with congenital heart disease.

The BioMonitor 2 insertable cardiac monitor: Clinical experience with a novel implantable cardiac monitor

INTRODUCTION

Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are leadless subcutaneous devices that allow cardiac monitoring for up to 3 years and are a valuable tool in the diagnosis of arrhythmias, cryptogenic stroke and unexplained syncope. The Biotronik BioMonitor 2 is a novel, insertable ILR allowing long-term continuous monitoring with wireless telemetry options.

METHODS

A single-center, prospective, observational study investigating the reliability of sensing quality and detection performance in the BioMonitor 2 ILR, as well as post-implantation patient satisfaction. R-wave amplitude was recorded immediately post implantation and 1 day post implantation, followed by extensive patient instruction. Follow-up was scheduled after 3 months, or after an event. Data from the ILR were retrieved, with documentation of all episodes, R-wave amplitude and noise burden. The anatomical position of the ILR was determined 1 day post implantation and after 3 months. A patient questionnaire was conducted after 3 months.

RESULTS

30 consecutive patients (mean age 71 ± 12 years, 56% male) were analyzed. Indications for ILR implantation were: unexplained syncope (n = 24, 80%), suspected atrial fibrillation (n = 4, 13%), cryptogenic stroke (n = 1, 3%) and palpitations (n = 1, 3%). Median time from skin cut to suture was 8 min. No complications occurred. Mean R-wave amplitude at implantation was 0.84 ± 0.32 mV, at day 1 post implantation 0.96 ± 0.31 mV, and after a mean follow-up of 85 ± 24 days 1.02 ± 0.47 mV (p = 0.01). The mean noise burden was 1.4 ± 2%.

CONCLUSION

Implantation of the novel BioMonitor 2 ILR is fast and uncomplicated. Initial sensing values are good and improve over time.

Nanogenerator for Biomedical Applications

In the past 10 years, the development of nanogenerators (NG) has enabled different systems to operate without external power supply. NG have the ability to harvest the mechanical energies in different forms. Human body motions and activities can also serve as the energy source to drive NG and enable self-powered healthcare system. In this review, a summary of several major actual applications of NG in the biomedical fields is made including the circulatory system, the neural system, cell modulation, microbe disinfection, and biodegradable electronics. Nevertheless, there are still many challenges for NG to be actually adopted in clinical applications, including the miniaturization, duration, encapsulation, and output performance. It is also very important to further combine the NG development more precisely with the medical principles. In future, NG can serve as highly promising complementary or even alternative power suppliers to traditional batteries for the healthcare electronics.

BioMonitor 2 Pilot Study: Early Experience With Implantation of the Biotronik BioMonitor 2 Implantable Cardiac Monitor

BACKGROUND

The BioMonitor 2 Pilot Study assessed the implantation procedure, the sensing amplitude and the remote monitoring transmission success rate of the second generation implantable cardiac monitor, the BioMonitor 2 (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany).

METHODS

This was a prospective, multi-centre, single-arm, non-randomised study involving seven operators in five sites across Australia. Data were collected at implantation, during clinic visits at 1 week and 1 month post-implantation, and through wireless remote monitoring.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with indications for long-term cardiac monitoring underwent successful insertion of a study device. The median implantation time was 9 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 5-14 mins). The mean R-wave amplitude at 1 week was 0.75±0.39mV and remained stable over the follow-up period. Within 1 day, 97% of the patients connected to the remote monitoring network and daily messages were transmitted on 93.8% of all study days. Seventy-six per cent of patients transmitted at least one subcutaneous ECG (sECG), with a median number of sECGs per patient of seven (IQR 3-37) within 28 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the BioMonitor 2 Pilot study confirm the excellent sensing amplitudes afforded by this new device and the utility of the implantation tools and technique. Patient compliance with and the transmission success rate of the home monitoring system were excellent.

P- and R-wave Amplitude Sensed by Reveal LINQ™ Loop Recorder in Pediatric Patients

Implantable loop recorders are commonly used to sense arrhythmias. The purpose of this study is to assess the P- and R-wave amplitudes at implantation (I) and follow-up (F) following insertion of the Reveal LINQ™ Insertable Cardiac Monitor (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) in an institutional review board-approved, multicenter study performed on pediatric patients younger than 18 years old. Collected data included demographics, presence of congenital heart disease (CHD), P- and R-wave-sensed amplitude at I and F, and the method of implant (i.e. mapping or standard.) P waves were manually measured and R-wave sensing was recorded by the device. A total of 87 patients had a Reveal LINQ™ (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) device implanted; the mean patient age was 11.8 years (0.5 years to 18 years) with 48% of patients being female and 19% of patients having CHD; mapping was used in 43% of patients. The Reveal LINQ™ (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) experienced no change in average sensed R-wave amplitude at either I or F (1.28 mV vs 1.26 mV, p = NS). There was no difference in sensed R-wave amplitude noted with or without mapping used at I (1.29 mV vs 1.26 mV, p = NS) or F (1.48 mV vs 1.18 mV, p = NS). Additionally, no difference could be found in R-wave sensing of patients with CHD or without CHD at I (1.26 mV vs 1.4 mV, p = NS) or F (1.32 mV vs 1.32 mV, p = NS). R-wave sensing trended towards being inversely proportional to patient body surface area (BSA) (p = NS). P waves were detected on 48% of tracings in all patients at I and/or F, irrespective of whether the Reveal LINQ™ (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) device was placed with mapping. The R wave was (0.37–3.5 mV) at I and (0.3–3 mV) (p = NS) at F when P waves were detected. From these results, it can be said that the Reveal LINQ™ Insertable Cardiac Monitor (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) has an excellent ability to sense R-wave amplitude in pediatric patients. No significant difference in the sensing ability of the device could be identified with respect to the presence of CHD, use of mapping or BSA. P waves tended to be identified when there was a higher baseline R-wave amplitude.

Self-Powered, One-Stop, and Multifunctional Implantable Triboelectric Active Sensor for Real-Time Biomedical Monitoring

Operation time of implantable electronic devices is largely constrained by the lifetime of batteries, which have to be replaced periodically by surgical procedures once exhausted, causing physical and mental suffering to patients and increasing healthcare costs. Besides the efficient scavenging of the mechanical energy of internal organs, this study proposes a self-powered, flexible, and one-stop implantable triboelectric active sensor (iTEAS) that can provide continuous monitoring of multiple physiological and pathological signs. As demonstrated in human-scale animals, the device can monitor heart rates, reaching an accuracy of ∼99%. Cardiac arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation and ventricular premature contraction can be detected in real-time. Furthermore, a novel method of monitoring respiratory rates and phases is established by analyzing variations of the output peaks of the iTEAS. Blood pressure can be independently estimated and the velocity of blood flow calculated with the aid of a separate arterial pressure catheter. With the core-shell packaging strategy, monitoring functionality remains excellent during 72 h after closure of the chest. The in vivo biocompatibility of the device is examined after 2 weeks of implantation, proving suitability for practical use. As a multifunctional biomedical monitor that is exempt from needing an external power supply, the proposed iTEAS holds great potential in the future of the healthcare industry.

Implantation of the new Medtronic LINQ™ loop recorder in an infant with ventricular tachycardia

The Medtronic LINQ™ was inserted in an 11-month-old boy for close monitoring of rapid ventricular tachycardia. The device is much smaller than the conventional Medtronic loop recorder. The real advantage of the LINQ™ is that it automatically notifies Carelink if any ventricular tachycardia is seen, which is very advantageous for this particular type of patient. This device is ideal for close monitoring of asymptomatic yet potentially dangerous arrhythmias in smaller children.