Landiolol hydrochloride for prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis

OUP accepted manuscript

Rate and rhythm control are still considered equivalent strategies for symptom control using the Atrial Fibrillation Better Care algorithm recommended by the recent atrial fibrillation guideline. In acute situations or critically ill patients, a personalized approach should be used for rapid rhythm or rate control. Even though electrical cardioversion is generally indicated in haemodynamically unstable patients or for rapid effective rhythm control in critically ill patients, this is not always possible due to the high percentage of failure or relapses in such patients. Rate control remains the background therapy for all these patients, and often rapid rate control is mandatory. Short and rapid-onset-acting beta-blockers are the most suitable drugs for acute rate control. Esmolol was the classical example; however, landiolol a newer very selective beta-blocker, recently included in the European atrial fibrillation guideline, has a more favourable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile with less haemodynamic interference and is better appropriate for critically ill patients.

Beta-Blocker Landiolol Hydrochloride in Preventing Atrial Fibrillation Following Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article was to assess the benefit of perioperative administration of the intravenous beta-blocker landiolol hydrochloride in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardiothoracic surgery.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, and OVID to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohorts up to January 2021. Data regarding postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) and safety outcomes were extracted. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Meanwhile, subgroup analyses were conducted according to surgery type including lung cancer surgery, esophageal cancer surgery, and cardiac surgery.

RESULTS

Seventeen eligible articles involving 1349 patients within 13 RCTs and four cohorts were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with control group, landiolol administration was associated with a significant reduction of the occurrence of AF after cardiothoracic surgery (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.23-0.43, P <0.00001). In addition, the results demonstrated that perioperative administration of landiolol hydrochloride minimized the occurrence of postoperative complications (OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.70, P = 0.0002). Funnel plots indicated no obvious publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering this analysis, landiolol was effective in the prevention of AF after cardiothoracic surgery and did not increase the risk of major postoperative complications.

A prospective observational survey on landiolol in atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter patients with chronic heart failure - AF-CHF landiolol survey

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter occur commonly in patients with heart failure. Ultrashort-acting β-blockers, including landiolol, can rapidly control heart rate. As part of postmarketing surveillance for landiolol in Japan, a real-world drug-use survey (AF-CHF landiolol survey) was established for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in patients with heart failure. We report the safety and effectiveness of landiolol from this survey, focusing on adverse events/adverse drug reactions.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with cardiac dysfunction who received landiolol (continuous intravenous infusion, starting at 1μg/kg/min) for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in routine clinical practice in Japan were enrolled between June 2014 and May 2016. Safety variables included adverse events and adverse drug reactions (number of patients and events, incidence rate, types, seriousness). Effectiveness variables included the proportion of patients with a ≥20% decrease in heart rate.

RESULTS

Data were available for 1121 patients (safety analysis set); 888 patients were evaluable for effectiveness parameters. Mean (± standard deviation) patient age was 72.5±13.5 years, 57.2% were male. Most patients (84.2%) received landiolol for atrial fibrillation. Overall, 174 adverse events occurred in 140 patients (12.5%), including 105 serious adverse events. The most common type of adverse events was cardiac (60 events). Seventy-five events in 63 patients were categorized as adverse drug reactions (5.6% of patients). Mean heart rate decreased substantially after treatment with landiolol, by ≥20% in 77.5% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world setting in Japan, landiolol for the treatment of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter with heart failure was acceptable without new safety concerns, and most patients achieved effective heart rate control during their arrhythmias.

New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Adult Patients After Cardiac Surgery

Purpose of Review

An overview of recent literature regarding pathophysiology, risk factors, prophylaxis, and treatment of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in post-cardiac surgical patients.

Recent Findings

AF is the most frequent adverse event after cardiac surgery with significant associated morbidity, mortality, and financial cost. Its causes are multifactorial, and models to stratify patients into risk categories are progressing but a consistent, evidence-based system has not yet been developed. Pharmacologic and surgical interventions to prevent and treat this complication have been an area of ongoing research and recent societal guidelines reflect this.

Summary

Inconsistencies remain surrounding how to best identify higher-risk AF patients, which interventions should be used to prevent and treat AF, and which patient groups should receive these interventions. The evidence for these available strategies and their place in contemporary guidelines are summarized.

Landiolol for managing atrial fibrillation in post-cardiac surgery

Landiolol is an intravenous ultra-short acting beta-blocker which has been used in Japan for many years to prevent and/or to treat post-operative atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery. The drug is now available in Europe. This article is a systematic review of literature regarding the use of landiolol in that specific surgical setting.

Pharmacological interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a network meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common complication following cardiac surgery, and randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews have been conducted to compare and evaluate different pharmacological interventions for preventing POAF. This study aimed to explore the effect of different pharmacological interventions for prophylaxis against POAF after cardiac surgery using network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A systematic search will be performed in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to identify RCTs, systematic reviews, meta-analyses or NMA of different pharmacological interventions for POAF. We will evaluate the risk of bias of the included RCTs according to the Cochrane Handbook V.5.1.0, and use GRADE to assess the quality of evidence. Standard pairwise meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis will be used to compare the efficacy of different pharmacological interventions.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval and patient consent are not required as this study is a meta-analysis based on published studies. The results of this NMA and trial sequential analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017067492.

Randomized clinical trial of landiolol hydrochloride for the prevention of atrial fibrillation and postoperative complications after oesophagectomy for cancer

Background

Atrial fibrillation is common after oesophageal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether landiolol hydrochloride was effective and safe in the prevention of atrial fibrillation after oesophagectomy, and to see whether a reduction in incidence of atrial fibrillation would reduce other postoperative complications.

Methods

This single-centre study enrolled patients scheduled for transthoracic oesophagectomy in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial between March 2013 and January 2016. Enrolled patients were randomized with a 1 : 1 parallel allocation ratio to either landiolol prophylaxis or placebo. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of atrial fibrillation after oesophagectomy. Secondary endpoints were incidence of postoperative complications, and effects on haemodynamic and inflammatory indices.

Results

One hundred patients were enrolled, 50 in each group. Postoperative atrial fibrillation occurred in 15 patients (30 per cent) receiving placebo versus five (10 per cent) receiving landiolol (P = 0·012). The overall incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the landiolol group (P = 0·046). In the landiolol group, postoperative heart rate was suppressed effectively, but the decrease in BP was not harmful. The interleukin 6 level was significantly lower on days 3 and 5 after surgery in the landiolol group (P = 0·001 and P = 0·002 respectively).

Conclusion

Landiolol was effective and safe in preventing atrial fibrillation after oesophagectomy. Registration number: UMIN000010648 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/).

Efficacy and Safety of Landiolol Compared to Amiodarone for the Management of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Intensive Care Patients

OBJECTIVE

The authors assessed the efficacy and safety of landiolol, an ultra-short-acting beta-blocker, with those of amiodarone in the restoration of sinus rhythm for postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

DESIGN

A retrospective data analysis.

SETTING

Data were collected from patients admitted to the ICU in a single university hospital between 2012 and 2015.

PARTICIPANTS

Records of a total of 276 patients who developed POAF after ICU admission were collected from hospital records.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Treatment success was defined as restoration of sinus rhythm without concomitant therapy within 24 hours of treatment and lasting for more than an hour. The landiolol dosage was in the range of 0.7 µg/kg/min-to-2.5 µg/kg/min. The authors compared a total of 55 patients with POAF who received either landiolol (n = 32) or intravenous amiodarone (n = 23) in the ICU. The major findings were that the median time required for conversion to sinus rhythm was shorter in landiolol patients compared with amiodarone patients (75 v 150 min respectively, p = 0.0355). However, treatment success rates did not differ significantly after 24 hours (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.17-9.09, p = 0.60). Adverse events with bradycardia leading to drug discontinuation were seen only in the patients receiving amiodarone (n = 3, p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Landiolol achieved swift and safe restoration of sinus rhythm in ICU patients with POAF and could be considered as a favorable drug choice over amiodarone in such patients.