Electrical Stimulation of Vascular Autonomic Nerves: Effects on Heart Rate, Blood Pressure, and Arrhythmias

The role of renal nerve stimulation in percutaneous renal denervation for hypertension: A mini-review

Recent trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of percutaneous renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) for blood pressure (BP)-lowering in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Nevertheless, major challenges exist, such as the wide variation of BP-lowering responses following RDN (from strong response to no response) and lack of feasible and reproducible peri-procedural predictors for patient response. Both animal and human studies have demonstrated different patterns of BP responses following renal nerve stimulation (RNS), possibly related to varied regional proportions of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve tissues along the renal arteries. Animal studies of RNS have shown that rapid electrical stimulation of the renal arteries caused renal artery vasoconstriction and increased norepinephrine secretion with a concomitant increase in BP, and the responses were attenuated after RDN. Moreover, selective RDN at sites with strong RNS-induced BP increases led to a more efficient BP-lowering effect. In human, when RNS was performed before and after RDN, blunted changes in RNS-induced BP responses were noted after RDN. The systolic BP response induced by RNS before RDN and blunted systolic BP response to RNS after RDN, at the site with maximal RNS-induced systolic BP response before RDN, both correlated with the 24-h ambulatory BP reductions 3-12 months following RDN. In summary, RNS-induced BP changes, before and after RDN, could be used to assess the immediate effect of RDN and predict BP reductions months following RDN. More comprehensive, large-scale and long term trials are needed to verify these findings.

Renal nerve stimulation: complete versus incomplete renal sympathetic denervation

PURPOSE

Blood pressure (BP) reduction after renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is highly variable. Renal nerve stimulation (RNS) can localize sympathetic nerves. The RNS trial aimed to investigate the medium-term BP-lowering effects of the use of RNS during RDN, and explore if RNS can check the completeness of the denervation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-four treatment-resistant hypertensive patients were included in the prospective, single-center RNS trial. The primary study endpoint was change in 24-h BP at 6- to 12-month follow-up after RDN. The secondary study endpoints were the acute procedural RNS-induced BP response before and after RDN; number of antihypertensive drugs at follow-up; and the correlation between the RNS-induced BP increase before versus after RDN (delta [Δ] RNS-induced BP).

RESULTS

Before RDN, the RNS-induced systolic BP rise was 43(±21) mmHg, and decreased to 9(±12) mmHg after RDN (p < 0.001). Mean 24-h systolic/diastolic BP decreased from 147(±12)/82(±11) mmHg at baseline to 135(±11)/76(±10) mmHg (p < 0.001/<0.001) at follow-up (10 [6-12] months), with 1 antihypertensive drug less compared to baseline. The Δ RNS-induced BP and the 24-h BP decrease at follow-up were correlated for systolic (R = 0.44, p = 0.004) and diastolic (R = 0.48, p = 0.003) BP. Patients with ≤0 mmHg residual RNS-induced BP response after RDN had a significant lower mean 24-h systolic BP at follow-up compared to the patients with >0 mmHg residual RNS-induced BP response (126 ± 4 mmHg versus 135 ± 10 mmHg, p = 0.04). 83% of the patients with ≤0 mmHg residual RNS-induced BP response had normal 24-h BP at follow-up, compared to 33% in the patients with >0 mmHg residual RNS-induced BP response (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

The use of RNS during RDN leads to clinically significant and sustained lowering of 24-h BP with fewer antihypertensive drugs at follow-up. RNS-induced BP changes were correlated with 24-h BP changes at follow-up. Moreover, patients with complete denervation had significant lower BP compared to the patients with incomplete denervation.

Renal Denervation Reduced Ventricular Arrhythmia After Myocardial Infarction by Inhibiting Sympathetic Activity and Remodeling

Background Ventricular arrhythmia after myocardial infarction is the most important risk factor for sudden cardiac death, which poses a serious threat to human health. As the correlation between autonomic nervous systemic dysfunction and heart rhythm abnormality has been gradually revealed, remedies targeting autonomic nervous system dysfunction, especially the sympathetic nerve, have emerged. Among them, renal denervation is noted for its powerful effect on the inhibition of sympathetic nerve activity. We aim to investigate whether renal denervation can reduce ventricular arrhythmia after myocardial infarction and thus decrease the risk of sudden cardiac death. In addition, we explore the potential mechanism with respect to nerve activity and remodeling. Methods and Results Twenty-four beagles were randomized into the control (n=4), renal denervation (n=10), and sham (n=10) groups. Permanent left anterior descending artery ligation was performed to establish myocardial infarction in the latter 2 groups. Animals in the renal denervation group underwent both surgical and chemical renal denervation. Compared with dogs in the sham group, dogs in the renal denervation group demonstrated attenuated effective refractory period shortening and inhomogeneity, flattened restitution curve, increased ventricular threshold, and decreased ventricular arrhythmia. Heart rate variability assessment, catecholamine measurement, and nerve discharge recordings all indicated that renal denervation could reduce whole-body and local tissue sympathetic tone. Tissue analysis revealed a significant decrease in neural remodeling in both the heart and stellate ganglion. Conclusions Surgical and chemical renal denervation decreased whole-body and local tissue sympathetic activity and reversed neural remodeling in the heart and stellate ganglion. Consequently, renal denervation led to beneficial remodeling of the electrophysiological characteristics in the infarction border zone, translating to a decrease in ventricular arrhythmia after myocardial infarction.

Endovascular Electrical Stimulation - A Novel Hemorrhage Control Technique

OBJECTIVE

In this study we present a novel approach for inducing vasoconstriction by pulsed electrical treatment delivered via endovascular electrodes, which can be used in cases where external access to the vessel is limited.

METHODS

Using computer simulations, we optimized various geometries of endovascular electrodes to maximize the induced electric field on the arterial wall. Using the optimal configuration parameters, we investigated endovascular induced vasoconstriction in both the carotid and femoral sheep arteries.

RESULTS

Endovascular electrodes induced robust vasoconstriction in the carotid artery of sheep, showing gradual recovery following treatment. Moreover, the obtained vasoconstriction was accompanied by a sevenfold decrease in blood loss for 100% constriction, compared with no treatment (6ml vs 42ml, p<0.001). The femoral artery was less amenable to the electrical treatment, which we hypothesize results from the reduced density of the sympathetic system's innervation of the adventitia of the sheep femoral artery, as was validated by immunohistochemical analysis. Finally, treatment safety was validated through arterial histological studies, in which no adverse effect was observed, and through computer modeling, which depicted a negligible temperature increase.

SIGNIFICANCE

These results are an important step toward developing a novel approach for inducing reversible and controlled vasoconstriction in arteries that are remote from access.

Renal Nerve Stimulation as Procedural End Point for Renal Sympathetic Denervation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) as treatment option for hypertension has a strong rationale; however, variable effects on blood pressure (BP) have been reported ranging from non-response to marked reductions in BP. The absence of a procedural end point for RDN is one of the potential factors associated with the variable response. Studies have suggested the use of renal nerve stimulation (RNS) to adequately address this issue. This review aims to provide an overview of the clinical and experimental data available regarding the effects of RNS in the setting of RDN.

RECENT FINDINGS

Animal studies have shown that high-frequency electrical stimulation of the sympathetic nerves in the adventitia of the renal arteries elicits an increase in BP and leads to an increased norepinephrine spillover as a marker of increased sympathetic activity and these effects of stimulation were attenuated or blunted after RDN. In a human feasibility study using RNS both before and after RDN, similar BP responses were observed. Moreover, in patients with resistant hypertension, RNS-induced changes in BP appeared to be correlated with 24-h BP response after RDN. These data suggest that RNS is a useful tool to identify renal sympathetic nerve fibers in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension undergoing RDN, and to predict the likely effectiveness of RDN treatments. In acute procedural settings both in animal and human models, RNS elicits increase in BP and HR before RDN and these effects are blunted after RDN. Up to now, there is preliminary evidence that the RNS-induced BP changes predict 24-h ABPM outcome at follow-up in patients with resistant hypertension. Of note, studies are small sized and results of large trials comparing conventional RDN to RNS-guided RDN are warranted.