The postimplantation electrocardiogram predicts clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Differences in the prognostic value of the electrocardiographic pattern after cardiac resynchronization therapy according to age

OBJECTIVES

In this cohort study, we analyzed if a specific pattern in three leads of the electrocardiogram (Rs in V1, Qr in aVL, or rS in I) was associated with outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) depending on age.

METHODS

Patients with CRT devices were included from January 2012 to April 2019. We divided the sample into 2 groups, those with age ≥ 75 years old and those younger. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization at 1 year.

RESULTS

We included 111 patients. Patients older than 75 years (26.1%, n = 29) had a significantly higher rate of hypertension and atrial fibrillation and received less frequently optimal medical therapy. The patterns were observed in 32 (39.0%) younger patients and 11 (37.9%) older patients. Patients who presented any of them had a lower incidence of the primary endpoint in the younger group (0 vs. 14%, p = 0.029), but not in the older group (9.1 vs. 27.8%, p = 0.24). The presence of a basal QRS duration greater than 160 ms was associated with a higher rate of the primary endpoint in the elderly (50 vs. 13%, p = 0.015), but not in the younger group (16.7 vs. 7.1%, p = 0.254).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of the selected patterns after CRT is associated with a lower incidence of all-cause death and hospitalization for HF in patients younger than 75 years, but not in those older than 75 years. Conversely, baseline QRS duration was associated with worse outcomes in older patients, but not in the younger group.

What Have We Learned in the Last 20 Years About CRT Non-Responders?

Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has become well established in the treatment of heart failure, the management of patients who do not respond after CRT remains a key challenge. This review will summarize what we have learned about non-responders over the last 20 years and discuss methods for optimizing response, including the introduction of novel therapies.

The HF-CGM Study: An Analysis of Cardiogoniometric Axes in Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

GOAL

The HF-CGM is a proof-of-principle study to investigate whether cardiogoniometry (CGM), a three-dimensional electrocardiographic method, can differentiate between pacing modes in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

METHODS

At a tertiary cardiology center, CGM recordings were performed using four pacing modes: no pacing; right ventricular (RV) pacing; left ventricular (LV) pacing, and biventricular (BIV) pacing. Three orthogonal CGM planes orientated to the long axis (XY), the frontal plane (YZ), and the short axis (XZ) of the heart were constructed, and the direction of the QRS-axis was calculated for each pacing mode in each plane. During BIV pacing, the direction of CGM QRS-axis was compared between patients with optimal and nonoptimal 12-lead pacing variables.

RESULTS

Twenty-two participants (aged 71.5 ± 10.8; 77.3% male, LVEF 29 ± 7%) were consecutively recruited. Only QRS-axis measured in the XY plane could significantly distinguish between all three pacing modes versus no pacing. Mean QRS-axis in the XY plane with pacing off and during RV pacing was leftward and basal; LV pacing was apical; and BIV pacing was rightward and basal. There was a statistically significant difference in the direction of the QRS-axis between patients with optimal versus nonoptimal paced QRS morphology in the XY plane (rightward and basal versus inconsistent).

SIGNIFICANCE

CGM recorded in the XY plane can accurately detect differences between ventricular pacing sites. It may also be able to identify patients with a CRT device in situ who have optimal response.