Clinical Predictors of Pacemaker Implantation in Patients with Syncope Receiving Implantable Loop Recorder with or without ECG Conduction Abnormalities

Usefulness of last generation insertable cardiac monitors in the diagnosis of unexplained syncope

AIMS

Guidelines recommend insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) in the early phases of the evaluation of unexplained syncope (US) syncope, when an arrhythmic etiology is suspected. We examined the diagnostic yield of the last generation ICM (LG-ICM) to establish the causes of US, by assessing in the clinical practice the incidence of: relevant arrhythmia diagnosis, syncope recurrences and CM-guided cardiac electronic device (CIED) implantation. We investigated also baseline patient characteristics associated to an increased risk of relevant arrhythmias and of syncope recurrence.

METHODS

Data prospectively collected from consecutive patients receiving LG-ICM for investigation of US or presyncope in our institution between November 2020 and January 2023 were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients (mean age 64.4 ± 16.1 years, 40.4% women) with US or pre-syncope episodes underwent implantation of the LG-ICM. During a mean follow-up of 11.7 ± 8.1 months, LG-ICM diagnostic yield was 42%. In particular, LG-ICM detected cardiac arrhythmias in 29 (27%) patients (in 6 out of them during a syncope recurrence) and to exclude the arrhythmic origin of the syncope in additional 19 (17%) patients. LG-ICM guided the implantation of a CIED in 16 (15%) US patients, due to the diagnosis of asystole or severe bradycardia. Age ≥ 65 years (p = 0.012) and atrial arrhythmia history (p = 0.004) are significant independent predictors of arrhythmic diagnoses performed by LG-ICM, while CAD is predictor of syncope recurrence (bordering on statistical significance, p = 0.056).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic yield of LG-ICM in US syncope is comparable to those of ILR and previous generation ICM. The advantages of LG-ICM should be sought in lower hospital workload necessary to manage ICM data. Age ≥ 65 years and atrial arrhythmia history are independent predictors of significant ICM-detected arrhythmias.

Predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients receiving implantable loop recorders for unexplained syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are increasingly used to evaluate patients with unexplained syncope. Identification of all predictors of bradycardic syncope and consequent permanent pacemaker (PPM) insertion is of substantial clinical interest as patients in the highest risk category may benefit from upfront pacemaker insertion.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify risk predictors for PPM insertion in ILR recipients with unexplained syncope.

METHODS

An electronic database search (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane) was performed in June 2023. Studies evaluating ILR recipients with unexplained syncope and recording risk factors for eventual PPM insertion were included. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR) for clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics with respect to future PPM requirement.

RESULTS

Eight studies evaluating 1007 ILR recipients were included; 268 patients (26.6%) underwent PPM insertion during study follow-up. PPM recipients were older (mean age, 70.2 ± 15.4 years vs 61.6 ± 19.7 years; P < .001). PR prolongation on baseline electrocardiography was a significant predictor of PPM requirement (pooled OR, 2.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-5.20). The presence of distal conduction system disease, encompassing any bundle branch or fascicular block, yielded a pooled OR of 2.88 for PPM insertion (95% confidence interval, 1.53-5.41). Injurious syncope and lack of syncopal prodrome were not significant predictors of PPM insertion. Sinus node dysfunction accounted for 62% of PPM insertions, whereas atrioventricular block accounted for 26%.

CONCLUSION

Approximately one-quarter of ILR recipients for unexplained syncope require eventual PPM insertion. Advancing age, PR prolongation, and distal conduction disease are the strongest predictors for PPM requirement.

Predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients with implantable loop recorder and unexplained syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Identifying the underlying cause of unexplained syncope is crucial for appropriate management of recurrent syncopal episodes. Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) have emerged as valuable diagnostic tools for monitoring patients with unexplained syncope. However, the predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients with ILR and unexplained syncope remain unclear. In this study, we shed light on these prognostic factors. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were systematically searched until May 04, 2023. Studies that evaluated the predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients with implantable loop recorder and unexplained syncope were included. The "Quality In Prognosis Studies" appraisal tool was used for quality assessment. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated. The publication bias was evaluated using Egger's and Begg's tests. Ten studies (n = 4200) were included. Right bundle branch block (OR: 3.264; 95% CI: 1.907-5.588, p < .0001) and bifascicular block (OR: 2.969; 95% CI: 1.859-4.742, p < .0001) were the strongest predictors for pacemaker implantation. Pacemaker requirement was more than two times in patients with atrial fibrillation, sinus bradycardia and first degree AV block. Valvular heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension were also significantly more in patients with pacemaker implantation. Age (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.560; 95% CI: 0.410/0.710, p < .0001) and PR interval (SMD: 0.351; 95% CI: 0.150/0.553, p = .001) were significantly higher in patients with pacemaker requirement. Heart conduction disorders, atrial arrhythmias and underlying medical conditions are main predictors of pacemaker device implantation following loop recorder installation in unexplained syncopal patients.

Management of Patients With Unexplained Syncope: Derivation and Validation of a Simplified 2-Step Diagnostic Approach

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to develop a structured 2-step approach, based on noninvasive diagnostic criteria, that led to an electrophysiology study in patients with unexplained syncope.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two independent cohorts were used: the derivation cohort with 665 patients based on electronic health record data to develop our 2-step diagnostic approach, and the validation cohort based on 160 prospectively screened patients, presenting with unexplained syncope episodes. Noninvasive electrocardiographic and imaging markers and an electrophysiology study-based invasive assessment were combined. A positive diagnostic approach according to our study's prespecified criteria resulted in a decision to proceed with a permanent pacemaker/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. The primary end point was the time until the event of recurrent syncope (syncope-free survival). Number needed to treat was calculated for patients with a positive diagnostic approach. The number of patients with unexplained syncope and borderline sinus bradycardia needed to treat was 5, and the number of patients with unexplained syncope and bundle branch block needed to treat was 3 over a mean follow-up of ≈4 years. After the structured 2-step approach, the primary outcome occurred in 14 of 82 (17.1%) with a pacemaker/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and 19 of 57 (33%) with a negative approach, with a mean follow-up of ≈2.5 years (29.29±12.58 months, P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The low number needed to treat in the derivation cohort and the low percentage of syncope recurrence in the validation cohort supports the proposed 2-step electrophysiology-inclusive algorithm as a potentially low-cost, 1-day, structured tool for these patients.

Arrhythmic syncope: From diagnosis to management

Syncope is a concerning symptom that affects a large proportion of patients. It can be related to a heterogeneous group of pathologies ranging from trivial causes to diseases with a high risk of sudden death. However, benign causes are the most frequent, and identifying high-risk patients with potentially severe etiologies is crucial to establish an accurate diagnosis, initiate effective therapy, and alter the prognosis. The term cardiac syncope refers to those episodes where the cause of the cerebral hypoperfusion is directly related to a cardiac disorder, while arrhythmic syncope is cardiac syncope specifically due to rhythm disorders. Indeed, arrhythmias are the most common cause of cardiac syncope. Both bradyarrhythmia and tachyarrhythmia can cause a sudden decrease in cardiac output and produce syncope. In this review, we summarized the main guidelines in the management of patients with syncope of presumed arrhythmic origin. Therefore, we presented a thorough approach to syncope work-up through different tests depending on the clinical characteristics of the patients, risk stratification, and the management of syncope in different scenarios such as structural heart disease and channelopathies.

Arrhythmic risk in single or recurrent episodes of unexplained syncope with complete bundle branch block

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with a single syncopal episode (SSE) and complete bundle branch block (cBBB) are frequently managed more conservatively than patients with recurrent episodes (RSE). The objective of this study was to analyze if there are differences between patients with single or recurrent unexplained syncope and cBBB in arrhythmic risk, the diagnostic yield of tests, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Cohort study of consecutive patients with unexplained syncope and cBBB with a median follow-up time of 3 years. The patients were evaluated via a stepwise workup protocol based on electrophysiological study (EPS) and long-term follow-up with an implantable cardiac monitor.

RESULTS

Of the 503 patients included in the study, 238 (47.3%) had had only 1 syncopal episode. The risk of an arrhythmic syncope was similar in both groups (58.8% in SSE vs 57.0% in RSE; P=.68), also after adjustment for possible confounding variables (HR, 1.06; 95%CI, 0.81-1.38; P=.674). No significant differences between the groups were found in the EPS results and implantable cardiac monitor diagnostic yield. A total of 141 (59.2%) patients with SSE and 154 (58.1%) patients with RSE required cardiac device implantation (P=.797). After appropriate treatment, 35 (7%) patients had recurrence of syncope. The recurrence rate and mortality were also similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cBBB and unexplained syncope are at high risk of an arrhythmic etiology, even after the first syncopal episode. Patients with SSE and RSE have a similar arrhythmic risk and similar outcomes, and therefore there is no clinical justification for not managing them in the same manner.

Clinical Predictors of Pacing Device Implantation in Implantable Cardiac Monitor Recipients for Unexplained Syncope

Background

Implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) help investigate the cause of unexplained syncope, but the probability and predictors of needing a pacing device thereafter remain unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who received ICM insertion for unexplained syncope with suspected arrhythmic etiology. The data were obtained from a nationwide database obtained between April 1, 2012 and March 31, 2020. Multivariable mixed-effects survival analysis was performed to identify predictors of pacing device implantation (PDI), and a risk score model was developed accordingly.

Results

In total, 2905 patients (age: 72 years [range: 60-78]) implanted with ICMs to investigate the cause of syncope were analyzed. During the median follow-up period of 128 days (range: 68-209) days, 473 patients (16%) underwent PDI. Older age, history of atrial fibrillation, bundle branch block (BBB), and diabetes were independent predictors of PDI in multivariable analysis. A risk score model was developed with scores ranging from 0 to 32 points. When patients with the lowest quartile score (0-13 points) were used as a reference, those with higher quartiles had a higher risk of PDI (second quartile: 14-15 points, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.62-5.68; third quartile: 16-18 points, HR: 4.67, 95% CI: 3.14-6.94; fourth quartile: 19-32 points, HR: 6.59, 95% CI: 4.47-9.71).

Conclusions

The 4 identified predictors are easily assessed during the initial evaluation of patients with syncope. They may help identify patients with a higher risk of requiring permanent PDI.

Clinical predictors of cardiac syncope in patients with unexplained syncope after the implantation of an insertable cardiac monitor

Syncope prognosis is related to both its etiology and comorbidities, with cardiac syncope (CS) having higher risks for mortality and cardiovascular events than syncope of non-cardiac causes. Although a novel insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) is an effective diagnostic tool for unexplained syncope, decision regarding ICM implantation with a high pre-test likelihood of CS should contribute to economic cost reduction and avoidance of unnecessary complications. This study aimed to investigate clinical factors associated with CS after ICM implantation in patients with unexplained syncope. This retrospective observational study included 31 consecutive patients with ICM implantation for syncope between September 2016 and August 2021. The initial examinations for syncope included a detailed history, physical examination, blood tests, 12-lead electrocardiograms, and transthoracic echocardiography. Of the 31 patients, 13 (41.9%) experienced recurrent CS during follow-up (676 ± 469 days). Among several clinical factors, syncope-related minor injuries (p = 0.017) and higher brain natriuretic peptide (BNP; p = 0.043) levels were significantly associated with CS. Moreover, multivariable analysis showed that both syncope-related minor injuries (odds ratio, 11.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-88.4; p = 0.022) and BNP higher than 64.0 pg/mL (odds ratio, 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-44.2; p = 0.038) were independent predictors of CS after ICM implantation. In conclusion, a history of minor injury secondary to syncope and higher BNP levels were independent CS predictors in patients receiving ICM for syncope. These results emphasized the utility of ICM implantation early in the diagnostic journey of patients presenting with CS predictors requiring specific treatments.

Prediction of Pacemaker Requirement in Patients With Unexplained Syncope: The DROP Score

BACKGROUND

Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are increasingly utilised in the evaluation of unexplained syncope. However, they are expensive and do not protect against future syncope.

OBJECTIVES

To compare patients requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation during ILR follow-up with those without abnormalities detected on ILR in order to identify potential predictors of benefit from upfront pacing.

METHODS

We analysed 100 consecutive patients receiving ILR: Group 1 (n=50) underwent PPM insertion due to bradyarrhythmias detected on ILR; Group 2 (n=50) had no arrhythmias detected on ILR over >3 years follow-up. Baseline clinical characteristics, syncope history, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters were assessed to identify predictors of ultimate requirement for pacing.

RESULTS

Group 1 (64% male, median age 70.8 years; IQR 65.5-78.8) were older than Group 2 (58% male, median 60.2 years; IQR 44.0-73.0 p=0.001) and were less likely to have related historical factors such as overheating, posture and exercise (98% vs 70% p<0.001). PR interval was also longer in Group 1 (192±51 vs 169±23 p=0.006) with greater prevalence of distal conduction system disease (30% vs 4.3% p=0.002). Significant univariate predictors for PPM insertion were distal conduction disease (p=0.007), first degree atrioventricular (AV) block (p=0.003), absence of precipitating factors (p=0.004), and age >65 years (p=0.001). Injury sustained, recurrent syncope, history of atrial fibrillation (AF) or heart failure, left atrial (LA) size and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were not predictive. These significant predictors were incorporated into the DROP score¹ (0-4). Using time-to-event analysis, no patients with a score of 0 progressed to pacing, while higher scores (3-4) strongly predicted pacing requirement (log-rank p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The DROP score may be helpful in identifying patients likely to benefit from upfront permanent pacemaker (PPM) insertion following unexplained syncope. Larger prospective studies are required to validate this tool.

Sex-Related Differences in Patients With Unexplained Syncope and Bundle Branch Block: Lower Risk of AV Block and Lesser Need for Cardiac Pacing in Women

Objective

To analyze if there are sex-related differences in patients with unexplained syncope and bundle branch block (BBB).

Background

Despite increasing awareness that sex is a major determinant of the incidence, etiology, and the outcomes of different arrhythmias, no studies have examined differences in presentation and outcomes between men and women with syncope and BBB.

Methods

Cohort study of consecutive patients with unexplained syncope and BBB was included from January 2010 to January 2021 with a median follow-up time of 3.4 years [interquartile range (IQR) 1.7–6.0 years]. They were evaluated by a stepwise workup protocol based on electrophysiological study (EPS) and long-term follow-up with an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM).

Results

Of the 443 patients included in the study, 165 (37.2%) were women. Compared with men, women had less diabetes (25.5 vs. 39.9%, p = 0.002) and less history of ischemic heart disease (IHD; 13.3 vs. 25.9%, p = 0.002). Left bundle branch block (LBBB) was more frequent in women (55.2 vs. 27.7%, p < 0.001) while right bundle branch block (RBBB) was more frequent in men (41.5 vs. 67.7%, p < 0.001). His to ventricle (HV) interval in the EPS was shorter in women (58 ms [IQR 52–71] vs. 60 ms [IQR 52–73], p = 0.035) and less women had an HV interval longer than 70 ms (28.5 vs. 38.1%, p = 0.039), however, EPS and ICM offered a similar diagnostic yield in both sexes (40.6 vs. 48.9% and 48.4% vs. 51.1%, respectively). Women had a lower risk of developing atrioventricular block (AVB) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.44–95% CI 0.26–0.74, p = 0.002) and of requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.72–95% CI: 0.52–0.99, p = 0.046). The mortality rate was lower in women (4.5 per 100 person-years [95% CI 3.1–6.4 per 100 person-years] vs. 7.3 per 100 person-years [95% CI 5.9–9.1 per 100 person-years]).

Conclusions

Compared to men, women with unexplained syncope and BBB have a lower risk of AVB and of requiring cardiac pacing. A stepwise diagnostic approach has a similar diagnostic yield in both sexes, and it seems appropriate to guide the treatment and avoid unnecessary pacemaker implantation, especially in women.

Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations

Background

The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a small cardiac rhythm‐monitoring device. Our aim was to determine ILR diagnostic value in patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias.

Methods

This has been a retrospective, observational, single‐center study. We included 181 patients in whom ILR was implanted at the Clinical Center of Serbia between January 2006 and July 2019. An event was marked as diagnostic if it led to a diagnosis and ILR was considered diagnostic if it verified or excluded an arrhythmia as the cause of syncope or palpitations.

Results

The mean age was 51.8 ± 17.8 years and 94 (51.9%) were male. The mean follow‐up period was 20.2 ± 15.8 months. ILR was diagnostic in 98 patients (54.1%). There was no significant difference in diagnostic value of ILR in regard to the baseline patients’ characteristics. The mean time to occurrence of the diagnostic event was 11.1 ± 9.6 months. The time to occurrence of a diagnostic event did not differ significantly between patients who underwent basic as compared to extended diagnostics before ILR implantation.

Conclusions

ILR was able to achieve an etiological diagnosis in 54.1% of patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. In a subgroup of patients with recurrent palpitations, ILR was significantly less diagnostic than in patients with syncope or presyncope. ILR should be implanted beforehand in syncope evaluation process.

Clinical predictors for bradycardia and supraventricular tachycardia necessitating therapy in patients with unexplained syncope monitored by insertable cardiac monitor

Background

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) improve diagnostic yield in patients with unexplained syncope. The most of cardiac syncope is arrhythmic causes include paroxysmal bradycardia and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in patients with unexplained syncope receiving ICM. Predictors for bradycardia and SVT that necessitate therapy in patients with unexplained syncope are not well known.

Hypothesis

This study aimed to investigate predictors of bradycardia and SVT necessitating therapy in patients with unexplained syncope receiving ICMs.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of consecutive patients who received ICMs to monitor unexplained syncope. We performed Cox's stepwise logistic regression analysis to identify significant independent predictors for bradycardia and SVT.

Results

One hundred thirty‐two patients received ICMs to monitor unexplained syncope. During the 17‐month follow‐up period, 19 patients (14%) needed pacemaker therapy for bradycardia; 8 patients (6%) received catheter ablation for SVT. The total estimated diagnostic rates were 34% and 48% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Stepwise logistic regression analysis indicated that syncope during effort (odds ratio [OR] = 3.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 to 9.6; p = .02) was an independent predictor for bradycardia. Palpitation before syncope (OR = 9.46; 95% CI, 1.78 to 50.10; p = .008) and history of atrial fibrillation (OR = 10.1; 95% CI, 1.96 to 52.45; p = .006) were identified as significant independent predictors for SVT.

Conclusion

Syncope during effort, and palpitations or history of atrial fibrillation were independent predictors for bradycardia and for SVT. ICMs are useful devices for diagnosing unexplained syncope.

Permanent pacemaker implantation in unexplained syncope patients with borderline sinus bradycardia and electrophysiology study-proven sinus node disease

BACKGROUND

Significant sinus bradycardia (SB) in the context of sinus node dysfunction (SND) has been associated with neurological symptoms. The objective was to evaluate the effect of permanent pacing on the incidence of syncope in patients with rather mild degrees of SB, unexplained syncope, and "positive" invasive electrophysiologic testing.

METHODS

This was an observational study based on a prospective registry of 122 consecutive mild SB patients (61.90 ± 18.28 years, 61.5% male, 57.88 ± 7.73 bpm) presenting with recurrent unexplained pre and syncope attacks admitted to our hospital for invasive electrophysiology study (EPS). Τhe implantation of a permanent antibradycardia pacemaker (ABP) was offered to all patients according to the results of the EPS. Eighty patients received the ABP, while 42 denied.

RESULTS

The mean of reported syncope episodes was 2.23 ± 1.29 (or presyncope 2.36 ± 1.20) in the last 12 months before they were referred for a combined EP guided diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Over a mean follow-up of approximately 4 years (50.39 ± 32.40 months), the primary outcome event (syncope) occurred in 18 of 122 patients (14.8%), 6 of 80 (7.5%) in the ABP group as compared to 12 of 42 (28.6%) in the no pacemaker group (P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with mild degree of SB and a history of unexplained syncope, a set of positivity criteria for the presence of EPS defined SND after differentiating reflex syncope, identifies a subset of patients who will benefit from permanent pacing.

Etiology of syncope in patients with preexisting atrioventricular conduction disorders

BACKGROUND

The discussion about the feasibility of empiric pacemaker implantation in patients with preexisting atrioventricular (AV) conduction disorders continues. The aim of the study was to determine the etiology of syncope and the need for pacemaker insertion in patients with AV conduction impairment using implantable loop recorder (ILR).

METHODS

ILR was implanted after negative diagnostic workup in 37 patients with syncope (24 men, 13 women, age 72 ± 10 years) and preexisting impairment of AV conduction. First-degree AV block (AVB I) was present in 26 patients, and bundle branch block (BBB) in 17 patients.

RESULTS

ILR-based diagnosis was made in 28 patients (75%)-sinus arrest in 13 patients, complete AVB in 10 patients, and vasodepressor syncope in five patients. In patients with preexisting BBB, sinus arrest occurred during ILR monitoring significantly more frequently than in patients without BBB (53% vs 20%, P = .03). Complete AVB was significantly less common in patients with preexisting BBB than in patients without BBB (12% vs 40%, P = .04). On multivariate regression analysis, the only independent predictor of AVB occurrence during ILR monitoring was preexisting AVB I (P = .03). The only independent predictor of sinus arrest during ILR monitoring was preexisting BBB (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with preexisting AV conduction disorders, prevailing syncopal mechanism during ILR monitoring was asystole. However, sinus arrest occurred more often than complete AVB and was predicted by preexisting BBB. Preexisting AVB was a predictor of complete AVB during ILR monitoring.

Implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope: Clinical predictors of pacemaker implantation

BACKGROUND

Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are a valuable tool for the investigation of unexplainedsyncopal episodes. The aim of this retrospective single center study was to identify predictive factors for pacemaker implantation in patients with unexplained syncope who underwent ILR insertion.

METHODS

One hundred six patients were retrospectively analyzed (mean age 59.1 years; 47.2% male) with unexplained syncope and negative conventional testing who underwent ILR implantation. The pri- mary study endpoint was detection of symptomatic or asymptomatic bradycardia requiring pacemaker implantation.

RESULTS

The average follow-up period after ILR implantation was 20 ± 15 months. Pacemaker im- plantation according to current guidelines was necessary in 22 (20.8%) patients, mean duration until index bradycardia was 81 ± 88 (2-350) days. Ten (45.5%) patients received a pacemaker due to sinus arrest, 7 (31.8%) patients due to third-degree atrioventricular block, 2 (9.1%) patients due to second- degree atrioventricular block and 1 (4.5%) patient due to atrial fibrillation with a slow ventricular rate. Three factors remained significant in multivariate analysis: obesity, which defined by a body mass index above 30 kg/m2 (OR: 7.39, p = 0.014), a right bundle branch block (OR: 9.40, p = 0.023) and chronic renal failure as defined by a glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 mL/min (OR: 6.42, p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Bradycardia is a frequent finding in patients undergoing ILR implantation due to un- explained syncope. Obesity, right bundle branch block and chronic renal failure are independent clinical predictors of pacemaker implantation.

Differences in Cardiovascular Aging in Men and Women

Cardiovascular diseases increase dramatically with age in both men and women. While it is clear that advanced age allows more time for individuals to be exposed to risk factors in general, there is strong evidence that age itself is a major independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Indeed, there are distinct age-dependent cellular, structural, and functional changes in both the heart and blood vessels, even in individuals with no clinical evidence of cardiovascular disease. Studies in older humans and in animal models of aging indicate that this age-related remodeling is maladaptive. An emerging view is that the heart and blood vessels accumulate cellular and subcellular deficits with age and these deficits increase susceptibility to disease in older individuals. Aspects of this age-dependent remodeling of the heart and blood vessels differ between the sexes. There is also new evidence that these maladaptive changes are more prominent in older animals and humans with a high degree of frailty. These observations may help explain why men and women are susceptible to different cardiovascular diseases as they age and why frail older adults are most often affected by these diseases.

Predictors of future arrhythmic events in patients with unexplained syncope

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to examine the usefulness of implantable loop recorders (ILRs) for symptom-rhythm correlation and to identify predictors of future arrhythmic events.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In our dual-centre study, we analysed ILR data of 189 patients (mean age 67.4 ± 15.2 years, 114 male) with unexplained syncope (single syncope 21 patients, recurrent 168 patients, traumatic injury 43 patients). Patients had severe comorbidities such as hypertension (n = 127), coronary artery disease (n = 31), diabetes mellitus (n = 33) and chronic renal insufficiency (n = 18). The median ILR usage was 29 months (M), with a range between 1 and 46 M.

RESULTS

Forty-nine (26%) patients experienced syncope during the study, with a median of 8 M to first recurrence of syncope. In 43 patients, pacemaker implantation was performed because of sinus node disease (n = 29), high-degree AV-block (n = 6) or atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular rate (n = 8). In five patients, an ICD was implanted because of documented ventricular tachycardia (n = 4) or left ventricular ejection fraction <35% (n = 1). One patient received ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus because of documented atrial flutter. Concerning the clinical course, in five patients explantation of the ILR was necessary due to pocket infection. Three patients died due to non-cardiac causes. Logistic regression analysis revealed that older patients had a significantly higher risk for future arrhythmic events (OR 1.3, p = .039).

CONCLUSIONS

ILR monitoring is effective in indicating causes of unexplained syncope by providing symptom-rhythm associations. Only age was a predictor of future arrhythmic events. The mortality in patients with unexplained syncope was very low.

Ajmaline Challenge To Unmask Infrahisian Disease In Patients With Recurrent And Unexplained Syncope, Preserved Ejection Fraction, With Or Without Conduction Abnormalities On Surface ECG

Background: Pharmacological challenge with class I antiarrhythmic drug is a recommended diagnostic test in patients with unexplained syncope only in the presence of bundle branch block, when non-invasive tests have failed to make the diagnosis. Its role in patients with minor or no conduction disturbances on 12-leads ECG has not been evaluated yet. It is also not clear which are the values of His-Ventricular interval to be considered diagnostic. We sought to evaluate the role of ajmaline challenge in unmasking the presence of an infrahisian disease in patients with recurrent and unexplained syncope, regardless of the existence of conduction disturbances on surface ECG. Materials And Methods: Patients with history of recurrent syncope, preserved EF and a negative first level workup were enrolled. Conduction disturbances on ECG were not considered as an exclusion criteria. During EPS, basal HV conduction was determined. In the presence of a HV >70 msec the study was interrupted and the patient was implanted with a pacemaker. If the HV was ≤ 70 msec, ajmaline was infused and HV was reassessed. The maximum value of HV was considered. A prolongation ≥ 100 msec was considered as diagnostic and indicative of conduction disease, and the patient underwent pacemaker implantation. Patients with an HV <100 msec were implanted with an ILR. Results: Sixteen consecutive patients were studied (age 76±5.2 years). Nine patients had conduction disturbances at baseline ECG (group ECG+). Among them, 5 had a basal diagnostic HV interval and 4 had a non-diagnostic HV interval. In the latter group, abnormal response to ajmaline was observed in 3 patients. In this group only one patient was implanted with an ILR, 8 patients were implanted with a pacemaker. Among the seven patients without conduction disturbances (group ECG-), no one had a diagnostic basal HV interval. After drug administration, 4 patients had a non-diagnostic response and were implanted with an ILR, while 3 patient had a pathological response and were implanted with a pacemaker. No difference was found in the values of maximum HV interval prolongation after ajmaline between the two groups (P = 0.89). During a mean follow up of 13±3 months, no patient has developed a syncopal episode. One patient in group ECG- and negative drug test was implanted after 3 months with a permanent pacemaker because of a two to one asymptomatic AV block at ILR interrogation. Conclusions: Ajmaline challenge is a useful tool to unmask the presence of a infrahisian disease in patients with preserved EF, unexplained syncope and negative workup, even in the absence of conduction disturbances on 12-leads ECG. It is a simple and safe test that may disclose the detection of the disease. In these patients, an earlier pacemaker implantation of a pacemaker, may avoid the consequences of a syncopal recurrence. Values of HV interval > 70 msec in basal conditions and ≥ 100 msec after ajmaline administration seem appropriate to unmask infrahisian disease. Larger population is required to validate this hypothesis.

Efficacy And Safety Of Implantable Loop Recorder: Experience Of A Center

Introduction: Symptoms like syncope or palpitations frequently present a diagnostic challenge. An implantable loop recorder (ILR) is an important aid in the management of these patients. Methods: A retrospective study of patients that underwent ILR implantation from November 2007 to 2014. For each patient the indication for implantation, baseline characteristics, previous study, complications, recorded tracing and interventions were evaluated. Results: A total of 62 patients were included, 50% men, with a mean age of 62.5±18.8 years old. Previously to ILR implantation 88.7% of patients had performed Holter, 17.7% external events recorder, 33.9% Tilt test and 29% an electrophysiological study. The implantation indications were recurrent syncope in 90.3%, palpitations 8.1% and ischemic stroke in one patient. Mean follow-up time was 17.1±16.3 months. Symptoms were reported in 66.1% of the patients, 46.8% of those yielding a diagnostic finding. In all cases of palpitation complaints with diagnosis we found atrial fibrillation (AF). In patients with syncope atrioventricular conduction disturbance was demonstrated in 19.6%, sinus node dysfunction in 16.1%, paroxysmal supra-ventricular tachycardia 7.1% and AF in 1.8%. These finding resulted in 19 pacemaker and one CRT-D implantation, introduction of anticoagulation in five patients and one ablation of accessory pathway. There were no major complications. Conclusion: ILR proved to be safe and efficient. It has enabled the identification or exclusion of serious rhythm disturbances in more than half of patients and provided a targeted therapeutic intervention.

Efficacy And Safety Of Implantable Loop Recorder: Experience Of A Center

Introduction: Symptoms like syncope or palpitations frequently present a diagnostic challenge. An implantable loop recorder (ILR) is an important aid in the management of these patients. Methods: A retrospective study of patients that underwent ILR implantation from November 2007 to 2014. For each patient the indication for implantation, baseline characteristics, previous study, complications, recorded tracing and interventions were evaluated. Results: A total of 62 patients were included, 50% men, with a mean age of 62.5±18.8 years old. Previously to ILR implantation 88.7% of patients had performed Holter, 17.7% external events recorder, 33.9% Tilt test and 29% an electrophysiological study. The implantation indications were recurrent syncope in 90.3%, palpitations 8.1% and ischemic stroke in one patient. Mean follow-up time was 17.1±16.3 months. Symptoms were reported in 66.1% of the patients, 46.8% of those yielding a diagnostic finding. In all cases of palpitation complaints with diagnosis we found atrial fibrillation (AF). In patients with syncope atrioventricular conduction disturbance was demonstrated in 19.6%, sinus node dysfunction in 16.1%, paroxysmal supra-ventricular tachycardia 7.1% and AF in 1.8%. These finding resulted in 19 pacemaker and one CRT-D implantation, introduction of anticoagulation in five patients and one ablation of accessory pathway. There were no major complications. Conclusion: ILR proved to be safe and efficient. It has enabled the identification or exclusion of serious rhythm disturbances in more than half of patients and provided a targeted therapeutic intervention.

Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the implantable loop recorder (ILR) in diagnosing atrial fibrillation (AF) and assessing the postoperative efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 32 patients who successfully underwent RFCA were selected. These patients discontinued antiarrhythmic medication with no AF recurrence for more than 3 months after RFCA, and underwent ILR placement by a conventional method. The clinical manifestations and information on arrhythmias recorded by the ILR were followed up to assess the efficacy of AF RFCA. RESULTS The mean follow-up period was 24.7±12.5 months. Of 32 patients with ILR information, 27 had successful RFCA and 5 had recurrent AF. The follow-up results obtained by traditional methods showed 29 patients with successful RFCA and 3 with recurrent AF (P<0.05). Among the 18 patients with clinical symptoms, 13 had recorded cardiac arrhythmic events (72.2%) and 5 showed sinus rhythm (27.8%). The ILRs recorded 18 patients with arrhythmic events (56.3%), including 12 cases of atrial arrhythmias, among whom 5 recurred at 9, 12, 16, 17, and 32 months after AF RFCA; there were also 2 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and 4 with bradycardia. CONCLUSIONS The value of ILR in assessing the efficacy of AF RFCA was superior to that of traditional methods. ILR can promptly detect asymptomatic AF, and can monitor electrocardiogram features after RFCA, thus providing objective evidence of efficacy.