Biomarkers in Persistent AF and Heart Failure: Impact of Catheter Ablation Compared with Rate Control

Natriuretic peptides as predictors for atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation (CA) has become the first-line treatment strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF) but remains with a substantial recurrence rate. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the association between baseline natriuretic peptide levels and AF recurrence after CA.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Wiley-Cochrane Library for relevant studies published up until May 2022. Overall effect analysis and subgroup analysis were performed with Review Manager software.

RESULTS

Finally, 61 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with the nonrecurrence group, the recurrence group had increased baseline level of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-0.56), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (SMD = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31-0.71), N-terminal pro-BNP (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.49-0.92), and midregional N-terminal pro-ANP (SMD = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.27-1.56).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased baseline natriuretic peptide levels, including ANP, BNP, N-terminal pro-BNP, and midregional N-terminal pro-ANP, are associated with a higher risk of AF recurrence after CA. Nonetheless, further studies are needed to elucidate the predictive value of baseline natriuretic peptides in AF patients undergoing CA.

Impact of Midregional N-Terminal Pro-Atrial Natriuretic Peptide and Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity 2 Levels on Heart Rhythm in Patients Treated With Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: The Biorhythm Study

Background

We assessed the impact of preprocedural plasma levels of MRproANP (midregional N‐terminal pro–atrial natriuretic peptide) and sST2 (soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2) on recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) at 1 year after catheter ablation of AF.

Methods and Results

This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study including patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. MRproANP and sST2 were measured in a peripheral venous blood preprocedure, and MRproANP was assessed in the right and left atrial blood during ablation. The primary end point was recurrent AF between 3 and 12 months postablation, defined as a documented (>30 seconds) episode of AF, flutter, or atrial tachycardia. We included 106 patients from December 2017 to March 2019; 105 had complete follow‐up, and the mean age was 63 years with 74.2% males. Overall, 34 patients (32.1%) had recurrent AF. In peripheral venous blood, MRproANP was significantly higher in patients with recurrent AF (median, 192.2; [quartile 1–quartile 3, 155.9–263.9] versus 97.1 [60.9–150.7] pmol/L; P<0.0001), as was sST2 (median, 30.3 [quartile 1–quartile 3, 23.3–39.3] versus 23.4 [95% CI, 17.4–33.0] ng/mL; P=0.0033). In the atria, MRproANP was significantly higher than in peripheral blood and was higher during AF than during sinus rhythm. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified a threshold of MRproANP>107.9 pmol/L to predict AF recurrence at 1 year and a threshold of >26.7 ng/mL for sST2. By multivariate analysis, MRproANP>107.9 pmol/L was the only independent predictor of recurrent AF (OR, 24.27; 95% CI, 4.23–139.18). MRproANP<107.9 pmol/L identified subjects at very low risk of recurrence (negative predictive value >95%).

Conclusions

Elevated MRproANP level independently predicts recurrent AF, whereas sST2 levels do not appear to have any prognostic value in assessing the risk of recurrence of AF up to 1 year after catheter ablation.

Registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03351816.

Clinical outcomes following rhythm control for atrial fibrillation: is early better?

Introduction: An integral aspect of atrial fibrillation (AF) management involves better symptom control, incorporating a rate control, rhythm control, or a combination strategy. The 2020 ESC Guidelines suggest that rhythm control strategy should be recommended for symptomatic patients, to mitigate their symptoms and improve the quality of life. However, adequately powered randomized control trials and prospective 'real-world' registries are needed to fully assess the impact of early rhythm control strategies on clinical outcomes in patients with AF.Objective: In this narrative review, we discuss clinical outcomes following rhythm management approach among patients with AF, considering the effectiveness of an early intervention strategy.Expert opinion: Patients involvement and shared decision-making are crucial when deciding the optimal management strategy among patients with AF. For those with newly diagnosed symptomatic AF, an early invasive approach such as catheter ablation may have a role in preventing AF progression and subsequent pathophysiological changes.

Rhythm Control of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Systolic Heart Failure: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background and Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical impact of serial change in brain natriuretic peptide before and after catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure

BACKGROUND

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) predicts the prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF); however, the level of BNP can change immediately after restoration of sinus rhythm. We aimed to investigate the clinical impact of serial change in BNP level before and after catheter ablation for AF, on the prognosis.

METHODS

In this retrospective single center study, 162 consecutive patients (67±9 years, 66.7% male) with AF and concomitant HF who underwent catheter ablation were examined. We analyzed the cardiac rhythm and % change in BNP pre- and post-ablation.

RESULTS

BNP increased by 32.7% (-4.5% to 51.3%) in patients with sinus rhythm at baseline (sinus rhythm group: N=50) and decreased by 47.6% (20.9 to 61.6%) in patients with AF rhythm at baseline. Patients with AF rhythm at baseline were categorized into two groups according to the median value of reduction in % BNP; patients with good % BNP reduction (good BNP-R group; N=56), and with poor % BNP reduction (poor BNP-R group; N=56). Although the rate of recurrence of AF after ablation was comparable between the good and poor BNP-R groups, poor BNP-R was an independent predictor of subsequent composite events including HF hospitalization, ischemic stroke, and all cause of death after ablation, even after adjusting for other confounders (hazard ratio: 6.85, 95% confidence interval: 2.16 to 21.7, p-value=0.001). In the longitudinal analysis of echocardiographic parameters, shortening of the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter with preserved ejection fraction was evident except in the poor BNP-R group.

CONCLUSION

In patients with AF and HF, poor % BNP reduction was an independent predictor of adverse outcome, although the rate of recurrence of AF was comparable. Serial BNP measurement might help in better identification of high-risk patients in whom sinus rhythm is restored with catheter ablation.