Late potentials and their correlation with ventricular structure in patients with ventricular arrhythmias

Incremental value of the signal-averaged ECG for diagnosing arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is currently diagnosed using a combination of clinical features, imaging, electrocardiography, and genetic investigations. An abnormal signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) is defined as a minor diagnostic criterion by the 2010 Task Force Criteria, but doubts remain about the value of this investigation.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the utility of the SAECG in diagnosing ARVC using the Canadian Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Registry, a population representative registry of probands with ARVC and relatives, less influenced by referral bias.

METHODS

Probands with ARVC and family members from the Canadian Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Registry underwent phenotype review. SAECG parameters were compared individually and in combination between those with varying degrees of ARVC severity and healthy controls (family members of probands with ARVC and unexplained sudden death, free of evidence of cardiac disease).

RESULTS

A total of 196 patients with ARVC and 205 controls were included (mean age 44 ± 15 years; 186 of 401 men [46%]). SAECG abnormalities were seen in 83 of 205 controls (40%), 33 of 68 patients with ARVC and mild disease (51%), and 31 of 42 with severe disease (74%). The SAECG associated strongly with imaging abnormalities (major: odds ratio 3.0, 95% confidence interval 1.3-6.9; minor: odds ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval 0.7-16.5) but not with other aspects of phenotype. Patients carrying pathogenic variants but with minimal phenotype had similar SAECGs to healthy controls (filtered QRS duration 111.2 ± 11.2 ms vs 111 ± 7.6 ms, P = .93; duration of low amplitude signals < 40 μV 32.3 ± 8.9 ms vs 34.2 ± 7.2 ms, P = .32; root mean square of the terminal 40 ms of the filtered QRS complex 43.1 ± 25.2 ms vs 38.2 ± 20.2 ms, P = .38).

CONCLUSION

The SAECG appears to be a surrogate marker for structural abnormalities seen on imaging in those with ARVC. Great caution is required in interpreting SAECG findings in those without other corroborating evidence of an ARVC phenotype.

Missing Link between Molecular Aspects of Ventricular Arrhythmias and QRS Complex Morphology in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

The aim of this opinion paper is to point out the knowledge gap between evidence on the molecular level and clinical diagnostic possibilities in left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) regarding the prediction of ventricular arrhythmias and monitoring the effect of therapy. LVH is defined as an increase in left ventricular size and is associated with increased occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia. Hypertrophic rebuilding of myocardium comprises interrelated processes on molecular, subcellular, cellular, tissue, and organ levels affecting electrogenesis, creating a substrate for triggering and maintaining arrhythmias. The knowledge of these processes serves as a basis for developing targeted therapy to prevent and treat arrhythmias. In the clinical practice, the method for recording electrical phenomena of the heart is electrocardiography. The recognized clinical electrocardiogram (ECG) predictors of ventricular arrhythmias are related to alterations in electrical impulse propagation, such as QRS complex duration, QT interval, early repolarization, late potentials, and fragmented QRS, and they are not specific for LVH. However, the simulation studies have shown that the QRS complex patterns documented in patients with LVH are also conditioned remarkably by the alterations in impulse propagation. These QRS complex patterns in LVH could be potentially recognized for predicting ventricular arrhythmia and for monitoring the effect of therapy.