External validation and comparison of CHA
2DS
2-VASc-RAF and CHA
2DS
2-VASc-LAF scores for predicting left atrial thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2022;
65:535-542. [PMID:
35831771 DOI:
10.1007/s10840-022-01285-y]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE
CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF (R is renal dysfunction, and AF is atrial fibrillation type) and CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF (L is left atrial diameter, and AF is atrial fibrillation type) scores have been developed to estimate the risk of left atrial thrombus (LAT) and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, few external validations have been conducted to assess their accuracy. Thus, this study aimed to validate and compare the two modified scores for predicting LAT/SEC in patients with NVAF.
METHODS
This study included 399 patients with NVAF who underwent transesophageal echocardiography. Risk factors related to LAT/SEC were identified through logistic regression analysis, and predictive value and diagnostic efficiency were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
RESULTS
Approximately 9.8% (39/399) of the patients with NVAF had LAT/SEC. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that history of stroke/transient ischemic attack, congestive heart failure, non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, lack of anticoagulation therapy, enlarged left atrial diameter, enlarged left ventricular end diastolic diameter, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased left atrial appendage emptying velocity, and decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate were independent risk factors for LAT/SEC. The CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.839) and CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF (AUC = 0.829) scores showed larger predictive values than the CHA2DS2-VASc (AUC = 0.737) and CHADS2 (AUC = 0.736) scores. The AUC of the CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF score was similar to that of the CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF score (Z = 0.432; P = 0.666).
CONCLUSION
This study validated that the CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF and CHA2DS2-VASc-LAF scores are useful prognostic scoring systems for predicting LAT/SEC in patients with NVAF.
Collapse