Inappropriate activation of pacemaker magnet response mode by CPAP masks

Interaction of positive airway pressure mask magnets with cardiac implantable electronic devices

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate for potential interactions between magnetic positive airway pressure (mPAP) masks and cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) for patients with sleep apnea.

METHODS

Adult patients with a CIED who used an mPAP mask were recruited from our sleep clinic to undergo a safety visit at our pacemaker clinic. We tested whether the mPAP interacted with the implanted device at home during normal use and in the clinic during simulated normal use and with direct contact. The magnetic field strength of 6 mPAP masks was tested with a gaussmeter.

RESULTS

Of 13 patients tested, 1 (8%), wearing a full face mask (ResMed AirFit F30 [ResMed, San Diego, California]), had a magnet response event (interaction) with direct contact, but no interactions were identified during normal or simulated normal use in any patient. The magnetic field strength of the mPAP masks increased the closer the mask got to the CIED, from 0.4 mT (4 G) at the mask manufacturer's recommended 5.1-cm (2-inch) distance from an implanted medical device up to 291 mT (2,910 G) at 0 cm (0 inches; direct contact).

CONCLUSIONS

An mPAP mask may interact with a CIED if placed directly on the skin overlying the CIED. The use of Philips Respironics (Philips, Cambridge, Massachusetts) mPAP masks is now contraindicated in patients with a CIED. Until additional studies are conducted to better document the risks and benefits of mPAP masks, we recommend discouraging patients with CIEDs from using any mPAP mask.

CITATION

Ruoff CM, Tashman YS, Cheema KPK, et al. Interaction of positive airway pressure mask magnets with cardiac implantable electronic devices. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(5):941-946.

Interference of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by static electric and magnetic fields

Introduction: Electromagnetic interference (EMI) of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) can lead to malfunctions and pose a danger for implant carriers. The increased use of DC technologies, e.g. in electric mobility, creates more static fields representing an increasing hazard for implant carriers.Areas covered: A combination of approaches was used to determine thresholds for EMI by static fields. A literature search was conducted to identify relevant EMI mechanisms and to extract possible thresholds. The literature search revealed four interference mechanisms caused by static magnetic fields and none for static electric fields. Due to the scarce information on motion-induced EMI, numerical simulations were performed to obtain a threshold. The simulation results were evaluated using medical product standards and benchmark tests on commercially available CIEDs. The results show that motion-induced interference should not occur below the activation of the magnetic safety switch (reed switch or Hall-effect sensor, MSS).Expert opinion: The determined threshold for motion-induced EMI at 24.8 mT shows that the MSS activation is still the most relevant mechanism that can occur at 0.8 mT. Limit values for the general population do not protect implant carriers from EMI.