Parreira L, Carmo P, Marinheiro R, Chambel D, Mesquita D, Amador P, Pinho J, Marques L, Reis RP, Adragao P. A simplified approach to radiofrequency catheter ablation of idiopathic ventricular outflow tract premature ventricular contractions.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2022;
33:2308-2321. [PMID:
35938385 DOI:
10.1111/jce.15652]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Frequently, low voltage areas (LVAs) and diastolic potentials (DPs) are present at ablation site in sinus rhythm in patients with idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs).
OBJECTIVE
Validate these findings as substrate for PVCs and evaluate the feasibility of a simplified substrate approach based on LVAs and DPs for ablation of idiopathic outflow tract PVCs, in patients with a low PVC burden during the procedure.
METHODS
Prospective single-arm clinical trial at two centers with comparison with a historical group, matched to age and gender. The study group consisted of consecutive patients referred for ablation of frequent idiopathic PVCs with inferior axis, that presented with less than 2 PVCs/min in first 5 minutes of the procedure. The ablation was based on fast mapping of the RVOT in sinus rhythm looking for LVAs and DPs, defined as isolated small amplitude potentials occurring after the T wave of the surface ECG. The area with LVAs and DPs was tagged, and a simplified activation mapping of the PVCs was done in that area. The procedure time, success rate and recurrence rate were compared with the historical group in whom ablation was performed based on activation and pace mapping only. A validation group without PVCs was also studied to assess the prevalence of LVAs and DPs in the general population.
RESULTS
The study (n=38), historical (n=38) and validation (n=38) groups did not differ in relation to age or gender. Prevalence of LVAs and DPs was significantly higher in the study group in comparison with the validation group, respectively, 71% vs 11%, p<0.0001 and 87% vs 8%, p<0.0001. Procedure time was significantly lower in the study group when comparing to the historical group, 130 (100-164) vs 183 (160-203) min, p<0.0001 and the success rate was significantly higher, 90% vs 64%, p=0.013. The recurrence rate in patients with a successful ablation was not significantly different between both groups, Log-Rank=0.125.
CONCLUSION
Prevalence of LVAs and DPs was significantly higher in the study group than in the validation group. The proposed approach proved to be feasible, faster and more efficient than the historical approach. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse