Comparison of standard vs modified "figure-of-eight" suture to achieve femoral venous hemostasis after cryoballoon based atrial fibrillation ablation

Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel external compression vascular closure device: The LockeT® study

INTRODUCTION

Hemostasis following large-bore femoral vein access remains a challenge. Manual compression has been the standard of care but requires bedside staff, prolonged bed rest, and longer length of stay. The LockeT is an external compression device that attempts to address these issues while achieving venous hemostasis.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluate postprocedural hemostasis and vascular closure outcomes after using LockeT following cardiac electrophysiologic procedures.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, observational study of patients who underwent vascular closure for electrophysiology procedures using LockeT. Postprocedural outcomes were subsequently analyzed.

RESULTS

We studied 102 patients (N) for whom LockeT was used to close 182 separate vascular access sites (n). Common procedures were atrial fibrillation ablation (56.9%, N = 58) and left atrial appendage occlusion (28.4%, N = 29). Most often, 8-Fr [48.3% (n = 126)], 11-Fr [27.2% (n = 71)], and 8.5-Fr [16.9% (n = 44)] sheaths were used, with an average procedure time of 82.1 ± 29.4 min. Hemostasis was achieved in 97.8% (n = 187) of all LockeT cases. Time to ambulation and discharge were 3.93 ± 1.10 h and 8.1 ± 4.4 h, respectively. No major complications were noted. Postprocedurally, 52% (N = 53) of patients were discharged on the same day. There were no differences in hemostasis (p = .859) or ambulation times (p = .202) between procedure types.

CONCLUSION

The LockeT can effectively close venous access sites with no major complications.

Feasibility and efficacy of real-time ultrasound-guided venous closure with suture-mediated vascular closure device

BACKGROUND

Venous vascular access complications are usually nonfatal but are the most common complications after transvenous catheter intervention. Vascular closure devices (VCDs) have recently become available for venous closure.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of real-time ultrasound-guided venous closure with suture-mediated VCDs in patients who underwent catheter ablation.

METHODS

This single-center observational study enrolled 226 consecutive patients who underwent elective catheter ablation with femoral venipuncture. For hemostasis, vessel closure by VCD was performed with real-time ultrasound guidance after 2022 (n = 123) and without ultrasound guidance in 2021 (n = 103). The occurrence of venous access site-related complications (major, minor, or other) was compared.

RESULTS

The rate of device failure was significantly lower in patients with ultrasound guidance than in those without (1.6% vs 6.3%; P = .048). The occurrence of all venous access site-related complications was significantly lower in patients with ultrasound guidance than in those without (4.9% vs 18.4%; P = .001). Time to ambulation was shorter in patients with ultrasound guidance than in those without (2.0 ± 0.1 hours vs 2.2 ± 0.6 hours; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Real-time ultrasound guidance can reduce device failure, access site-related complications, and time to ambulation in performing venous closure with a VCD.

Suture-based techniques versus manual compression for femoral venous haemostasis after electrophysiology procedures

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Methods for femoral venous haemostasis following electrophysiology (EP) procedures include manual compression (MC) and suture-based techniques such as a figure-of-eight suture secured with a hand-tied knot (Fo8HT) or a modified figure-of-eight suture secured with a 3-way stopcock (Fo8MOD). We hypothesised that short-term bleeding outcomes using the Fo8MOD approach would be superior to MC. We additionally compared outcomes between Fo8MOD and Fo8HT approaches.

METHODS

We studied consecutive patients undergoing EP procedures at our institution between March and December 2023. Patients were categorised into three haemostasis groups: MC, Fo8HT and Fo8MOD. Access site complications were classified as major (requiring intervention or blood transfusion, delaying discharge or resulting in death) or minor (bleeding/haematoma requiring additional compression).

RESULTS

1089 patients were included: MC 718 (65.9%); Fo8HT 105 (9.6%); Fo8MOD 266 (24.4%). Procedures were most commonly for atrial fibrillation (52.4%), atrial flutter (10.9%), and atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (10.1%). In patients receiving periprocedural anticoagulation (865, 79.4%), Fo8MOD associated with fewer complications than MC or Fo8HT (major: MC 2.2%, Fo8HT 6.0%, Fo8MOD 0.8%, p = .01; minor: MC 16.5%, Fo8HT 12.0%, Fo8MOD 7.4%, p = .002). In patients not receiving periprocedural anticoagulation, complications did not differ between haemostasis methods (total major and minor complications 5.8%, p = .729 for between groups rates). On multivariable logistic regression, Fo8MOD was associated with a significantly lower risk of access site complications (OR 0.29 [95% CI 0.17-0.48], p < .001), whilst intraprocedural heparinisation (OR 5.25 [2.88-9.69], p < .001) and larger maximal sheath size (OR 1.06 [1.00-1.11], p = .04) were associated with a higher risk of complications.

CONCLUSION

Femoral haemostasis with Fo8MOD associates with fewer access site complications than MC and Fo8HT following EP procedures that need periprocedural anticoagulation.

A Novel Suture-Based Vascular Closure Device to Achieve Hemostasis after Venous or Arterial Access While Leaving Nothing behind: A Review of the Technological Assessment and Early Clinical Outcomes

Vascular hemostasis after venous and arterial access in cardiovascular procedures remains a challenge. As sheath size gets larger for structural heart and vascular procedures, no dedicated closure devices exist that can overcome all the challenges of achieving vascular hemostasis, in particular on the venous side. Efficiently and reliably ensuring hemostasis at the access point is crucial for enhancing the safety of a procedure. Historically, hemostasis relied on manually compressing venous access sites. However, the shift towards larger sheaths and the more frequent use of continuous anticoagulation has strained this approach. Achieving hemostasis solely through compression in these scenarios demands heightened vigilance and prolonged application, resulting in increased patient discomfort and extended immobility. Consequently, manual compression may consume more time for healthcare providers and contribute to bed occupancy in hospitals. This review article summarizes the development of the SiteSeal® Vascular Closure Device, a novel leave-nothing-behind approach to achieve hemostasis. The introduction of this technology has provided clinicians with a safer and more effective way to achieve immediate hemostasis, facilitate early ambulation, and enable earlier discharges with fewer access site complications compared with traditional manual compression.

Venous vascular closure system vs. figure-of-eight suture following atrial fibrillation ablation: the STYLE-AF Study

AIMS

Simplified ablation technologies for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are increasingly performed worldwide. One of the most common complications following PVI are vascular access-related complications. Lately, venous closure systems (VCSs) were introduced into clinical practice, aiming to reduce the time of bed rest, to increase the patients' comfort, and to reduce vascular access-related complications. The aim of the present study is to compare the safety and efficacy of using a VCS to achieve haemostasis following single-shot PVI to the actual standard of care [figure-of-eight suture and manual compression (MC)].

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, controlled, open-label trial performed at three German centres. Patients were randomized 1:1 to undergo haemostasis either by means of VCS (VCS group) or of a figure-of-eight suture and MC (F8 group). The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to ambulation, while the primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major periprocedural adverse events until hospital discharge. A total of 125 patients were randomized. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The VCS group showed a shorter time to ambulation [109.0 (82.0, 160.0) vs. 269.0 (243.8, 340.5) min; P < 0.001], shorter time to haemostasis [1 (1, 2) vs. 5 (2, 10) min; P < 0.001], and shorter time to discharge eligibility [270 (270, 270) vs. 340 (300, 458) min; P < 0.001]. No major vascular access-related complication was reported in either group. A trend towards a lower incidence of minor vascular access-related complications on the day of procedure was observed in the VCS group [7 (11.1%) vs. 15 (24.2%); P = 0.063] as compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

Following AF ablation, the use of a VCS results in a significantly shorter time to ambulation, time to haemostasis, and time to discharge eligibility. No major vascular access-related complications were identified. The use of MC and a figure-of-eight suture showed a trend towards a higher incidence of minor vascular access-related complications.

Long-term outcomes of left atrial appendage isolation using cryoballoon in persistent atrial fibrillation

AIMS

There is an increasing trend evaluating the role of non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers to improve ablation outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) as pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) strategy alone has modest outcomes. We investigated the long-term safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage isolation (LAAi) in addition to PVI using cryoballoon (CB) in persistent AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this multicentre retrospective analysis, we included a total of 193 persistent AF patients (mean age: 60 ± 11 years, 50.3% females) who underwent PVI and LAAi using CB. Baseline and follow-up data including electrocardiography (ECG), 24 h Holter ECGs, and echocardiography were recorded for all patients. Atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) recurrence was defined as the detection of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia (≥30 s) after a 3-month blanking period. At a median follow-up of 55 (36.5-60.0) months, 85 (67.9%) patients with PVI + LAAi were in sinus rhythm after the index procedure. Ischaemic stroke/transient ischemic attack occurred in 14 (7.2%) patients at a median of 24 (2-53) months following catheter ablation. Multivariate regression analysis revealed heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [hazard ratio (HR) 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-5.02; P = 0.038], male gender (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.96; P = 0.037), and LA area (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.53-1.32; P = 0.023) as independent predictors of ATa recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated that the LAAi + PVI strategy using CB had acceptable long-term outcomes in patients with persistent AF. Systemic thrombo-embolic events are an important concern throughout the follow-up, which were mostly observed in case of non-adherence to anticoagulants.

Comparative outcomes of vascular access closure methods following atrial fibrillation/flutter catheter ablation: insights from VAscular Closure for Cardiac Ablation Registry

PURPOSE

This registry compared the safety and efficacy of vascular closure device Perclose (PC) with figure-of-eight stitch (Fo8) and manual compression (MC) following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation/flutter.

METHODS

VAscular Closure for Cardiac Ablation Registry (VACCAR) is a prospective, observational registry that assessed the time to hemostasis (TTH), time to ambulation (TTA), length of stay (LOS), complications, patient-reported outcomes, and pain medication use.

RESULTS

A total of 434 patients (mean age 64.0±11.0 years; 38% female; 94.9% white) were enrolled between October 2017 and May 2019: 156 in MC, 203 in Fo8, and 75 in the PC group. Median TTH was significantly reduced in the PC and Fo8 group at 7 and 9 min respectively vs. the MC group at 20 min (p<0.001). Median TTA was significantly reduced in both the PC and Fo8 group at 2.2 h vs. the MC group at 6.5 h (p<0.001 for both). Median LOS for the PC group was significantly reduced at 27.5 h compared to the MC and Fo8 group at 29 h (p<0.01). A higher proportion of same-day discharges were noted in the PC and Fo8 groups at 14 (18.7%) and 25 (12.3%), respectively, compared to 5 (3.2%) in the MC group (p<0.01 for all). There was no significant difference in complications between the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both PC and Fo8 are safe with improved TTH, TTA, LOS, and a higher number of same-day discharges compared to MC.

A comparison of figure-of-8-suture versus manual compression for venous access closure after cardiac procedures: An updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Manual compression (MC) is the current standard to achieve postprocedural hemostasis in patients who need venous vascular access closure after cardiovascular procedures. Figure-of-8 (F8) suture for venous access closure has been reported to be a safe and efficacious alternative to MC.

METHODS

A systematic search was done using PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and ClinicalTrials.gov without language restriction up until April 15, 2020 for studies comparing F8 suture versus MC. Risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Time to achieve hemostasis was significantly reduced in the F8 arm [MD -21.04 min (95% CI: -35.66 to -6.42; P = .005)]. Access site bleeding was significantly lower in the F8 group [RR 0.35 (95% CI: 0.18 to 0.66; P = .001)] along with a lower incidence of hematoma formation [RR 0.42 (95% CI: 0.26 to 0.67; P = .0003)]. There was no significant difference in rates of fistula or pseudoaneurysm formation between the two groups. Overall access site complications were lower in the F8 arm [RR 0.38 (95% CI: 0.26 to 0.55; P < .00001)] and the effect was more pronounced for sheaths ≥10 Fr [RR 0.33 (95% CI: 0.18 to 0.60; P = .0003)]. There was lower postprocedural protamine use in the F8 group [RR 0.07 (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.36; P = .001)].

CONCLUSION

For large-bore venous access closure, the F8 suture results in a shortened time to achieve hemostasis along with a lower overall risk of access site complications and postprocedural protamine use.

Acute Procedural Complications of Cryoballoon Ablation: A Comprehensive Review

Catheter ablation is increasingly performed for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Balloon based procedures have been developed aiming at safer, easier and more effective treatment as compared to point to point ablation. In the present review article, we aimed to discuss acute procedural complications of cryoballoon ablation.

Heparin reversal with protamine sulfate is not required in atrial fibrillation ablation with suture hemostasis

BACKGROUND

The utility of protamine sulfate for heparin reversal in catheter-based atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is unclear when using the suture closure technique for vascular hemostasis.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to address if protamine sulfate use for heparin reversal reduces vascular access complications in AF catheter ablation when suture techniques are used for postprocedural vascular hemostasis.

METHODS

This is a retrospective multicenter observational study of 294 consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation for AF with subsequent vascular access hemostasis by means of a figure-of-eight suture or stopcock technique. A total of 156 patients received protamine for heparin reversal before sheath removal while 138 patients did not receive protamine. The two groups were compared for procedural activated clotting time (ACT), access site complications, and duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Baseline demographic characteristics were comparable in both groups. Despite higher ACT before venous sheath removal in patients not receiving protamine (288.0 ± 44.3 vs 153.9 ± 32.0 seconds; P < .001), there was no significant difference in groin complications, postoperative thromboembolic events, or duration of hospital stay between the two groups. Suture failure requiring manual compression was rarely observed in this cohort (0.34%).

CONCLUSION

With modern vascular access and sheath management techniques, for patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF, simple suture closure techniques can obviate the need for protamine administration to safely achieve hemostasis after removal of vascular sheaths.