Prevention of adhesive capsulitis following pacemaker implantation: A randomized controlled study

Optimizing Recovery: A Systematic Scoping Review of Upper Extremity Exercise Immediately after Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers, defibrillators, and resynchronization devices, significantly enhance patient outcomes, reduce sudden cardiac death, and improve health-related quality of life. CIED implantation is associated to persistent shoulder dysfunction in a considerable number of patients one-year post-implantation. This may result in disability, diminished quality of life, work absenteeism, and negative psychological effects. Restoring upper extremity function after CIED implantation should be a standard of cardiovascular care. Our systematic scoping review aimed to summarize available evidence, addressing vital questions about safety, effectiveness, exercise type, and time of exercise initiation immediately after CIED implantation.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search in 5 electronic databases for original research in English, and a manual search on the references of included studies. We used Rayyan web application for study selection, and PRISMA-ScR to conduct and report the review. We assessed methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists.

RESULTS

This review included 6 studies that used upper extremity pendular, range of motion, stretching and strengthening exercises. Initiation time varied from the first postoperative day to the second postoperative week. All studies showed significant association between active upper extremity exercise and reduced dysfunction and disability after CIED implantation. There were no significant differences in complication rates between control and experimental groups.

CONCLUSION

A limited number of low-to-average quality studies suggest active upper extremity exercise immediately after CIED implantation is safe, effective at reducing dysfunction, and improves quality of life. Higher-quality studies are needed to validate these findings.

The diagnostic value of physical examination tests in adhesive capsulitis: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Adhesive capsulitis, a condition marked by pain and stiffness of the shoulder, can have a frustrating clinical course for patients and health care professionals. Despite huge research interest, a universally accepted and used definition of clinical criteria for the diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis is currently still lacking. This systematic review aimed to identify diagnostic values for clinical examinations tests used in the diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A total of 5 electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL] and PEDro) were searched for relevant studies from 2002 until October 2022 using the terms: "adhesive capsulitis AND diagnosis" and "frozen shoulder AND diagnosis." The Downs and Black Checklist (modified) was used to assess the risk of bias. The study protocol was prospectively registered at the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42022365993).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The initial database search identified 1799 studies, of which 9 (0.50%) were eventually included in the systematic review. Non-intrusive shoulder range of motion measurements in patients with adhesive capsulitis using the Kinect for Windows (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) showed high correlation with clinical range of motion measurement. Two specific clinical tests, the affected-unaffected shoulder approach of the Coracoid Pain Test and the Distension Test in Passive External Rotation, were identified and presented excellent sensibility and specificity in the diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis, in their original study. Comparison between clinical tests was not possible due to the heterogeneity in clinical tools.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review identified several physical examination tests developed for the diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis but could not compare them nor advance a set of clinical diagnostic tests that are scientifically validated. Further research is warranted to obtain validation of clinical diagnosis tools for adhesive capsulitis.

Relationship between CIED extent of displacement toward the shoulder while in the supine position and shoulder impairment

BACKGROUND

Device-related shoulder impairment is a common complication in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) recipients. This study examined the relationship between the extent of device displacement toward the shoulder while in the supine position and ipsilateral shoulder impairment.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 142 consecutive patients with CIEDs. The effects of the extent of device displacement on functional limitations, muscle strength, pain-disability, and quality of life were evaluated. Range of motion (ROM), grip strength (GS), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and the 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) Health Survey were used.

RESULTS

The mean device displacement was greater in patients with than without device-related shoulder impairment (51 ± 19 vs. 38 ± 15 mm; p < .001). Female gender (p = .046), high body mass index (p = .008), and defibrillator implantation (p = .004) were significantly more frequent in patients with than without impairment. Patients with excessive device displacement had significantly higher ROM limitation rates (p = .003) and SPADI scores (p = .02) and significantly lower GS (p = .04) and SF-36 scores (p = .032). Defibrillator implantation (OR: 2.569, 95% CI: 1.216-4.681; p = .03) and the extent of device displacement (OR: 1.502, 95% CI: 1.186-1.852; p = .01) were independent predictors of shoulder impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Excessive displacement of the device toward the shoulder while in the supine position causes shoulder impairment by contacting more muscle fibers. Obese female patients with defibrillators have the highest risk.

Efficacy and safety of different exercises in preventing cardiac implantable electronic device-related shoulder impairment

BACKGROUND

Shoulder impairment on the implant-side is common after cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the pendulum exercise (PE) and stretching & strengthening exercises (SSE) in preventing postimplantation shoulder impairment.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized study collected data from 89 patients, including 30 in a control group, 31 in a PE group, and 28 in a SSE group. Shoulder functions on the implant-side were evaluated by grip strength (GS), range of motion (ROM), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), and 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

Shoulder median flexion and abduction ROM were significantly improved two-month postimplantation compared to two-week postimplantation in PE (156±11 vs. 146±10, p = .002; 147±9 vs. 136±9, p = .001, respectively) and SSE (158±13 vs. 147±11, p = .003; 149±13 vs. 138±9, p = .002, respectively) groups, but not in the control group. Two months after implantation, the two exercise groups showed no significant differences in any assessment. Compared with the PE and SSE groups, the control group had significantly lower GS (p = .012 and p = .002, respectively) and SF-36 physical component summary (p = .007 and p = .003, respectively) and significantly higher VAS (p = .003 and p = .001, respectively) and QuickDASH (p = .002 and p = .005, respectively) scores two-month postimplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

PE and SSE for the ipsilateral upper arm starting two-week after CIED implantation provided similar benefits in preserving shoulder girdle muscle strength, maintaining shoulder motion, relieving shoulder pain, preventing shoulder injury, and improving quality of life, without the risk of lead dislodgement. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.