Physical activity and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence in atrial fibrillation patients after catheter ablation

Comparison of short-term efficacy of two bipolar radiofrequency ablation forceps for rheumatic heart disease concomitant with atrial fibrillation

Background

Currently, the bipolar radiofrequency ablation forceps manufactured by AtriCure are the main instrument for surgical ablation in patients with rheumatic heart disease (RHD) concomitant with atrial fibrillation (AF). The bipolar radiofrequency ablation forceps by Med-Zenith has a greater advantage in price compared with AtriCure. However, few studies have been reported on the comparison of their clinical efficacy. The aim of this study is to compare the short-term clinical efficacy of the two ablation forceps for RHD concomitant with AF.

Methods

Clinical data of 167 patients with RHD concomitant with AF admitted to the Department of Cardiac Major Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, were retrospectively analyzed, and the restoration efficacy of sinus rhythm (SR) and cardiac function after surgery were compared with two ablation forceps.

Results

The end-systolic diameter of the right atrium and the end-systolic diameter of the left atrium in the patients of both groups at each postoperative time point decreased compared with that of the preoperative period (P < 0.05), and the left ventricular ejection fraction started to improve significantly at 6 months after surgery compared with that of the preoperative period (P < 0.05). There was no difference between the two groups of patients in the comparison of the aforementioned indicators at different points in time (P > 0.05). At 12 months postoperatively, the SR maintenance rate in using the ablation forceps by Med-Zenith (73.3%) was lower than that for AtriCure (86.4%) and the cumulative recurrence rate of AF in using the Med-Zenith ablation forceps was greater than that for AtriCure.

Conclusions

The two bipolar radiofrequency ablation forceps compared in the study are safe and effective in treating patients of RHD concomitant with AF, and the ablation forceps by AtriCure may be more effective in restoring SR in the short term.

Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence following Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1)Introduction: Catheter ablation has become a cornerstone for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Nevertheless, recurrence rates remain high. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) has been associated with AF pathogenesis and maintenance. However, the literature has provided equivocal results regarding the relationship between EAT and post-ablation recurrence.(2) Purpose: to investigate the relationship between total and peri-left atrium (peri-LA) EAT with post-ablation AF recurrence. (3) Methods: major electronic databases were searched for articles assessing the relationship between EAT, quantified using computed tomography, and the recurrence of AF following catheter ablation procedures. (4) Results: Twelve studies (2179 patients) assessed total EAT and another twelve (2879 patients) peri-LA EAT. Almost 60% of the included patients had paroxysmal AF and recurrence was documented in 34%. Those who maintained sinus rhythm had a significantly lower volume of peri-LA EAT (SMD: -0.37, 95%; CI: -0.58-0.16, I2: 68%). On the contrary, no significant difference was documented for total EAT (SMD: -0.32, 95%; CI: -0.65-0.01; I2: 92%). No differences were revealed between radiofrequency and cryoenergy pulmonary venous isolation. No publication bias was identified. (5) Conclusions: Only peri-LA EAT seems to be predictive of post-ablation AF recurrence. These findings may reflect different pathophysiological roles of EAT depending on its location. Whether peri-LA EAT can be used as a predictor and target to prevent recurrence is a matter of further research.

Impact of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation on Activity Minutes in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

BACKGROUND

Impaired quality of life due to atrial fibrillation (AF), which often includes decreased activity level, is an indication for ablation. However, the impact of ablation for AF on activity is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of ablation on activity minutes per day using continuous accelerometer data from cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED).

METHODS

Using the Optum® Health Record dataset (2007-2019) linked with the Medtronic CareLink® database, we identified patients who had a CIED with AF detection and accelerometer capabilities. Patients with a device that transmitted heart rhythm and activity data ≥ 3 months prior to- and ≥ 12 months following ablation were included in analysis. The associations between ablation and activity minutes were assessed in each CIED type.

RESULTS

Of 4297 eligible patients who underwent AF ablation, 409 (9.5%) (65% Male, 67.3±9.8 years, 64% paroxysmal AF) were included in analysis. The average AF burden and activity minutes per day pre-ablation were 30.9±37.4% and 175±99 minutes, respectively. Following ablation, relative AF burden decreased by 75.1±53.2% (p<0.001). There was no change in activity minutes per day following ablation in the entire cohort (average change: -0.10±36.2 min, p=0.96). There were also no clinically significant changes in activity minutes post-ablation in subgroups based on CIED, season of ablation, quartile of AF burden change, and quartile of age at the time of ablation.

CONCLUSION

There were no clinically significant changes in activity minutes per day in patients with CIEDs following ablation for AF.

Efficacy of exercise in patients with atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The benefits of exercise in atrial fibrillation (AF) are not clear yet. The aim was to assess the effects of exercise on functional capacity, quality of life, symptoms and adverse events in AF patients.

METHODS

Pubmed, Web of Science, Science Direct and CENTRAL databases were searched to collect the literature concerning AF and exercise. Studies using an endurance and/or strength exercise of at least one-month duration were included. The meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects method.

RESULTS

10 randomised controlled trials were selected. The analysis reported a significant improvement in the maximum exercise capacity (SMCR=0.35; CI95%=0.18, 0.51; p<.001) after exercise intervention. In patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF, exercise improved significantly VO_2peak (SMCR=0.387; CI95%=0.214, 0.561; p<.001). Moreover, patients with permanent AF showed significant results in the 6-min walk test (SMCR=0.74; CI95%=0.31, 1.17; p<.001) and the resting heart rate (SMCR=-0.51; CI95%=-0.93, -0.10; p=.0015) thanks to exercise. Regarding quality of life, there was an improvement trend in the physical component score (SMCR=0.13; CI95%=-0.05, 0.31; p=.17) and mental component score (SMCR=0.09; CI95%=-0.09, 0.27; p=.35) in the exercise group. Nevertheless, pharmacological treatment tended to control the systolic blood pressure (SMCR=0.13; CI95%=-0.03, 0.3; p=.11).

CONCLUSION

Exercise has a beneficial role as an adjuvant treatment of AF.