Feasibility and safety of left atrial access for ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava

Long-term outcome after ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with postprocedurally unmasked sinus node disease

BACKGROUND

About three percent of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) additionally suffer from a concealed sinus node disease (SND). We sought to determine the success of ablation one year after ablation of persistent AF in patients with postprocedurally unmasked SND.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In total, 2539 patients with an ablation of persistent AF at our centre were screened for a postprocedurally unmasked SND, which made acute cardiac pacing necessary within one week after ablation. In a propensity score-matched case-control study (1:2 matching), the long-term ablation success of 51 patients (mean age 73 ± 8 years, 59% male) with unmasked SND after ablation of persistent AF was compared to that of 102 patients without SND after ablation of persistent AF. Controls were matched to cases based on the propensity score considering age, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, gender, blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, atrial low voltage, previous number of ablations, and method of ablation. One year after ablation of persistent AF, 20 (39%) patients with postprocedurally unmasked SND and 61 (60%) patients without postprocedurally unmasked SND were in sinus rhythm (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.90, p = 0.017). The number of repeat ablation procedures within the follow-up year did not differ significantly between cases and controls (mean 0.60 ± 0.68 vs 0.53 ± 0.80, rate ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.78, p = 0.566).

CONCLUSION

In patients with a postprocedurally unmasked SND after ablation of persistent AF, long-term ablation success seems to be worse compared to patients without postprocedurally unmasked SND.

Techniques and outcomes of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava

OBJECTIVES

To investigate tailored approaches, techniques, and outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

BACKGROUND

PLSVC presents unique challenges for AF ablation due to its potential as an arrhythmogenic source and the complex anatomical variations it introduces.

METHODS

The retrospective cohort included 16 patients with PLSVC that underwent 21 AF ablation procedures between August 1, 2008, and February 14, 2024, at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. Procedures involved pre-ablation imaging, 3D electroanatomical mapping, pulmonary vein isolation, and targeted ablation strategies focusing on the PLSVC-related ablation. The primary endpoints were procedural safety and AF recurrence postablation.

RESULTS

The cohort's mean age was 51.9 ± 17.9 years, 31.2% of whom were female. Triggers from the PLSVC were identified in 66.7% of procedures. Tailored ablation strategies were employed to isolate PLSVC-left atrium/coronary sinus connections or directly target the induced triggers, with a success rate of 85% in achieving isolation or targeted ablation once triggers were induced. The recurrence rate of arrhythmia postablation was 46.7% in the patient-based analysis and 65% in the procedure-based analysis. No major complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the significance of recognizing PLSVC as a potential source of AF triggers. The single procedure success rate is low compared to patients without PLSVC. Further studies are warranted to enhance outcomes in this challenging AF population.

Persistent left superior vena cava isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: Selective or empirical?

BACKGROUND

Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is the most prevalent form of thoracic venous abnormality and can serve as a significant arrhythmogenic source in atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among the 3950 patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation for AF between September 2014 to April 2020, 17 patients (mean age 59.4 ± 8.0 years, 64.7% male) with PLSVC were identified. Among them, nine patients (52.9%) had a prior history of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone. Eight out of nine patients who experienced AF recurrence underwent PLSVC isolation with or without pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection. For the remaining eight patients (47.1%), PVI plus PLSVC isolation were performed during the index procedure. Ectopy originating from PLSVC was documented in 11 patients (64.7%) and successful PLSVC isolation was achieved in 16 patients (94.1%). After a median follow-up of 28.3 months, freedom from AF/ atrial tachycardia (AT) was observed in 13 patients (76.5%).

CONCLUSION

Empirical PLSVC isolation beyond PVI appears to be a feasible and safe strategy to prevent AF recurrence in patients with concomitant PLSVC.

Repeat ablation strategy for recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation: A propensity-matched score comparison between "2C3L" and "extensive ablation" approach

BACKGROUND

Debates exist in the repeat ablation strategy for patients with recurrence presenting as persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) after initial persistent AF ablation.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcome between the "2C3L" and "extensive ablation" approach in patients undergoing repeat procedures for recurrent persistent AF.

METHODS

Propensity-score matching was performed in 196 patients with AF recurrence undergoing repeat ablation, and 79 patients treated with "2C3L" strategy were matched to 79 patients treated with "extensive ablation" strategy. The "2C3L" approach included pulmonary vein isolation, mitral isthmus, left atrial roof, and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation, while the "extensive ablation" strategy included extensive ablation of a variety of other targets aiming to terminate the AF. The primary outcome was freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia after 24-h ambulatory monitoring follow-up for 12 months.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found between the primary outcome between the "2C3L" and the "extensive ablation" group [70.9% vs. 69.6%, p = .862; 95% confidence interval (CI) -12.8 to 15.3], although the "extensive ablation" group had a significantly high proportion of AF termination (19.0% for "2C3L" vs. 41.8% for "extensive ablation" group, p = .002; 95% CI 8.5-35.9). And AF termination was not related to the primary outcome in multifactorial regression. At 40 ± 22 months after the repeat procedure, the primary outcome was also comparable (57.0 % for "2C3L" vs. 48.1% for "extensive ablation" group, p = .265; 95% CI -6.6 to 23.7).

CONCLUSION

The outcome between the "2C3L" and "extensive ablation" approaches was comparable in patients undergoing repeat procedures for recurrent persistent AF.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava: Case series and systematic review

Introduction

Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is the most common form of thoracic venous abnormality. Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be complicated by the existence of PLSVC, which could act as an important arrhythmogenic mechanism in AF.

Methods and results

We reported a case series of patients with PLSVC who underwent CA for AF at our center between 2018 and 2021. A systematic search was also performed on PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for research reporting CA for AF in patients with PLSVC. Sixteen patients with PLSVC were identified at our center. Ablation targeting PLSVC was performed in 5 patients in the index procedures and in four patients receiving redo procedures. One patient experienced acute procedure failure. After a median follow-up period of 15 months, only 6 (37.5%) patients remained free from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) after a single procedure. In the systematic review, 11 studies with 167 patients were identified. Based on the included studies, the estimated prevalence of PLSVC in patients undergoing CA for AF was 0.7%. Ablation targeting PLSVC was performed in 121 (74.7%) patients. Major complications in patients with PLSVC receiving AF ablation procedure included four cases of cardiac tamponades (2%), three cases of cardiac effusion (1.5%), one case of ischemic stroke, and three cases of phrenic nerve injury (1.5%) (one left phrenic nerve and two right phrenic nerve). Pooled analysis revealed that after a median follow-up period of 15.6 months (IQR 12.0–74.0 months), the long-term AF/AT-free rate was 70.6% (95% CI 62.8–78.4%, I² = 0.0%) (Central illustration). Different ablation strategies for PLSVC were summarized and discussed in the systematic review.

Conclusion

In patients with PLSVC, recurrence of atrial arrhythmia after CA for AF is relatively common. Ablation aiming for PLSVC isolation is necessitated in most patients. The overall risk of procedural complications was within an acceptable range.